Odesa International FF

… ended last night and two documentaries reviewed on this site were awarded:

“Delta” (PHOTO) by Ukrainian Oleksandr Techynski got main award in the category “National Competition. Features”. I saw it at DOK Leipzig last year, where it was in the “Next Masters Competition”. A quote from the review: “… It is multilayered, it has a clear aesthetic choice with a skilled camerawork that suits the theme or rather the location, it’s a Film: the delta of the Danube, a kind of Klondyke, where people live under harsh chaotic conditions and where men with worn faces struggle their way through the reed that they harvest to sheaf, to bring in to be sold…”

And Alisa Kovalenko’s “Home Games” got first prize in the “European Documentary Competition”. A quote from the review: “… The film lives from its ability to create a feeling of presence in the situations with Alina and the kids. Here there are fine, often poetic moments in the claustrophobia of the small flat. On the football pitch, it is not poetry that reigns, when the coach states to the girls that they have “to die on the pitch”, a sentence which will probably be used many times the next month in a neighbouring country (world championship in Russia).

And another quote from the press release from the festival: “… Janina Sokolova and Oleh Paniuta reminded everyone that the hunger strike of Oleg Sentsov has been lasting for 69 days already as for 21st of July. ”The OIFF and all of us wish him to stay strong and to come back to his artistic occupation to the native land.”, – Janina Sokolova said. And as well as at every screening and the Opening ceremony there was a special seat reserved for the Ukrainian director/political prisoner at the Closing Ceremony.

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4258/

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4073/

https://oiff.com.ua/en/festival/news/urochista-tseremonija-zakrittja-9-go-omkf.html

IDFA 2018

IDFA – November 14-25 2018 – has sent out a Newsletter “for Industry” revealing that “this year (we) will present an inspiring, diverse program featuring many impressive screenings… led by our new artistic director Orwa Nyrabia”.

With a click I went to discover what were the “new program sections and other changes to the festival”. Here are some of them with my comments and questions:

FEWER films in total with only 12 films in each competition category… to be

“even more selective… raising the profile of each film premiering at the festival… GOOD, will hopefully also make many of us viewers less confused and frustrated.

ONLY FIRST films in “First Appearance”… OF COURSE with a more clear focus on new talent, “to be assessed by a jury of renowned professionals”. OK, but I thought that was always the case! Maybe not?

STATEMENT: “Issues of gender and geography lie at the heart of the plan presented: both younger and more experienced advisors and selectors from around the world are being added to IDFA’s proven programming team. The Artistic Director pledged that IDFA will publish an annual diversity report and will ensure that its efforts – or shortcomings – in terms of inclusivity are transparent, accountable and useful to the global documentary film community…” HMM, smells a bit of political correctness, Orwa!

STAR GUEST: Czech master Helena Treštikova; could be seen as a conservative choice but from here, YES, so right to put her in focus!

A SCOOP: “Renowned Russian film scholar Nikolai Izvolov worked for years on unearthing the fragments of Dziga Vertov’s very first film, The Anniversary of the Revolution. Vertov made this film in 1918. Parts of the film were shot during the October Revolution in 1917 and a year later during the celebrations of October 1918. This is not only the first feature-length film Vertov made, but perhaps even the first creative documentary film ever made. In this film, we see the early signs of Vertov’s cinematic language as we know these from films such as Man With a Movie Camera: exploring aesthetic details, the individual versus the crowd, rhythm as well as the camera and the man with the camera as subjects. 

Until recently, only twelve minutes of material had been recovered from this film, but during IDFA the entire film will premiere as part of IDFA on Stage.” WOW!

FOCUS PROGRAMS: “Me”, “The Memory of Space”, “Humanoid Cookbook”, the two first are easy to understand, the last one “will take the dining table as a metaphor and timeless stage for experimentation with new art forms and human behavior”. All right, are we viewers expected to sit and watch people eating on the stage…

FRONTLIGHT: … Up to twenty films – “IDFA’s view of the world through the eyes of filmmakers as opposed to the eyes of global media…” EXCITING WHAT COMES OUT OF THAT!

ART AND CINEMA… Maybe most important are these lines that could be interpreted as a (soft) criticism to IDFA’s previous emphasis on social, well-meaning documentaries: … the selection will be more rigorous with an even tighter selection that does not prioritize subject matter over artistic value and cinematic ambition… Yes, go ahead Orwa, and don’t forget to look to Eastern Europe, here there are many more auteurs to be found than Mansky and Loznitsa and Kossakovski.

https://www.idfa.nl/en/

Nicolas Wagnières: Hotel Jugoslavia

Since the beginning of this century I have visited Belgrade once per year – as readers of this site will know because of reports from the Magnificent7 documentary festival. Every year one of our tours for lunch goes to wonderful Zemun at the the Danube, and to go there we have passed the Hotel Jugoslavija. What is the story of the hotel, I have asked local hosts. Ahh, it used to be important in Tito’s time but after his death and after Yugoslavia stopped being Yugoslavia, it stopped being important. Were the short answers you get in a car passing by the huge building.

Now I know much more thanks to the film of Nicolas Wagnières, his first long documentary. His mother was born and lived in the country until the sixties, bringing him to visit, he became fascinated, fell in love with the ideas that were once behind the non-aligned country – unity, brotherhood, collectiveness and self-management.

In stylized images, with constant camera movements through the empty hotel, beautiful as it was, then totally in ruins and built up again, but not totally, once a superb hotel built on the order of Tito, in 1969, a hotel where top politicians and celebrities checked in, placed beautifully in New Belgrade, then later in the 1990’es home for criminals, bombed by NATO in 1999, as Arkan and his gang was supposed to operate from there… he set up a casino, and there is still a casino there, I was there a couple of years ago, super posh with no soul.

Wagnières makes the hotel a symbol for a country falling apart, he has interviews with his mother, with people working at the hotel, he goes from images from inside the hotel to interviews, to propaganda films, to archive footage showing the mourning that followed Tito’s death in 1980, but he also includes clips from fiction films, one of them a recent action film, where the hotel is blown up. And there is Milosevic with his nationalism.

Wagnières says that he during a decade has come back to the city and the hotel and that he has filmed “pour garder and pour regarder”. He conveys his point of view very much through his personal voice off – one of the best sequences is the interview with the mother, who remembers how people stood together after the ww2, eager to build a new society of unity and brotherhood, values that are no longer part of the Serbian society. Wonderful propaganda footage.

The film is not deep, it is not an analysis of the history of a country, there is too much “it was much better before”, but the director is an outsider, his style and approach is to be respected, and as I have seen and experienced Belgrade during the years of visiting, I can only share the director’s and Belgrade friends worry for what is happening with the city and its development, when you see the glass skyscrapers popping up at the water front. Which he captures well at the end of the film.

Switzerland/France, 2017, 78 mins.

https://hotel-jugoslavija-film.com/en/home-an/

Peter Kerekes: Occupation 1968

A Russian comes to the passport control in a Western European country. Occupation asks the passport official? No No, answers the Russian, just visiting…

A classic joke that I dare put as the beginning of this review of the omnibus film, with Peter Kerekes as the main producer. 5 films, 5 directors from the 5 Warsaw Pact countries that occupied Czechoslovakia in August 1968. 5 films seen from the point of view of those, who took part in the occupation. Excellent idea and excellently performed even if, as with all omnibus films I am afraid, the difference in style and quality is sometimes disturbing.

From me as a visitor to Prague during the Prague Spring in 1968 months before the invasion, with several visits to the city during the communist times and with tears in my eyes when the velvet revolution took place in 1989 and I saw Dubcek and Havel saluting and being saluted by the population from the balcony in Prague… Thanks for dealing with the past.  

I put Kerekes at the top of this text and included the joke as it is obvious that

the producer/director has been strongly shaping the visual approach of the film – in many of the episodes I was thinking of his masterpiece “Cooking History” = searching for the absurdity AND the humanity in an important world historical event:

We viewers are invited to be with old men in uniforms with medals and with old men without uniforms remembering their participation in the Soviet-led invasion. Of course some films are more interesting than others, storytelling is different going from staged fictionalized to classical documentary, always with some b/w archive material from the streets of Prague, tanks, demonstrations, corpses, politicians talking about what they saw as a counter-revolution.

A few observations on each of the five films:

“The Last Mission of General Ermakov” by Evdokia Moskvina – has a fine touch of the absurdity mentioned above starting with a grandiose dinner on the beach in Odessa, where Ermakov invites his fellow comrades from the invasion to toast for the good old days being in telephone contact with the man in Moscow, who was in charge of the air attack on Prague. The scoop in this film episode is that the director takes the general and a nurse who was with him in 1968 on a tour that includes Kiev, Minsk, Moscow to end up in Prague, where they (now also having a third companion from Belarus, introducing himself as Jewish) meet a 90 year old captain from the Czechoslovakian army, who takes them to the control tower at the airport where the occupants landed in August 1968. The jolly good fellow atmosphere goes away instantly when the captain declares that “I can not forgive you”. A brilliant original start on “Occupation 1968” is Moskvina’s film with General Ermakov as a proud soldier, who is now telling his grandchild what is was to be at war, at “Operation Danube” and teaches him to hold a pistol in the right way…

“Red Rose” by Linda Dombrovszky – starts weaker with soldiers dressing up as then, gets stronger when memories are conveyed through letters and archive material and has a fine personal story about a soldier, who met his former wife to be, when he and the other Hungarian soldiers entered the part of Czechoslovakia that had a Hungarian population. This episode did not really catch my attention as did

“I’m Writing to You My Love” by Magdalena Szymkow – that is Polish hybrid documentary at its best, different from the other episodes putting the focus on the strong reactions IN Poland on the invasion, set up “inside” a love story between a woman, who sits with love letters from her colonel, who went to invasion and got a three-day leave pass to go home to get married. The film is tense in an editing that communicates the atmosphere of the time – surveillance by the Secret Service – the protests connected to a music festival in Sopot where singers left – the dramatic footage of a man burning himself to death in a stadium, an event that after 1989 became the subject of a film by Maciej Drygas. In other words: a very competent visual interpretation of the 1968 invasion from a Polish point of view. Cinema!

“Voices in the Forest” by Marie Elisa Scheidt – is a minimalistic report from Walter Ulbricht’s GDR, that was totally pro all decisions made in the Soviet Union, including this act of war. The title refers to conversations between two men, who decided to NOT obey what they were told to and paid a prize for their anti-socialistic action. The film is like a chamber play, important in words, a fine dialogue where they go back to what they remember “from this madness”. And the episode ends with a fine concert in the forest!

The film – with a small epilogue that I will not reveal – ends with a straight forward touching documentary by experienced director Stephan Komandarev, title “An Unnecessary Hero”, about a Bulgarian soldier who died in Czechoslovakia in September 1968, told primarily by his brother, a hero or not a hero, is the discussion in the film in the small village where a bust is placed in his honour. He died for what…? Fine choice to have this episode at the end, simple storytelling, emotional contrary to the hybrid elements in many of the other episodes.    

Directed by: Evdokia Moskvina, Linda Dombrovszky, Magdalena Szymkow, Marie Elisa Scheidt, Stefan Komandarev

Coproducers: Martichka Bozhilova, Filip Remunda…

Slovakia, Russia, Hungary, Poland, Germany, Bulgaria, 2018, 130 mins.

https://www.facebook.com/Occupation1968/?hc_ref=ARSI9JnqUsYro4xDtq-uAXOl3P9UrMfmEJcMRhbsohnQiVjovVXIf2VQldh6VL-HcXI

There is a fine trailer here:

https://www.filmfestival-goeast.de/en/film/6483/OCCUPATION%201968

Ingmar Bergman 100 år /8

Jeg sidder ved skrivebordet, der står midt i værelset. En rødbrun soldatertæge kravler tøvende op over bordkanten. Der står helt afgørende nogen bag min ryg, selv om døren hverken er blevet åbnet eller lukket. Der står altså nogen bag min ryg…

 

SKRIVEBORD

Det handler om manden i huset ved havet, og sådan begynder Bergmans manuskript til filmen om lige netop den mand:

”Første akt nr. 1. Mit navn er Andreas Winkelman. Jeg er otteogfyrre år. Jeg husker at det var en trykkende oktoberdag. Jeg sad på taget af mit medtagne hus og reparerede på bedste beskub. Efter den sidste omgang regn var det begyndt at lække for alvor. Da jeg så op fra mit arbejde stod der tre sole over havet. Ikke en vind rørte sig, alt var fuldkommen lydløst. Jeg tændte min pibe, sad længe og betragtede fænomenet. Så trak en mørk sky op vestfra og gik for solene. Det begyndte endelig at blæse. Eftermiddagen skumrede. En hund gøede. Fårene bevægede sig gravitetisk over heden. Nede på vejen kørte Daniel med et læs halm, hans gamle hest gik i luntetrav. Jeg steg ned fra mit ophøjede stade og gik ind i køkkenet for at lave kaffe. Radioavisen fortalte om forskellige mislykkede foretagender. Derimod nævnede den ikke noget om mine tre sole. Omtrent en time senere så jeg dem for første gang. De fulgte vejen langs havet. En mand og to kvinder…” (En Passion, 1968)

Teksten fastholder og gentager med fuld billeddannelse og lydetablering denne erfaring om den resignerende mand, som forsvarer sin ensomhed der på fåreøen og venter på kærligheden. De få linjer i dette anslag har siden, jeg læste dem første gang – det var før jeg så filmen – været aldeles centrale for mig, min opfattelse af at være mand og af mandens ambition: ensomheden, kysten, havet, stilheden, enkelheden – jeg stiger ned og går ind i køkkenet for at lave kaffe – og så mødet… Senere da jeg så filmen, var manuskriptets tekst og scenen naturligvis fuldstændig kongruente. Filmen var for så vidt færdig i dens manuskripts formulering. Og teksten fastholder filmens erfaring, og den har næsten mere end filmen haft enorm betydning for mig, når jeg har skullet leve mit eget liv opmærksomt.

Hos Ingmar Bergman er det muligt for mig at forfølge disse temaer, som jeg bilder mig ind er mine, finde scenerne frem, som jeg også bilder mig ind, jeg er alene med. For eksempel – jeg bladrer i hans bøger – skrivebordet i huset ved havet. Her samles alt. Det bord er hans mindste scene. Lidt større scener er dukketeateret i Fanny og Alexander, havehuset i Som i et Spejl, stuen, hjemmet… De medvirkende er børnene og forældrene og slægtningene. Manden og kvinden. Elskeren og elskerinden. De elskende… Ind imellem er der flere personer i huset ved havet:

”Huset står ensomt på den lange sandodde og er tydeligt mærket af den udsatte beliggenhed. Det er i to etager og mørkegrønt de steder, hvor sol og blæst ikke har slidt malingen af og fået en lysere silketone til at træde frem i træet. Bagsiden vender ud mod en stor tilgroet have, som delvis ligger skjult bag et højt plankeværk. Huset er beboet. Vasketøj flagrer fra en tørresnor, og vinduerne står åbne under halvt sønderblæste markiser. Råb og latter stiger op fra det brusende, aftenmørke hav. Pludselig vipper fire hoveder på bølgerne, og snart begynder fire mennesker at vade ind over den lange, flade forstrand. De er forpustede som efter en hård svømmetur og ler udmattet; de går ved siden af hinanden og tegner sig som fire sorte figurer mod solnedgangen og vandspejlingernes urolige flammer. To mænd, en dreng og en kvinde.” (Som i et spejl, 1960)

Det er faderen, Gunnar Björnstrand, datteren Harriet Andersson, sønnen Lars Passgård og svigersønnen Max von Sydov. Faderen er forfatter, datteren er skizofren, sønnen beundrer sin far, men føler sig afvist og er sin søster hengiven, svigersønnen er læge. Skrivebordets scene, det er sent på sommernatten, faderen er alene. Det lyder sådan i manuskriptet:

”David (læser): Hun kom imod ham dirrende af forventning, blussende rød af den skarpe blæst… (sukker): Herregud, herregud.

Han skubber brillerne op i panden og skjuler sit grå ansigt i hænderne. Lidt efter går han atter i gang med arbejdet.

David (læser): Hun kom imod ham dirrende af forventning…

Så streger han resten af sætningen over med en tynd streg, betragter sit værk. Så streger han det hele ud.

David: Hun kom løbende imod ham med ansigtet blussende af den skarpe blæst…

Han ryster på hovedet og bøjer sig over papiret, prenter følgende med rødt blæk: Hun kom løbende imod ham. Så sukker han og ryster på hovedet, streger det ud med en tyk streg og skriver resolut: De mødtes på stranden.” (Som i et spejl, 1960)

Det handler om ham og hende, resten ved vi godt, når handlingen er et møde og stedet er stranden.

Bergman skriver: ”I dag forstår jeg, at jeg i Persona – og senere i Hvisken og råb – er kommet så langt, som jeg kan komme. Så langt, at jeg i frihed berører ordløse hemmeligheder, som alene cinematografien kan løfte frem til os…” (Billeder, 1990)

To kvinder, sygeplejersken Bibi Andersson og skuespillerinden Liv Ullmann bor for en tid i huset ved havet. Det nordiske sommerhus, som bliver til huset på Fårø.

”Det ligger afsides med en langstrakt kyststrimmel ud mod det åbne hav mod nord og en bugt med stejle klipper mod vest. Bag huset strækker en lynghede og et skovområde sig. Fru Vogler (Ullmann) har godt af opholdet ved havet. Den apati, der har lammet hende, mens hun lå på hospitalet, begynder at vige for lange spadsereture og fisketure, madlavning, brevskrivning og…”(Persona, 1966)

Brevet, ja det afgørende brev bliver til ved bordet foran vinduet, det er Liv Ullmann, som skriver. Ude i regnen ved Volvoen ser vi Bibi Andersson. Hun skal om lidt læse det brev, som ikke er til hende, men handler om hende. Som Harriet Andersson i Som i et spejl læser faderens tilsvarende notat i dagbogen. Som handler om hende, men jo ikke er beregnet for hende. På handlingsplanet. Havet og kysten, ja, det sted er eksistensgenererende, det erotiske højdepunkt er ved havet. Men det eksiterer alene i Bibi Anderssons fortælling som foregår i huset, i Bergmans manuskript. Men jeg ser stranden. De store opgør mellem de to er en lang travelling langs kysten. Brevet og dagbogen, forfatterens værktøj, afdækker krisen og tabet, kunstens utroværdighed. Sygeplejerskens uskyld. Fortrolighedens forræderi.

Det må så blive manden selv, som alene i huset ved havet ved skrivebordet i arbejdsværelsen tager et sidste opgør med sig selv. Det er i Troløs, som Liv Ullmann instruerer på Bergmans manuskript. Bordet står midt på gulvet. Bag det reoler med bøger og plader, tekster og musik og den indbyggede bænk i nichen med det store vindue med havet lige udenfor. Igen bordet midt på gulvet, hvor manuskript efter manuskript er blevet afsluttet med ”Fårö…” og så datoen. Som gør, at jeg fornemmer vejret den dag, han var færdig. Jeg så ivrigt efter i Marie Nyreröds dokumentarserie, som SVT sendte for et par år siden. Som nu disse måneder genudsendes. Jo, det var og er intakt, det rum. Det er en fast kulisse. Filmenes billeder står alvorlige og rolige omkring teksterne herfra. Vi ser huset og havet. Personerne kommer ind på scenen. I begyndelsen er bænken ved vinduet tom. Bergman begynder manuskriptet sådan:

”En mild forsommerdag. Vinduet står åbent. Havet og fyrretræerne bruser. Jeg sidder ved skrivebordet, der står midt i værelset. En rødbrun soldatertæge kravler tøvende op over bordkanten. Der står helt afgørende nogen bag min ryg, selv om døren hverken er blevet åbnet eller lukket. Der står altså nogen bag min ryg, men det er ikke Døden…” (Troløs, 2000)

Det er kvinden, skuespillerinden, som endnu en gang dukker op der i erindringsarbejdet, i selvangivelsen før døden. Han havde tilsagt hende, men glemt det. Lena Endre er kvinden, Erland Josephson er manden ved skrivebordet. Hun sætter sig på bænken i vinduesnichen. De taler om manden og kvinden. Udenfor er havet. Kort efter sætter han sig på bænken, så han sidder over for hende. Her får vi så fortællingen om, at de dengang tog til Thielska Galleriet, og de sad der i en krog og talte, især han, og så kom tavsheden og dette tomme sekund og det første kys mellem de elskende troløse…

Ingmar Bergman 100 år /6

… Frid (Åke Fridell) fortæller Petra (Harriet Andersson) om sommernattens tre smil. De hjælper Henrik og Anne med at flygte. (Bertil Wredlund i sin filmografi til Bergmans bog Bilder, 1990)

 

FILMVÆRKER

Cinemateket i København har udsendt en smuk invitation: LØRDAG 14. JULI, er Sommarnattens leende / Sommernattens smil så dejligt på programmet. Det kan jeg godt lide! Jesper Andersen og Lone N. Sardemann skriver i deres indbydelse: ”Vi markerer Ingmar Bergmans 100-årsdag den 14. juli ved at vise komedien ’Sommernattens smil’ og byde på et glas vin i Asta Bar efter filmen.” Videre præsenterer de veloplagt og inspirerende en stor tilbageskuende serie af Bergmans filmværker, mange af dem i nye, restaurerede og digitaliserede versioner. Her er det meste af deres tekst med beskrivelse af hele programmet:

RETROSPEKTIV

Af Jesper Andersen og Lone N. Sardemann

Vi markerer den svenske instruktør Ingmars Bergmans 100-årsdag med en stor retrospektiv fra juli-december med en lang række af hans bedste film – flere af dem i spritnye digitale kopier. I første del præsenterer vi bl.a. hovedværkerne ’Sommernattens smil’, ’Det syvende sejl’ og ’Hvisken og råb’.

Bergmans film præsenteres ikke kronoligisk, og serien er ikke komplet. Den tidligste film i juni-august-programmet er ’Sommerleg’ (1951), som var en af de film, Bergman selv holdt mest af, uden tvivl fordi den er baseret på en selvoplevet sommerflirt, da familien ferierede på Ornö. Jean-Luc Godard skrev i Cahiers du Cinéma, at ’Sommerleg’ var ”verdens smukkeste film”. Den sorgløse komedie ’Sommernattens smil’ (1955) – om advokat-familien Engmans ægteskabelige og udenomsægteskabelige affærer – blev Bergmans internationale gennembrud.

Hans berømmelse blev cementeret med ’Ved vejs ende’ (1957) og ’Det syvende segl’ (1957), der repræsenterer instruktørens mest kreative periode, hvor også hans vigtigste stilistiske bidrag til filmhistorien – den kompromisløse brug af nærbilledet – blev etableret. ’Det syvende segl’ er et opgør med Bergmans egen dødsangst og er en hyldest til livet. Scenen hvor ridderen spiller skak med døden er instruktørens – og måske filmhistoriens – mest citerede og parodiserede.

”Jomfrukilden’ (1960) er et intenst drama om det gode og den onde, uskyld og skyld. Filmen gav Bergman en Oscar for bedste fremmedsprogede film samt kritikerprisen i Cannes. I sit banebrydende kameraarbejde lod Sven Nykvist sig inspirere af Akira Kurosawas ’Rashomon’.

Den smertelige og hjerteskærende ’Hvisken og råb’ (1972) bliver af mange – sammen med ’Persona’ – regnet for en af Bergmans vigtigste film. ”Alle mine film kan tænkes i sort/hvid, undtagen ’Hvisken og råb”, sagde Bergman. Der findes meget få film, hvor værkets dybere indhold er intimt forbundet med anvendelsen af farver.

https://www.dfi.dk/cinemateket/biograf/filmserier/serie/ingmar-bergman-100-ar (Program og billetbestilling)

Baltic Sea Forum 2018

It’s a classic, this documentary event in Riga, Latvia. I am proud to say that I have been part of it since the beginning. An event that has nurtured my love to the Baltic documentary cinema. Here is a brief from the website on the history:

The Baltic Sea Forum took place for the first time in 1997 in Denmark, initially it was a Danish initiative for the Baltic countries, Poland and the western part of Russia. It continued to be a Danish initiative until 2001 and then, as the Baltic countries were on their way to enter the European Union, the Danish government decided to let Latvian organizations continue this adventure. At the beginning of this “second phase”, the Baltic Sea Forum was a travelling event through the Baltic countries, but since 2005 it always takes place in Riga…

24 projects have been selected for the 2018 edition, reflecting indeed the social and political situation in the region. See the link below.

One of the projects to be presented is by talented Tatiana Soboleva, whose films, first of all “The Floating Hospital” I have written about/praised on this site. The new film to be presented is called “The Russian Way” (PHOTO) and the description goes like this:

After twenty five years spent abroad, Natalya comes back to Russia and tries to change the life in her native village by using European experience. Her attempts are not approved by the local authorities and makes her neighbors fear…

http://balticseadocs.lv/

Ingmar Bergman 100 år /5

Jane Magnussons Bergman – Et år, et liv er et dramatisk kunstnerportræt om omkostningerne ved at satse hele livet på kunsten… (Kim Skotte)

 

DOKUMENTARFILMINSTRUKTØR

Så kom de danske anmeldelser af filmen, jeg sådan glæder mig til, Jane Magnussens dokumentarfilm om Ingmar Bergmans liv (og måske også hans værk, det er stadigvæk lidt uklart for mig), men i dag har den premiere i en række biografer (desværre ikke også i min by) og så får de udvalgte se. Jeg selv prøver at følge lidt med i anmeldelserne, og i mine aviser i dag finder jeg to. De er naturligvis begge mest optaget af Ingmar Bergman og dokumentarfilmens belysninger af de fortrinsvis mere udvendige sider af hans biografi, ikke så meget af dens behandling af det kunstneriske indhold i hans værker, i teateropsætningerne, fjernsynsproduktionerne, bøgerne og filmene.

Heller ikke dokumentarfilminstruktøren Jane Magnusson journalistiske / cinematografiske kunst er i fokus i de to tekster, til trods for hun må siges at være hovedpersonen. Ikke Bergman for så vidt, men hun har premiere i dag. Der er dog i konklusionerne blevet plads til at kommentere hendes arbejde. Jeg skriver lige lidt af fra disse afsnit:

Fra Caspar Vangs anmeldelse i Randers Amtsavis (Kultur, JF Medier) til 4 af 6 stjerner disse citater:

”Med fornemt overblik og konstant pendulering tilbage til skæbneåret 1957 fortæller Magnussen historien om den store svenske filmskaber, mens der sættes spørgsmålstegn ved, hvor meget der i virkeligheden er selviscenesættelse. Uden at der rokkes ved Bergmans status som kunstnerisk ikon og svensk films mægtigste skikkelse.

Det kan diskuteres om dele af ’Bergman’ fremstår som selvfølgelige og unødvendige som fx de afsnuppede interviewbidder, hvor nutidige filmskabere uden de fjerneste nuancer skamroser manden til skyerne, men overordnet sige, at Magnusson kommer flot omkring manden og myten Bergman. Man får lyst til at gense en masse film…”

Fra Kim Skottes helsidetekst i Politiken til 5 af 6 hjerter denne konklusion:

Bergman – et år, et liv er et dramatisk kunstnerportræt om omkostningerne ved at satse hele livet på kunsten. Bergman nåede helt ind til veddets hårde kerne ved ’at bruge sig selv som både træ og økse’, som han selv udtrykte det. Han var nådesløs over for sig selv og andre, når først filmens magiske sjælelampe blev tændt. Når han arbejdede, var der ingen pardon, og arbejdsnarkomanen Bergman arbejdede altid.

Jane Magnussen har med svenske nøglevidner lavet en på mange måder fremragende film om Ingmar Bergman. Desværre har hun også skullet markere 100-året, så berømtheder fra Barbara Streisand til Zhang Yimou og Lars von Trier bliver luftet for at minde om, at Bergman også internationalt var en gigant.

I en film, der ellers ikke mangler bid, er disse ligegyldighedr som at blive bidt i benet af en tandløs hund. Heldigvis fylder denne logren ikke voldsomt i det samlede billede.

Jane Magnusson: Bergman – Et år, et liv, Sverige 2018, 117 min. Medvirkende: Ingmar Bergman, Lena Endre, Thorsten Flinck, Elliott Gould, Barbra Streisand, Lars Von Trier.

Biografpremiere I DAG torsdag den 12. juli i Grand Teatret og Dagmar NFB, København, i Bibliografen, Bagsværd, i Reprise Teatret, Holte, i Humle Bio, Humlebæk, Nicolai Biograf & Cafe, Kolding, i Biffen, Aalborg, i Øst For Paradis, Aarhus og i Cafebiografen, Odense.

https://biograf.blog/2018/06/01/bergman-et-aar-et-liv/ (Synopsis and NB trailer. Dansk og svensk)

Mansky Wins in Karlovy Vary

The winner of the documentary competition at the festival in Karlovy Vary was – no surprise – “Putin’s Witnesses”, which I did not manage to watch while at the Czech festival, that had – according to competent sources – a good documentary section. I take a bite of the review at Cineeuropa, written by Vladan Petkovic:

…With Mansky’s approach, the film might as well have been titled Putin and I, as his closeness to the Russian ruler during that period provides for unprecedented access and remarkable insight. You would be hard pushed to find such intimate and close-up footage of the president in his early days elsewhere. But what Mansky does best here is showing us the reasons for Putin’s popularity and detailing his rise and gradual evolution into the autocrat that he is today. While the president will still essentially remain a mystery to us mere mortals, Mansky’s film brings us much closer to him than, say, Oliver Stone‘s panegyric The Putin Interviews..

http://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/356761

Ingmar Bergman 100 år /4

Jane Magnussons Bergman – Et år, et liv skildrer hele mennesket Bergman – alle hans sider…


PRIVATLIV

Det drejer sig om hele mennesket Bergman forstår jeg på pressemeddelelsen, jeg håber det også drejer sig om hans film, teateropsætninger, tv-produktioner og forfattervirksomhed, altså Bergmans hele værk og dets indhold. Jeg har ikke set filmen, så jeg ved det ikke, men jeg glæder mig meget, rigtig meget. Og jeg forbereder mig lidt ved at læse, hvad jeg sådan lige her og nu kan finde om Magnusson og hendes film. Først altså fra biograf.blog pressemeddelelsens synopsis:

”Jane Magnusson har med filmen forsøgt at portrættere HELE mennesket Bergman – alle hans sider. Både de fantastiske og de mindre flatterende for at forstå denne store kunstner endnu bedre. Filmen tager sit udgangspunkt i 1957, hvor Ingmar Bergman fik sit store gennembrud. 1957 var året, hvor Bergman var allermest produktiv – han lavede to spillefilm, havde premiere på ”Det syvende sejl” og ”Ved vejs ende”, stod bag fire teateropsætninger, en TV film, havde seks børn med tre forskellige kvinder, og der skete samtidig en masse andre vigtige ting i hans liv. Ingmar Bergman betragtes af mange som en af verdens absolut største kunstnere i moderne tid, først og fremmest indenfor film og ikke mindst ved Cannes Film Festival efter gentagne triumfer. Bergman – Et år, et liv havde sin verdenspremiere på ”Bergman – Et år, et liv” havde sin verdenspremiere på Cannes Film Festival i år.”

Dernæst læser jeg altså så anmeldelser fra Cannes deltagelsen. I The Hollywood Reporter ser jeg dette indholdsreferat, en synopsis sådan lidt mere lovende:

”Bergman: A Year in a Life is nominally structured as a look at what Magnusson argues might be Bergman’s most “productive year of his career,” from the premiere of The Seventh Seal, in February 1957, through the premiere of Wild Strawberries, on Boxing Day. But the focus on those specific months, during which Bergman turned 39, is for the most part a structural device that’s kept in the background, while Magnusson free-associates and roams throughout Bergman’s entire life to illuminate and explore his character. The work’s Swedish title, which literally translates as A Year, A Life, is a more accurate description of what to expect. “ Boyd van Hoeij fra The Hollywood Reporter konkluderer sin anmeldelse sådan:

“… Magnusson is a TV journalist and director who has previously explored Bergman’s legacy in the Trespassing Bergman/Bergman’s Video project, which looked at his influence on filmmakers ranging from Woody Allen to Ang Lee and Martin Scorsese, who all visited Bergman’s iconic Faro Island location. She here makes a more clearly biographical work that delves into the life and work of the writer-director and only occasionally gets carried away by the impression he left on other famous people, like when Barbra Streisand recounts her set visit to Bergman’s 1970 English-language debut, The Touch, which starred her then-husband, Elliott Gould. While what’s being said is fun to hear in a trivial kind of way, the film’s few snippets of celebrity talking heads — others include Holly Hunter, John Landis and Lars von Trier — are unnecessary distractions that don’t add all that much (a few at the end especially feel like an unnecessary retread of Trespassing Bergman territory). “

The Variety’s Owen Gleiberman skriver en langt mere accepterende, lang, grundig og detaljeret anmeldelse, som han begynder således:

“We tend to think of film directors as generals, a cliché that’s useful, and accurate, as far as it goes. Yet compared to almost any other vocation, the essence of what it means to be a film director — especially if you’re a serious and powerful artist — is that you occupy a dozen roles at once. You’re a politician, an acting coach, a therapist, a budget manager, an image technician, a literary dramatist, a back-room manipulator, a dictator, and (when you need to be) everyone’s best friend. Not to mention the things that often go with the job: a media star, a sexual hound dog, and a workaholic.

When you see a typical documentary about a filmmaker, much of this stuff often ends up on the cutting-room floor. But Jane Magnusson’s “Bergman — A Year in a Life,” a portrait of Ingmar Bergman in the pivotal year of 1957 (though it covers his entire life and career), is one of the most honest and overflowing portraits of a film artist that I can remember seeing. It’s one of two Ingmar Bergman documentaries at Cannes this year (the other, which has yet to screen, is Margarethe von Trotta’s “Searching for Ingmar Bergman”), and it captures Bergman as the tender and prickly, effusive and demon-driven, tyrannical and half-crazy celebrity-genius he was: a man so consumed by work, and by his obsessive relationships with women, that he seemed to be carrying on three lives at once…”

Jane Magnusson: Bergman – Et år, et liv, Sverige 2018, 117 min. Medvirkende: Ingmar Bergman, Lena Endre, Thorsten Flinck, Elliott Gould, Barbra Streisand, Lars Von Trier. Biografpremiere torsdag den 12. juli i Grand Teatret og Dagmar NFB, København, i Bibliografen, Bagsværd, i Reprise Teatret, Holte, i Humle Bio, Humlebæk, Nicolai Biograf & Cafe, Kolding, i Biffen, Aalborg, i Øst For Paradis, Aarhus og i Cafebiografen, Odense.

https://biograf.blog/2018/06/01/bergman-et-aar-et-liv/ (Synopsis and NB trailer. Dansk og svensk)

https://variety.com/2018/film/reviews/bergman-a-year-in-a-life-review-ingmar-bergman-1202808268/ (Review, English)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/bergman-a-year-a-life-bergman-ett-ar-ett-liv-1111535 (Review, English)