Audrius Stonys on DocAlliance

For 2.5€ in total you will be able to watch three great films by Lithuanian documentary poet, Audrius Stonys, who is “the event of the week” of the brilliant vod.

The films are Uku Ukai (2006) (photo), Countdown (2004) and Ramin (2011). DocAlliance has made a small talk with the director:

The acclaimed director Audrius Stonys ranks among the most prominent Lithuanian documentary filmmakers. According to Stonys, the issue of freedom plays the main part in cinematography, being more important than any aesthetic criterion. Especially as there still are attempts to restrict such freedom, only they have taken the form of dictatorship of money. Stonys believes that documentary filmmaking was not born out of the desire to provide information. It was born out of astonishment and the possibility of being able to stop time and contemplate the miracle called “the world”.

In response to a seemingly perplexing question: “Who makes your films?” Stonys said: “Recently, I visited a doctor because I had problems with my back. And for only fifteen minutes of work he asked for a lot of money. Sure, he fixed me up, but he is my friend. So I wondered why the heck he was asking so much. This is what he said: ‘Look, those fifteen minutes contained all the years of my practical training, all the books I have read plus the experience of my professors who have shared their knowledge with me.’ And my films are also the result of the work of many souls.”

http://dafilms.com/event/109-audrius-stonys/

The Act of Killing Wins in Berlin

… of course it does, two awards, the Ecumenical and the Audience Panorama Award. What is more important to notice is the speech given by one of the directors, Joshua Oppenheimer, when he accepted the Ecumenical Award. Here you are:

The perpetrators we filmed in Indonesia destroyed other human beings for money and for power. This greed, unfortunately, is all too human. After killing people, the perpetrators felt trauma, even remorse. This, too, is human. And so they needed excuses, propaganda, so that they could live with themselves, so that they could kill again, and then go on to build a regime on the basis of terror, lies, and the celebration of mass murder.

The new dictatorship quickly obliged, making up lies to rationalize what they had done. Through these lies emerged a distorted morality to justify evil, even to celebrate it.

Among the most effective of these lies is that the victims were atheists, and that non-believers have no place among the living. The killers themselves know that their victims were not atheists. And we know that it does not matter. But in Indonesia, atheism is still equated with evil. And this remains a pillar in the justification of genocide. THE ACT OF KILLING has been accused of being a film by and for atheists.

Since International Human Rights Day on December 10, 2012, The Act of Killing has screened hundreds of times in Indonesia, in more than 90 cities. It has helped give rise to a national conversation in which, finally, the silence around the genocide has been broken, and Indonesians are openly discussing how today’s regime of corruption and fear is built on a mountain of corpses. Necessarily, the distorted morality, in which the victims are represented as “evil” atheists, is starting to crumble.

We thank the Ecumenical Jury for this prize: it is an important contribution to our effort to break the silence. In itself, this award exposes lies that have, for so long, been used to justify crimes against humanity, to stigmatize survivors, to keep people afraid. Your decision to give this award to THE ACT OF KILLING confirms that when religion is used as a justification for crimes against humanity, it has lost its moral foundation.

We thank you. Indonesia thanks you.

Filmkommentaren.dk review

Filmkommentaren.dk anmeldelse

http://theactofkilling.com/ 

In the Belly of the City

A newsletter arrived from Torino sent by Stefilm, now the classic Italian documentary production company, once – when we were much younger – the company that was mentioned by everyone as the only one from Italy, that dared to go international in order to make films for the European market. I say ”we” because I have a lot of warm memories for almost a couple of decades, working/meeting with the two architects Elena Filippini and Stefano Tealdi, and the doctor Edoardo Fracchia. The three, who left what could have been decent careers, to enter unstable lives as documentary producers, directors and distributors. Now the trio stands behind a company with an impressive filmography that can be studied on their website, link below. Doing also distribution of films from other European countries in Italy as well as running training and workshops. The aim is to improve the documentary culture in Italy.

One thing was always on the agenda when we met in Bardonecchia for the Documentary in Europe or in Marseille for the Sunny Side of the Doc or in Torino for visits in the office or privately: Food. When Stefano Tealdi was president for the EDN, he often joked that EDN (European Documentary Network) also could stand for Eating and Dining Network… and right he was, having workshops in the South of Europe meant good food and wine. It still does. And coming from Piemonte the wine quality in these meetings had to be high, and now – after a couple of dark years for the club – you can also talk football, about Juventus, the champions.

Concluding: it is therefore only natural that Tealdi and his colleagues send out a newsletter advertising that Stefilm from monday 18th of February till friday 22nd of February ”takes you to the wonderful world of foodmarkets” on arte. The company has produced a tv series of one (television) hour documentaries shot in the bellies of Torino, Barcelona, Budapest, Vienna and Lyon. Before this series Stefilm has been studying and producing docs on coffee, tea, gelato, pizzas of course, pasta…

Bon Appetit!

http://www.stefilm.it/

Paul Pauwels gives Pitch Advice

“Don’t be afraid of showing your passion. Prepare yourself and do your homework. Try to find out who will be present during a pitching session and what kind of slots people are responsible for. Use body language, make sure the producers see you and remember your face. Entertain your audience! They will be grateful for it. Listening to a lot of pitches can be a dull job. Make sure your project stands out. Humor always works, but in the right measure. Don’t turn the pitch into a stand-up comedy routine.”

These are just a few sentences from Paul Pauwels, a veteran in documentary sessions all over the world, a producer – and an always strong supporter of filmmakers, who have something important to say.

Of course there is no recipe for how to pitch but down-to-earth advice conveyed in an entertaining manner as does Pauwels in three texts for POV, on their website, as a guest-blogger, is good reading and useful for beginners as well as for those, who have been in the business for years. Year after year I have seen professionals doing bad presentations at the idfa Forum because they had not done their homework.

Pauwels makes his focus on the written and the verbal pitch – and (see quote above) “when you are in the room”. 

http://www.pbs.org/pov/blog/#.UR0feYu3Its

Ulla Jacobsen 1967-2013

We knew it was serious. Ulla wrote it herself in personal facebook messages. Always in her modest, gentle way, returning the question about her health to ”but how are you” and ”how is the documentary world out there?”. A world she took active part in for more than a decade. In her kind, unselfish and competent manner.

And then came the message about her death, Saturday February 9th in Copenhagen. 45 years old…

After Ulla left DOX and EDN in 2009 to go freelance, I had only written contact with her. The following edited article was written, when she left DOX in 2009. This was and is what I recall from our working years together. I am sure many other documentary people have the same kind of memories. Let me start in Syria:

March 2009. A hotel lobby in Damascus. A group of women from the Middle East are sitting at their computers. They are journalists. They are chain smokers. They are concentrated, a bit stressed. They have a deadline for delivering texts to the daily news bulletin of the DoxBox international documentary festival, being held for the second year. A calm, Nordic looking woman goes from one to to the other. She gives advice with a smile on her face. She is the one in charge, the chief editor radiating expertise and kindness. Her name is Ulla Jacobsen. She is the natural choice for this difficult task of encouraging young journalists to express opinions and write good reports…

Ulla, editor in chief of DOX from March 1998 until early 2009, would never have accepted an intro like this. ”I am not important”, she would have said. Personal gonzo-style journalism was never something given priority by her in running a magazine, whose reputation she built up until it became the international cultural documentary magazine, where you’re always sure to find reliable information about what is going on worlwide – with the creative documentary.

DOX’s connection to EDN was clear from the outset: DOX should remain independent and never become an internal, extended EDN-newsletter. The editor should be given free reign and thus Ulla was in charge. On the other hand, the fact of having Ulla in the EDN office was an obvious advantage for both parties. Ulla often found her stories through EDN’s network of filmmakers, and EDN profited from her knowledge. She was simply part of the gang of the early days of EDN, did a lot of work for the organisation (selecting projects for workshops, giving lectures and presentations, serving on juries etc.) and her personal qualifications contributed strongly to the fine working atmosphere both in Skindergade and after moving into facilities at the Danish Film Institute. I couldn’t begin to count the times when I, as director of EDN, went to Ulla for an opinion that I knew would be based on positive analysis and common sense.

After DOX Ulla went freelance. This is how she presented herself: I make short web-videos for organisations and company websites. My film ”The Plastic Battle” for Friends of the Earth (UK) has been watched by a quarter of million people on the internet. I write feature articles about climate change, social issues and film/media.”

A true documentarian has passed away.

Jørgen Vestergaard: Spillemanden

Vestergaard tager igen simpelthen ordet og fortæller en historie. Den her gang om en stor musiker ude på landet, der hvor de bor. Han gør det på den måde, han kan og altid har gjort det på, i en dokumentarfilm, som han bare laver. Han samler pengene sammen, han samler holdet af kolleger og venner og går i gang. Optager og klipper og færdiggør og indtaler sin fortælling voice over. Det er sådan han tager ordet, og jeg bliver så glad, når jeg igen hører hans stemme fortælle om det, han nu er optaget af. Det gik sådan til, at Jacob Oschlag fra foreningen Thy Folkemusik pegede på en fortsættelse af filmene om Evald Thomsen, Evald og Ingeborg og alle de andre (1974) og om brødrene Ejnar, Hans og Karl Nielsen fra Oksbøl, Æ Tinuser (1979). Han skulle lave en film med Karl Skaarup.

Filmen er for så vidt om ham, spillemanden Karl Skaarup (1924) fra Koldby i Thy, men den er mere end det, den er en film om musik, og den er derfor især med ham som medvirkende, han fortæller skam lidt om sig selv og sit liv, men vigtigst, han forklarer fagligt og omhyggeligt om sin musik i ellers ubeskrevne detaljer, om sine forbilleder og om sin undervisning, som han sent i karrieren med succes blev lokket ud i af en ny generation af musikere. Filmen er om musik og musikalske generationsskifter uden egentlige brud, men med traditioner og videreførelser og fornyelser. Og så om den personlige faktor: det drejer sig her om Karl Skaarup. Og den loyale, klassiske tv-dokumentar udvider sig, ja, Skaarup fortæller, som han forventes, om gamle dage og missionens syn på hans fag i dans og alkohol og hans myndige dialekt slår fast: det er ikke synd. Men han bliver faglig i sin selvbiografi, holder sig til instrumenternes række, fortæller om dem, han har ejet siden barndommen. Og så kommer det interessante, musikken. Han lærte at se på de dansende, skille de dygtigste ud og spille efter dem, for dans og musik hører sammen, i hans verden i den rækkefølge. Sådan er kunsten.

Filmens kerne er mødet mellem Karl Skaarup og violinisten fra konservatoriet, Kristian Bugge, mødet mellem erfaring og begejstring. Bugge overtaler Skaarup til at tage sig som elev, og efterhånden bliver Skaarup en slags ekstern lærer ved Fyns Musikkonservatorium. Selv havde han lært af violinisten Viggo Post fra Bedsted, og han kunne så videreføre kendskabet til de lange, lange thyske turdanse i akademiske rammer, men ikke kun denne folkloreindsamling, han tilføjede og fortsætter med at tilføje sin egen kunst, det gammeldags på den autentiske, den ægte måde. Musikken er levende, variationerne udvides med improvisationer, som i opmærksomhed på dansen stadig understreger denne. Dette er Vestergaards films fornemhed, klippet følger og illustrerer konkret i dejligt lange scener uden nogen fotografisk eller klippeteknisk pynt, at Karl Skaarup samler en stil omkring sig, en musikalsk skole velsagtens, der som hovedingrediens er afhængig af og respekterer, hvad folk gør, når de danser, og af, hvad de simpelthen kan lide.

Jørgen Vestergaard har lavet en film om og en udforskning af en stor musikalsk tradition i sin værkrække, endnu en fint følt film om kunst. Direkte gribende er det at overvære den gamle musiker lytte sig opmærksomt ind i et ungt orkester, Habadekuks fremmede musik og lidt efter lidt spille sammen med dem, senere at se ham give koncert for 400 alvorligt lyttende tilhørere i Vestervig Kirke, koncert, ja! Både spillende med i stort orkester og som solist med fuldstændig stilhed omkring sig og sin harmonika.

Jørgen Vestergaard: Spillemanden – en film om Karl Skaarup, Danmark 2012, 39 min. Fotografi: Orla Nielsen, lyd: Erik Nielsen, klip: Henrik Jørgensen, musik: Karl Skaarup, Kristian Bugge og Habadekuk, idé: Jakob Oschlag, produktion: JV film & tv, salg: Forlaget Knakken orpo@thisted.dk

How to Build a Country from Scratch

… is the title of another fine Op-Doc that you can watch on New York Times website. A bit more than 9 minutes long it is a presentation, full of humour, in 12 steps/chapters of the new country, South Sudan, made by the French filmmakers Florence Martin-Kessler and Anne Poiret. A feature duration documentary entitled ”State Builders” will premiere later this year to be broadcasted on arte, the German/French cultural channel.

Again, chapeau for this initiative of New York Times, bringing the short documentary to a big audience.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/opinion/how-to-build-a-country-from-scratch.html?_r=0

Hybrid Docs at Forum Berlin

The Forum of the Internationale Filmfestspiele Berlin (runs until February 17) is the section, where you can be sure to find new and exciting works. Including documentaries. Here is a clip from an interview with the Forum director Christoph Terhechte, with the mentioning of four docs, below please find a link to the full text:

Is the Portuguese film Terra de ninguém (No Man’s Land) by Salomé Lamas, in which a mercenary talks about the atrocities he has committed, an example for this sort of blurring the boundaries between fiction and documentary?

It is a documentary, but at the same time a piece of fiction. At first the director asks herself whether or not it is fiction, because until the very end she cannot be sure whether the man who recounts his story is telling the truth. What is clear is that the background information is true, insofar as the actions that he mentions actually happened. But it remains unclear how much he was really involved and to what degree the story is false. Of course, the same goes for every documentary. One can never know whether people are telling the truth and there are always different versions of a story. Terra de niguém explicitly addresses the possibility of falsehood or pathological lying.

The undefined boundaries between feature and documentary film can be seen in many of this year’s films. Larger audiences are beginning to get used to these hybrid forms. The Greek documentary Sto lyko (To the Wolf) is partially staged. But you don’t know how much, because the people play themselves in the film. La plaga (The Plague) employs a feature film style of dramaturgy, in order to follow its five protagonists in today’s Catalonia. A batalha de Tabatô (The Battle of Tabatô) (photo) is a feature which has very strong documentary elements. The film takes place in Guinea-Bissau and tries to contrast African tribal traditions with the colonial history…

Link to berlinale.de 

Agnès Varda Online Festival

What a feast! And don’t say you can not afford it – it is for free! And it lasts until February 17!

I am referring to another generous offer from ”your online documentary cinema” provider DocAlliance.

17 films of Agnès Varda, voilà.

Including ”The Beaches of Agnès”, ”The Gleaners and I”, the documentary she made about her late husband Jacques Demy, ”L’univers de Jacques Demy” and several short films like ”Salut les Cubains” (photo) from 1963, that has the following description on the site of DocAlliance:

”Four years after Fidel Castro came to power, Agnès Varda brought back from Cuba 1,800 photos and used them to make an educational and amusing documentary.”

Have a nice festival and tell others about it!

http://dafilms.com/

Best Nordic Documentary/2

A short follow-up – Mika Ronkainen got his well-deserved Dragon Award Best Nordic Documentary at the Göteborg International Film festival. The jury motivated the award to ”Finnish Blood, Swedish Heart” (photo) with these words:

… a touching story of inner and outer exile, which brings out a rarely discussed trauma of the Swedish welfare state of the prosperous 60s and 70s. With great sensibility and refinement, the director describes a personal relationship between father and son and their emotional trip down memory lane in the search of a sense of belonging. Their conversations and meetings with other Swedish Finns along the way gradually unfolds the theme of rootlessness and estrangement, while intertwined live recordings of Finnish immigrant songs from the 70s poetically comment on the theme and widens the picture to encompass an entire culture.”

http://www.giff.se/us/public/article/post/the-dragon-award-winners-2013-1590.html