Viesturs Kairiss: Pelican in the Desert

This new film by Latvian film and opera director Kairiss will have its international premiere tomorrow at Visions du Réel in Nyon. Here is an article I wrote for the promotion of the film:

The first film work I met from the hands of Viesturs Kairiss was ”Romeo and Juliet” (2004). A wonderful original short documentary, or as it has been named ”a documentary musical”, where two deaf youngsters perform the staging of Bernstein’s ”West Side Story”. It has since then been one of my first choices, when I have had the privilege to make retrospectives of Baltic documentary cinema for international festivals.

I learned that Kairiss already from the late 1990’es worked as a theatre and opera director and in that field now has developed into an often used director internationally with a special fame for his Wagner opera settings. His way of working in opera was interpreted freely and with a lot of inspiration by his colleague Davis Simanis, a soul brother in Latvian documentary. The film was ”Valkyrie Limited” (2009), a masterpiece overseen by international festivals. Simanis has worked with Kairiss as editor in several of his films, including the features.

Kariss is an opera director who also makes films, and tries to

combine the two art forms… Well, you could say so, when you look at his ”Lohengrin from Varka Crew” (2009) that has Wagner in the title in a film, where the protagonist is a sportsman with the mission to help people on this earth, and you can indeed sense the opera director in ”Pelican in the Desert”, the new grandiose work of the directorand – that credit must be given up front in this article – Gints Berzins, the cameraman whose images are magnificent. Nothing less!

Latgale

The film opens with an informative text about the mysterious, spiritual place that the director and cameraman take us: Latgale is a land lying at the furthest point of the European Union’s Eastern border… and is continued by a text that gives an idea of how this place is to experienced in the film: At times it seems to be an island surrounded by water, yet at times this land reminds of a desert, which has covered the Ark carrying the salvaged humanity…

Voila! Untergang! Doomsday – and there is a preacher in the film, who foresees that this is the way it goes.

And (almost, comes below) no more written text, actually there are relatively few words uttered in this mythical journey to people and faith, performed by mostly old representatives of a society and culture that seem to disappear.

The Visual Flow

The film literally takes off with a flying over water, images that come back as a kind of chaptering. Between sequences that have a focus on bringing a beautiful combination of image and sound. A woman singing a prayer, the sound (and image) of water, a man painting a crucifix, another man washing himself in mud… this is not an anthropological film, there is no instisting on giving information, nevertheless, through the people who take part, the audience is invited to know more about Latgale.

The Jews

An example – quoting one more text from the screen: An old Jewish tale tells that a pelican cut open its breast with the beak and fed his hungry young with its own blood. Followed by long silent passages, a shift in season to winter, a man who is saying that there were many Jews here, today there are none, to be followed by a visit to a house, where a woman tells that this used to be a synagogue, calling for grandpa in the sofa to stand up and play his accordeon. He does, and he does well, she continues by saying that this is a holy place, and the film makes it a holy atmosphere the moment, where she starts to sing. To mention just one of many magic poetic moments in the film.

The Building of the Story

Well, you can not really talk about ”story” in the way it is often used in modern documentary discussions. More about an associative editing where death follows the sequence about the Jews, to the cemetery, to a woman in summer time chasing her dog to catch it and take it back, and then winter again, where a man takes his teeth out of the mouth and gives a concert with tongue and nose. Hilarious. But also – the whole film is like that – respectful to the people. No easy making fun, the man continues to play on abandoned iron rails outside the wooden house, which turns out to be a church.

Prayers

Many church houses are visited and many prayers and chants are heard. It is a multi-layered film with an emphasis on religious rituals and their believers and priests and preachers. The interiors of the churches are described, the huge catholic processions as well as the fascinating entry to the place of an old believer, who tells about where and how he baptizes children as well as grown-ups – and gets interrupted by a call on his cellphone! For whom the bells toll – beautiful are the many sequences where old women draw the ropes that brings the bells to perform music.

No Future

Latgale seems to have no future, is what the film communicates. A brilliant montage brings that kind of feeling. Four men in the snow are digging a grave, the sound of their shovels accompany Mahler music, women are dancing to this sound score, with and without cowboy hats, cut to empty abandoned houses, stones, mountains, yes, there is a desert, and then back to the four men, the dead body… I have not given the scenes in their right order but the death is there, also in the tragic accident that a man describes he witnessed next to a ruin, a burnt down house.

No message but experience and a hymn to spirituality, sometimes solemn, always letting the dignity of the people come forward whatever mad or weird they might appear. Kairiss did not go there to inform, he went there to experience. He was impressed, he saw an operalike drama or an elegy, if you like. He dwelled like another Visconti on the decadence of the decline. He went with his superb cameraman Berzins to convey this inspiration in an observational, expressionistic film language of super-aesthetic sequences. What more could you ask for?

Latvia, 2014, 70 mins.

http://www.visionsdureel.ch/en.html

EDN Today and Yesterday

The EDN website is a rich source of general information for documentarians around the world. Available, even if you are not a member – which you definitely should be to get all the service provided by the organisation.

For instance the newly published call for projects to be pitched online, this time projects ”From the Opposition”, deadline for submission May 2nd, check the website, from where this (edited) text is taken:

EDN Online Pitching is a pitching format based on an online video conference, where a limited number of documentary projects are pitched. For this pitching session EDN is calling for documentary projects from the opposition. The submission deadline is May 2, 2014 at noon.

EDN Online Pitching is an initiative where four documentary projects are pitched to a group of leading international financiers and decision makers… each session lasts one hour. This session, which will focus on documentary projects on ‘the opposition’, will take place on May 23, 2014 at 14:00-15:00 (Central European Time).

With projects from the opposition, we mean documentary projects done by or portraying people, groups or movements forming a social or political opposition. This can for instance be: 

  –  Political oppositions fighting for democratic rights

  –  Armed groups battling suppressing political leaderships

  –  Social movements trying to change current dominant structures.

For this session we plan to have the presence of 4 – 6 financiers and experts with a special interest and experience in human rights, political and current affairs documentaries. So far the following have confirmed their participation:

Iikka Vehkalahti, YLE, Finland

Ryan Harrington, Tribeca Film Institute, USA

This is EDN of today, if you want to hear a bit from the past, EDN has published an interview with its Member of the Month, Tue Steen Müller, who remembers the days of the fax machine in the office in the mid 1990’es.

http://www.edn.dk/

Glawogger – Collected Posts on his Works

”A World of Troubled Beauty…”

 

 

 

 

 

HEADLINE

NY Times brought the most precise headline to an article about the films of Austrian filmmaker Michael Glawogger’s impressive work: A World of Troubled Beauty – referring to his trilogy ”Megacities”, ”Workingman’s Death” and ”Whore’s Glory”. (Post 08-08-2012)

 

AN ART OF CROSSING BOUNDARIES

The IDF (Institute of Documentary Film) website informs that the first retrospective of the Austrian documentarian is taking place in New York at the Museum of Moving Images until April 29. The website of the Museum includes interesting text excerpts from a soon to be published book on Glawogger. Here comes the series intro by the museum:

”One of the most versatile and original talents in contemporary world cinema, the Austrian filmmaker Michael Glawogger has made an art of crossing boundaries, both geographic and formal. He spans diverse, far-flung locations within a single film, often dealing with ambiguous notions of home and foreignness, and moves back and forth between fiction and documentary, sometimes combining and subverting both modes. Glawogger’s career resists classification at every turn, but whether set on the margins of the developing world or in precincts of privilege, his surprising, beautifully photographed films are testaments to his own boundless curiosity and to the endless complexity of the human condition. This retrospective, his first in the United States, includes his widely acclaimed and much debated documentary trilogy on harsh working environments, as well as a selection of fiction features and experimental short films.” (Post 22-04-2012)

 

MEGACITIES (1998)

Renata Medero, documentary film student at Zelig, Bolzano, Italy, writes this review of a neo- classic:

Unforgettable images… whether you like it or not.

Some films deliver images to never be forgotten, some beautiful, some not. But – what happens when the ugliness is so hypnotizing that one cannot stop watching? “Megacities” is a unique film because it brings toghether issues that by themselves seem irreconcilable. The worst of the megalopolis is brought together: dehumanization, cruelty, despair, all wrapped in a glossy and luxurious manufacturing, which makes the film as beautiful as mercyless.

The aesthetization of the poverty is not a new tendency in some films of the international scenario, but “Megacities” is tricky. Has a spotless photography, where the flawless and somewhat mysterious composition of images forces the spectator to keep watching the movie even when he might not want to.

And then, the big lettered question: Do I have the right to see this? What right did the director had to film it? And there is still another ethical issue to deal with: a group of russian street kids reveal that they were paid to be filmed. Does that mean that they were paid for showing the inhuman condition in which they live? How maquiavelic could such an idea be? In any case this film is not advisable to animal right activists, good consciences and weak hearts!

I think it is a masterpiece, because it achieves the impossible even though I don’t agree in some of the director’s views of the situations. (Post 26-04-2008)

 

MAGNIFICENT 7 2012

… And for closing – Michael Glawogger, the Austrian director of many controversial films. This time he cares about prostitutes in his travel to Thailand, Bangladesh and Mexico. As with his previous globalisation films (”Megacities” and ”Working Man’s Death”) the camerawork is done by Wolfgang Thaler, who excellently interprets each location in its own way. ”Whore’s Glory” is done with sensitivity and respectfully tells us about prostitutes who offer moments of love. It is a stunning film that for sure will create debate about what documentaries can and should do – as all 7 films it is for the big screen, and for the social and artistic experience. (Post 13-01-2012)

 

AT DOCSBARCELONA 2013

… The job given to Michael Glawogger at DocsBarcelona was very simple: find 7 clips and talk about them in your master class. He found 6 and surprised this blogger, who thought he knew the work of the Austrian filmmaker, by showing ”Haiku”, a film he made in the 1980’es, wonderful in editing and – as he said – a film that includes the theme that he was to develop a couple of decades later: work. To prove that, he showed a sequence from ”Workingman’s Death”, that has a dialogue between workers about prostitutes, the theme of the director’s latest work, ”Whore’s Glory” (photo), that is in the official selection at the festival.

Glawogger is not only an important artist, he also has the gift to be able to talk precisely about what he does, and how he approaches his characters. And he does that in a provocative way that is perfect for a master class as well as a Q&A session like the one he performed yesterday in the new Filmoteca in Barcelona. The audience wanted to know how he got the prostitutes in ”Whore’s Glory” to participate, how his research was done, if he paid them to take part (yes, of course), how much the film’s budget was (2 mio.€ the answer was), practical as well as ethical question.

Masters come to Barcelona, last year it was Viktor Kossakovsky, this year he was followed by Michael Glawogger. For sure, two of the best documentary (if not the best) artists of our time. (Post 01-06-2013)

 

CATHEDRALS OF CULTURE (2014)

6 3D documentaries by Wim Wenders, Michael Glawogger, Michael Madsen, Robert Redford, Margreth Olin and Karim Ainouz. Executive producer: Wim Wenders. Each film is 26 mins. long. Subtitle: ”If Buildings Could Talk” and this is where the overall problem lies if the idea is that they have to be watched as one film with six locations… I saw it like that at the press screening tuesday and this is how the 6 are to be screened at the Copenhagen Architecture Festival x Film, with one small break… Michael Glawogger’s part ”The National Library of Russia” is close to my heart as educated librarian (in the last century), and because this is magic St. Petersburg, where you have this fantastic building in the middle of the city, on Nevski Prospekt, where you with Glawogger in a few seconds leave modern times and enter a place full of people and books and index cards and kilometers of bookshelves and students at their small study tables and old ladies sitting in their small booths writing on their cards or taking books out to be transported to the reader in the reading room. Glawogger avoids the ”I am a building”. Instead he lets voices and texts come out from the images – Dostojevski of course, Bunin, Brodsky and many others – unfortunately difficult to understand it all as there are Russian voices in the background with an English voice in the foreground that only gives some of the texts, if I got it right. Visually this film is excellent, there is a flow, a constant movement, great close-ups, small stories within the overall story, Glawogger and his cameraman Wolfgang Thaler succeed to convey their fascination fully. A great visit! (Post 20-03-2014)

 

MICHAEL GLAWOGGER 1959-2014

Shocking news – Michael Glawogger has died from malaria during the shooting of a film in Africa. So young! My deepest condolences to family and the many, who were close to him.

In June last year I had the privilege to moderate a masterclass with Michael Glawogger. It happened in Barcelona at DocsBarcelona, where his ”Whores Glory” was shown. I had recommended the masterclass to happen after meeting the director at the Magnificent7 festival in Belgrade 2011, where he stayed the whole week of the festival, took everyone by heart with his warm generosity and ability to inspire, sharing his experience as a filmmaker, who never compromised and gave us, as he expressed it himself, a description of ”la condition humaine”.

In connection with a retrospective in New York, NY Times characterised his impressive work as ”A World of Troubled Beauty” – referring to his trilogy ”Megacities”, ”Workingman’s Death” and ”Whore’s Glory”. Films that will stay in film history.

A couple of quotes from his hand, taken from the many texts about Glawogger: ”I start filming when I sense that nothing is exotic any longer. But common. Not before.”“For me documentary filmmaking is a very special kind of life and I come to see places in a way that I could not see by just travelling, and I would also feel lost travelling without the purpose of watching things in order to work with them, since that makes sense to me. If I weren’t a filmmaker, I wouldn’t take that time for travelling and watching, so that makes me very happy. The people I meet for these films, that make them very happy…”

Take a look at the photo, see his smile, see his calm and open invitation to ask whatever question relevant to the art of filmmaking that he mastered so wonderfully – most recent with the film from the National Library in St.Petersburg. (Post 24-04-2014)

Michael Glawogger 1959-2014

Shocking news – Michael Glawogger has died from malaria during the shooting of a film in Africa. So young! My deepest condolences to family and the many, who were close to him.

In June last year I had the privilege to moderate a masterclass with Michael Glawogger (photo). It happened in Barcelona at DocsBarcelona, where his ”Whores Glory” was shown. I had recommended the masterclass to happen after meeting the director at the Magnificent7 festival in Belgrade 2011, where he stayed the whole week of the festival, took everyone by heart with his warm generosity and ability to inspire, sharing his experience as a filmmaker, who never compromised and gave us, as he expressed it himself, a description of ”la condition humaine”.

In connection with a retrospective in New York, NY Times characterised his impressive work as ”A World of Troubled Beauty” – referring to his trilogy ”Megacities”, ”Workingman’s Death” and ”Whore’s Glory”. Films that will stay in film history.

A couple of quotes from his hand, taken from the many texts about Glawogger:  ”I start filming when I sense that nothing is exotic any longer. But common. Not before.”“For me documentary filmmaking is a very special kind of life and I come to see places in a way that I could not see by just travelling, and I would also feel lost travelling without the purpose of watching things in order to work with them, since that makes sense to me. If I weren’t a filmmaker, I wouldn’t take that time for travelling and watching, so that makes me very happy. The people I meet for these films, that make them very happy…”

Take a look at the photo, see his smile, see his calm and open invitation to ask whatever question relevant to the art of filmmaking that he mastered so wonderfully – most recent with the film from the National Library in St.Petersburg.

Baltic Responses to Ban of Russian Channels

Is this a wise decision, I wondered, when i read a text on “Film New Europe” a couple of weeks ago:

Governmental bodies in both Latvia and Lithuania have banned broadcasts of Russian state TV channels. A three month ban began on 8 April 2014. Lithuania first issued a three month ban of the Russian channel NTV Mir two weeks earlier over broadcast of the documentary The Convicted. It later suspended broadcasts of RTR-Planeta (Russia) also for a period of three months. Latvia issued a three-month suspension of rebroadcasts of the channel Rossiya RTR over reports of biased coverage reflecting military propaganda. One-third of Latvia’s population is native Russian-speaking, and 8 percent of Lithuania’s population is comprised of native Russian language speakers…

I decided to ask three very good friends to give me their reactions, Latvian Lelda Ozola who works as Media Desk at the National Film centre, film directors Giedre Beinoriūtė and Audrius Stonys from Lithuania. The answers, the strongest one first, were:

STONYS: Let me answer you what I think about the banning of Russian TV channels in few questions. Would it be possible that ‘Der Stűrmer’ or ‘Vőlkischer Beobachter’ would be published and distributed in London in

1941? Would any European country accept a TV channel which would openly propagate war, violence and national or racial discrimination? What is the difference between Putin and Goebbels propaganda?

The war against Ukraine already started. Also in the information front. The banning of these Russian state TV channels has nothing to do with rights of Russian population in Latvia and Lithuania. Actually a majority of Lithuanian Russians are not supporting war against Ukraine. Lie is a lie and it has nothing to do with a freedom of speech. I follow events in Ukraine and how they are presented in Russian TV channels on the internet. It is mind blowing open and extremely cynical lie. We banned this open lie in our countries, but I think this issue should be taken very seriously in the European context. In XXI century in Europe, a Television is used as a repressive weapon against freedom of another country. How could this be possible?

Audrius Stonys

OZOLA: The things happening in the Ukraine is not fun. Somehow we here take it very personally – the fear is almost physical. Russia is so close and performs so cynically in the Ukraine. We have witnessed provocations here from the Russian speaking population and the state TV channels of Russia broadcast sheer propaganda and lies – they incite hatred on regular basis. So, actually, the ban on the channels is a measure of defence. The pretext for Russia to come and defend their citizens who suffer here seems very close to reality at the moment. That’s why the channels are banned even though it is most probably difficult for you to understand it looking from the media democracy point of view…

Lelda Ozola

BEINORIUTE: I think it is not about just banning the Russian TV channel. Russia is using media as a weapon constantly and deliberately spreading lies and disinformation and inciting hatred. Russia is waging the information war. So I see this ban not as a sanction but as a defence. And I think this ban is the least reaction which should be reacted to. Somebody has just to say: stop.  And I wish Europe would be less faltering.

Giedré Beinoriute

Bill Brummel: Erasing Hate

Danish DR/Dokumania shows tomorrow the American tv (NBC) documentary “Erasing Hate”. I got a link to watch it for a review, I could go through the first third of the film then the link went on strike. So no points are being given but impressions from what I saw and clips found on the internet:

The story is simple: Bryon Widner used to be “ready to kill for the white race.” For 15 years he was a skinhead, he was a neo-nazi. One of the worst, an expert in the field says. Bryon, that is what he says, “became a role model for many”. But he changed his mind when he found Julie, who was also part of the movement, they got a baby and decided to leave their violent past behind. BUT Bryon was tattooed all over, he wanted to get rid of the “signification of a killer”. So, that’s the story… people from an organisation that investigates the far right movements in the US meet with Bryon and Julie, wants to help and an anonymous donor pays for the plastic surgery that is extremely painful.

It is indeed an American documentary: Narration, interviews where you hear the interviewer, close-up of the tattoos, music from “wall to wall”, reenactments, sweet sequences from the family life etc. No surprises, but pretty hard to watch the plastic surgery going on! A quote from the doctor: Your heart has changed, now we need to change the surface…

http://www.erasinghatethemovie.com/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/10/31/erasing-hate-reformed-skinhead-endures-agony-to-remove-hateful-tattoos/

(This article give the whole story in details).

To be shown on DR, Dokumania Tuesday April 22

USA, 91 mins., 2011

Carmen Cobos: Imperfect Harmony

Louis Andriessen, charismatic Dutch composer, and Mariss Jansons, charismatic Latvian chief conductor of the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra in Amsterdam. The two characters in the fascinating observational documentary drama, which is very well told, interesting and entertaining.

The drama evolves as the days pass. Andriessen has composed music for the 125 year’s anniversary of the Concertgebouw, and enters the building to follow the rehearsals during the last five days before the performance. The camera stays very much on the face of the composer, who appears a bit nervous and confused in the beginning. His relationship to the musicians is warm and generous, while the relationship to the conductor is on the contrary a bit complicated. At some moments, to say the least… ”school teacher”, says Andriessen having discussed details with Jansons, ”he is a pain in the…”. Some of the musicians seem to agree with Jansons and his need for pedantry – it is clear that he in his questions to the composer that this is not the kind of music he favours – others like the more open attitude to interpretation that Andriessen stands for.

It is a very generous film. You get very close to the artistic creation of a fine piece of music, you get a fine impression of how two characters of different temperament get closer to each other, two old proud professionals who have to meet each other, whether they like it ot not. You see how an orchestra works preparing down to the smallest details, asking questions to the composer. Andriessen has very interesting comments to his work, to music and to from where his inspiration comes… Happy Ending, Andriessen walks out of the building, out into windy Amsterdam mission completed.

The film is shown in Tuschinski, Amsterdam May 6 in the context of the 75 birthday of the composer. It deserves an international life.

The Netherlands, 2014, 75 mins.

Cucic & Skoric: Mitch – Diary of a Schizophrenic

It is rough. It is provoking. It is touching, poetic and shocking because you experience the difficulties of a man’s aim to come to terms with himself and life as it goes on in his head and around him in the psychiatric hospital, where he is, has been for 12 years and where he in a film, he is making himself, expresses his despair. Outstanding it is, nothing less!

He does not understand, why he is put up here, ”I am a bohemian, I write poems and songs, I take photographs, why am I here with retarded people”. And Mitch makes this film, together with Damir Cucic, filming himself and patients behind the bars, he is an intelligent well-formulated man, who talks about himself and asks questions in different languages to other patients. They sing songs, they rap and perform. Or sit on a bench, have given up, have been here for 22 years. These patients are not visually recognisable, they have been given silhouettes to cover their identity.

Mitch is a man who has been using many drugs, and you understand quickly that he is locked in because he has committed crimes. He turns the camera (a cellphone?) towards himself, he is filming himself at night time as well, and the director of the film, Damir Cucic, interprets his situation in these and many other

sequences, where the excellent sound score comes in. There is from Cucic established a rythm in the film from Mitch talking all the time to silent sequences, where he observes leaves on a tree, something beautiful, or the camera goes down the corridor ending on closed doors and bars. A place where claustrophobia has an easy take.

He is for some time out of the institution, he travels with his mother, sweet scenes, but back to darkness, tha bars and the metallic sounds that surround the images. The shaky camera movements create a constant atmosphere of nervousness, Mitch talks a lot and quite openly about sex, he sings/raps with other patients, he gets out at some point, meets some girls, says that he is ”making a film about myself and stuff”, wants to look for some cocaine, he is in a workshop, he is out fishing, he is talking drugs… He reflects on his wish to have all his thoughts flow together, be under control. You have total empathy for him from the beginning of a film that never becomes sentimental, thank you for that!

The film ends with a text about Mitch brought in again for some crimes. Back in the shit.

Croatia, 2014, 73 mins.

Epilogue: I should have watched the film at ZagrebDox but that did not happen. The text from the website of the festival:

The documentary film Mitch – Diary of a Schizophrenic directed by Damir Čučić was withdrawn from the programme of the 10th Zagrebdox due to the threat of court proceedings in the event that the film was screened publicly. The film′s producer Sinisa Juricic decided to withdraw the film after the psychiatric hospital where the movie was filmed threatened legal action for unauthorized recording and eavesdropping

I have asked the producer Sinisha Juricic, who was so kind to give me a link for watching the film, about what has happened since the withdrawal that deserves to travel all over. No answer yet.

Ossama Mohammed and Wiam Berdirxan: Silvered Water

A mail came in today with the headline: Good News in Bad Times! It came from Orwa Nyrabia from Syrian Proaction Film, together with French Films d’Ici the producer of ”Silvered Water. Syria, An Auto-Portrait”.

Orwa Nyrabia: It is with much pleasure that we share with you, wonderful friends and partners, the news we received while Homs is under merciless shelling. Our new release is premiering in May, and taking the story another step further…

The film in question has been selected for the Festival de Cannes, Official Selection, Special Screenings.

Directed by Ossama Mohammed (photo) and Wiam Berdirxan, the description of the film goes like this, according to the mail received:

“In Syria, everyday, YouTubers film then die; others kill then film. In Paris, driven by my inexhaustible love for Syria, I find that I can only film the sky and edit the footage posted on YouTube. From within the tension between my estrangement in France and the revolution, an encounter happened. A young Kurdish woman from Homs began to chat with me, asking: ‘If your camera were here, in Homs, what would you be filming?”. Silvered Water is the story of that encounter.”

Indeed a Special Screening at the upcoming Cannes Festival!

90min, documentary

Music by Noma Omran

Editing by Maisoun Asaad

In association with Arte France – La Lucarne 

With the Support of CNC, AFAC and Sundance Documentary Fund, Procirep.

Gus Holwerda: The Unbelievers/ 2

Herzog taler sig bestemt ikke igennem filmen (havde han dog bare gjort det…), der er ikke så meget mere end på traileren. Hans rolle er at anbefale filmen, og det gør han ved at anbefale de to unbelievers, biologen Richard Dawkins fra Oxford og fysikeren Lawrence Krauss fra Phoenix. Vi har alle brug for modige mennesker som disse, som taler om nødvendigheden af videnskab og fornuft som grundlag for at forstå vores omverden, siger han.

Herzog speaker altså ikke filmen roligt, indtrængende og skarpt, som han ville kunne, som jeg opfattede traileren lovede, som var min egentlige begrundelse for at åbne for Dokumania i aftes. Han kommer altså slet ikke til orde i filmen, som tværtimod støjende, overfladisk og sjusket prøver at dække Dawkins og Krauss på en verdensturné med foredrag og interviews. Jeg synes, det er uudholdeligt, men de er sympatiske og fascinernede hovedpersoner, og det holder mig fast, for der er dog et par scener, som den på fotoet her, hvor de to vist nok, har jeg på fornemmelsen, vist nok i virkeligheden karismatiske videnskabsmænd begynder at udfolde sig i en ordentlig samtale. Jeg, der ellers er smidt af fortællingen, finder i disse få gode scener ind til, hvad der kunne have været en dokumentarfilm, et værk, som kunne bevæge og flytte mig.

Hvad er der da i vejen? Jeg oplever filmen indforstået, og det plejer bestemt ikke at gøre mig noget, hvis værket ikke tager hensyn til mig af den grund, men her er der en åbenlys arrogance, som forudsætter, at jeg kender de to fra amerikanske shows, så de uden videre kan fortsætte i stilen med fikse hentydninger uden at gå i dybden med noget som helst, men bare klippe til den sjoveste replik, som netop kun er indforstået morsom. Der er imidlertid fem til syv gode scener, hvor et argument føres igennem, hvor en udredning gives plads. Og så er der de tos samvær, hvor en stemning af dokumentarisk ægthed viser sig, om ikke realiseret, så en anet mulighed, et kig bagom den smagløst hæsblæsende konstruktion af overfladiskheder.

Kan dette være rigtigt? Jeg ser filmen en gang til og undrer mig. Der er ikke mere, den kommer ikke længere, ikke dybere. Og jeg konkluderer med at tildele den to penne af seks (den ene pen ekstra alene for for de længere scener med de to medvirkende alene i et foredrag, alene sammen i denne samtale, som er så vigtig og så forsømt), og jeg finder nogle anmeldelser frem (i tvivl, er det kun mig, som ser den film sådan?) og ser, at den ikke blev særlig godt modtaget i USA, og jeg vil gøre The New York Times’ Jeannette Catsoulis’ beskrivelse i hendes anmeldelse (12. december 2013) til min. Netop sådan tænkte jeg faktisk, da jeg så filmen:

”Accompanying the respected scientists and atheists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss on a triple-continent series of public engagements, Gus Holwerda’s unforgivably superficial documentary is too busy drooling over its subjects to flesh out their body of work. Whether debating Muslims in Canberra, Australia, or making rhetorical mincemeat of the archbishop of Sydney; bantering with Stephen Colbert in New York City; or holding forth at the 2012 Reason Rally in Washington, this genial tag team is photographed with the deference of star-struck teenagers. Train, cab and airplane journeys between locations are pointlessly recorded, as is Mr. Krauss’s spell in a makeup chair and the vibrant hue of his pink sneakers — as though to underscore their wearer’s nonconformity…” Og Jeannette Catsoulis konkluderer: ”Too slight to Persuade, ’The Unbelievers’ is also too poorly made to entertain. The rational roots of atheism deserve a much better movie that this.”

USA, 2013, 75 min.