Nicolas Philibert with Film on Radio France

For this blogger Nicolas Philibert is one of the most important documentary directors of out time. Filmkommentaren has written about his films frequently, below you have a link that will take you to ”collected posts” about the French director, who in the 5th edition of the Damascus DoxBox festival in 2009 was reported to have said the following at a master class:

”Constantly looking for beauty… my work consists of creating the conditions for something to happen, he said, this great filmmaker, who masters the art of listnening to the other. I am a documentarian and not a fiction filmmaker, I do not want people to play roles. Maybe I ask them to repeat something or ask if I can be present on a special occasion but they are themselves.”

There is a new film by Philibert at the Berlinale Panorama section. It is presented like this:

”La maison de la radio by Nicolas Philibert, France/Japan.
Creator of images Nicolas Philibert has always been fascinated by the “blind” medium of radio and its ability to fire the imagination. Millions share this passion. For many, radio lends life a rhythm and structure, bringing – between kitchen and bathroom – the world to their homes. With this work, Philibert pays tribute to its diligent makers by bringing the invisible to the screen. And so achieves what every filmmaker seeks.”

The film will be released in April in France. Below also a link to an interview (in French) with the director.

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/1931/

http://www.filmsdulosange.fr/en/film/13/la-maison-de-la-radio

http://www.telerama.fr/cinema/nicolas-philibert-realise-un-documentaire-sur-la-maison-de-la-radio,71515.php

Godard, Pennebaker & Leacock

… and 7 wonderful minutes with Jefferson Airplane performing from a roof in New York Midtown in 1968. Yes, it is film and music history at its best as Richard Brody, cinema editor at The New Yorker, wrote yesterday urging the locals to run to the Film Forum to get acquainted with ”One P.M.”, shot in the revolutionary year, but never completed.

The article is a must-read for all lovers of Godard AND legendary documentarians D.A. Pennebaker (photo) and Richard Leacock. An excerpt from the article by Brody (who wrote ”Everything is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard):

… a rare, obscure, and fragmentary—yet exemplary, fascinating, and even intermittently iconic—film, “One P.M.,” … It was, in the event, edited by the great documentary filmmaker D. A. Pennebaker… Pennebaker and another great documentary filmmaker, Richard Leacock, were the film’s producers and its principal cinematographers. Godard had intended to call it “One A.M.” (“One American Movie”); Pennebaker called his cut of the footage “One Parallel Movie,” but the initials, as Godard noted, could also stand for “One Pennebaker Movie.” And, in this form, it’s one of the most extraordinary time capsules of the era…

Yes, it is politics, as you will see in the clip with Grace Slick and her band but it also reminds you about what the nervous always present direct cinema camera work was. Great.

Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/movies/2013/01/one-pm-all-day.html#ixzz2ImqAxHVu

Magnificent7 2013/2

On Wednesday January 30 at 7pm the opening of the 9th edition of the European
Feature Documentary Film Festival, Magnificent7 will be announced
by the lady, who represents the festival venue, the biggest theatre in the region, the Sava Center in Belgrade. Ms Nevena Djonlic will be followed by Mr Popovic and Mr Müller, who will introduce the selection of films for the 9th edition of the European Feature Documentary Film Festival, Magnificent7. The festival runs until February the 3rd.

The opening film is the international hit, nominated for an Oscar, Searching for Sugar Man (photo) by Malik Bendjelloul. The 6 other films in the programme have equally received awards and been world wide honoured for their quality. That goes for Tea or Electricity by Jérôme le Maire, Ilian Metev’s Sofia’s Last Ambulance, Kimmo Koskela’s Soundbreaker, Helena Trestikova’s Private Universe and Manuel von Stürler’s Winter Nomads.

Tonight the 7th film in the festival, Swedish Palme, directed by Kristina Lindström and Maud Nycander, is nominated in three categories at the Swedish award ceremony Guldbaggen.

The audience will be spoilt with good films in the evening with an additional workshop programme during day time for, quoted from the website: “young film authors and film students as well as students in related art disciplines, but also towards all those who feel the need for a different kind of “film food”; film professionals and professional amateurs are also the suitable candidates for our workshop.”

http://www.magnificent7festival.org/home.html

Magnificent7 2013/1

This text is written for the catalogue of Magnificent7 2013: I am writing this from New York, a metropole of mainstream entertainment cinema, but also the place to be for two veterans of independent cinema, the 86 years old Albert Maysles and the 90 year old Jonas Mekas. Maysles, part of the classical direct cinema movement once said that “the eye of the cameraman should be the eye of the poet”. Mekas is, if anyone, the father of the personal cinema, never compromising in his way of putting together his diaries from all over the world.

One should go for innovation but also honour roots and tradition – this is what we do in Belgrade year after year with a festival that carries the name of a mainstream American movie but has its focus on poetry and independent, personal storytelling.

And which, like the old people mentioned, insists that documentary films should be shown on a big screen for a big audience. In cinema halls.

Actually all the films selected for the 2013 edition of Magnificent7 have been shown theatrically in their countries of origin, some of them also in theatres abroad. It can be interpreted as one more sign of the golden times, we experience for the popular documentary genre, but it also proves that the filmmakers who come to Belgrade with their films have thought of the big screen when making their works.

We promise you poetry and personally made documentaries. With a diversity in themes and “handwriting”. From the minimalistic and original interpretation of an urban social reality in “Sofia’s Last Ambulance” to the beautiful and respectful meeting with people, who do very seldom appear in the media: “Tea or Electricity” and “Winter Nomads”. From the portrait of a great humanist, Olof “Palme”, who was shot down, when he chose to walk home after a visit to the cinema, a rich film in its time depiction of a society asis the Czech “Private Universe”, a family film in the wonderful epic tradition.

Magnificent7 is a tribute to the art of cinema, but it is also a tribute to the power of art itself. Two films point directly in that direction. “Searching for Sugar Man”, internationally the most succesful documentary of 2012, is (also) about the fact that important art will always survive, whereas “Soundbreaker” (photo) is, as the title indicates, about an artist who seeks to break all rules to give us viewers and listeners an experience, we will never forget.

Do come to the 7 films we hope you will enjoy and never forget.

Tue Steen Müller

IDFA Statistics and Info

It is a good idea to get on the mailing list for the idfa newsletter. The one from January 18 includes statistics on the 25th edition of the festival last November and communicates deadlines for the IDFA Bertha Fund (before Jan Vrijman Fund), the Docs for Sale, the festival and the Academy Summer School. How to it, quote from the newsletter:

If you would like to stay in tune with IDFA and all our industry deadlines and events, then subscribe now to IDFA’s monthly Industry Newsletter. Subscribing is easy and can be done via your MyIDFA account.

… and for the news: the 25th edition of the festival in 2012 had 2700 festival guests and 200.000 tickets sold. Twohundredthousand tickets!!!

Furthermore IDFA, the European Film Market and EDN runs a documentary newtworking platform at the upcoming Berlinale (February 7-15), where 16 documentaries from the idfa festival are screened – among them are “The Gatekeepers”, “Elena” (photo) and “Beware of Mr. Baker”.

Link to idfa.nl

Link to efm-berlinale.de

P.P.P.

Taken from a newsletter from FID, the International Film Festival in Marseille (July 3-8), where a passionate director Jean-Pierre Rehm writes:

Concerning our upcoming 24th edition… a retrospective will be devoted to Pier Paolo Pasolini. A Mediterranean figure, certainly, since such is the orientation of Marseille, but also a personality of mythical importance. Poet, writer, playwright, critic, polemicist, screenwriter, actor, painter, filmmaker: some go so far as to call him a contemporary saint. The wager of this undertaking devoted to Pasolini remains largely before us. That is why, citing his own words, we have baptized this homage, “P.P.P., the scandalous force of the past.” Implemented in conjunction with three local organizations, Alphabetville, the CIPM and INA Région, the programming of his films, amplified by an exhibition, readings, round-tables, etc., will take place a month-and-a-half before the festival. A way of multiplying the possibilities to better embrace, in its integrality, his untimely oeuvre that is generous as well as dazzling.

Bravo!

http://www.fidmarseille.org/dynamic/

http://mubi.com/cast_members/2150

Documentary Fortnight 2013

A press release in an edited version: Moma, the Museum of Modern art in New York organizes February 15–March 4 “Documentary Fortnight 2013: MoMA’s International Festival of Nonfiction Film and Media”, the 12th annual two-week showcase of recent documentary films examining the relationship between contemporary art and nonfiction practices, and reflecting on new areas of documentary filmmaking.

This year’s festival includes an International Selection of 20 feature-length films and several shorts, all of which are U.S. or New York premieres that will be presented by the filmmakers. The festival also features New Cuban Shorts, a spotlight on films by emerging Cuban filmmakers, many of which have never before been seen in the U.S.

The programme also includes a tribute to POV, highlighting award- winning films from the past 25 years of Public Television’s longest-running showcase for independent documentary film—plus a sneak preview of a title in the upcoming season.

The festival opens on February 15 with two daring new approaches in filmmaking: Ilian Metev’s Sofia’s Last Ambulance (Germany/Bulgaria/Croatia, 2012) (photo), which premiered at the 51st International Critics Week at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival, where it was the second documentary ever to compete; and Chico Pereira’s Pablo’s Winter (Spain, 2012), winner of the Competition for Student Documentary at IDFA, the world’s largest documentary festival. Sofia’s Last Ambulance follows a three-member paramedic crew in one of

Bulgaria’s dwindling fleet of emergency ambulances. The camera’s focus is on the intimate emotions and reactions of a doctor, nurse, and driver—not their patients—as they respond to situations both the serious and absurd.

In Pablo’s Winter, Chico Pereira explores the tragic history of an old mining town, inspired by real-life characters playing themselves.

Other highlights include Jose Álvarez’s Canícula (Dog Days, Mexico, 2012), the BestDocumentary Film at the 2013 Cinema Tropical Awards, a sensorial film that follows the daily rituals of the ancient Totonac people of Zapotal Santa Cruz, Mexico, who are known for their daring aerial Voladores (Bird Men).

The Machine Which Makes Everything Disappear (Germany/Georgia, 2012), Tinatin Gurachiani’s first feature film, combines the compelling stories of 15- to 23-year-old youths with a look at contemporary Georgia.

New Cuban Shorts comprises four programs of short documentaries by nine emerging directors from Cuba. Highlights include three films by Armando Capo, including Nos quedamos (We Stay, Cuba, 2009), which follows a Cuban family that persists in defending their home from an invasion of bees, and three films by Ariagna Fajarado, including La Vuelta (The Bend, Cuba, 2008), which depicts a community thriving through the collective efforts of its residents, all of whom are brick-makers.

The POV section includes 21 award-winning, outstanding, and controversial films from the 25-year history of POV (Point of View). Highlights include the world premiere of Homegoings (U.S., 2013), Christine Turner’s account of a Harlem funeral director who honors 150-year-old funereal traditions, and the first film ever showcased on the series, American Tongues (U.S., 1988), Louis Alvarez and Andy Kolker’s humorous look at American dialects.

Ada Bligaard Søby: Petey & Ginger

Ada Bligaard Søby har i lidt mere end syv år været i gang med et konsekvent filmisk værk, som med undertitlen til den seneste af de syv film, det består af, også samlet kan kaldes a testament to the awesomeness of mankind. Det er store ord, men de siges på en stilfærdig måde. Der larmes ikke i hendes film, men hver rystende detalje, hvert udbrud af pludseligt vid præcist på plads i konstruktionerne, er fyldt med intens og sagte alvor: dette er mine ønsker for menneskets fremtid, og i et kaos af nutidig moralsk og materiel sammenbrud skimtes i filmene en forunderlig blid fasthed og en ærbødighed over for enhver kulturs integritet og historie. Alle filmene har, uden at Ada Bligaard Søby har rystet på hånden, i et og alt intenst levet op til de store ord. Der har været bygget og bygget på værket.

Sådan er det derfor selvfølgelig med den syvende og seneste film, Petey & Ginger(2012), som havde premiere på CPH:DOX i november og har været sendt for nylig på DR K. Den skal ikke først og fremmest nye veje, den skal videre med det, værket er i gang med. Så den vender tryg tilbage til den første film, American Losers (2006) i tema, den amerikanske kultur, og i kunstnerisk greb, en sammenstilling af en kvindes og en mands biografier og liv nu. I denne tilbagevenden, i denne sunde vedholdenhed fremstår den som en rig variation i en filmisk passacaglia.

Som i American Losers lægger Ada Bligaard kortene på bordet fra begyndelsen: jeg er ved at lave en film med mine venner, de er her: og vi får en scene med et samvær en aften. Instruktøren har samlet dem til en fest, et måltid i hvert fald, vi er formodentlig ved optagelsernes afslutning, de præsenterer sig for hinanden, de kender nemlig ikke hinanden, i hvert fald ikke alle, de er musikere i samme band, en del af dem, og så er der to, som er gift med hinanden, og der er fotografen Adam Nilsson og Ada Bligaard selv. Det er en hurtig, lidt genert og aldeles autentisk scene, sådan er det med det. Og herefter er filmen i gang, de to hovedpersoner skiller sig ud fra de andre medvirkende. Som i den første film: ”Ginger er min bedste ven, Petey er også min bedste ven”, kunne der have stået på speedmarker skilte. De to tager over og kommenterer deres samfund, deres tid og deres egne biografier, som de fortæller markante træk fra.

Det bliver til et helt andet end vanligt tidsbillede af årtierne omkring årtusindskiftet, Ada Bligaard tegner, en anden USA historie. Imperiets storhed er, ser det ud til, forbi, det er forfaldets kapitler, som nu skrives. Det vokser til en overvejelse af magthavernes, de økonomiske beslutningstageres dekadence, til en meditation over frådseriet og den flossede moral for øjnene af flere og flere fattige blandt menneskene, flere og flere, som lever sat på gaden åbenbart som følge af finansfolkenes dispositioner.

Men nogle af menneskene er rene af hjertet, og Petey og Ginger hører til den gruppe, på hver deres måde, som dog både er forskellige og ligner hinanden. Ada Bligaard kæmper som i andre film af sine film, ud over den nævnte American Losers og særlig fornemt i Meet me in Berlin (2007), en film om et muligt møde mellem hende og ham, så forskellige, men bevæget af den samme ømhed for hinanden i et mærkeligt fællesskab, hun arbejder energisk, men med dejlig let hånd på at holde balancen mellem de to personer, hun hver gang placerer på vippen. Og det bliver hver gang til klippekunstens vanskelige balancegang, på én gang holde fokus for iagttagelserne og balance i de ligevægtede karakterers udvikling. Netop det er Ada Bligaards særkende, et af dem. Det kan hun, det er en del af den cinematografiske musikalitet hun er begavet med.

En anden del af talentet er det hos hende selvfølgelige, men ganske særprægede billedsyn, som driver kameraet til optagelser, hvis stilfærdige skønhed berører dybt, ikke kun mig, men for eksempel også juryen, som gav hende prisen på CPH:DOX 2010. Den begrundede valget af De nøgne fra Skt. Petersborg (2010) med instruktørens ”særligt kreative udtryk og evne til vedholdende at være i stand til at imponere sit publikum med et stærkt visuelt udtryk”… “Scenerne er bundet sammen med et unikt blik og en meget personlig palet af farver, situationer, stemninger og følelser.” Det samme kunne siges om alle Ada Bligaards film og således også om Petey & Ginger. Ved sine egne optagelser, ved sine instruktioner til den kongenialt fotograferende Adam Nilsson og i høj grad også ved den overraskende dristige brug af arkivmateriale, ofte ganske privat og ofte af overfladisk set ret tvivlsom kvalitet, ser hun og aflokker det besynderlige æstetiske kvaliteter, der udgør billedmæssige territorier, som til nu var ukendte for i hvert fald mig. I sig selv en opdagelsesrejse.

En tredje del af Ada Bligaards kunstneriske særpræg er alvoren bag det hele og den ganske originale og naturlige evne, hun har til nå dybde i den filmiske tænkning. Petey & Ginger bliver og er således først og fremmest et personligt essay om moderne fattigdom på grundlag af en antropologisk undersøgelse, en poetisk og filmisk etnografi, som kommer tydeligt igennem. Efter at have set filmen sidder jeg helt stille, for det her er egentligt tankevækkende. Det er ikke en bekymring, dog, det ligner, men det er noget mere, det er en stille fortvivlelse. Ada Bligaard Søby ser det vist ikke selv sådan, jeg læser imidlertid filmen sådan, og så rigt er værket, det kan bag ryggen på sin autor forstås ud fra en lang række andre forudsætninger, og jeg er sikker på, der er svar til dem alle. Elementerne er for så vidt enkle og sædvanlige, men kvaliteten af dem er overraskende og overrumplende, ny og frigørende. Jeg har ikke set det tilsvarende i nogen anden af den nye bølge af berømmede danske dokumentarfilm. Dette er enestående i filmverdenens nu. Måske er Ada Bligaards arbejde især mærket af en munter uskyld på trods, på sin måde lig Peteys og Gingers liv.

Ada Bligaard Søby: Petey & Ginger, Danmark, 2012. 59 min. Manuskript: Ada Bligaard Søby, medvirkende: Ginger Partington og Petey Damnit, fotografi: Adam Nilsson og Ada Bligaard Søby, klip: Charlotte Munk Bengtsen, musik: The Oh Sees (og mange flere), lyddesign: Roar Skau Olsen, producer: Morten Kjems Juhl, Anna Byvald og Frank Mauceri, produktion og salg: Beofilm interfere@beofilm.dk  www.beofilm.dk

http://peteygingerfilm.com/#Home   

Murphy/ MediaStorm:A Darkness Visible: Afghanistan

In a quest for taking a viewer beyond the headlines, Seamus Murphy embarks on a journey through Afghanistan, the land he has grown to love and its culture and people that never ceased to amaze.

A long-term project by acclaimed documentary photographer Murphy with a contribution of the footage from the Afghan Film Organization and Augustin Pictures was produced by the award-winning New York-based multimedia production studio MediaStorm. Based on 14 trips between 1994 and 2010, “A Darkness Visible: Afghanistan” charts people’s journey to find their way in the country deluged by the political upheaval. From the Soviet invasion and the mujahideen resistance to the Taliban and the American occupation, the film deftly traces thirty years of Afghan history telling a tale of war through the eyes of ordinary people. In times of war, there is loss and fear but there is also a place for hope, dreams, and even love. The production portrays war giving it a face. The toll should not be esteemed in numbers. Be it a commander of the mujahideen resistance or a member of a typical Afghan family, the life of a man is equally precious and fragile once the war knocks on the door.

“A Darkness Visible: Afghanistan” finds a compelling way to deliver its intricate web of stories by utilizing multiple media and fusing photography, audio-visual material, and external footage. Its dramaturgy follows a clear structure by plotting different chapters of Afghan history. The presentation of the film, therefore, is undeniably comprehensible and adds an educational value. Its powerful black-and-white imagery is captivating, enduring, and will be distinctly ingrained into one’s memory.

Candid, with much tender and care, Murphy tells the story of Afghanistan. They say, “No one comes to Afghanistan once.” Indeed, there is something about this land that captures imagination and allures to come back. But as the shadow of the war lingers long, “there is a moment when you hold your breath knowing that something so bright might just become dark again.”

USA, 2011, MediaStorm, webdocumentary.

http://mediastorm.com/publication/a-darkness-visible-afghanistan

Dror Moreh: The Gatekeepers

This Academy Award Nominee 2013 – and it was also nominated for the main prize at idfa in November 2012 – has troubled my mind for days since I watched it. Which I did a couple of times. Why? Because it is so well crafted and effectively told? Yes, but many films are. Because it gives you an intelligent, mature, open-minded and critical insight to a world that you did not know about? Through (again) an effective use of storytelling elements that give you associations to fiction thrillers that takes place in the fascinating world of secret agents? Yes, but is that a sufficient explanation? No, it is not, it all comes down to the talking faces, the six former heads of Shin Bet, the Israeli internal secret service (contrary to Mossad, the external), and to what they say, and to how they say it. Seldom have talking faces been so well situated, you listen and you watch and you get the director’s description and interpretation ”in-between” the faces – rooms full of computer-screens with faces and names, air shots on targets, archive corridors of drawers with cards of suspected terrorists AND unique archive material of Palestinians being arrested and led to interrogations. As well as the known archive with Arafat and Rabin shaking hands with Clinton in the middle, and all the material around the murder of Rabin etc. And excellent computer graphic work that is used to give life to photos.

The six have since 1980 represented a secret service in a country that is in a constant fight with terror and with itself. You might have thought that many horrible events should not be talked about, but they are talked about in this film, that from that point of view is a journalistic scoop. Far away from the quick news clips we are used to from television, the six get their time to talk and to make this viewer shocked and confused. And the questions put to them are all the time direct and right to the point.

Take the oldest of them, Avraham Shalom (who was Shin Bet head 1980-86), a nice grandpa with red braces. Does not look like a man, whose job it was to run a secret service (even if there is a slight ressemblance to Alec Guinness in Tinker, Tailor…). You get empathy for him until you hear about his role in the 1984 Bus 300 incident, where he ordered the execution of two terrorists

(his terminology), who had kidnapped a bus. They were caught alive, injured, Shalom, in the film, told the soldiers to ”finish them off”. A later Head of the Service characterises him as a ”bully, ”a tough guy”. He lost his job after Bus 300. He talks very nice and appears as a cultivated man, who has lost hope in any peace process, and then suddenly his words reveal his look at ”the other”, ”the enemy”. And then he suddenly indirectly states that what Israel has done to the Palestinians today is a bit like what the Nazis did to the Jews!

Shalom and several of the others keep coming back to the theme of lack of security policy. They have no good things to say about the politicians, who want to be presented with two options, when decisions are to be made, no nuances, ”not with strategies only tactics” and ”forget about morality”. These words from high rank officials with a long career in the IDF and in the secret service are more than shocking, presented in this intelligent, analytical frame that also, of course, is the History of Israel with the ”Palestinian Issue” being constantly present.

Information on how the Shin Bet functions? Indeed – the recruitment policy for hiring collaborators in the occupied West Bank and in Gaza is brought forward. The professional Intelligence work. And how to target terrorists and try to kill only those targeted and not innocent civilians. Which often has failed. As it failed for Carmi Gillon (1994-1996) to establish enough security for Rabin, who was killed by an Israeli extremist in 1995. ”I suddenly saw a different Israel”, the killer changed history and conequently the work of Shin Bet that included the settlements as areas of operation.

I could go on with examples of what is being said, let me finish with Yuval Diskin (2005-2011), who in the first four minutes catches the viewer’s attention, and the core of the visual side of the the film, by talking about the perfect ”sterile” operation, illustrated by air photography, from the pov of where the killing bomb will come from, targeting a moving car, that explodes and completes the mission: Killing. ”It feels a bit unnatural”, he says, ”when you know  that they were human beings”. Later he is the one opposing the government policy, stating that after all this he has almost become a leftist. ”We’ve become Cruel”.

Israel, 96 mins. 

PS.

Below the link to the website of the film, which gives additional biographical information on the sic head of Shin Bet.

And please do also read the full article by Gideon Levy in Israeli newspaper Haaretz, here is a quote from the conclusion, he makes:

Rolling their eyes, they pass responsibility on to the political leadership, whose role they scorned, as if they could not have influenced much more, or tortured and assassinated much less. As if they did not know at the time that alongside the successful counter-terror operations, the question of how much terror their cruel methods ignited cried out for an answer. How many new terrorists were born in the interrogation cells in which tens of thousands of people were shaken, beaten, bound, humiliated and tortured with the monstrous methods whose use they have admitted.

There are countries in which individuals who are responsible for similar deeds have been prosecuted; in others they at least expressed remorse years later. Not so for our Shin Bet heads. Here they are welcome guests in every news studio or party, celebrities whose opinions are valued, stars who decorate party slates, national heroes no one would think to repudiate…

http://www.thegatekeepersfilm.com/

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-gatekeepers.premium-1.490739