O. Balahura: Life Span of the Object in Frame /2

Ukranianweek.com writes to a still from the film: ” ’Life Span of the Object in Frame’ began with a photograph taken by Oleksandr Chekmeniov seven or eight years ago at Privoz, a huge market in Odesa. The girl on the right of the picture told the director that the main character of the photograph – the woman sleeping under the counter – used to be a homeless red-haired beauty. She froze to death on the street after an illegal operation to remove her organs…”

Link to ukrainianweek.com/Culture  

O. Balahura: Life Span of the Object in Frame

A good advice – go to the trailer of this film which is to be found on the website of the upcoming festival in Kiev, Ukraine DocuDays UA. Click below.

It will give you a fine introduction to a documentary that is not easy accessible but attracts you with its many layers and angles, its beautiful verbal narration, its sincerety, its editing originality – you don’t see many (hybrid) essay films like that any longer. And it will hopefully give you appetite to watch the whole work, which you can do at the festival, if you happen to be there from friday onwards.

… a film about the film not yet shot… is the undertitle of the film and you see a film crew meeting and discussing, you see the actors, including the director, rehearse, saying lines, building up a labyrinthic studio with photos from the last 20-30 years – if I get it right. Photos that are extremely beautiful in their depiction of Life situations. The main photo that the film comes back to again and again is an almost surrealistic one with a woman sleeping in a marketplace, having found shelter on the ground while life goes on around her. Who was she? What has happened to her?

And what happened to us, the artists, the film narrative seems to ask. Through images from Genoa, from a room with a sea view, it is indicated that the man talking (the director?) had a mistress, forgot to phone home to his mother, these scenes are beautifully shot like a painting by Matisse from Nice. The photos and the colour manipulation of some of them bring forward a kind of nature morte feeling, there are discussions about Dante, verbal tributes to Jean-Luc Godard, and (the title) a constant going-back-sequences to Edward Muybridge, the movement of the dog running, the man coming up from his chair, a woman getting in or out of her bed… There are many side stories and there are for sure references that I do not understand, so let me give you the catalogue text from the festival:

”The time of exposure is the life span of an object in frame. In this regard, no photo is just a two-dimensional graphic composition – it always has the third, temporal dimension, the temporal depth. A photo is a time carrier, a time vessel. That means – a vessel of memory… But whose memory?.. Of the Face or the Thing or the Landscape which are still on the photo?.. Of the photographer?.. Having chosen photos as the material of the film and memory as the theme, we inevitably find ourselves in a labyrinth of our own and others’ memories, of our own and others’ time. And in seeking for the escape, we become a part of this labyrinth and the material of our own film.”

Had no real stills from the film, here is a photo of the director, who is in the film.

Ukraine, 2012, 116 mins.

http://www.docudays.org.ua/eng/2013/movies/specialni-podii/chas-zhittya-obyekta-v-kadri/

http://www.docudays.org.ua/eng/2013/jury/16/

Being a Tutor…

And there you are – hello, nice to meet you and you are the one with which project? A situation many documentary tutor colleagues will recognise from the extraordinary many documentary workshops in and outside Europe, set up for local and EU money through the MEDIA Programme or other international organisations. I have done this job for a couple of decades, it is not easy and I am still not sure that I am doing it in the right way. I know when I have given some help, and I know when I did not help. More or less at least.

And what is this job? Well you read project proposals, watch teasers (also called tasters, a better word maybe?) and other material and you talk. Yes, you talk a lot. You ask questions, the filmmakers ask questions. You listen, they listen. You try to be honest in your evaluation, you don’t want to discourage, on the other hand you don’t want to encourage and give false hopes.

It is mostly easy when you meet filmmakers you know and with whom you have had the dialogue many times before. They know what you are good at, and you know what they are good at. You have seen their previous work, you have maybe written about it on your blog – you don’t need a lot of introduction, you can go directly to the film project… and there are definitely people who don’t want to talk to you

because the chemistry is not there, they don’t find you professional, you don’t like their films or their approach to filmmaking.

But if you have not met the filmmakers in beforehand… Iate February I was at a well organised 3 day documentary workshop in Beirut with 7 interesting projects from different Arabic countries at different levels of development. Some were ready for production, some close to starting the editing, some had developed the project and had eventually some material to show and/or a teaser. And some were at the idea stage.

So how to tutor, how to give feedback that inspires and is constructive, how to push a process in the right direction. When you don’t know the person(s) who sit in front of you. Which was the case for the major part of the filmmakers attending.

Yes, what is the right direction? The one that leads the filmmaker to make what he/she is aiming for? Or the one that you could imagine would be good market-wise, that opens up for a wider audience?

We were four tutors with different backgrounds, which of course gave different pieces of advice for the filmmakers to digest and reflect upon. Did they get confused – of course they did, hopefully in a creative way!

In this case, in Beirut, I also met some stories with a historical and cultural background that was very far from my hemisphere. You can google a lot in beforehand to understand more but when you sit there with the filmmaker there is always something that you have not understood. And politics and culture and history is not that easy in the Middle East!

We had 90 minutes slots to be with the filmmakers in Beirut. Good time to talk about the project AND about many other things that have to do with your life. It is my simple philosophy that you have to know the person just a little bit better than what the cv in the catalogue gives you, you have to create an atmosphere where you can talk freely and openly. They expect that you are professional, know how to analyse a project, know how to get to the core of a project – and the tutor expects an equal professionalism, be it from a filmmaker who has just graduated from film school, or a journalist who was to make documentaries, or an autodidact.

… you leave a workshop like this and many others with many doubts. Did you fall into the trap making suggestions for the film project that were more in the direction that you could see the film and not in the way of the director? Were you making your film? Were you listening to what was being said from the filmmaker? Were you lecturing rather than having a dialogue? Did you encourage rather than discourage? Were you honest or did you hide critical remarks behind politeness?

Is there a recipe for being a tutor? Is there a list of points to remember? Probably, I know that there are workshops for tutors to be better. I have never attended, probably a mistake, but basically I think the most important qualification is the ability to change the way of talking and proceding according to the person(s) you sit with.

Did I forget to say that you of course need to be prepared (read the proposal, analysed it, watched material, eventually watched previous work, checked the history/culture behind the proposal) for the dialogue. And please be humble, you are not the filmmaker!

The photo presents the tutor at work next to talented Egyptian director Nadine Salib, one of seven participants at the AFAC workshop in Beirut, see previous text “Afac and Documentaries”.

 

Karla’s Arrival – for free

Got a mail from Koen Suidgeest, whose touching film “Karla’s Arrival” has gone all over the world due to the director’s constant commitment and energy. Here it is, and here is the generous invitation to watch the film for free, this week:

Wondering whether you could help out. Today – March 15th – is the 4th birthday of Karla, the baby in my documentary Karla’s Arrival. To celebrate, we’re offering the film for free for a week through the below link. I am writing to some of my friends in the doc world to see if they wouldn’t mind posting this on their own timeline.

Karla’s Arrival is about a Nicaraguan teenage girl who lives on the street, is pregnant and plans to raise the baby under a tree in a park. The story starts shortly before birth and follows mother and child for 14 months.

This ITVS supported doc has been seen by some 4 million people, played at 35 festivals, was broadcast in 14 countries and won four international awards.

http://www.karlasarrival.com/screening-room.html

AFAC and Documentaries

They are doing important work for the documentary at AFAC (Arab Fund for Arts and Culture). I have been privileged to be tutoring at two of their workshops, the last one in Beirut late February. Rima Mismar is the woman in charge (photo, two from right), she wrote the following text taken from the website of AFAC. Via the link you will get precise information about the workshop and the upcoming films:

For each cycle of the Arab Documentary Film Program (ADFP), AFAC holds a workshop that aims at providing its documentary projects with professional support in areas where it is needed. In addition to providing financial support, AFAC works closely with individual grantees and involves a number of seasoned film professionals to act as advisors, particularly for less experienced filmmakers, the majority for this edition of the ADFP.

Between February 22 and 24, a development workshop for the 2012 ADFP projects took place in Beirut, with the support of a team of advisors, coming from different cinematic and geographical backgrounds. Seven documentary projects took part in Beirut’s workshop, most still in development phase, one that has finished shooting while two

others still in production for various reasons: Dahna Abourahme’s A folktale of Palestine (Lebanon), Selim Mrad’s Counterbalance (Lebanon), Rachid Biyi’s Bread and Angels (Morocco), Nadine Salib’s Mother of the Unborn (Egypt), Mariam Mekiwi’s Hinter Tausend Staeben Keine Welt (Egypt), Ramez Mikhael’s The Craft (Egypt), and ElKheyyer Zidane’s Deadly Business (Algeria).

A top-notch team of advisors was assembled to give the filmmakers in-depth feedback in addition to an insight into the market, additional sources for funding, and possible solutions to the restrictions they are facing. The advisors committee comprised Danish documentary consultant and critic Tue Steen Müller, American producer Joslyn Barnes, Syrian producer and festival director Orwa Nyrabia, and Lebanese filmmaker and Commissioning Editor Mohamad Soueid.

http://www.arabculturefund.org/bulletin/article.php?genre=1&id=247#.UUXwAY6rN2R

EDN & DocAlliance join Forces

Here is an offer you can’t refuse, taken from the EDN website: EDN is happy to announce that all members, who are part of the organization on April 12, will get free access to over 700 documentaries at Doc Alliance Films.

EDN and Doc Alliance Films will offer all members of EDN free access to stream the over 700 documentaries available at the DAFilms.com web site. The offer will be available for current EDN members with a valid membership on April 12 and those joining the organization before this date. The over 700 documentary films at Doc Alliance Films will be available for streaming for three months. The free streaming period will start on April 16 and run until July 16 2013.

DAFilms.com is an online documentary distribution site offering access to a selection of over 700 documentary films from around the world, with an emphasis on European cinema. In addition to offering notable recent films, the website also functions as a film archive of important documentaries. This includes works by masters such as Ulrich Seidl, Jørgen Leth and Peter Mettler. Every month, DAFilms.com expands its catalogue with the addition of up to 20 new titles. The films are selected on the basis of strict dramaturgic criteria, with an emphasis on their social and aesthetic value and signature style. Photo from Michael Glawogger’s extraordinary “Working Man’s Death”, one of many classics at DocAlliance.

http://www.edn.dk/

http://dafilms.com/

Dox Box Global Day for Syria

… is a project initiated by the film festival DoxBox in Damascus where the festival for obvious reasons do not take place. Instead Syrain films have been shown all over the world – and there has been a “soirée thématique” on arte last week. The Danish cph:dox offers until midnight Sunday/Monday free streaming of “professional short films from Syrian filmmakers, but focus mainly on films and videos made by the Syrian people themselves. Films that often circulate and are seen outside of the official media circuit. Therefore we have decided to host this year’s event online: Free streaming in support of free speach! “

Hurry up, watch the films – there are a bit more than 3 hours:

http://www.cphdox.dk/d/blog.lasso?s=2012800&show=430&n=430

and go on facebook, write Dox Box Syria Global Day, to see how wide the support is with screenings all over. Bravo!

Photo: Lina al Abed: Damascus, My first Kiss

Boris B. Bertram: The War Campaign

Boris B. Bertrams “The War Campaign” har den danske titel “Krigskampagnen” og den har premiere på DR2 Dokumania på tirsdag 19. marts 20:30. De skriver “Bush, Blair og Fogh” som overtitel. Og det er ikke urimeligt, det var deres krig.

Det er en flot række vidner Bertram har samlet, udsøgt smukt fotograferet og intelligent og indfølt intrtviewet, ser det ud til, ja, der ville være nok tilbage og helheden meget stærk og overbevisende, vil jeg tro, hvis de svageste, Frank Grevil og Per Stig Møller ikke havde forstyrret det samlede billede. Nu må jeg med det samme notere, at jeg foreløbig har set filmen i en arbejdskopi, meget vil ske / er sket før tv-visningen på tirsdag.

Men hvad er det nu for noget, Bertram har lavet? Dorte R. Stidsing kalder det på DFI’s FILMupdate “en dokumentarisk politisk thriller”, og ja, det er da spændende at få repeteret begivenhderne for årtiet siden, men jeg vidste det jo godt. Nu har Boris Bertram snakket med alle disse kloge velformulerede folk som er med i filmen og flere til og læst alle artiklerne, alle rapporterne og alle bøgerne og så gør han alligevel det, at han i sin kommentar nøjes med et handlingsreferat. Nu må du selv bedømme, mærker jeg, han siger bag det, og den nødvendige analyse og samlende overvejelse lægger han fra sig, essayet overlader han til mig at skrive selv…

Thessaloniki Doc Fest 15

The 15th edition of the Thessaloniki Documentary Film Festival started two days ago and runs until the 24th of March. The programme is as always impressive – as is the communication from the festival that in a classical journaistic form reports on debates, speeches, meetings with the directors present, for us who are not able to attend… The section titles give a clear hint to what the visitors will be able to watch: “Greek Panorama”, “Music and Dance”, “Human Rights”, “Habitat”, “Portraits: Human Journeys”, “Recordings of Memory”, “Stories to Tell”, “Views of the World”. The director and selector for the festival, been there from the very beginning, Dimitri Eipides has put together a tribute to celebrate the 15 years. Here is his introduction and a link to the list of 36 films, in alphabetical order, (PHOTO) “Gaea Girls” by Kim Longinotto:

A retrospective marking the 15 years of the Thessaloniki Documentary Festival can only be in the form of a summary. For how can one fit so many films, so many conferences and masterclasses, so many guests, so many parties – so many memories, in other words – in just a few lines? Each one of the Festival’s editions stands alone, as a living, breathing life collage, rich with emotions, experiences, social and existential questions, empathy and spiritual elation. Our tribute entitled “A Fascinating Journey” does not refer to the Festival’s best editions or best moments. In our hearts, each Festival is the best one. Our aim was rather to seek out and bring to mind of some of the documentaries that were especially discussed and loved by audiences; documentaries that followed developments or revaled hidden aspects of our daily lives; documentaries that caused a reaction; documentaries that moved or inspired us. This is a selection of films which we have been unable to been unable to forget; films which drew the public to the Festival; films which gave shape to the Festival’s character, ethos and role. It would not be an exaggeration to say that these documentaries are responsible for the boom of the documentary genre, its renewal, its release from past constraints and its elevation as the main form of expression of the human experience. One could say, then, that this 36-film tribute is our own summary of the fascinating journey the Thessaloniki Documentary Festival has been taking us on all these years. We hope you enjoy the view!

http://tdf.filmfestival.gr/default.aspx?lang=en-US&page=1110

Ulla Boye, samlede tekster om hendes film

Fulde af trodsalthumør behandler hendes film alvorlige sager og konstruerer verdener, hvor udveje og lyssyn overalt er til stede som konkret iagttaget realitet – og den vamle sentimentalitet og organiserede bedreviden helt ukendte størrelser…

 

 

 

 

 

Ulla Boye er månedens instruktør i FILMKLUB FOF i Randers. Vi skal se ”Kun med hjertet” og før den klip fra andre af hendes film. Og bagefter diskutere det hele.

LEENDE FILM

Lattermilde Ulla Boye laver leende film. Også om tunge emner. Fulde af trodsalthumør behandler hendes film alvorlige sager og konstruerer verdener, hvor udveje og lyssyn overalt er til stede som konkret iagttaget realitet – og den vamle sentimentalitet og organiserede bedreviden helt ukendte størrelser.

“Ludvig og lidenskaben” fra 1999 er om en enlig mand og hans gennemorganiserede dagligdag, “To må man være” fra 2001 var en folkelig succes på tv vistnok uden lige blandt dokumentarfilm. Det er en række ti minutters film med par, som har været gift i mere end et par årtier og stadig er forelskede. Og fulde af mild latter. “Rêverie”, 2002 er korte sansninger i en græsk landsby, et forelsket smil med kant af smerte og “Dage med Kathrine”, 2003 er en hjerteknuser af en biografi over en kvinde, som sandelig ikke har haft det let, ikke har det let, det forstår man i hendes overdådighed af begavet og selvironisk fortællekunst, som Ulla Boye har lokket ud af hende. Ja, så det forstås gennem tårer og – ved latter. (Blogindlæg 09-01-2009) 

TO MÅ MAN VÆRE (2001)

Portrættet er en vanskelig kunst. Den som portrætteres skal sidde længe. For han skal iagttages af maleren, som skal finde alle overensstemmelser og uoverensstemmelser. Alle ligheder med sig selv og alle forskelligheder. Fra sig selv. Så dette menneske foran ham skiller sig ud fra ham og bringes i kontakt med ham. På én gang. 

Dobbeltportrættet er endnu vanskeligere. Her går forbindelseslinjerne, disse elektriske impulser, vi benævner udstråling, nærvær, forståelse ikke alene mellem maler og modeller, men også mellem de to.

Når de to i dobbeltportrættet så kender hinanden gennem mere end tyve år i ægteskab, er med ét – ud over alt det nævnte – alle disse forbindelsestråde mellem dem det mest mærkbare, og det bliver det som skal skildres først og fremmest. Mellem de to i rammen findes det gnistgab af nerveender tæt på hinanden, som Paulus vier det største af alle ord. 

Det er den opgave Ulla Boye og filmholdet stillede sig. De prøvede først én gang. Anbragte kameraet foran to, en kvinde og en mand, som instruktøren havde lært at kende gennem researchens lange samtale. En mand og en kvinde i en båd, hvor de bor. Der i kahytten sidder de og fortæller. Og underet sker: de åbner sig og indvier os i hemmeligheden. Sådan lykkes det at blive sammen og elske hinanden.

Denne muntert og musikalsk klippede bagatel havde premiere på Odense Festival sidste år. Man kunne bestemt lide den. Det var ikke til at tage fejl af, når man sad i salen. Ulla Boye og Lasse Jensen ville så gerne videre med syv mere. Ulla Boye tog rundt i landet og fandt de medvirkende par. De skulle kunne det der, de skulle komme fra forskellige egne, fra forskellige kulturer, fra land som by. Der fandtes flere. Og det forunderlige kunne gentages. Nu foreligger resultatet.

Hvordan gik det til? Jeg tror det er instruktørens særlige evne som søger og lytter, der gjorde det. Der skulle ses og høres efter og vælges midt i nærværet. Men det skulle også bringes sammen i fotografens ramme, som her blev så afgørende, fordi den ikke siden ændredes. Og så måtte fotografen og tonemesteren opmærksomt registrere disse samvær, skabe det forråd af erindring i computerens harddisk Der skulle uafbrudt ses og lyttes og vælges.

Bagefter sad klipperen og instruktøren i klipperummet med dette potentielle erindringsmateriale. Igen skulle der ses og lyttes og vælges: en bevægelse af en hånd, et kast med hovedet, et særligt blik, en bestemt formulering udgjorde erindringen om samværene. Og valgene blev monteret med små sorte mellemrum i disse billedrækker vi kalder film. Her blev dobbeltportrætterne til. I atter et nærvær. Tro mod de første.

Når vi erindrer et andet menneske, husker to sammen, to elskende, vi mødte og iagttog, samler vi et billede af øjeblikke. Klip i vores hukommelse så at sige. Theodor Christensen sagde vistnok, at hver gang to scener lagdes sammen i klippebordet, var det som når kirurgen forbandt hundredvis af nervetråde. I klipperummet ovre på Easy Film talte vi meget om den sorte markering af de der klip, om det at montagen derved blev synlig, fordi man ser sytrådene.

I Ulla Boyes, Jørgen Johanssons, Kasper Munks, Gregers Kjars, Mette Esmarks, Marie Louise Bordinggaards, Mette Zeruneiths og Lasse Jensens otte dobbeltportrætter ser vi således nu om et øjeblik, hvordan billedet af selve kærligheden, måske – er syet sammen. Rigtig god fornøjelse. (28. september 2001, tale ved premieren)

RÊVERIE (2002)

Hun lægger sig til at sove, og dagens billedrester i øjnene passerer hjernen. Lige før hun falder i den dybe søvn. Dette fjerlette drømmeri er for det drømmende kamera, som ellers nærmest havde fri. Næsten af sig selv (og selvfølgelig er det ikke sådan) optager det tydelige billeder af stedets farver og rum og ting – af havet, marken, dyrene, menneskene, køkkenet, kirken. Så jeg ved jeg er i en lille græsk landsby ved havet. Det er enkle, selvfølgelige billeder. Det er akademisk fotografi, at scenen er drømmen før søvnen gør dem ikke eksperimenterende eller noget. Det er præcis og opmærksom impressionisme.

På mange måder er disse anderledes optagelser anderledes på den måde, som jeg ser i Søborgs optagelser til ”Under New York” (1996). De to film er i slægt med hinanden. Det er vidt forskellige steder, det er en lille film og en stor film, ok, men fotografernes dristige følsomhed ligner hinanden også deri, at den konkluderer, at tingene hænger sammen, at tiden findes. Og et tiårs karakter skrives i hvert sit kamera.

Fotografen Jørgen Johansson er med ”Rêverie” på en lille koncentreret ferie fra rækken af store spillefilmopgaver. Imidlertid har Johansson for Ulla Boye også fotograferet den gennemførte tv-succes “To må man være” (2001) og den prægnante og lige så ægte folkelige og opmærksomt iagttagne “Kun med hjertet” (2008) (Fra ”Billedets skriven” i Dirk Brüel m. fl., red.: ”Fotografens Øje”, 2009)

DAGE MED KATHRINE (2003)

Den skotske dokumentarist John Grierson har til sit fag en mærkelig bemærkning, som jeg igen og igen vender tilbage til. Det gælder om for dokumentarfilmen at finde sit sted, at gøre dette steds drama til filmens drama og med filmen bygge stammens værdighed op. Sted og drama. Værdighed. Her står vi ved en central bestemmelse for den klassiske dokumentarfilm: det gælder om at bygge op, ikke rive ned. Når dokumentarfilminstruktøren beskrev livet på stillehavsøen, i landsbyen i bjergene, i fiskerbyen ved Atlanterhavet.

Ulla Boye skildrede for nogen tid siden den danske stamme. I en række korte film, hvor ægteparrene, som stammen består af, omgivet af den særlige sproglige fortrolighed, vi kalder lune, fortæller om hinanden og snakker med hinanden. Og Boye demonstrerer i denne filmrække, hvad den griersonske værdighed kan være limet sammen af. Elementerne er indlevelse og humor. DR viser stadigvæk de film. Stammen har brug for den opbygning. Måske især på tv, hvor en anden, mindst lige så vigtig dokumentarisk tradition, den journalistiske, har så travlt med at afdække, travlt med at rive ned. Det er en anden opgave. Lige så vigtig, altså. Sådan holder eksistentielle elementer hinanden i balance i en indsigtens arbejdsdeling.

I dag skal vi se en film om menneskelig værdighed, hvor mennesket er helt alene. Det er Kathrine Jacobsen, der som medvirkende så generøst og, vil vi indse, modigt byder os indenfor i sit hjem, i sin erfaring.

I den film er det menneskets værdighed, som bygges op. Ikke Kathrine Jacobsens alene, ikke stammens alene, men hele den gudsskabte eksistens.

Som Gud berøver Job alt, ejendom, formue, familie, helbred, berøver Kathrine Jacobsen sig selv alt. Men som Job bevarer sin tro, bevarer hun sin, som er troen på det humane, på livet, på sig selv. Og hun giver sin tro navnet friheden. Når Kathrine Jacobsen drikker med vilje, er hun stadigvæk fri, fortæller hun os.

Og vi forstår hende i det samvær, vi aldrig havde etableret alene, et samvær, som Ulla Boye forærer os med dette dokumentariske arbejde. Ulla Boye har været til stede (og stedet er dette andet Griersonbegreb), hun har talt og spurgt og lyttet. Registreret og samlet ind. Så hensynsfuldt og nænsomt. Så antastelsen blev mindst mulig. Så fortroligheden dukkede op, og humoren og lunen. Skønheden i umistelige glimt og autenticiteten hele tiden.

Mette Esmark har så siddet med materialet og instruktøren i klipperummet og lyttet og lyttet og kigget og kigget. Og valgt ud og lagt væk og flyttet om. I dage og uger. Hvor jeg dog beundrer hende og hendes håndværk. Som på et maleri af Hammershøi vender på filmens plakat den rygvendte kvinde sig om. I skønhed og værdighed. Sådan er portrættets øjeblik. Med filmens forløb opbygger Esmark det drama (det sidste af Griersonordene), dramaet af smerte og glæde, et sådant øjeblik vokser ud af.

Kære Ulla Boye og Mette Esmark, det skal I have tak for. Tak for endnu en film. Kære Kathrine Jacobsen. Du har modigt vist os din tillid. Vi lover dig at tage vare på den og bruge den. Filmen handler om dig – og om os. Må jeg ønske publikum en god filmkørsel. Tak. (12. september 2003, tale ved premieren)

GULDDOK 2008/CPH:DOX 4

Danish Producers Association distributed documentary prizes at the opening of CPH:DOX 2008. 3 films took the five prizes. All three films have been reviewed at filmkommentaren.dk In Danish. All three films have very local themes.

Årets GuldDok/Grand Prix: Instruktøren Ulla Boyes “Kun med hjertet”, der handler om hverdagen på Kofoeds Skole i København. Koncern TV- og Filmproduktion.

Bedste lange dokumentar/Best feature length doc: Instruktørerne Mads Kamp Thulstrups og Carsten Søsteds “…Og det var Danmark!”, filmen om det danske landsholds udvikling fra 70’erne til EM-triumfen i 1992. SF Film Production.

Bedste korte dokumentar/Best short doc: Instruktøren Janus Metz’ “Fra Thailand til Thy”, om thailandske kvinder, der søger lykken i det nordlige Danmark. Research: Sine Plambech. Cosmo Doc.

Bedste foto/Best Camerawork: Lars Skree og Henrik Bohn Ipsen for “Fra Thailand til Thy”.

Bedste klip/Best montage: Janus Billeskov Jansen, Stig Bilde og Mette Esmark for “Kun med hjertet”. (Tue Steen Müller, Blogindlæg 07-11-2008)

KUN MED HJERTET KAN MAN RIGTIGT SE (2008)

På Odense festivalen kan man så se kronen på værket, instruktørens nye film. Den har vi ventet længe på. Og den er værd at vente på. Den kan vist alt det Ulla Boye kan. Og det er en del. Selvfølgelig åbner den i en set scene, set så tydeligt med hjertet, netop som Saint-Exupérys tamgjorte ræv i titlens citat pointerer over for den lille prins. Øjet alene ville ikke se det, Boye og fotografen Jørgen Johansson ser til os. Det væsentlige er usynligt for øjet, tilføjer jo ræven. Og scenen er så også lyttet af de tre klippere, den er balanceret, den er lang, og alt muligt andet. Den er en lattermild dialog mellem hende og ham i kantinen på Kofoeds Skole. Og det fortsætter bare. Det er en vidunderlig film, en ægte dokumentarisk komedie. Glæd jer!

Ulla Boye: “Kun med hjertet kan man rigtigt se”, 2008. Kamera: Jørgen Johansson, klip: Mette Esmark, Stig Bilde og Janus Billeskov Jansen, produktion: Koncern www.koncern.dk  Distribueres på Filmstriben www.filmstriben.dk (Blogindlæg 16-08-2008)