Mikael Opstrup: Iikka Vehkalahti

Iikka Vehkalahti is dead, and I am writing through tears. It’s not so easy, makes the screen blurry as are my thoughts.

I was a little afraid of him before I got to know him, he was so big and he seemed to have a sharp immediate analysis of everything.

Then we started working together, did so for 20 years: Ex Oriente, In-Docs, Twelve for the Future, Doc Forward, Below Zero, Story doc, Baltic Sea Docs, Nordoc, Latvian Code. Iikka was everywhere. And my distance changed to admiration. Or maybe first and foremost respect, respect for the dedication to the – it must be thousands – film makers he has worked with. Not consulted, not tutored, but talked to. You know this little … ‘maybe you should’ … ‘have you thought of’ …

Iikka was a producer, a director, a writer, a commissioning editor but I think it was these meetings with the film people that was closest to his heart. Except of course his wife and children, that he was so enormously proud of. We talked a lot about film of course but somehow always ended with Katri & the kids.

Damn it, how it feels empty without him.

We wrote together 2 days ago, I asked for some help, we had not talked for some months. I wrote that I missed him. Typically Iikka, he did not write ‘I miss you too’ as most of us would have done. But he wrote me back after 10 minutes with the help I needed. Typically Iikka.

We only cried together one time. At lunch at IDFA. I told him about an emotional experience and started crying and then Iikka started crying too. It felt good and we decided to write our memoirs together with the title ‘Big boys do cry’.

Of course, the humor. Iikka was so funny. Laughter all over and this little teasing glimpse in the eye.

I would like to end there. With the humor.

Above  a photo of Iikka and me as moderators at Below Zero, Tromsø, that we posted with a caption:

Was it you or me who should have invited the decision makers?

THANKS  my friend, I miss you. And not any more try to remind myself your name is with both 2 i’s and 2 k’s. IIKKA.

Mikael, Copenhagen, 23.12.2024

Andreas Köchel-Steinmann – fylder 75

Andreas er født i Berlin, kom til Danmark i 1970, uddannede sig til pædagog…nej, det er for kedeligt. Jeg prøver igen: Jeg har kendt Andreas siden begyndelsen af 1970’erne, hvor vi fandt sammen i Taastrup Filmklub, dengang en af de førende i Danmark. Jeg tog til filmfestival i Berlin med Andreas, mødte hans forældre, overnattede hos frau Steinmann og vi skrev avisartikler fra festivalen. Vi kørte gennem det daværende DDR med et forsidefoto af Olsen-Banden fra Levende Billeder på bilruden. Ah Ooolsen, sagde grænsebetjentene, vi undgik kontrol og kørte videre.

Meget senere var vi i Leipzig til den første festival Nach der Wende. Vi skulle hjem, det kunne vi ikke komme pga. togstrejke, så vi måtte leje en bil, som Andreas kørte i et vanvittigt tempo op til Lübeck, hvor bilen blev parkeret før vi tog toget til færgen i Puttgarden. Vi nåede færgen. Jeg sad ved siden af Andreas, hans kone Ingrid var skrækslagen på bagsædet og bad mindeligt sin mand om at køre langsommere, jeg sang Beatles-sange for at holde chaufføren vågen.

Andreas kendes som den stille mand, som man ofte må hive ordene ud af. Men når de så kommer ud, holder han ikke sin store viden, specielt om Tyskland, tilbage. Og, som bilturen vidner om, har der altid været lidt desperado over Andreas kombineret med den stille og rolige mand, som aldrig har kendt til almindelige arbejdstider. Som om nogen har været en troubleshooter for festivaler og mange i hans omgangskreds. Jeg ved ikke, hvad jeg skulle have gjort uden Andreas hjælp til at fixe min computer… Da han arbejdede for festivalerne opbyggede han sit eget velfungerende edb-system, som han frygtede ingen ville kunne videreføre… kan jeg ikke få en lærling, sagde han.

Andreas kom til Danmark med en solid filmviden og -praksis og det blev filmen, der blev hans verden, hvor han udnyttede sin ekstraordinære sans for organisation – og sin tekniske flair. Han var børnehaveleder 1975-1987, engagerede sig i filmklubbevægelsen nationalt og internationalt; vi arbejdede sammen i Statens Filmcentral 1987-1993, hvor han organiserede festivalen “Det Åbne Vindue” i daværende Delta Bio og var en ledende figur ved Balticum Film &TV Festival på Bornholm 1990-2000. Vi tog til de baltiske lande og valgte film ud og når de skulle vises i Gudhjem Kino, stod Andreas i operatørrummet og vekslede mellem de mange filmformater.

På det tidspunkt arrangerede Andreas og Kim Foss, nu biografdirektør i Grand, den legendariske Natfilmfestival, hvor Andreas stod for alt det logistiske og layout af programmer og de fantastisk flotte plakater, som festivalen producerede.

Ja, festivalproducer var Andreas og den rolle fortsatte han med, da de to stiftede CPH:DOX i 2002. Jeg husker stadig et møde i deres lille lokale i Store Kanikkestræde, hvor jeg repræsenterede EDN og Tine Fischer Cinematekeket. De to instanser som var samarbejdspartnere. Tine blev så senere ansat af Andreas som programansvarlig for den succesrige dokumentarfestival og Andreas blev produktionschef og senere konsulent for denne og de andre festivaler under Copenhagen Film Festivals. Han har stadig noget konsulentarbejde for CPH:DOX. Andreas og Kim fik i 2006 en Bodil for deres pionerarbejde med Natfilmfestivalen.

Andreas og Ingrid bor i hus i Ballerup. Det har han selv tegnet. De har tre børn og 8 børnebørn! To af dem bor I Japan og går turen ikke til Tokyo, så tager parret til Saorge i det sydlige Frankrig, hvor hus og have er bygget op af Ingrid og Andreas.

Laila Pakalnina: Termini

In “Spoon” (2019) and “Homes” (2021) Latvian director Laila Pakalniņa worked with cinematographer Gints Bērziņš, a collaboration that continued with “Termini”, that is as the previous films formally interesting due very much to the work of Bērziņš following the ideas from Pakalniņa , some would say crazy ideas, I am one of those, who would say wonderfully crazy! Pakalniņa, however, has always a focus on people and the two have an eye on, this time, how we behave, how we stand, how we sit, how we wait… for the bus to come and take us further in Life, in “the endless cycle of everyday routines”. It’s an invitation indeed. The film had its premiere in the city, where it was filmed, at the Riga FF and went later to Jihlava FF in Czech Republic and to a Chinese festival. In connection with a festival in Poland Pakalniņa said:

“Every film for me means risk. I am not craftsman; I am not delivering certain product. I am making film and that means breathtaking balancing between shit and art. I hope for art of course. And I admire this risk. As for me this is the only way how to make film… – I call my method of work “Fishing in the river of time”. As life is extremely talented, we just put camera, set composition and wait. And life happens. So film happens. Sometimes immediately, sometimes in hours and even days…”

If you are interested in the work of Laila Pakalniņa, you can find many posts on this website. About “Termini” I found this catalogue text from the Jihlava FF, very precise and inviting:

 “The final stops of buses, trams and trolleybuses in the suburbs of Riga. “Non-places” with no specific character, where nothing special happens and yet there is no stopping movement. Some people go from here to work or school, others return home. Or they work in their flower and vegetable stalls near the bus stops. Morning, evening, in snow and rain. Weekdays and holidays. Laila Pakalniņa captures their work, waiting and passing, calm and impatient, in tight moving shots. Gints Bērziņš’s black and white camera stays at one point, describing a circle that begins and ends nowhere. Ordinary stopping points, which we use without thinking about their function, become important crossroads in a wordless urban symphony, to whose unchanging rhythm the entire metropolis must submit…”

Photo: Hargla Company.

Latvia, 2024, 71 mins.

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE FILM

Fifteen films will advance in the documentary feature film category for the 97th Academy Awards. One hundred sixty-nine films were eligible in the category. Members of the documentary branch vote to determine the shortlist and the nominees.

  • The Bibi Files, dir. Alexis Bloom
  • Black Box Diaries, dir. Shiori Itō
  • Dahomey, dir. Mati Diop
  • Daughters, dirs. Natalie Rae and Angela Patton
  • Eno, dir. Gary Hustwit
  • Frida, dir. Carla Gutierrez
  • Hollywoodgate, dir. Ibrahim Nash’at
  • No Other Land, dirs. Yuval Abraham, Basel Adra, Hamdan Ballal, Rachel Szor
  • Porcelain War, dirs. Brendan Bellomo, Slava Leontyev
  • Queendom, dir. Agniia Galdanova
  • The Remarkable Life Of Ibelin, dir. Benjamin Ree
  • Soundtrack To A Coup d’Etat, dir. Johan Grimonprez
  • Sugarcane, dirs. Emily KassieJulian, Brave NoiseCat
  • Union, dirs. Brett Story, Stephen Maing
  • Will & Harper, dir. Josh Greenbaum

Eliza Kubarska: The Last Expedition

… which was in 1992 in Nepal at Kanchenjunga, the world’s third highest mountain, that Wanda Rutkiewicz wished to “conquer”, a word she hated as you can read below. The legendary Polish mountaineer, who had “taken” K2 and reached the summit of Mount Everest, went for Kanchenjunga and if she made it or not, that is the question being raised. She disappeared and was not found. Kubarska, a climber herself, and an award-winning director and cinematographer, specialising in mountaineering films, stands behind this film that has unique archive material with Wanda – visuals and texts from diaries – sets out to find out if she is still alive. She meets monks and talks to other mountaineers like the famous Reinhold Messner. However, what makes the film watchable and fascinating is Wanda herself, a charismatic woman, who has opinions about her profession and the male world of mountaineering that she met again and again. She has a tough family story, she was married twice, and when she finally met the man of her life, Kurt, he died in an accident. The film lacks a flow, however, it seems that Kubarska is doubtful to her role in the film even if she starts indicating her role as the searcher, she – sorry – disappears as well and we are left with Wanda and the archive. Which is wonderful in many ways.

Kubarska, however again, has written a great “statement of the director”, that goes like this, taken from the press kit:

I first learned about Wanda Rutkiewicz from my mother, who, despite having no connection to mountains or sports, spoke of this extraordinary woman who conquered the highest Hima-
layan peaks before men did. For women of our mothers’ generation, Wanda became a symbol of a free woman, navigating her own path despite numerous challenges. Wanda was the first person from Poland to summit Everest in 1978 at a time when men believed that “babes can’t climb.” She continued to break barriers, becoming the first woman in the world to reach K2 in 1986. It was difficult for me to understand why the mountain community and the public opinion did not celebrate this fact. The first woman to climb the world’s most difficult peak, a pioneer of women’s expeditions, could be as famous as Reinhold Mess-
ner. Yet, she is not. Why?

I began to wonder what price Wanda paid for her love of freedom. Two years ago, a journalist publicly referred to her as a “monster woman.” He justified this by attributing to her characteristics typically associated with strong male expedition leaders. Her ambition was often mischaracterised as stubbornness, and her leadership style was perceived as combative.

She was very attractive. Some men went so far as to suggest they would prefer her in their
sleeping bag than on the summit of K2. Yet, Wanda remained focused on her goals.
This reality shocked me.
The climbing community is a conservative group; full of men, adrenaline and testosterone.

The language used is often militaristic, referring to “conquering” peaks. Wanda already talk-
ed about this in interviews during the 1980s, asserting that she could not “conquer” a moun-
tain because she was not a soldier; instead, she expressed gratitude for being allowed to climb to the top.

For me as a filmmaker this story began in 1990, two years before Wanda disappeared. At
that time, she embarked on her ambitious «Caravan for Dreams» project, aiming to become
the first person in the world to climb eight of the eight-thousanders in one year. Her dream
was dismissed by a large part of the community as impossible. However, we now know that it
can be done; in 2019, Nepali climber Nirmal Purja achieved this feat in just 189 days, with
modern technology and equipment.

She had already been to six important peaks in the Himalayas, gained recognition, and
made her dreams come true. And she now realised that she would never be a mother. It would
be impossible for her. She couldn’t give birth to a child and be on an expedition at the same
time. A mature Wanda meets the man of her life, Kurt Lyncke-Krüger, a German neurologist.
She stated that she was ready to give up a lot for him, her mountain plans, that she would
even like to have a child with him. Wanda knew no moderation. This great, romantic love
wound end tragically: a couple in love, they set off to Broad Peak together, dreaming of a kiss
at the top. Kurt is not an experienced climber; he falls and dies before Wanda’s eyes.

Shortly thereafter, doubts arose regarding her solo ascent of Annapurna. Although experts
stated that there was no doubt that she had reached the top, scepticism persisted among the
climbing community and the public. Facts seemed irrelevant. She experienced ostracism.
As a climber myself, I understand this environment from a woman’s perspective and can
relate to the challenges she faced. I am acutely aware of what Wanda experienced mentally
before her last expedition to Kanchenjunga just four months after Annapurna. Like Wanda, I
have faced slander and false accusations in the climbing world—a devastating experience
that can take years to overcome. Even today, despite efforts to vindicate her legacy, the mud
thrown at Wanda still clings to her name.

As a woman who climbs and has experienced hate and exclusion, I chose to draw upon my
own experiences in creating “The Last Expedition.” This sensitivity informs my portrayal of
Wanda’s story. The starting point for telling this story is the premise that Wanda did not die but instead
entered a Buddhist monastery in the Himalayas as some people say – a notion supported by
insights from her diaries, suggesting she may have wished to disappear. The central question
of the film is why Wanda might not have wanted to return. What happened in the life of this accomplished, educated, and beautiful woman that led her to consider disappearing? Ulti-
mately, loneliness and exclusion marked her journey.

When I discovered Wanda’s previously unheard audio diaries, I realised I had unearthed a
treasure that would allow me to tell a true story about Wanda. In them, I found the real Wanda,
a mature woman. A recording from a few months before she disappeared reveals the state of
her soul and the emotions that accompanied her at that time. We hear a woman who is lonely,
lost, questioning many of her own earlier choices, wondering about the meaning of mountain
expeditions. We witness her as she reflects on motherhood, male-female relationships, and
love.

Was it worth it? This is the question I pose at the conclusion of my film. In my view, she paid
a terrible price for her pursuits. But on the other hand, when I reflect on her life, I think: you did
it, woman!

Poland, Switzerland, 2024, 85 mins.

Ulla Hjorth Nielsen: I sync med virkeligheden. Et portræt af filmfamilien Roos

(366 sider. Gennemillustreret. Omfattende noteapparat. Litteraturliste. Navneregister. Filmografier. Forlaget Politisk Revy. 299 kr.)

Se, det er en rigtig filmbog! En bedrift simpelthen, researchet og forfattet over en årrække af Ulla Hjorth Nielsen, som skriver om “det mest forgrenede og betydningsfulde filmdynasti i dansk film”. Roos er efternavnet med tre vigtige instruktører (Jørgen, Ole og Lise), hvis værker og liv gennemgåes i forhold til tiden med referencer til Jørgens bror Karl, som var Ole og Lises far, og med omtale af mor Luise, som var en legende på Filmmuseet og også mor til Gerd, som startede ude i produktionsmiljøet og endte i Statens Filmcentral. Og så er der jo også Peter, filmfotograf, søn af Jørgen, bror til Anne (Vinterberg), instruktør og klipper. Og for at det ikke skal være løgn, har Ulla også kapitler om børn af ovennævnte. Fra 1930’erne og op til i dag, det er filmhistorie og også kulturhistorie, fortalt levende og engageret.

Ulla er selv i branchen, har produceret og instrueret og været konsulent på de statslige institutioner. Hun har oplevet historien om Roos’erne indefra og er både filmografisk og biografisk i sin vinkel. Det sidste gør bogen stærkt underholdende med mange anekdoter, som jeg kan nikke genkendende til – jeg tilbragte 25 år af mit arbejdsliv i Statens Filmcentral (SFC) og har selv bidraget med nogle af fortællingerne, mest om Jørgen og Lise, men nikker også når Ulla fortæller om SFC og om alle de andre instruktører og producenter, som havde kontakt til dynastiet. Hold op hvor var der mange sjove øjeblikke og små og store konflikter, i familien og udenfor. Og varme, ja lad mig bare kalde det hygge, hos søstrene Hanne og Helle Høyberg på Ved Stranden, eller rundt om hjørnet nede i kælderen på Nikolaj Plads hos Saga Kortfilm, hvor Gerd Roos og Karin Plummer bød velkommen, når råklip skulle vises.

Ole Roos havde jeg et frankofilt forhold til. Det kom sig selvfølgelig af hans “Michel Simon” film, som får stor plads i bogen som det mesterværk, det er. Jeg har et par gange fået dvd kopier af store franske film, som Ole Roos havde stående i sit imponerende videotek – “L’atalante” og “Paradisets børn”. Ulla skriver i øvrigt fantastisk om Ole og tilblivelsen af filmen om den store skuespiller… Peter Roos, fotografen, fortæller at Michel Simon insisterede på at der kun blev et filmportræt, hvis danskerne også lavede en pornofilm med hans kæreste, hvor filmholdet selv medvirkede! Fantastisk historie. Filmen blev lavet!

Ole Roos lavede en smuk film om Cobra-bevægelsen, men ellers huskes han bedst for sine fremragende tv-teater film med Otto Brandenburg og Jørgen Ryg. Og “Hærværk” ikke at forglemme og jeg vil tilføje “Forræderne”. Ullas hovedkilder til bogen er Ole Roos og Peter Roos, og når jeg ser på sidstnævntes filmografi, bliver jeg helt forpustet. Ikke alene har han fotograferet for Jørgen, Ole og Lise men også for Ole Askman, Ole Henning Hansen, Hans Henrik Jørgensen, Ib Makwarth, Peter Ringgaard m.fl.

Og for Troels Kløvedal… Her er et smukt citat fra bogen. Peter Roos var på Nordkaperen: “…Det siges at når man rejser på langfart, gør man det for at møde sig selv. Undervejs på turen og et par dagsrejser fra Påskeøerne – ja, næsten så langt væk fra Danmark, som man overhovedet kan komme, fik Peter en besked fra sin kone Annemarie om, at Jørgen Roos var død. Vinden havde været hård, men med ét lagde den sig, og Stillehavet blev blikstille. Peter vidste ikke, hvor han skulle gøre af sig selv på den trange plads og alt for tæt på de andre filmarbejdere og besætningsmedlemmer. Troels Kløvedal foreslog ham en lang svømmetur. Og der på afstand af Nordkaperen i verdens største hav tog Peter Roos afsked med sin far.” Sådan! Selv var jeg i Marseille til dokumentarmarked, det var en hård besked at få, Jørgen Roos var en af få mentorer for mig. Sidste gang jeg så ham var på Chr.Winthers vej, hans atelier med en kajak placeret oppe på reposen. Derfor billedet af mesteren klædt “grønlandsk” på.

Ulla skriver godt og direkte om Lise Roos mange film om børn og om, hvor svært det var for hendes børn Silke og Eline at have en mor, som ofte blev væk om natten, hvor de to søgte efter hende – ” vi kendte telefonnumrene på alle værtshusene i nabolaget”. Silke og Eline var hovedfigurer i et par af morens film og ingen har vel beskrevet børns liv så godt som Lise Roos. Ulla kalder “Kan man klippe i vand” for et hovedværk, hun har ret og skriver præcist at hvor onkel Jørgen Roos lavede film om de kendte så lavede Lise Roos film om de almindelige mennesker. Hun var som sin far Karl socialt engageret, hun skrev anmeldelser af fjernsynets børneprogrammer i Information, hun lagde ikke fingrene imellem i sin kritik – og hun blev ikke filmkonsulent “med særlig interesse for film for børn” i Statens Filmcentral, på trods af sine mange film for og om børn, det blev Mette Knudsen, som dagen før ansøgelses-deadline trak sig fra sin bestyrelsespost for at få jobbet. Jeg burde kunne huske det, det var i 1985. Men jeg husker og læser med glæde om “Familien Danmark”, den dokumentariske tv-serie, som gav Lise Roos en gevaldig tv-succes – hun nåede to serier til, “Frikvarteret” og “Fik du set det du ville?”, smukke tidsportrætter.

Bogen er skrevet med entusiasme og kærlighed og det er med stor fornøjelse jeg i den sidste måned er vendt tilbage til filmene og deres ophav.

Køb bogen, læs den og du vil få lyst til at se filmene på DFI’s platforme, der er de fleste.

European Film Awards

European Film
Emilia Pérez [+] – Jacques Audiard (France)

European Documentary
No Other Land [+] – Yuval Abraham, Rachel Szor, Basel Adra & Hamdan Ballal (Palestine/Norway)

European Animated Feature Film Flow [+] – Gints Zilbalodis (Latvia/France/Belgium) (PHOTO)

European Short Film – Prix Vimeo
The Man Who Could Not Remain Silent – Nebojša Slijepčević (Croatia/France/Bulgaria/Slovenia)

European Director
Jacques Audiard – Emilia Pérez

European Actress
Karla Sofía Gascón – Emilia Pérez

European Actor
Abou Sangare – Souleymane’s Story [+] (France)

European Screenwriter
Jacques Audiard – Emilia Pérez

European Discovery – Prix FIPRESCI
Armand [+] – Halfdan Ullmann Tøndel (Norway/Netherlands/Germany/Sweden)

European Young Audience Award
The Remarkable Life of Ibelin [+] – Benjamin Ree (Norway)

European Cinematography
Benjamin Kračun – The Substance [+] (UK/USA/France)

European Editing
Juliette Welfling – Emilia Pérez

European Production Design
Jagna Dobesz – The Girl With The Needle [+] (Denmark/Poland/Sweden)

European Costume Design
Tanja Hausner – The Devil’s Bath [+] (Austria/Germany)

European Make-Up & Hair
Evalotte Oosterop – When The Light Breaks [+] (Iceland/Netherlands/Croatia/France)

European Original Score
Frederikke Hoffmeier – The Girl With The Needle

European Sound
Marc-Olivier Brullé, Pierre Bariaud, Charlotte Butrak, Samuel Aïchoun & Rodrigo Diaz – Souleymane’s Story [+] (France)

European Visual Effects
Bryan Jones, Pierre Procoudine-Gorsky, Chervin Shafaghi & Guillaume Le Gouez – The Substance

Movies on War Festival

I have copy-pasted from Modern Times Review this intro to a festival in my neighboring country Norway – a festival that starts today and lasts until November 17 with an impressive collection of films (alas!) that deals with conflicts and wars in the world we live in:

“Movies on War is a film festival devoted to films about war and conflict, peace and reconciliation. The films we screen in our programs cover the full range of armed conflicts, regardless of geography, and provide insights into social movements, cultural events, popular uprisings, and political change, both in the past and in the present. Since the very beginning, filmmakers have used the language of the cinema for reflection on world wars and conflicts. They have worked for a better understanding of the human, political, military and social driving forces behind these conflicts, and through this contributed to the work for peace.”

The intro praises the filmmakers as you can read, and I have no reservations, when I see that films like “Hollywoodgate” by Ibrahim Nash’at is there (theme: Afghanistan) as well as the film that is all over and is a candidate to win the EFA award (theme: Israel/Palestina) “No Other land” and my favourite as film of the year Olha Zhurba’s “Songs of Slow Burning Earth” (theme: Ukraine) and Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat by Johan Grimonprez (Congo/Patrice Lumumba) – are in the program. Not to forget the film by Askold Kurov & Anonymous 1 “Of Caravan and Dogs” that I saw in Budapest at the Verzio Festival, a strong documentation of the implementation of the “foreign agent” law in Russia that led to the closure of important opposition media in the country, having the chief editor Muratov of Novaya Gazeta leave the country among many others.

The festival takes place in Elverum 1,5 hour by car North of Oslo.

Verzio Film Festival 2024

Impressions from five days in Budapest for the Verzio FF. I already – the post before this – wrote about a day with Diana Groó and Judit Hoffmann, unforgettable, so much looking forward to the film “Dear Helena” with Diana as director and Judit Hoffmann, her grandmother as the protagonist, 97 years old now, holocaust survivor.

I was there invited by festival director Enikö Gyuresko to sit in the Hungarian jury with Polish Adam (Kruk) and Slovak Eva (Krizkova). Adam and Eva! We saw 6 films, all good ones, comments to Life and Social Conditions. For the screenings there were full houses and the organizers had made time for Q&A’s, obvious as the films called for discussions. All fine and professional.

We gave the first prize to “Your Life Without Me” by Anna Rubi, which was already awarded at the Sarajevo FF and was shown in September at the Magnificent7 Festival in Belgrade. The festival directors Svetlana and Zoran Popovic wrote about the film (https://filmkommentaren.dk/anna-rubi-your-life-without-me/). Our short winner motivation at the Verzio FF went like this:

“For a film that is simultaneously engaged in social issues and is engaging the viewer’s attention – one that avoids oversimplifying family relationships in order to show, that unbreakable determination of mothers can even win against the impotency of the state, the winner is Your Life Without Me.

Our short motivation for the special mention ‘to “Kix” by Bálint Révész & Dávid Mikulán went like this:

An impressive interpretation of how social conditions over years can influence the lives of kids. For its long-lasting, honest, playful and immediate dialogue with its protagonists, in which the medium of film plays a unique and irreplaceable role,  a Special Mention goes to KIX.

Some words on other awards, happy that Ukrainian Olha Zhurba was given main award for her extraordinary Songs of Slow Burning Earth that I reviewed on this site (https://filmkommentaren.dk/olha-zhurba-songs-of-slow-burning-earth/), the best documentary of 2024?, with a special mention for Balomania by Danish Sissel Morell Dargis, that film was also in Belgrade and the festival directors Svetlana and Zoran Popovic wrote about it (https://filmkommentaren.dk/sissel-morell-dargis-balomania-2/).

The Verzio website can give you the full list of winners.

It was biting cold in Budapest the last days I was there but the festival atmosphere was warm, supporting the films and their makers. There is a strong Hungarian filmmakers organization Madoke that has a website – https://madoke.hu/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/madoke_katalogus_2024_online.pdf – and the understated characterization of the state of the art goes like this:
“The art of documentary is needed more than ever in Hungary, where independent filmmakers are faced with a lack of proper funding.” It was obvious that the 6 films we watched in the jury were all funded – all of them or partly – by NGO’s and humanitarian organizations.