CPH:DOX 2017 /Where is Rocky II?

PIERRE BISMUTH: WHERE IS ROCKY II?

Since he saw an old BBC documentary from 1980 about American pop artist Ed Ruscha, the director has seemingly had an obsession to find the topic of that doc; a piece of artificial rock that Ruscha planted in the Mojave Desert in California among other rocks. What became of it? Is it still there?

Bismuth hires a private detective to help find the rock, but soon we learn that he also hires a couple of scriptwriters. Bismuth was on the scriptwriting team on the unfathomable “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” (dir. Michel Gondry”) and it is therefore no surprise that ”Where is Rocky 2” is composed in a puzzling way, combining with what looks like (staged) documentary scenes; scenes with the scriptwriters working, and scenes from the fiction film on which they are working.

I’m a sucker for meta-films and for films playing with the genres – thus giving us a chance to ponder which reality we prefer or can relate to and ultimately understand. Bismuth has called this film a piece of “fake fiction” which is a great term I intent to steal.

However, something goes awry during the last fifth or so of the film, at least for me. The essence of the story itself is something like: “Is a piece of art still art if nobody knows it’s there?” and the film’s problem is probably that the documentary-like scenes with the private detective (who plays himself) turns out to be the most engaging ones. The film that the scriptwriters are working on doesn’t add much but a flavor of trivial storytelling techniques, and it’s like the structure and the conundrums are both too obvious and too obscure. Towards the end, it seems just unnecessary and too apparent to reveal the film crew in a certain shot with the actors.

Still, until the last five or ten minutes I was rather amused and it is definitely worth a look – unless you hate this sort of thing. Then don’t look. It’s still a film of some significance even though YOU don’t watch it.

Pierre Bismuth: Where is Rocky II?, 2016. Seen at CPH:DOX. Filmkommentaren: 3/6 penheads.

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=75 

Dokumania /THE FEAR OF 13

DAVID SINGTON: THE FEAR OF 13

Filmen har den danske titel Manden der ville henrettes. Den var med på CPH:DOX 2015, DR2 Dokumania sendte den forrige sommer, og nu tager Dokumania den op igen. Det sker på tirsdag 21. marts 20:45. Det er også denne gang en god disposition, fordi David Sington er en vigtig instruktør, han har lavet mere end 30 dokumentarer for BBC, og det er en god disposition, fordi det er en vigtig film, en konsekvent egensindig konstruktion, som fik et stort publikum på CPH:DOX til at give den prisen. Men filmen fik omvendt The Guardian’s meget erfarne Peter Bradshaw til at afvise dens radikale fortællegreb:

“… Director David Sington effectively turns the film over to Yarris (hovedpersonen, red.), who is allowed to narrate the documentary on-camera and control its pace, tone and content. For me, he feels like a ham actor auditioning for the role of himself in a movie version: he delivers what sounds like an overwritten, over-rehearsed monologue in a breathy-mellifluous voice. His story is important, yet the style is mannered. I wondered if it might have been better as an interview, with Sington interrupting him, questioning him, getting more perspective on his (important) story.”

Independent’s Geoffrey Macnab blev lige modsat begejstret over grebet: “…What is fascinating about Sington’s invigorating documentary is that the inmate Nick Yarris recounts his story in his own words. He is formidably articulate, an autodidact who knows how to emphasise all the urgency, suspense, drama and macabre humour in the events that led him to be condemned to die. His account is complemented by reconstructions similar to those found in Errol Morris’ The Thin Blue Line. This is virtuoso film-making only partially let down by its artifice.”

Jeg fik ikke set The Fear of 13 ved de tidligere lejligheder, så jeg må nu bestemt se det filmværk tirsdag aften, se modet til at konstruere uden om enhver konvention om filmfortælling, se filmen, som åbenbart er genstand for en uenighed på højt niveau om en kunstnerisk problemstilling. Det er på tirsdag 20.45 på DR2 og efterfølgende på DR TV.

SYNOPSIS

After more than 20 years on death row, a convicted murderer petitions the court asking to be executed. But as he tells his story, it gradually becomes clear that nothing is quite what it seems. This film is a stylistically daring experiment in storytelling, in effect a one-man play constructed from a four-day interview. In a monologue that is part confessional and part performance, Nick, the sole protagonist, tells a tale with all the twists and turns of classic crime drama. But as the story unfolds it reveals itself as something much deeper, an emotionally powerful meditation on the redemptive power of love and literature. A final shocking twist casts everything in a new light. (BBC Storyville)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ja1wrRAAm4 (Trailer)

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/12/the-fear-of-13-review-nick-yarris-death-row-inmate

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/the-fear-of-13-film-review-suspense-drama-and-macabre-humour-from-death-row-inmate-nick-yarris-a6732641.html

PS

Præsentationen her af David Singtons film er en lettere justering af en tidligere præsentation her på Filmkommentaren.

CPH:DOX 2017 /The President from the North

LARS FELDBALLE PETERSEN: THE PRESIDENT FROM THE NORTH/ PRÆSIDENTEN FRA NORDVEST

It’s a Dane writing this review. Important to say as the main character of this film, Ahmed Dualeh, is Danish, well he is born in Somalia but has been living in Denmark for 47 years – and he speaks the most perfect, classic Danish. An accent is there but the vocabulary is huge, which is heard, when he in first person tells the amazing story about his life in the country he loves and where he settled in 1967. He became a captain of ships at Maersk, he set up his own company and became a millionaire, he established a family… but he has his heart in Somalia, where he was born in poverty, adopted by an Italian family, and where he – voted by exile Somalis – became the president of Jubaland in 2012, the republic in the South of Somalia. As it turns out there are many other, who want that job, and also a position as prime minister is not reachable for the charismatic idealistic man, who wants to help his native country and dedicates a lot of time to go to political meetings and to meet people in the streets. Most of the time outside Jubaland, in Mogadishu or in neighbouring Kenya as Jubaland still is a dangerous place because of warlords.

The structure of the film goes from here to there, from Denmark to Somalia, from the family to politics. Very simple and efficient. His wife Zhara is worried about him – and their life together – as he is so much away from home. In a scene she is packing her suitcase, cut to him trying to catch her by phone, no success, cut to a daughter who tells him to stop all that travelling, cut to him and wife on what is said to be the last tour, where he is bringing computers and other technical equipment to a school in his native region in Somalia.

Apart from the drama, which is actually not described as a drama, of the couple who has been together for 45 years, the film lives through the way he – and she – is described. An almost constantly smiling, well formulated positive Danish Somali and his adventurous life with Zhara. You will be in a good mood watching this film, which of course also in a Denmark of today full of restrictions towards foreigners is a very timely documentary.

Denmark, 2017, 65 mins.

The film will be shown at CPH:DOX Sunday 19.3 at 21.30 Park Bio, Saturday 25.3 12.30 Empire Bio, Sunday 26.3 13.30 Nordisk Film Palads.

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=150    

CPH:DOX 2017 /The Unforgiven

LARS FELDBALLE PETERSEN: THE UNFORGIVEN

1992. Celebici in Bosnia-Hercegovina. A prison camp for Serbs. Esad Landzo, 19 years old was a guard. He killed and tortured, he was one of the worst, say survivors who remember what ”Zenga”, his nickname, did to them and friends and relatives. In 1996 he was arrested and in 1998 sentenced to 15 years in prison at the Court in den Haag. He sat in a Finnish prison from 2003 till he was released in 2006. He now lives and is married in Finland.

Facts about a war criminal, who is the main protagonist of this important documentary that puts focus on the question whether you can forgive. Esad suffers after his release, ”my old demons come back, they don’t let me sleep”, ”I am a dead man walking”, ”I need my life back”. His life story is told, you meet his parents, there is archive material from the camp, showing strong emotional material of prisoners sitting in a squat position, waiting for the next atrocity to be committed. He visits a psychiatrist.

It all builds up to the confrontations. Esad writes to some of the former prisoners to ask if they will meet him. And the film takes its time to let us viewers meet them – before the confrontation – to hear, what they remember, and to see them get ready to meet Esad – at the camp. Several other people are built up as characters in the film. Accompanied by the man, who was a doctor at the camp, and who seems to be respected by the survivors, as well as by Esad, they come to meet Esad, who asks for forgiveness, ”I am not here to excuse”, ”I want to apologize”, he says to one after the other, a broken man talking to people, broken as well, they have scars on their souls – it is very tense, very sad to watch these authentic and actually mostly silent scenes that reminds you that the best documentaries do not give answers, they raise questions.

Lars Feldballe and his Finnish producer have worked on this film for years, with respect for the theme and the involved, they have avoided tabloid journalism to make a film that will have a long life ahead. Hopefully not only at festivals but also whereever post-war traumas are being dealt with. It deserves to be used like that.     

Finland/Denmark, 2017, 75 mins.

The film will be shown at CPH:DOX Monday 20.3 at 8pm Empire Bio, Wednesday 22.3 at 4.30pm Nordisk Film Palads, Saturday 25.3 Nordisk Film Palads. At the two first screenings there will be debates. More about who and what on

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=120

CPH:DOX 2017 /The Trial

ASKOLD KUROV: THE TRIAL

… with the subtitle ”The State of Russia vs Oleg Sentsov”, a film that premiered at the Berlinale, now to be shown at CPH:DOX and at DocuDays in Kiev on the 25th of March with the director and guests present.

I mention the latter as Oleg Sentsov is Ukrainian and for those, who do not know the story, here is the laconic film description from the festival in Ukraine:

Oleg Sentsov is a Ukrainian filmmaker, Euromaidan activist and native of Crimea. After the Russian annexation of Crimea, he became an active opponent of the occupation. In May 2014 he was arrested by the Russian security

service, charged with planned terrorist attacks and transported to Moscow. After over a year in custody, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison, despite the fact that the testimonies were given under duress and evidence was insufficient. Sentsov never pled guilty…

The film intends to convey the case in a political context, what  happened since Sentsov was put behind bars (look at the photo, Sentsov in the court room, where filming is allowed, behind bars, like an animal in the zoo, before the verdict has been given). It does so through interviews with key involved persons and through following the courageous cousin of Sentsov, who goes to Crimea, to Moscow, to Kiev and to deliver food (snack) packages to him in the prison. The film shows clips from his feature film ”Gaamer” (2011), it has archive from Russian official television, interviews as well, with witnesses, who have pointed at him as the man behind terrorism. The camera is there, when his mother and his two children talk to their father on the phone, it is emotional – there are shootings from Moscow where demonstrations deal with the killing of Boris Nemtsov. And a clip where master director Sokurov tries to convince Putin to show mercy and release Sentsov.

Sentsov behind bars… he seems to be a strong person, who is very well formulated when he quotes from Bulgakov’s ”Master and Margarita”: Cowardice is the principle and greatest sin on earth.” And he speaks about the Russian television propaganda. He was sentenced to sit until 2034!

Filmmakers from many countries have supported the campaign for setting Sentsov free. Wim Wenders, Dariusz Jablonski, Zanussi etc. Their appeals are in the film, the release of the filmmaker is now a goal for activism, including the solidarity demonstrations at festivals.

Askold Kurov has with this film made his fine contribution to the campaign, you feel the commitment, when watching a film that does not have its own style but where you sense how important it was for the director to make it.

Thanks to the director and to his Estonian producer Max Tuula.

Estonia, Poland, Czech Republic, 2017. 75 mins.

In Copenhagen the film will be screened Saturday March 18, 7.30pm at Nordisk Film Palads.

CPH:DOX 2017 /Modern Times Review

First day of the 2017 CPH:DOX. I went to the new festival centre, Charlottenborg, got my accreditation, ran into always energetic Frank Piasecki Poulsen, who ordered me to go up to see the impressive colourful so-called social cinema, where the morning had hosted a lot of young people discussing ”democracy”, meeting journalists and opinon-makers. Poulsen also told me to see his ”blue room”, where he resides with his ”Every Day” videos and a small kitchen, that is open – with Frank as cook – at 6pm every night… amazing! CPH:DOX is much more than a film festival-

I was happy to meet Norwegian Truls Lie, the man behind ”Modern Times Review” (MTR), the European Documentary Magazine, that

he is now launching at different festivals. At CPH:DOX 1300 copies have been put aside for ”distinguished guests”, as he put it, 500 will be given out to potential subscribers for the bi-annual magazine in newspaper format, this first one has 24 pages. He has been to the Swedish festival Tempo, he will go to Visons du Réel in Nyon, to Krakow… It is quite an achievement of Lie, around 30 reviews and several essays he presents, and a subscription gives access to the DOX archive for 28€ per year. 800 articles on documentary! Go to

www.moderntimes.review/register/subscription

Truls Lie is editor-in-chief of the monthly newspaper (in Norwegian) Ny Tid, which has (in Norwegian) a supplement for ”dokumentar og litteratur”, which is very actual and inviting. And funny for me to see my review of ”Mogadishu Soldier” in Norwegian language! With the original English version in MTR. Colleague Allan Berg and I welcome warmly Modern Times Review and have told Truls Lie that he is welcome to pick articles from www.filmkommentaren.dk. Glad to say that two filmkommentaren articles by Serbian Svetlana and Zoran Popovic are also to be found in MTR. To give you appetite to take a subscription let me mention some of the films which are dealt with: 21xNew York, Amazona, I am not Your Negro, Ambulance, Houston We have a Problem, Safari…

Photo: There it is on the wall of CPH:DOX new festival centre Charlottenborg.

Eva Mulvad: A Modern Man

Moderne har jo både at gøre med modernus (ny, nyere) og med modus (måde), og denne dobbelthed får den præcise titel til pege på et menneske med nye måder at være på, måske være til i virkeligheden på, leve sit liv på, sortere sine valg på. Jeg opfatter det sådan, at Eva Mulvad vil undersøge det nye moderne. Måske vil hun også som filmskaber i naturlig forlængelse lægge en ny slags film til fænomenerne, hun skildrer i A Modern Man, en ny moderne filmisk stil, hvor det karakteristiske er, at filmen løsnet af den litterære episke fremadskriden, løsnet af journalistikkens opklaringsdrama fungerer på gamle cinematografiske betingelser som at stille scene ved scene. Og der er er i Mulvads film sandelig lange og tydelige og selvbevidste scener bygget af lange rolige optagelser af enkeltafsnit i Charlie Siems liv.

Charlie Siem er violinist og fotomodel, og det på verdensplan, en mondæn mand, som medvirker som en populær stjerne i samtaleshows i tv i samtaler om offentligheden, omsværmelsen og i dette ensomheden. Facebook og Instagram er medierne, men forbilledet er Robert De Niro.

Første afsnit, filmens åbning, er mangetydig. Den skildrer købet af en ny, rød Porsche. Reklamefilm eller dokumentarfilm? Køber han eller er han model? Pointen er, at han spørger sælgeren: Hvordan er dens lyd? Prøver motorlyden af som en musiker et instrument, og så vil han i en æstetisk ideosynkrasi have et underlødigt designet typenavn mærke fjernet fra bagklappen. Detaljen er vigtig.

Så følger en scene fra en koncert. Siem er alene foran orkesteret, spiller kadancen, som er vanskelig, kun violinen høres, en nåls fald kunne høres. Den virtuose kadance afbrydes, det her handler ikke om fordybelse, så der klippes til et voldsomt hovedspring fra højt oppe ned i havet, derfra til et stille svømmebassin uden person, en smuk ensom arkitektur, derfra til en scene med Siem i et soveværelse, han pakker vitaminpiller ud. Den moderne mand passer sin krop. Og sin skrædder.

Han er model for Hugo Boss og for Martell cognac: en scene fra en reception for vel et nyt mærke. Og så en scene fra fotomodellens helt private almindelige 30 års fødselsdag. Det er spændvidden.

Han køber et flygel, eller gør han? Eller er han model i en film for fabrikanten? Eva Mulvads billede kan bruges til begge formål, hendes fascination og interesse har begge disse filmiske blik på hændelsen. Flyglet bakses op af robuste flyttemænd med beskyttelseshandsker, oppe på plads i hjørneværelset stilles instrumentet med et støn, og det åbnes efter at være udsat for strabadserne, en af mændene slår sine behandskede fingre i tangenterne. Det virker! Siger han med et charmerende smil. Pointen er der brug for, både i reklamefilmen og i dokumentarfilmen. I Adam Nielsens klip. En lille fryd.

Scenerne stiller Adam Nielsen i en rolig, tydelig række, så de belyser hinanden, bliver til denne gamle fortælling af billeder: animeret natklubscene i sort/hvid, stilfærdig scene med søsteren, de øver sammen i en varm og hyggelig hytte, hun viser med sin karakter noget, der ellers er fremmed i filmen, en intellektuel, følsom natur. Restaurantscenen er også ægte og éntydig, Siem er sammen med en uundværlig, meget livligt talende kvinde med en dyb stemme og sin pianist Itamar Golan, som også er meget til stede. Det er film, det her! Tænker jeg, hun er god, pianisten er fin. Scenen med massage hos fysioterapeuten er spændt til grænsen af det udholdelige, til lige før, tæer krummes. Massørens kommentarer er vidtløftige, en slags følelsesanalyse, en tolkning af hovedpersonen, modellen og violinisten med den glatte kontrollerede kølige noget fattige udstråling. Og med den store monolog lige efter vokser filmen, noterer jeg det sted i story-line, ja, filmen vokser og vokser hele vejen mod et helstøbt og beslutsomt værk. Og idet jeg indser det, kommer min belønning, violinistens og pianistens morgenbad i havet, violinisten sportstrænet, frisk, pianisten tøvende, frysende, ængstelig. Det er herligt, det er jo Don Juan og Leporello, det er Don Quichotte og Sancho Panza. En vild koncert for violin og orkester afslutter filmen, og omsider fortsætter musikken til den er slut og dør med de sidste credits.

Eva Mulvad skildrer en fascination, det er værkets kerne og styrke. En fascination af de materielle tings skønhed som hos Tom Ford i hans meget beslægtede film A Single Man, 2009 med dens fejlfrie setdesign. I Fords film er det en anden tid, og fascinationen gælder en fejlfri scenografi som ramme om tragedien at miste sin elskede, men det i en tid, i begyndelsen af 1960’erne, hvor at leve alene var det nye moderne. Filmens anden styrke er pianisten, Itamar Golan, som er den nødvendige Leporello / Sancho Panza / den kloge klovn. Han har den filmkarakterens totale udstråling, som Charlie Siem mangler. En hviskende samtale mellem de to er et fint skildret højdepunkt.

Svagheden er, at der faktisk ingenting er om musikken, om Siems særegne tolkning, og hans spil kommer så også til at danne en overflade af virtuose detaljer, som er teknik, men som det skildres uden egentlig forståelse. Fokus er, som hos Jørgen Leth et studium af overflade, Det perfekte menneske falder selvfølgelig i tanken. Er der her som der flere lag, har Eva Mulvad også flere lag? Scenen med søsteren i hytten måske? En smerte i et ansigtstræk måske? En tvivl midt i dette perfekte?

Det nye moderne filmklip er langsomhed og fravær af angst for pause og tomhed, den nye moderne cinematografi er optagethed af øjeblikket, er ønsket om at vide det ud. Hvor det lige før var afviklingen af øjeblikket, opløsningen af nuet i en hurtig strøm af meget korte klip, som dominerede det moderne. Den røde Porsche er en hurtig bil, den kører hurtigt i potente gearskift med helten, eller er det fotomodellen? ved rattet. Hurtigt i det stort tegnede dramatiske landskab. Men i optagelsen oppefra er scenen langsom og lang og fascinationen gælder den lille smukke bil i landskabet, gælder det hurtige i det langsomme, altså detaljen som for eksempel hos Tom Ford, mere end overfladen som for eksempel hos Jørgen Leth. Kunst laves ikke på virkeligheden, sagde Per Højholt, kunst laves på kunst. Sådan måske også filmkunst, dokument ved dokument. Eva Mulvad har skrevet et tidens dokument om det nye moderne.

Danmark 2017. Havde visninger på CPH:DOX 2017 fra 17. marts – 23. marts. Får nu egentlig biografpremiere 4. oktober 2017 i DOXBIO:

http://www.doxbio.dk/movie-archive/a-modern-man/

SYNOPSIS

Charlie Siem has everything: a career as a classical violinist with sold-out concerts around the world and golden offers from the leading fashion houses, using him as a model in their international campaigns. On the surface it looks like the perfect life. But behind his photogenic looks, we meet a man who is trying to navigate his many options. What is the definition of a good career? How do you become the best version of yourself? And how do you create a life that meets both the outside world’s as well as your own high conceptions of happiness and success? For Charlie, this is not easy. The demands are high when every detail counts and only the perfect is good enough.

The film is a portrait of a typical 21st century man. An existential journey into a world of expectations and choices. A story about us – the free and wealthy – who seem to have it all but are always on the hunt for more. (Freddy Neumann)

http://www.dfi.dk/faktaomfilm/film/da/98383.aspx?id=98383 

Dokumania /BOLSHOI BABYLON /2

Jeg så Nick Read’s Bolshoi Babylon, da TV2 Dokumania sendte den i aftes. Jeg havde glædet mig efter, hvad jeg havde læst og bragt som foromtale her, både glædet til filmen som sådan og til at se den navnkundige og erfarne Reads særlige greb om stoffet. Jeg må skrive, at jeg blev skuffet. Ikke over alting, men over en del, først og fremmest over, at den stort tænkte allegori over det særlige ved Rusland og landets sjæl afspejlet i Reads observernede kameras skildring af hele den komplicerede og bevægende verden, Bolshoi Teateret er, som et vældigt mikrokosmos over det russiske makrokosmos. For mig falder den allegori aldeles sammen, ikke i optagelserne, som er smukke og hver for sig tydelige rester af kloge lange scener, ikke i de veloplagte og tilsvarende smukt filmede interviews, som alle er rester af lange, kloge erfaringer og analyser, men af en brutal montage, som i en bestemt journalistisk tv-stil er klippet sønder og sammen, så det kunstneriske indhold svækkes til bortfald, så en tabloidlignende historie mest af sladder står tilbage som fremheskende indtryk.

En cinematogrfisk dokumentarfilm er her forvandlet til en ordinær tv-dokumentar, et shakespearesk drama ændret til en Readers Digest moralisering, direct cinema lavet om til populær collage, en ærlig kunstnerisk ambition sat til side for en kalkulerende journalistik, som synes styret af en svigtende tillid til, hvad vi som tv- publikum formår at forstå i for eksempel en klassisk juxta-position baseret filmfortælling, men som en overfadisk flok skal have alt, selv høj kunst formidlet i underholdende konfettidrys.

Men, men, tilbage er at indrømme, at det er en imponerende flot film, bestemt værd for nysgerrighedens og i hvert fald for balletglædens skyld at se på DR TV.

STILL: Den endelige vinder af magtkampen med Sergei Filin, den nye direktør Vladimir Urin, har sat sig i stolen.

Awards in Thessaloniki

The 19th Thessaloniki Documentary Festival were giving out awards a couple of days ago. The Danish production ”Dream Empire” by David Borenstein got the main prize, the Golden Alexander, with a Special Jury Award for the amazing ”Machines” by Rahul Jain from India.

An Amnesty Award for the best film in the Human Rights section was given to Raoul Peck’s masterpiece ”I am not Your Negro”. And the award in the name of late documentary guru Peter Wintonick was given to Zaradasht Ahmed for his Iraq film ”Nowhere to Hide”.

As motivation for the award to ”Dream Empire”, quote from festival site, ”The president of the jury, Mr Paul Pauwels, said that “we were captivated by this documentary because the story develops in an imaginative way: from a simple situation to a compellingly insightful journey to the global dynamic of a world in progress – or maybe in crisis? We appreciated the humour, the powerful character and the aesthetic, which make the film a delight for spectators, but also make them more sensitive towards serious issues that concern us all”.  

http://tdf.filmfestival.gr/

CPH:DOX 2017 /Last Men in Aleppo

FERAS FAYYAD: LAST MEN IN ALEPPO 

The tone is set in the opening, this story is of a universal scope. It is a film about life in a world of death and violence, of humanity surviving endless destruction.

Last Men in Aleppo is an homage to the White Helmets (officially the Syria Civil Defence), the civilian volunteer rescue corps that works relentlessly to save the lives of civilians in rebel-held areas of Syria. Filmed over a year, from September 2015 to fall 2016 up until Aleppo fell back in to the hands of Bashar al Assad’s government forces, the film is collaboration between the Syrian director, Feras Fayyad, the Aleppo Media Center, an independent news agency and network of reporters in Aleppo, and the Danish co-director and editor Steen Johannessen together with Danish producer Søren Steen Jespersen (Larm Film). Last Men in Aleppo won this year’s Grand Jury Price for World Cinema Documentary at the Sundance Film Festival.

We are introduced to the two main characters, Khaled and Mahmoud, one by one. Khaled, a former painter and decorator and one of the veterans of the White Helmets team, is a warm and playful man. But as the father of two young daughters, he is also haunted by the dilemmas of how to protect them best, should he have taken them to Turkey? is it still a possibility? Can he leave Aleppo, should he stay behind? Mahmoud, a student of philosophy before the revolution, is more quiet and thoughtful. His younger brother has also joined the White Helmets, they’ve lied to their parents, telling them that they are living safely in Turkey.

The days are spend heads leaned back, searching the sky for planes and helicopters bombing the city. As soon as the hit is located, get in to the car and drive straight to where the bomb has landed. Everyday life in Aleppo is barrel bombs, digging out dead babies from the rubble with their bare hands. A foot, a limb, who does it belong to? Body parts are carefully collected and handed over to relatives. And then, occasionally, the miracle: a child is found alive underneath the dusty fragments of what used to be his home.

The panoramic views of Aleppo are devastating. What’s in front of you seems unreal, the destruction unfathomable, apocalyptic. “Where is humanity?” as a member of the White Helmet team asks.

Why not leave? But how can you leave the place where you were born and have lived all your life? And for what? A refugee camp on the Turkish border? As an audience you cannot help but think how it must be to have been through all this and then end up loosing your child drowned in the Mediterranean.. In 2011, Aleppo was the largest city in Syria with 2,5 million inhabitants. In 2016, about 250.000 people live in the besieged eastern part of Aleppo, an estimated 100.000 of them are children.

The strength of the film is also how it portrays the life that exists and persists despite the hopeless situation, the exact civilian life that is being targeted by the bombs of the Assad-regime and, since 2015, the Russians. We meet the children living in Aleppo. An unforgettable sequence is a day trip to a playground, where the families of the White Helmets unit take a break from the horror. The joy of being outside – until another plane is roaming the sky..

The quality of the relationship the cinematographers on ground have with the characters makes you feel the sincerity in the scenes. The cinematography (shot with Canon cameras) is admirable, even more so with the difficult and highly dangerous circumstances in mind. The director of photography, Fadi al-Halabi, and the cinematographers, Thaher Mohamad and Hasan Kattan, from the Aleppo Media Center, risking their lives every moment of filming, have done an amazing work. The superb cinematography and editing is lifting the story up from film to cinema. But it is something else than that: it is documentation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, right there in front of your eyes. It is extremely disturbing and hard to watch.

A small ”but”: I found the music a bit too present at times. While the pathos of the music score (by composer Karsten Fundal) beautifully accompanies the opening of the film, I found it to be disturbing me in some of the strong scenes inside the film..

Last Men in Aleppo is a film you have to see. Everybody should see it. The film is screened at the opening of CPH:DOX on March 15, marking the 6th anniversary of the Syrian uprising.

Last Men in Aleppo, Denmark/Syria 2017, 110 min. Directed by Feras Fayyad, co-director and editor Steen Johannessen. Besides the opening night the film is screened 4 times during the CPH:DOX festival. See the program here.