DOX 103

I read the last article this morning in a plane on my way to Prague. I had browsed through the sport pages of a stupid Danish tabloid newspaper and felt good in my 24C seat on Czech Airlines with DOX in my hands. You concentrate on the reading and if any turbulence occurs you read the same sentences more than once holding quality in your hands! DOX is for these moments up in the air, or in the summer garden, in a train or in the sofa at home. I have never read the entire magazine right away, the same with this issue, you read it piece by piece, pick it up once in a while, also this number 103, where black is the cover and white are the letters that say ”last issue in print”.

Filmkommentaren.dk readers might have followed the posts of protest and the many why’s to Paul Pauwels (PP), who on the website of EDN has characterised this debate as a facebook campaign! In this last issue, PP writes, under the headline ”On to Greener Pastures”, that DOX does not fit into the EDN policy in a new challenging media situation.

Anyway, the other day I heard that an Executive Committee member of the EDN had suggested to publish/print one fat DOX per year to come out in connection with the idfa festival. That is

very much in line with the suggestion that I have made, inspired by what the Danish Film Institute does – they have an online service for smaller articles and longer, deeper background stuff in printed versions to come out at important festivals. Does not have to be that expensive – layout, printing, translation, symbolic fees… I am sure there could be volunteers for the editing. I do hope that PP, the staff and the Executive Committee will discuss this seriously…

Because we need articles like the ones in the last issue. Examples: Vibeke Bryld’s clever reporting from the Flaherty seminar, Sevara Pan’s intro to the succesful DocIncubator, Emma Davie on CAMP, a new way of storytelling with mention of an interesting Palestinian film, Suvi Helminen’s wonderful historical article about Glorianna Davenport and much more – all well written and edited, new to me and pointing in the direction of finding alternative ways for storytelling within our lovely documentary genre. They do not fit into an online concept. And the layout is fine, actually excellent, as is the language editing.

Yesterday I had dinner with Ole John, Danish film director and producer and writer, and one of the founders of EDN. When asked he said: I love DOX, I read all of it. Me too!

Photo: Frances Flaherty, accompanying the article by Vibeke Bryld.

CPH:DOX 2014 /Østergaard & Rácz

1989 by Anders Østergaard & Erzsébet Rácz 

Of course the film had to start with 1956 and it does so with very fine and moving archive footage of people searching for the remains of Imre Nagy, whose government was not accepted when the Russians invaded the country. Nagy was executed in 1958. That historical reference is important to include as the re-burial of Nagy, the rehabilitation of him, happened in the years around 1989, and with the support of Miklós Neméth, who served as prime minister 1988-1990 and is the main character of ”1989”, an intelligent, informative, entertaining and provoking documentary.

Yes, it deserves all these superlatives for its fresh look at what happened 25 years ago, when the wall went down as did the Soviet Union. Neméth, economist, coming into power, looked at a country close to bankruptcy and found the border control mechanisms extremely expensive – so he decided to have the borders opened, to tear down the iron curtain. He did so and had strong opposition from the hard-liners in his communist party, his rooms were bugged, and his manouvres were looked upon with more than skepticism from the GDR leader Erich Honecker, as the result was that thousands of Eastern Germans flew to the West through Hungary, before the wall went down in their own country.

They are all there in the film – Gorbachev, Helmuth Kohl, Honecker – and

they talk, well maybe not always with their own voices, but with their own words, researched, found and checked in the archives by the filmmakers. Who have put together archive images of these big-name players, or have reconstructed archive images of them – the meetings behind closed doors are brought into daylight. It is wonderful to watch a storytelling that breaks some rules of the mainstream television historical documentary. Call it hybrid or not, what the filmmakers seek is authenticity.

Parallel to the greater political story runs a personal – a Hungarian is being shot at the border at a time, when it was closed after being open. His widow talks about how it was to enter a freedom that her husband did not get to enjoy. This element in the film stands a bit weaker than the playful political interpretation and the moving images that relates to Hungary 1956. Neméth stands out as a brilliant and sympathetic man, who joined the communist party and went to its top, a decision he took even if his father told him ”remember where you come from” and did not talk to him for six months!

Clever, very clever film that has its premiere at cph:dox festival on November 5 and is being simultaneously screened in many European cities – in the press material is mentioned Oslo, Prague, Brussels, Dublin, Kiev, Helsinki, St. Petersburg, Vladivostok,Porto, Belgrade… check your local media for where the screenings take place.

Denmark, 2014, 90 mins.

http://cphdox.dk

CPH:DOX 2014 /Østergaard og Rácz

1989 af Anders Østergaard og Erzsébet Rácz 

Så er der guf for historikerne – igen. Denne gang ikke i forbindelse med et stykke 1864, Danmarkshistorie, vi er tættere på, det drejer sig om 1989, for 25 år siden i tiden omkring Europas totale forandring – murens fald, Sovjetunionens opløsning.

Og det drejer sig om en intelligent udarbejdet, filmisk provokerende, underholdende og oplysende film af danskeren Østergaard og ungareren Rácz. De præsenterer en nyfortolkning af begivenhederne, der førte til murens fald og et nyt Europa. I centrum er datidens ungarske premierminister Miklós Neméth, som fortæller, hvorfor han besluttede sig for at rive ”jerntæppet” ned. Det var ganske enkelt for dyrt at opretholde grænsekontrollen! Konsekvensen blev at østtyskerne i tusindvis flygtede til vesten via Ungarn.

Neméth blev ikke populær. Dels kom han i konflikt med landets betonkommunister, dels så DDR’s Erich Honecker med forfærdelse på, hvad der skete i Ungarn. Og Gorbatjov… Neméth besøgte ham i marts 1989. Og Kohl, Gorbatjov ringede til ham.

Det er alt sammen med i filmen, som genskaber historien (med rørende tilbageblik på Ungarn 1956) ved hjælp af originalt og rekonstrueret visuelt arkivmateriale, og dialoger som er fundet frem fra utallige kilder. Det er undertiden morsomt og undertiden dramatisk: Filmholdet har interviewet enken til en mand, der ikke nåede at opleve friheden, han blev skudt ved grænsen på et tidspunkt, hvor den stadig var lukket.

Hold da op for en rig og spændende film, glæder mig til et gensyn!

Filmen har premiere 5. november, ved CPH:DOXs åbningsgalla i DR Koncerthuset, hvor filmen samtidig får visninger i udvalgte biografer landet over og i mere end 15 forskellige biografer i Europa. Dermed bliver åbningsfilmen på CPH:DOX, for første gang i festivalens

historie, ikke blot en københavnsk begivenhed – men noget hele Danmark og resten afEuropa kan deltage i. (Citat fra cph:dox hjemmeside)

Danmark, 2014, 90 mins

 

 

 

http://cphdox.dk/node/8162

Maloof and Siskel: Finding Vivian Maier

”Finding Vivian Maier” is ”documentary of the Month” at the Cinematheque in Copenhagen with screenings from the 23rd of October, so Copenhageners – this is a must-see, it is lovely portrait of a mysterious woman, who her whole life was working as a nanny or governess, serving others at the same time as she, always with a camera around her neck, was taking photographs that she never showed to others. A person who ”never fit in”, an eccentric. She lived from 1926-2009. Close to her death, a quote from the website of the film…

”… Maier’s massive body of work … came to light when in 2007 her work was discovered at a local thrift auction house on Chicago’s Northwest Side. From there, it would eventually impact the world over and change the life of the man, who championed her work and brought it to the public eye, John Maloof.

Currently, Vivian Maier’s body of work is being archived and cataloged for the enjoyment of others and for future generations. John Maloof is at the core of this project after reconstructing most of the archive, having been previously dispersed to the various buyers attending that auction. Now, with roughly 90% of her archive reconstructed, Vivian’s work is part of a renaissance in interest in the art of Street Photography.”

Of course one might say that it is the work of an artist that is interesting and not her/his life. In this case, however, the putting her life together piece by piece through the photos and interviews with those, who employed her and

the kids, she took care of – many of them are in the photos – brings forward a facetted portrait of Vivian Maier, who did not want to tell, where she came from and in many cases gave people, who asked, a fake name like V. Smith. So the enigma, the mystery around her private life still stands as does the question whether she would have wanted the photos to be published. The answer to this… well, if she kept all the negatives in boxes, if she kept all the receipts from photoshops, if she kept everything in order, one could make the conclusion that she would not mind that someone found them and made them public?

The photos have a great documentary quality. She has been able to catch the moments, to get close to people, to convey humour and tragedy, ”the bizarreness and incongruity of Life” as one of the interviewed employers says. She travelled the world in 1959 documenting what she saw, a street photographer, well this is where she was with the children she was looking after, sometimes she forgot them, one of the now grown-up males says. A closed person, hiding behind the Rolleiflex, a true documentarian.

If you are not in Copenhagen, you can get to the film through the film-link below and/or go to the photos via the second link.

USA, 2013, 83 mins.

Photograph: © Vivian Maier/Maloof Collection © Vivian Maier/Maloof Collection (taken from Guardian).

http://www.findingvivianmaier.com/

http://www.vivianmaier.com/

Louise Detlefsen og Louise U. Kjeldsen: Forsøget

Filmen rummer et vigtigt sted 30 minutter inde den mest gribende scene, jeg mindes at have set i en tv-dokumentar. Den er en ægte og helt igennem autentisk filmscene. Den varer vel næsten fem minutter, og er netop så lang, den er, fordi den skildrer en vanskelig telefonsamtale, og en sådan tøver, som vi ved, med at slutte, for ingen ved, hvordan man gør. Scenen fortsætter, så den kan vise mig hvor smukt, det kan ske. Fortsætter til sin egen afslutning. Samtalen er den alvorligste en læge og en patient kan have. Når begge, patienten og lægen, er tømte for ord, naturligt færdige, trætte, vokser pauserne og bliver ligesom af sig selv til en slutning. Det er meget smukt, for sådan ved jeg naturligvis, det er i den virkelige virkelighed.

Patienten deltager i forsøget på Herlev Sygehus med t-celle behandling. Det var først gået så godt, men nu efter den seneste scanning opfylder hun ikke kriterierne for at fortsætte. Hun er opgivet, det er hvad lægen, uden direkte at sige det sådan, må meddele i denne telefonsamtale. Patienten argumenterer med lægen, hun gør det afdæmpet klogt. Både på et intellektuelt niveau og på et følelsesmæssigt niveau. Hele samtalen hører jeg på filmens lydside. Jeg er hos lægen og kigger hende over skulderen, mens hun sidder ved sit skrivebord og tager den samtale, som hun på forhånd har aftalt med patienten, som bor i Thy. Det er alt sammen meget, meget opmærksomt registreret af Henrik Bohn Ipsens kamera.  Det er filmens centrum og handlingens overraskende omdrejningspunkt. Sådan har klipperen Steen Johannessen klogt ordnet det.

Louise Detlefsen har lavet en interessant produktionsbeskrivelse, hvor hun skriver om filmens idé: ”Først mødte vi den erfarne kræftlæge Benny Vittrup Jensen, der som overlæge ved Enhed for Eksperimentel Behandling på Herlev Hospital, talte med os om tro, håb og kærlighed i arbejdet med de uhelbredeligt syge patienter. I en periode på nogle måneder fik vi lov at sidde med i hans konsultation på 17. etage, hvor patienter, der ikke har flere behandlingsmuligheder kommer for at medvirke i medicinske forsøg, i håbet om det kan forlænge eller redde deres liv. Efter at have fulgt Benny Vittrup Jensen havnede vi nogle etager længere nede på Herlev Hospital, hvor Center for Cancer Immunterapi holder til. Her oplevede vi, at der foregik noget nær et mirakel…”

“I al stilfærdighed var den ansete professor i klinisk immun terapi Inge Marie Svane sammen med et hold af yngre læger i gang med at afprøve en helt ny form for kræftbehandling. I vores øre lød det for godt til at være sandt: Lægerne opererede en kræftknude ud, tog nogle særlige immunceller ud, dyrkede dem i laboratoriet så de delte sig til milliarder og så fik patienten sine egne immunceller tilbage i kroppen. Her kunne de så i månedsvis bagefter helt af sig selv gnaskede kræftcellerne i sig. Så kræften skrumpede ind eller sågar helt forsvandt. Døende patienter kunne blive helbredt.

Det lød så enkelt, at selv vi forstod det. Og det lød ikke bare forståeligt, men også som første skridt hen imod en kur mod kræft. At Herlev Hospital til og med var det første sted i Europa, hvor denne nye metode blev afprøvet på mennesker, gjorde det endnu mere spændende for os…”

Jeg kan godt lide den film, ja, jeg er meget optaget af den film. Jeg har måske enkelte indvendinger. Vistnok. Men det har mindre betydning. Det vigtige er, at filmen er lavet. Den leverer en ren og ordentlig og afdæmpet beskrivelse af kræftlæge og kræftpatient på fælles hårdt arbejde. (At det stik modsatte billede af patient læge relationen andre steder i andre situationer både kan tegnes og er blevet tegnet, ved mange – bestemt også jeg.) Men her er jeg i den klassiske oplysende dokumentarfilms verden. Disse film skildrer opbyggeligt vore samfunds vitale funktioner. De skal bruges til folkeoplysning, og de var fra deres begyndelse ikke kritiske (blev det efterhånden ind imellem), og i dag er en film som Forsøget i sin art og kvalitet ikke så almindelig. Den er en gammeldags film på den fine måde. En tv-dokumentar med information og oplysning som formål og indhold i en filmisk form, hvor samtale og interview veksler med reportage med ren og behersket journalistisk holdning.

Danmark 2014, 56 min. TV2 på torsdag 23. oktober 20:50

http://www.dfi.dk/faktaomfilm/film/da/85454.aspx?id=85454

LOUISE DETLEFSEN

Fra Barbie til Babe (2003), Min bedste lærer (2006), Klara – livvagtens datter (2008), Jakob – Revisorens søn (2008), Christas mareridt (2010), Mig og mine forældre, Sådan er kvinder, Et forbandet år (2012), Lovebirds (2014) 7,9,13 (2014) Forsøget (2014)

LOUISE UNMARK KJELDSEN

Min bedste lærer (2006), Sådan er kvinder, Et forbandet år (2012), Store piger græder ikke, De sårede, Selvoptaget

 

Cinedoc-Tbilisi Second Edition /2

The festival in Georgian capital Tbilisi ended yesterday and I found this message on the FB page:

The award ceremony is over and we would like to announce the results:

International Competition: The main prize of this section goes to “Judgment in Hungary” (dir. Eszter Hajdu). 
The special mention to “Ne me quitte pas” (dir. Sabine Lubbe Bakker & Niels van Koevorden)

Focus Caucasus:
 The main prize of this section goes to “Blood” (photo) (dir. Alina Rudnitskaya). The special mentions to “Zelim’s Confession” (dir. Natalya Mikhaylova) and 
”Biblioteka” (dir. Ana Tsimintia)

Cinedoc Young:
 Our special jury – the youth – gave the main award of this section to “The Barrel” (dir. Anabel Rodriguez Rios)

Our opening film “Do you believe in love?” (dir. Dan Wasserman) received the Public Prize.

http://www.cinedoc-tbilisi.com/

Mark Levinson: Particle Fever

På tirsdag den 21. oktober 20:45 sender DR2 Dokumania filmen “Particle Fever”, en videnskabsformidlende dokumentar om verdens største og dyreste forsøg inden for teoretisk og eksperimenterende fysik, bygningen og ibrugtagningen af partikelacceleratoren under CERN, det europæiske forskningscenter for partikelfysik. Eksperimentet skal, hedder det i Dokumanias nyhedsbrev simpelthen ”hjælpe os med at forstå livets oprindelse ved en genskabelse af The Big Bang. 10.000 forskere fra mere end 100 lande samarbejder om verdenshistoriens vildeste videnskabelige eksperiment, og seerne er inviteret til første parket.”

Filmen har valgt over en årrække at følge nogle forskere i gang med dette. Hun her på fotoet hedder Monica Dunford og er fysiker fra Kirchhoff- instituttet på universitetet i Heidelberg. Hun forklarer det sådan til Huffingtonpost.com: “I am an experimental physicist, and with 3,000 of my fellow colleagues, I helped build the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, which is the size of a five-story building, encompasses 100 million electronic channels and has more than 1,800 miles of cable. To build this detector, 38 countries had to agree to the micrometer.

My daily work life has involved a mixture of thinking about the big questions (like how can we use this detector to search for dark matter particles), international relations (like managing a group of French, Russians, Georgians, Brazilians, Swedes, Italians and Americans) and large-scale project management (for example, we have 5,000 feet of cable that has to be run by next Tuesday). Zero math…” Hun kan ikke lide matematik og græske bogstaver skrevet med kridt på tavlen på væggen, men hun er ret glad for laboratoriearbejde, for at eksperimentere i praksis. Faget er delt i teoretisk og eksperimentel fysik, og der er brug for begge slags.

“Particle Fever” følger altså seks forskere (også sådan nogle som tænker med kridt i hånden) under opbygningen af den 27 kilometer lange cirkulære tunnel under CERN. Målet med den kæmpemæssige partikelaccelerator er at forsøge at genskabe de forhold, der eksisterede øjeblikket efter The Big Bang og finde Higgs partikel, der potentielt kan forklare oprindelsen til alt stof. Filmen, hedder det videre i Dokumanias anbefaling, ”…prikker til menneskets grundlæggende nysgerrighed om livets oprindelse, og stiller blandt andet spørgsmålet om hvorvidt vi har nået vores grænse for at forstå hvorfor vi eksisterer?”

Det er så rørende, når disse på deres vis bestemt imponerende videnskabsformidlende filmværker, en gruppe, som “Particle Fever så fornemt tilhører”, vil medtage den kunstneriske indsigt. Det lykkes som regel ikke for dem at integrere noget kunstnerisk udsagn i det journalistiske værk, så det ændres fra at være en film-forelæsning til at blive et film-essay. Også i denne film bliver det ved et velment citat fra Beethovens niende symfoni. Naturligvis netop ikke bassens solo med Schillerlinjen om glæden, men det af alle kendte sted, hvor koret kommer for fuld kraft, og naturligvis netop ved filmens vedtagne højdepunkt, hvor eksperimentet lykkes og auditorium og kontrolrum jubler. Og det bliver forsøgt med et kort citat fra Dantes guddommelige komedie i den italienske forsøgsleders festtale. Forsøget at kunstgøre filmen inkluderer uden videre van Goghs stjernehimmel og er tydeligst skuffende i det ret lange citat fra Herzogs “Caves of Forgotten Dreams”, hvor kun billedsiden bruges, netop ikke Herzogs umistelige essay i fortællestemmen.

Todd McCarthy på Hollywoodreporter.com ser venligere og med større forståelse på det her: ”On July 4, 2012, the results are finally obtained, to the joy of those assembled at CERN and in other smaller gatherings around the world. Among the crowd packed into the auditorium is aged British physicist Peter Higgs, for whom the elusive particle was named and who is seen removing his glasses and dabbing his eyes. It’s a well-earned moving climax to the film, as it’s evident that a major frontier has been conquered and new horizons opened up. A clip from Werner Herzog’s cave art documentary Cave of Forgotten Dreams is used to again invoke the link between art and science in the search for coherence and meaning. For the more art-minded, seeing such an articulate and clear-headed elucidation by physicists of what they do results in an invigorating new insight into a vital realm of exploratory endeavor.”

Jeg smiler og tænker: hvor sødt – og foretrækker som art-minded i stedet at lytte til videnskaben, til fysikeren, den almindelige kvinde med almindelig begejstring, som i den sportsverden, hvor hun træner på mountainbike til og fra arbejde på CERN, i løb på landevejen i weekenden og roende støt og sikkert i fireren på søen sammen med venner. Så for mig er den lille stump af filmen, den korte scene med Peter Higgs, som kommer til stede, netop den erfarne filmklipper Walter Murchs udnyttelse af den mindste materialestump, som blot rummer et strejf af den autenticitet, som er afgørende for værkets helhed som noget, jeg tror på og bevæges af.

Peter Higgs

Her har jeg hele spændet af tid og følelse og arbejdsindsats: fra den gamle fysiske teoretiker, som påviste denne universelle byggesten til den unge eksperimenterende fysiker, som i den vældige organisation er med til at påvise higgspartiklens materielle eksistens. Hun kan forklare, så jeg forstår og især begejstres, så jeg følger med, emotionelt accepterende. Uden modstand.

USA 2013, 99 min.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/monica-dunford/myth-breaking-in-physics_b_5214404.html  (interviewet med Monica Dunford)

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/particle-fever-film-review-646439  (anmeldelsen på Hollywoodreporter.com)

http://hub.jhu.edu/2014/03/21/particle-fever-director-levinson  (interview med Mark Levinson om produktionshistorien)

Riga – and Gustavs Klucis

The premiere was in 2008, in Riga, the film about Klucis, ”The Deconstruction of an Artist”. Directed by Peteris Krilovs. And here I stand in front of the Arsenals Exhibition Hall of the Latvian National Museum of Art, where there is an exhibition of the artist (runs until October 26), a very good one and for one who knows his work from the film it is a pleasure to walk around and see all the posters and collages from the film, here hanging with no movements, in the film set in motion in an intelligent presentation and with a superb flown and rythm in the montage.

This is a quote from one of many texts, that has appeared on filmkommentaren.dk about the film:

”Latvian director Peteris Krilovs’ documentary about legendary artist Gustav Klucis took several prizes at the National award ceremony in Riga a week ago: best director, best editor (Danish Julie Vinten), best script (Pauls Bankovskis) and best sound mix (Andris Barons). A big triumph for the company Vides Film Studio and its energetic leader Uldis Cekulis.

So well deserved. The same team has just completed a film from Krilovs. ”Obliging Collaborators”. Here is a promotion text from the internet:

With this full-length documentary, director Pēteris Krilovs delves into an

intricate and intriguing period in modern Latvian history, his father’s death at the hands of the KGB intertwined with the underhanded game played by Soviet Latvian KGB agents against Swedish-English-American intelligence services. In the 1960s, a book was released and a feature film made, later, a pseudo-documentary TV series produced propagandising how Soviet agents fooled their Western counterparts. This “game” and its players and pawns are the focus of Krilovs’ documentary “Uz spēles Latvija”. The compelling personal history, the protagonists, the editing of archival materials, distinct and at times ironic, as well as the powerful visuals will help the viewer to navigate these little-known historical events.

I have seen the film in a Latvian version and yesterday in an English. Unfortunately the screening room for the latter had a bad sound transmission so I did not get the personal commentary from Krilovs. Will get back later with a review.

Riga – and Herz Frank

I am in Riga – again – to take part in a “Baltic Sea Region Documentary Film Research Seminar” arranged by LAC Riga Film Museum. It starts today and my job is to give a brief introduction to the Danish documentary fllm history. More about that in the coming days.

Last night I met with producer Guntis Trekteris to catch up on the theme: When is the premiere of ”Beyond The Fear”, the last film of Herz Frank, made in collaboration with Maria Kravchenko, who finished the work after the death of Frank.

Trekteris told me that idfa had rejected the film so the premiere will be in Riga as the opening film of the new Riga International Film Festival on the 2nd of December. The festival runs until the 12th of December and includes the European Film Academy Awards Ceremony. Also the film will be the opening film of the ArtDocFest in Moscow (December 9), run by renowned director Vitaly Mansky. It was Mansky, who said the following about Herz Frank: “Years will go by, and only 2-3 documentary film-makers will be remembered from each century.” But even today it is clear – Herz Frank is on that list for the 20th century!”

… and the photo is me in front of the beautiful plaque of Herz Frank in Lacplesa Street 29, Riga. Photo taken by Lelda Ozola early September when we still had “indian summer”!

EDN Interview with Claas Danielsen

Cecilie Bolvinkel from EDN is responsible for extensive ”Member of the Month” – interviews, that can be found on the website of the association. A fine one came out two days ago with Claas Danielsen because ” DOK Leipzig 2014 will be Claas’ last edition as Festival Director – EDN has talked to Claas about the festival’s past and present and his own future.” I have taken a text quote, but please read the whole interview, link below:

“The funding is and has been a huge challenge. It is as complicated as putting an international co-production together and the requirements literally get more bureaucratic every year. It’s unbelievable how many small sources of income we have to generate to make the festival happen.

Secondly, it was not easy to win the trust of many people closely connected to the festival who were suspicious of me as a “Wessi”, a person from western Germany. Having worked for an organisation branded by Discovery Channel before, some thought that I wanted to change their “Dok Film Week” into a TV festival. To modernise a festival with such a long tradition was a huge task for me.

Another challenge for every festival organiser is the competition between festivals for films and professionals attending. With IDFA only three weeks away, this of course is a problem for us like it is for the other autumn festivals.

My background as a filmmaker helped me to make a clear decision: I will not play the premiere game and only insist on a national premiere for films in competition. Although many world or international premieres end up in our four documentary competitions the decisive criterion for us is the artistic quality of each individual film. After ten years in this job, I still deeply believe that festivals should first and foremost serve the films – and not the vanity of festivals. To stop a documentary that had its national premiere in spring from traveling to festivals in other countries till the end of the year only to get the international premiere harms the film as it will be too old for the other events next year.

The most rewarding experience definitely is to see the general audience growing from year to year. People want to watch documentaries and better understand what’s happening in the world! To see young people storm the festival cinemas is extremely uplifting – especially as it proves decision makers in public TV wrong who claim that they can’t win an audience with this genre. The truth is that this audience has turned its back towards television, especially young people.

(photo credit Christian Hueller)

http://www.edn.dk/news/news-story/article/edn-member-of-the-month-claas-danielsen/?tx_ttnews[backPid]=220&cHash=c349da043e8362c03071abbfe98c9832