DocuDays Kiev Ukraine: Equality/ 2

Look at the photo, an elderly couple studying the program waiting for the opening of the 15th edition of DocuDays UA. My wife, Ellen, and I have been here several times, the hospitality is always warm and generous and the program, 62 films this year and masterclasses, pitchings, photo exhibitions, you can not have any objections to. For the first time there is a special competition for Ukrainian feature films, 6 of them, I will try to watch as many as possible. The opening included great live music to accompany trailers for the many sections, good speeches around the theme of equality, again, alas, all of us standing up with yellow papers saying “Free Oleg Sentsov”, and the very obvious choice of an opening film “A Woman Captured” by Hungarian Bernadett Tuza-Ritter. With a fine Q&A afterwards. The opening took place at the new Zhovten Cinema that has – hope I am right – 4 cinema halls and meeting places. The festival people are committed, they have something to say about their country and the world and human rights. And Bravo again to Sweden that is the main sponsor of the festival. And it is not pocket money! The sun is shining outside Hotel Rus where I am right now waiting for the day program to start. I’ll be back with reports and reviews.

http://docudays.org.ua/

Awards at CPH:DOX

The winner of Dox:Award 2018 is ‘The Raft’ ( PHOTO) by the Swedish director Marcus Lindeen, which tells the story of one of the strangest social experiments of all times – told by those who took part in it.

The jury states:

“The winner of the DOX:AWARD 2018 is a film about an endless curiosity for the world and the characters who try to survive in it. Its great accomplishment lies in the equal measure of conceptual and emotional elements in the construction, in which feelings and emotions get literally elevated. Two very different forms are intertwined and merge surprisingly well: we see love, companionship and stamina triumph over darker sides of human behavior. We applaud the director for his stamina to continue working on this extensive and complex project until it reached a form where it looks deceptively effortless to the innocent eye. This jury is not innocent but we were nevertheless captivated and very moved by this film.

The jury perceives the film as a unique record of time and

culture, of aging and ultimately, a monument to the courage of people formerly known as the weaker sex, who embark on a journey into the unknown.

We cannot imagine a better metaphor for what it is we’re all trying to do everyday in the documentary field. We’re proud to announce a film that oozes CPH:DOX from all its pores, in its perfect marriage of form and content, of humanity and aesthetics: we’re delighted to announce as the winner of the DOX:AWARD 2018: The Raft, by Marcus Lindeen.

The winner of the F:ACT Award is ‘Laila at the Bridge’ by Elizabeth Mirzaei and Gulistan Mirzaei. A powerful film about a woman who is willpower in its purest form.

The jury states:

“In a time where the media leaves societal issues behind after long ages of war documenting the repercussion of conflict this film stands out for its vivid realism, unflinching focus on the fraught reality of a very human story. A story that ultimately we are all collectively responsible for.

In Kabul, full of scars and disappointment, we meet a true hero who tries to catch the faded hope in the eyes of thousands of opium addicts living under a bridge.  They rather take drugs than eat bread and the price is almost the same, but the consequences unbearable. But Layla Haidary has a mission and she fights every day to save lives without any support from a corrupt government. Breaking rules and social norms of a woman’s place in Afghanistan, Laila remains resilient and brave.

Meanwhile, the two directors remain persistent and engaged, carrying the flow of the film with honesty and agility, turning their investigation into an ethical mission despite the danger and risks they undertake to fulfill it. Juxtaposing their hero with a horrid environment and a countless number of people and issues aiming at portraying her as a true archetype, entangled in the world’s tragedy but never shying away from her near constant hope to change her world and the world. The award goes to: ‘Laila at the Bridge’ by Elizabeth Mirzaei and Gulistan Mirzaei.”

The winner of the New:Vision Award is the film ‘Wild Relatives’ by Jumana Manna.

The jury states:

“In a diverse selection of New:Vision-ary works in which Nature is understood both as Presence and the Present that defines us, the New:Vision jury has selected an ambitious work of non-fiction that draws a multi-dimensional Venn Diagram in which disparate geographies, contemporary geo-politics and Agro-Feminism intersects in the  form of a cinematic seed pod. For its optimism, empathy, and agility in engaging with the present, the New:Vision Award goes to Wild Relatives.”

The winner of the Nordic:Dox Award is the film ‘Lykkelænder’ by the Danish director Lasse Lau.

The jury states: 


“The Award goes to a film that challenges in both perception of those portrayed and through its form of representation. The winning film reflects upon historical imbalance with charm and playful questioning of those relationships in the present. This new voice presents a polyphonic cinematic topography that travels beyond borders. The Nordic:Dox Award goes to Lykkelænder.”

The winner of the Next:Wave Award is the film ‘Beautiful Things’ by the Italian directors Giorgio Ferrero & Federico Biasin.

The jury states:

“The award goes to an original film that marries boldness, style, meaning, precision and surprise: Beautiful Things by Giorgio Ferrero & Federico Biasin.”

The winner of the Politiken Audience Award is ‘False Confessions’ by the director Katrine Philp, a legal thriller about a pro-bono idealist’s work for justice in a cynical justice system.

https://cphdox.dk/

 

 

CPH:DOX 2018/ Dreaming Murakami

NITESH ANJAAN: DREAMING MURAKAMI

As a writer and film maker who is quite interested in (and even feel an affinity for) the Japanese author Haruki Murakami, I felt almost obliged to be disappointed and a bit bitter after watching this film. I just knew that about myself because I’m petty and jealous.

But lo and behold: I found that this is a good film and that you should see it.

The film discreetly and knowingly follows Danish translator, Mette Holm, and her work on one of Murakami’s first novels (first published in Denmark last year). At the same time an alternative world is introduced in different ways. Most prominently by a giant frog (inspired by the Murakami-story “Super-Frog Saves Tokyo” from the collection “After the Quake”) and for instance more subtly by adding another moon in a couple of scenes (inspired by the three-volume novel “1Q84”).

It actually works surprisingly elegant due to very convincing VFX. As we follow Holm, her thoughts and her talks with colleagues in a somewhat “normal” documentary style and therefore are forced to activate our cognitive skills, we are also introduced to that special other-world, which is so prominent – but feels truly “natural” – in his novels. So not only are we getting closer to the work of the translator (I actually prefer Holm’s translations and has stopped reading him in English), we are also getting a sense of the special characteristics of the authorship.

At some point, we are let to believe that the film’s climax will be at the Royal Danish Library where Holm will be on stage with Murakami himself after he has been given the “Hans Christian Andersen Literature Award”, but – SPOILER ALERT – I happened to know that THAT wouldn’t happen. They gave the performance, yes, but he just won’t appear on film.

Of course, that must be a bit disappointing for the average viewer – and it does amputate the film a bit – but at the end of the day, director Anjaan (still a pupil at Danish Film School) still offers us a great deal.

The film was selected for IDFA (Panorama section) and is currently featured at CPH:DOX.

PS. How did I know that Murakami wouldn’t appear in the film? Because we’ve tried ourselves for another project, and actually there is a small and somewhat crazy follow-up story in Danish here on that story: http://mikkelstolt.dk/extras/. Look for “PÅ JAZZKLUB MED MR. M.”.

Dreaming Murakami, dir. Nitesh Anjaan, 58 min., 2017

CPH:DOX 2018/ Giants…

ALEXANDER RYNÉUS, MALLA GRAPENGIESSER, PER BIFROST: GIANTS AND THE MORNING AFTER

I saw a clip of this Swedish documentary in Malmø at the DocIncubator presentation of new projects in connection with the Nordisk Panorama. Promising it was and I was not disappointed, when I saw the final result, a warm and beautifully shot documentary from the small community Ydre; quite right decision of the organisers to put the film in the main competition of CPH:DOX.

There he is, Sven-Inge, the mayor who welcomes new citizens to Ydre by going to the parents and the baby with a small welcome gift for the latter – encouraging the parents to continue to make babies in a town suffering from depopulation. Around 3000 they are but there is a slight increase, which makes the old white-bearded man happy. You see him often in the film studying the population statistics, when he is not taking part in the many activities that the film crew has caught so well during filming over several seasons.

And there are other characters of importance – the owner of the

sawmill, a third generation factory, that has problems to overcome but succeeds. You see him with his wife, and you see him in a lovely scene with his daughter, where they are decorating the xmas tree. Daughter: Cool down, let’s have a nice and quiet xmas, she says. Father is stressed but ”yes, and Aleppo is liberated”! Dialogues like that pop up in the film in situations of understated humour that there are so many of. The film lives from situations that are put very well together following the seasons.

And for a jealous Dane: Swedish summer, forest, it’s green, lakes, cows, horses and blond young girls and boys, who sing and dance, when it is mid summer and make activities like setting up ”Annie”. There is a positive welcome attitude to immigrants and to the parliament member, who come to learn about the problems the community have, like falling prices on milk.

11 meter tall Bule and the saga about him, the Giant, the symbol of Ydre, is embracing the film and its characters, Sven-Inge and his lovely citizens in a film that is much more than a report from a depopulated town due to the excellent cinematic storytelling that made me sit with a smile the whole film along. This is how life, according to the filmmaker’s interpretation, should be lived in small towns!

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=722

Doker Moscow Russia

In a break of the Danish television 3 hour long coverage of the re-election of President Putin – instead of falling asleep – I checked facebook and saw that the organisers of the independent documentary festival in Moscow had chosen the opening film, Polish Marta Prus ”Over the Limit”, for festival that runs April 12-17. A fine choice of course – the film is excellent and the characters are Russian.

I have since the first edition of the festival been a fan of what Irina Shatalova and Nastia Tarasova, and their team, have set up. This is the fourth edition and it includes a main competition of feature docs, a short film competition, docs for kids, masterclasses, discussions.

Other films in the main competition are ”A Woman Captured” by Hungarian Bernadett Tuza-Ritter (shown these days at CPH:DOX and is the opening film on friday 23rd at DocuDays in Kiev), the touching Dutch film ”Alicia” by Maasja Ooms, the equally moving Belorussian film about women in prison, ”Debut” by Anastasiya Miroshnichenko and French Emmanuel Gras Congo-film ”Makala”. 14 films are shown in the main competition.

High quality, a focus on how people live around the world.

https://www.midff.com/

Marie-Clémence Andriamonta Paes: Fahavalo

”I’ll try to tell you the story”, says the weak old man in a blue shirt with a hat on his head. He is adressing the camera crew. ”I was 22 in 1947”, the year that is the focus of the film, the year when a rebellion took place led by the ”Fahavalo”, the enemies it means, against the French who had colonised Madagascar. An uprising against the Vazaha, the French, the Europeans. He was one of the freedom fighters and he paid his price, 8 years and 9 months in prison. The rebels were hiding in the forests and long after they were defeated, many of them were still there.

That old man is just one of the storytellers in the film. A handful of other men and women still alive are the witnesses found and involved in the film by the filmmakers. In conversations, which are conversations and not interviews – and conversations that most of the time include listeners, relatives, children and grandchildren, who want to hear and – you sense that – are proud of what they did back then. The tellers are mostly ordinary (hate that word) people but there are also some, who have studied this crucial point in the Malagasy history… The way they talk is wonderful. They like to bring to life the dramatic stories about what happened, and about how life was, these 70 years ago, and they often do it in a flowerish, metaphoric language, helped by questions from the film crew. It is no secret that there is a film crew, who asks and respects and are curious on behalf of the viewer. Oral history at its best. At one sequence one of the old men starts his talk but is interrupted by one of the relatives, who says ”don’t talk so much, get to the point”, but behind the camera the filmmakers object: Let him talk. This is why one gets to love the people in the conversations: they are given space to express themselves. And it is an evidence of the love and cinematic competence the filmmakers have dedicated to the film.

A few words more on Malagasy history at that time: During WW2 many Malagasy men were going to Europe to fight with the French against the Germans. At the same time the official Madagascar was supporting the French Vichy government led by Marechal Pétain. For that reason the English occupied Madagascar during WW2. After the war the soldiers came back – for their support to France de Gaulle had promised them independence. It did not happen. Instead Madagascar became a part of France Union, a colony. This disappointment led to the rebellion. As one says: ”A lot of Malagasy blood was spilled back then”. Another sweet old man says that “de Gaulle colonised us to help us”!

The film is built as a journey in history and literally to find the survivors. Along and through mountain tunnels, passing lakes and rivers, bigger and smaller villages, inside and outside houses. The Film as a Film is excellent. Content and form go hand in hand. The scoop is that at the same time as you experience a historical event told as old men and women remember it – the insurrection against power and colonialism – it is also, through the images, giving the viewer a sense of the island of today. Daily hard life in the countryside as it was also at that time, like building a house from clay, carrying food and goods in baskets on their heads, cooking at a fireplace outside… With rituals like the Sikidy – I am not able to tell you what it is, but fascinating to watch.

A sequence to make you understand the way the film is shifting from then to now and back again: A man talks about the many rebels who were being killed in battles, where they fought with spears and machetes against guns and knives; cut to a poor cemetery where you find the inscription ”The Tomb of the Brave”; cut to a lake where a lonely man in a canoo is paddling; cut to the same motif in the past in one of the extraordinary black/white archive scenes that the film is full of; cut to animals crossing a river… and all that accompanied by the captivating accordéon music composed by Régis Gizavo, who is from Madagascar. It’s superb!

And I love the long scenes like the one, where a boy is cutting wood meant to give fire with a big knife. It is no surprise for me, who knows what cameraperson César Paes has been doing before together with Marie-Clémence as producer and co-director; he has ”a documentary eye” and knows a poetic situation, when he feels or sees one. There are many.

On the photo above you see cameraman César Paes, assistant director and set photographer Tiago Paes, Berthe Raharisoa, in her white dress, a lively lady, born in 1925, who was part of the MDRM. In the film she sings the anthem of the resistance party. Lovely!

And to the right director and producer Marie Clémence Andriamonta Paes, as the name indicates she is half Malagasy, half French. It is of course a huge advantage that she speaks the language and can communicate directky with the witnesses.

All I know about Madagascar, I know from Marie-Clémence and César Paes and their films. Way back from the 1989 “Angano… Angano”. That we bought for distribution in Denmark. It is so beautiful and well shot that our grand master of Danish documentary, Jørgen Roos, thought it was shot on 35mm film. Thank you for that and “Mahaleo” and more films and let this new wonderful film travel!

France, 2018, 90 mins.

http://fahavalo-film.com

CPH:DOX 2018/ Exit

KAREN WINTHER: EXIT

“How do you get out of the closed and often violent milieu among extremists without risking your life? Norwegian filmmaker Karen Winther has taken the journey herself. With her past as a right-wing extremist, she visits other defectors in the United States, Germany and Denmark, where she meets the former Danish left-wing activist Søren Lerche and the Frenchman David, who spent six years in prison as an accomplice in a terrorist attack in France. Jihadis, Nazis and violent Antifas: All the people whom Winther meets on her journey have broken with their past and are now living with the consequences. ‘Exit’ is an exploratory firsthand account about de-radicalisation and about the tough exit which leaves those involved looking back and asking the same question: Why me? The excitement and the clear sense of identity as a rebel and as a part of a group on a mission are among the obvious answers. But the truth is often more complex, and what they most often have in common is regretting the bitter mistakes of the past.” (CPH:DOX programme)

KOMMENTAR

Det er en beslutsom films beslutsomme slutscene. Manuel har skåret igennem sin tøven og har pakket det nødvendigste og er på flugt med sit barn til et nyt hemmeligt sted, fordi de tidligere venner i organisationen har fundet ham. Han er igen på flugt i sit eget land, i Tyskland, han er nødt til at beskytte barnet og sig selv. Jeg har ved gennem 80 minutter at være med Karen Winther på hendes gentagne møder lært ham at kende, og er med hende og hendes film faktisk kommet til at holde af ham, dette voldelige og fredelige menneske.

Det er en rigtig god film, det er en aldeles vedkommende og sober tv-dokumentar, en tilbageskuende jeg-fortælling i filmens nutid med en undersøgelsesrejse efter lignende fortællinger og samtaler med vigtige velformulerede vidner som denne de-radikaliserede mand. Alt skildret i et ordentligt og tvivlende og tænkende journalistisk essays form. Filmen er beregnet til tv, tror jeg, og den vil bestemt kunne findes på tv den kommende tid, men jeg vil lige så bestemt anbefale at se den i en biografs mørke koncentration nu det, er vil jeg igen tro, enestående muligt. Der er meget at lytte intenst til, fine nuancer i sjældne formuleringer at opfatte og vende og dreje i billedsidens vignetters korte hvile. Mine fordomme om moralsk og politisk radikalisering er blevet grundigt rystet.

Karen Winther: Exit, Norge, 2018, 83 min. Præsenteres på CPH:DOX 2018, som har visninger tirsdag, torsdag og følgende søndag: https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=571 (Datoer, tider, steder, billetter)

CPH:DOX 2018/ Lost Warrior

NASIB FARAH OG SØREN STEEN JESPERSEN: LOST WARRIOR

Mohammed was just three years old when he was sent away from Somalia without his parents to a better life in England. As a teenager in London he got involved in crime and ended up in prison where he became radicalised. As a 19-year-old he was extradited to Somalia, where he landed straight in the arms of the terrorist organisation Al-Shabab. But when Mohammed finds out that Al-Shabab is not a liberation movement, but kills innocent people, he decides to flee. As a 23-year old he is living undercover in Mogadishu in the hopes of hiding from Al-Shabab. Here, he meets Fathi who was born in London, but sent to Somalia to be ‘reeducated’. They get married and when Fathi returns home to London she is pregnant with their child. ‘Lost Warrior’ follows the young couple’s attempt to be united as a family and to create a future for themselves and their son, Yassir. But Fathi and Mohammed are caught in the global politics of the day. Where to go? And what are his options now? They are also caught in their own culture, where the demands to maintain traditional and religious patterns is not at all consistent with being a young person in a modern world.

KOMMENTAR

Jamen det er jo en kærlighedshistorie og den fortælles sådan. Der er forhindringer, politiske, juridiske, administrative, kulturelle, familiemæssige, og i denne umulighed er der alligevel korte løsninger og øjeblikke af mulig lykke, i en scene snakker de tæt sammen om farverne på europæiske pas, og i den smukkeste scene forsøger han at placere et øresmykke med sine fumlende hænder så nær hendes ansigt og hvisker genert undskyldende: det er min første gang. Det er regulært spændende og det er meget ungt. Der er de to og der er deres barn, som både er sammenhængskraften og udmattelsen. Fortællingen begynder midt i det hele og slutter der, fortællingen er en række kapitler i de tres dannelseshistorier kombineret til en familiehistorie. Hele tiden i to byer, i to verdener, i to kulturer, hvor de tre er én historisk fremspirende kultur, dannet i det nye moderne, det nye modernes unge familie, som er bundet i det globale, men med en længsel mod det nye lokale sted.

Det er et stærkt hold, som fortæller den historie: filmen åbner i fotografisk skønhed, et vidunderligt gadebillede med mange filmhistoriske mindelser om stedet for handlingen med det samme roligt defineret, fortsætter i lutter regelbundet billedskønhed med lange scener på række, alle med Henrik Bohn Ipsens tydelige signatur, vel at mærke ikke påskrevet, men indarbejdet sammen med Anita Hopland. Et filmfotografisk mesterværk.

Filmoptagelsernes fortælling skrider roligt og omhyggeligt frem i klart afgrænsede scener, som alle holder deres intensitet til sekundet før de dør og så bringes videre i en ligesom umærkelig intens, stadigt stigende spænding, et drama af overblik og ro, endnu et klippekunstnerisk mesterværk af Steen Johannessen.

Personinstruktionen og det velforberedte arrangement i en lang række af disse scener af replikfyldt og gestiktydeligt samvær, ja, det er for en stor del en iscenesat dokumentarfilm, efterlader hver af disse en sjælden tilfredsstillelse af dybere forståelse og kompliceret anfægtelse hos mig,

Det er et dristigt kunstnerisk eksperiment, det er opdateret iscenesat dokumentarisme, det er i alle detaljerne (fotografi, klip, lyd, dialog, dekoration…) rene og ganske klare stiliserede, improviserede, ekstemporerede eller altså iscenesatte samvær og samtaler uden mislyde for mig at høre. Lost Warrior er modigt kontrolleret filmkunst af instruktørduen Nasib Farah og Søren Steen Jespersen.

Det en vigtig problemfyldt historie, hvis både juridiske, etiske og socialantropologiske sider i min oplevelse af fortællingens virkelighed behændigt i klippet bringer mig i anfægtelsens tvivlende syv sind, når jeg lytter til den britiske advokats i samtalen med den fortabte kriger og til onklen fra hans familieklans besindige rådgivning i scenerne med ham, dels krigeren alene, dels hvor krigeren har sin mor med. Men, men de to besindige voksne har jo kun små, omend vigtige biroller og fylder ikke nok til at fungere som mine helte, jeg som publikum i biografen holder med, knytter min identitet til. Men de er mig nærmest.

For jeg kan slet ikke komme i kontakt med de to unge, specielt ikke med ham, finder ham som 23 årig barnlig og urimelig og mærkeligt uerfaren trods sin angiveligt begivenhedsrige fortid som selvhjulpet barn, gangster, udvist efter afsoning og deserteret hellig kriger. Hun er lettere at forstå som ung mor i et britisk-somalisk hjem med genkendelige generationsmodsætninger. De to er imidlertid overdådigt smukke, de er overvældende selvoptagne, især han, og min forståelse for deres ungdomskultur svigter.

Onklen, som griber ansvarligt objektivt analyserende ind, bliver min nærmeste helt i filmen, advokaten analyserer jo blot og lægger med en beklagelse sagen bort i den således helt centrale skype scene, som sammenfatter den episode i den tre personers dannelsesroman Lost Warrior er, en episode, som både begyndes og afsluttes in medias res. Så jeg har et problem: jeg nyder uansvarlig filmværket på dets smukke overflade, men jeg kan ikke trænge ned i dets indholds skarptkantede dybde uden tvivl, tvivl… Men at forårsage anfægtelse hører jo netop filmkunst til.

Danmark, 2018. 82 min. Produktion: Helle Faber, Made in Copenhagen med fast hånd må jeg tro i det komplicerede værk som hun præsenterer på CPH:DOX 2018:

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=515 (Datoer, tider, steder, billetter)

http://www.madeincopenhagen.dk/da/den-fortabte-kriger

Tsymbal & Smoljanski: Two Painters…

… Oscar Rabin and Valentina Kropivnitskaya, their lives and their art. I knew the name Rabin in beforehand and that he is exiled, living in Paris now, 90 years old, but I had never really heard the story about him as an artist in the USSR and I did not know that his wife Valentina was such an excellent artist. All that was clarified because I met Alexander Smoljanski at DOK Leipzig, who invited me to watch the two films about the artist couple. The film are introduced like this on the website:

”This is a film project in two parts showing the story of the leader of the Soviet underground artists, painter Oscar Rabin, and his wife, painter Valentina Kropivnitskaya. It is a story of painters who never betrayed their artistic principles and always fought to show how powerful a weapon nonviolent resistance can be – it’s a story of love, art and human dignity.”

I learned a lot from the two films. About the Lianozovo group of so-

called non-conformist artists from a small village outside Moscow, who rebelled against the official social realism; that was late 1950’es beginning of 1960’es. And I was reminded of the importance of the Bulldozer Exhibition in 1974 with Rabin as one of the main organisers – the bizarre name comes from the fact that the KGB sent, yes, bulldozers with water canons to stop the exhibition. It is said to have changed the art scene in USSR.

Oscar Rabin (th) sammen med kollegerne Youri Jarki og Alexander Gleser 1974

And it changed the life of Oscar Rabin, who with his family was expelled from the country to live in Paris.

The 2018 film about Rabin, made in this year where he is 90 years old, is shot in Paris with an enormous archive from his (almost) first years in USSR and including the known material with Kruschev calling modern art for perverse. Rabin’s childhood is explained, he is interviewed and colleagues and art critics talk about him. The Greek art collector Costakis and his important is mentioned in this film about an ”unofficial artist”.

And Rabin is the main storyteller in the film from 2015 about his wife Valentina Kropivnitskaya, who died in 2008. Their close love story is told by Rabin in his studio in Paris; he does so in a beautiful caring way, where he talks about this outsider in the Lianozovo school, who went her own way as an naíve artist, making fine delicate works – she used colored pencils like children do – it’s a artist who talks with love about his modest and shy wife, who did not say a lot and was not interested in publicity. In Sovietunion she painted animals, in France she turned to landscapes, dreamerish, the title of this film is rightfully ”In Search of a Lost Paradise”.

Two fine artists living and working in quite limited space. Portrayed in a classical way – lots of interviews, commentary, archive, works – conventional, yes, but the characters stand out as extraordinary.

In Search of a Lost Paradise, 2015, 52 mins. Director: Evgeny Tsymbal. Script and production: Alexander Smoljanski.

Oscar. 2018. Directors: Evgeniy Tsymbal and Alexander Smoljanski.

The film is quite new so I have no information on its festival life yet. But Rabin is celebrated in many countries where the film will get its place, I’m sure,

http://oscar-rabin.web61.server4.configcenter.info

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/17/bulldozer-underground-exhibition-revolutionised-russian-art

 

CPH:DOX 2018/ The Cleaners

HANS BLOCK OG MORITZ RIESEWIECK: THE CLEANERS

”What responsibility do Facebook, Google and YouTube have for what is being posted on their sites? And what power do they have to shape the public discourse through censorship? Two questions that are currently preoccupying legislators and politicians. But who are the people who actually try to keep the internet clean? Meet five Filipino ‘content moderators’ who have the unrewarding job of keeping social media free from offensive content, but who also work full-time in a legal and ethical grey zone between freedom of expression, censorship and commercial interests. ‘The Cleaners’ brings us into the underworld of the internet, where the debates are already raging. 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube and 2.5 million posts created on Facebook. Every minute. Every day. And the media giants’ influence on everything from presidential elections to the number of likes for one’s status updates is now so enormous that legislation can no longer ignore it.” (CPH:DOX programme)

KOMMENTAR

Han her på et still fra dokumentaren er content moderator, han er anonym, men dog ikke sløret som et andet mere forsigtigt vidne. Han er fra Manila, han arbejder der i et firma, der næsten som et almindeligt rengøringsfirma tilbyder de store på nettet som Facebook og You Tube og dem en smule nedefter i almægtighed at fjerne brugernes snavs fra deres sider beregnet til social medieaktivitet i det vældige og ufattelige betydningsfelt mellem frie ytringer og utallige økonomiske, politiske og moralske begrænsninger og hensyn. Utugtige billeder, frygtelige billeder, falske nyheder, politiske spamangreb og visse uacceptable gruppers agitation: Ignore or delete. Simpelthen skelne mellem ondt og godt, som en af hans kolleger fra arbejdsboksen ved siden af i firmaets værksted udtrykker det. Man kan, synes jeg, se Hans Blocks og Moritz Riesewiecks dokumentar alene for de filminspirerede afsnit med ham og hans kollegers skyld.

Man kan også se dokumentaren for Nicole Wongs skyld, det vil de to instruktører mene, da de har bragt hende i front med sine langt mere sofistikerede holdninger, som jeg ikke så umiddelbart som cleanernes ja eller nej har baggrund og mulighed for at opfatte med det samme. Vil jeg forstå hendes synspunkt, må det være langt mere middelbart end dokumentarens argumenterede journalistik kan tilbyde mig, dens nok næstvigtigste vidne er fra den anden sociale medieverden, hun er fra et helt andet overvejelses- og beslutningslag med sine erfaringer som juridisk rådgiver i Obamas administration og fra tilsvarende opgaver i Googles ledelseslag. For så senere at forstå hende, må jeg først læse meget mere og se dokumentaren flere gange. Det er meget rimeligt, sådan har jeg det ofte. Og man kan helt bestemt se dette tv-program alene på grund af de vigtige interviews med Wong og en række tilsvarende kompliceret artikulerende vidner.

Længere opklippede afsnit med reportage er skudt ind imellem: En fotokunstner sidder i sit værksted og fjerner, nej, dekonstruerer et foto af et bestemt barn druknet under en oversvømmelse, arbejder omhyggeligt med en skalpel i den fotografiske overflade, så der blot bliver et hvidt omrids, en skygge som af en engel. Det er egentlig smukt, et icon som fotografiet af den lille nøgne pige i en gruppe flygtende fra et flyangreb med napalmbomber, som alle i min generation kender. ”Det er et icon” siger content moderatoren, han har hørt ordet, hørt, at det er det, ”vist nok fra krigen i Viet Nam.” Men det overtræder reglen om gengivelse af genitalier, især børns, så det må væk. Delete. En maler arbejder et andet sted i verden med sit portræt af den amerikanske præsident nøgen og med lille penis. Ignore or delete?

Enkelte afsnit, eller hvad jeg skal kalde disse dokumentarens linjeskift i rapportstil, er fuldstændig og ren tabloid, omnibus, ugeblad og magasin. De er med vilje lavet for en åbenbart nødvendig breddes skyld, men de svækker den alvorlige dybde i Blocks og Riesewiecks værk, og grebet medfører det banale faktum, at alt er aldeles tekstbåret, alle billedscener er illustrationer til det, som siges. De eneste filmiske scener er de statements, som bevarer lyd og billede sammen. Alle spørgsmål er imidlertid klippet bort, så det er slet ikke samtaler, faktisk heller ikke interviews, jeg oplever som seer, men netop statements, udtalelser, citater fra et oprindeligt samværs helhed.

De fineste, mest interessante af disse er så dem, som de medvirkende content moderators, disse cleaners leverer. De gør dermed dokumentaren værd at se. De er også smukkest fotograferede scener, jeg ved ikke rigtigt, hvorfor jeg mener det. Låner billedet den medvirkendes oprigtighed og særlige aura? Er det journalistiske essay indlejret i dette lag, eller kunne det være det? Tænker jeg hver gang.

Dokumentaren i sin meget bevidste, sin teknisk fremragende, konsekvente og meget styrede helhed mangler nemlig sit essay, sin personlighed, sin intellektuelle synlighed, sin journalistiske værdighed. Den brede, underholdende, jeg synes tvivlsomme, henvendelse har overtaget overvejelsen og tvivlen. Men den er, hvad tv-dokumentaren The Cleaners vil og overdådigt lykkes med. Den er flot visuelt færdiggjort og overbevisende dygtigt produceret som den tv-dokumentar den bevidst vil være, fuldstændig i sin genres stil. Ja, den er stilren. Men er den så fremragende? Spørger jeg imponeret mig selv og mumler et usikkert nej.

Men gå under alle omstændigheder ind og se selv efter, som kollega Müller ofte skriver, og bliv elegant underholdt og lær som jeg gjorde, måske for første gang også som jeg gjorde, hvad en content moderator er. Disse mennesker er for mig dokumentarens uforglemmelighed, de er så almindelige og alvorlige og sympatiske, ja, søde mennesker i deres koldblodige manøvrering i deres arbejdsområde mellem Facebooks og You Tubes og Googles regler og deres firmas regler og så til når det kommer til beslutningen i brøkdele af et sekund deres egen smag og moral. 25 tusind gange i døgnet (eller var det pr. vagt?) denne hurtige afgørelse: ignore or delete.

Tyskland 2018, 90 min. Vises på CPH:DOX 2018: https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=583 (Datoer, tider, steder, billetter)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/cleaners-review-1076159 (Anmeldelse med god baggrundsorientering)