Krakow FF Announces Intl. Competition

The festival, that runs May 29 till June 5, has previously announced the selection of Polish documentaries and short films and animated films for competitive sections, as well as a special focus on Sweden this year. And not to forget a tribute to master Marcel Lozinski, whose ”Anything Can Happen” recently was honoured as The Best Polish Documentary Ever – today arrived a fine press release on the 19 titles invited to compete for the Golden Horn in the international section.

Talented Piotr Stasik opens the festival and the competition with a film from New York, ”21 x New York”, ” an extraordinary story about loneliness which accompanies the contemporary inhabitant of a great metropolis, shown from the point of view of twenty one people, met in the New York City subway…” Stasik has previously been praised on this site for his “The Last Summer” and “A Diary of a Journey”.

The press release: “Every year, the competition is characterised by extraordinary diversity of stories, portrayed protagonists or phenomena. However, very often the dominating motifs of the films mirror the current reality or social problems around the world…” in other words the festival selection mirrors the world we live in so you will find films about refugees, on “how we perceive “the others” today, on the armed conflict in Ukraine, but also films on “family bonds”, “interpersonal relationships, intricate and multi-faceted…”. Among them is Swedish Sara Broos “Reflections”, reviewed on this site.

Let me finish by giving you a full paragraph from the press release: The competition section does not lack cinematic portraits, either. Among them, there is the film “My Friend Boris Nemtsov” (dir. Zosya Rodkevich), depicting the last period in the life of the eponymous protagonist, the leader of the opposition in Russia, shot dead last year. The camera accompanies him during his pre-election journeys and also in less formal moments, but it also allows to notice the close bond which the director managed to create with her protagonist. “All You Need Is Me” (photo) (dir. Wim van der Aarn) is a story about young Dutch painter, his work and life, made on the basis of abundant archival materials and conversations with the protagonists, creating a colourful and at the same time tragic portrait of a contemporary artist.”

All titles and a mention of all sections, go to the website of the rich festival:

http://www.krakowfilmfestival.pl/en/news/618

Christian Holten Bonke: Ejersbo /2

… En særlig vægt og aura har interviewet med forlagsredaktøren Johannes Riis, optagelser som bliver en beretning helt for sig selv, en indlevet rapport om selve det litterære arbejde og kun det. Et element som distanceret faglig og indlevet digterisk findes centralt i filmens konstruktion, og det peger da også direkte mod filmens kerne: det store berømte romanværk og der særligt Afrika trilogien. Riis’ redegørelse er i sammenhængen et uundværligt element, det forekommer i og for sig alene en film, en tv-dokumentar værd…

TV2 Dokumania sender ”Ejersbo” på tirsdag 26. april 20:45. Jeg skrev om filmen ved DOXBIO premieren i efteråret, jeg anbefaler den igen meget, læs hele anmeldelsen:

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3372/

Olexa & Scalisi: Half Life in Fukushima

It makes me glad, when it goes well for former students from the Bolzano based Zelig Documentary School, where I was a teacher for many years. Therefore my curiosity made me ask Mark Olexa and Francesca Scalisi for a vimeo link, when I read that the film was selected for Visions du Réel, where it had two screenings followed by cinema screenings in their country Swizerland with upcoming 3 shows at the Hot Docs Film Festival in Toronto. With Olexa and Scalisi as directors and Jakob Stark as cameraman a fine film has been made from a no-go zone in Fukushima, five years after the catastrophe, and 30 years after Chernobyl. The film is shot on super 16mm (!) by Stark, who is (sorry!) a very Strong and talented cameraman as he, also a graduate from Zelig, demonstrated with ”Guanape Sur” by János Richter and ”Dal Profondo” by Valentina Pedicini.

I write this as an excuse. I can see the quality of the images but of course the experience will be quite different, when I will have the chance to watch it on a big screen, and not on my MacBook.

Anyway, the film bears evidence of a clear personal aesthetic choice. Long and quiet sequences take us to an insight visit to the empty streets of the radiated zone with Naoto, who lives there with his father. He is the one the camera follows around to his cows and horses, to the packed contaminated garbage, to an ostrich who is happy to see him (!), to an absurd situation where he stops his car at a traffic crossroad waiting for the red light to become green (!) with noone else present, to another absurd situation where he plays golf in this middle of nowhere (!), to him being in brief conversation at home with his father. Otherwise the information and the emotion is primarily given through a voice-off of Naoto. It’s a pretty silent visualization of a post-catastrophical landscape and the filmmakers deserve a praise for bringing in the absurdity and humour – we have seen enough images from the nuclear disaster, we have them in our heads, when Naoto shows around to the consequences. A couple of times we hear desperate people’s sound bites (from 2011) following Naoto, I could have done without them, much more productive are the loudspeaker messages about how deal with the garbage and other safety messages (!). A no-message film, no archive, no disturbing music to make us ”feel”, with a fine editing rythm (Zelig teacher Marzia Mete has taken part in that process) that suites the superb images that keep a respectful distance to Naoto, whose point of view the film conveys.

Switzerland, France, 2016, 61 mins.

https://www.facebook.com/HalfLifeInFukushima/?fref=ts     

Mads Ellesøe: Børnesoldatens nye job

Når Nagieb Khaja, som har min tillid og respekt som journalist anbefaler en ny dokumentar på sin facebookside, bliver jeg opmærksom. Han skrev i forgårs: ”På tirsdag kl.20.45 viser Dokumania på DR2 Mads Ellesøes dokumentar Børnesoldatens nye job, som handler om udlicitering af krig. Jeg har ikke set den endnu, men med mit indgående kendskab til Mads´tidligere produktioner, han er efter min opfattelse en af Danmarks dygtigste undersøgende journalister, er jeg sikker på, at det er en hårdtslående og vigtig dokumentar.”

Mads Ellesøe laver for tiden tv-dokumentarer for DR og har tidligere instrueret tv-serien Pind & Holdt i USA (2012) og filmen  Far, far, krigsmand (2009) om en dansk soldat udsendt til Afghanistan. I det, Ellesøe har skrevet om sin film i pressematerialet, finder jeg en overvejelse efter aksluttet research og en konklusion på materialets udsagn, som jeg læser som en vinkling af den nye dokumentar: ”… Filmen er ikke tænkt som en kritik af privatisering eller af udbud og efterspørgsel. Der er intet galt i, at en virksomhed vil tjene penge. Men filmen giver et portræt af, hvad der sker, når markedskræfterne får lov at virke helt uden regler. Ganske som vand altid vil finde den letteste vej ned, så vil uregulerede markedskræfter i et globalt marked altid søge efter den billigst mulige arbejdskraft. Og de billigst muligt unge mænd med massiv våbenerfaring er åbenbart tidligere børnesoldater fra Sierra Leone, der tager til Irak for 250 dollars om måneden. Ganske enkelt fordi det er deres eneste mulighed for at tjene penge.”

Filmen har to afdækninger, den første: vestens krig i Irak overlades i stigende omfang til private firmaers hære, og den anden: disse firmaer bruger de billigst mulige lejesoldater og blandt disse mænd som er oplært i krigens håndværk som børnesoldater i Afrika, hvor de metodisk har lært at anvende de frygteligste grusomheder og følgelig dehumaniseredes.

Fra pressemeddelelsens synopsis citerer jeg yderligere to nødvendigt lange stykker, for det er kompliceret det her: ”Filmen begynder på et rekrutteringskontor i Uganda, hvor man ikke har noget problem med at hyre tidligere børnesoldater. Derfra fortsætter dokumentaren til Sierra Leone, hvor en række tidligere børnesoldater fortæller om, hvordan de blev trænet i den nationale Camp Lion, før de skulle sendes til Irak. Samtidigt fortæller dokumentaren om, hvordan den private militære sikkerhedsindustri (Private military contractors) er boomet eksplosivt siden 11. september 2001. Og om hvordan de krige, der er blevet besluttet i Washington, støttet på Christiansborg og udkæmpet i Irak og Afghanistan i stor stil har været udliciteret til private militære firmaer. Private selskaber, der er gået i krig for at tjene penge og på mange niveauer har kunnet gøre, som det passer dem i forhold til rekruttering.”

… ”Samtidigt oprulles historien om, hvorfor politikere gerne vil bruge private soldater, da de dels ikke tæller som ”boots on the ground” og dels ikke kommer hjem i kister med flag på. Og vi ser hvordan der er tætte bånd mellem diverse politiske og militære nøglepersoner, beslutningstagere og så de private militære firmaer, der får milliardkontrakter af de selvsamme personer.”

Ellesøe og klipperne Bodil Kjærhauge og Steen Johannesen bygger i en neddæmpet, nøgtern, alvorlig stil deres konstruktion på fire elementer: interviews, erindringsstof i korte fortællinger, nye reportageoptagelser, og et omfattende arkivstof, især fra tv. Altså som man ofte eller oftest gør i sådanne journalistiske fremlæggelser beregnet for tv, men vel at mærke her med en story-line, som ikke bygger på en opklaringens spænding, men mere på en journalistisk undersøgelses vidnesbyrd på vidnesbyrd: interviews med en række nøglepersoner, tidligere medarbejdere i de undersøgte private defence services (de private hære), efterretningsfolk og undersøgende journalister, interviews med både aktive og tidligere soldater, som begyndte som helt små drenge.

Der klippes ikke i filmscener, der klippes direkte i vidneudsagnene og der indsættes dækbilleder, men de medvirkende er alle intense og meget kompetente og fotograferet i smukke omhyggelige filmbilleder og dækbillederne er valgt medfortællende mere end blot illustrerende, så i lange forløb oplever jeg faktisk en samtales kvaliteter. Ad den vej lykkes det fortællemæssigt yderst fornemt ved præcist valgte dækbilleder især fra arkivmaterialet at etablere Tim Spicer, lederen af de måske største militære firmaer / private hære Sandline, som bliver til det nuværende Aegis, som gennemgående hovedpeson skønt han, oplyses det til sidst, har nægtet at give interview, nægtet at medvirke i filmen.

De afrikanske lejesoldaters vidneudsagn er optaget i en mere uroligt bevæget reportagestil og klippet i kortere forløb, men tilstækkeligt lange til at skildre usigelige grusomheder. Jeg glemmer ikke disse fortællinger, men jeg når heller ikke at blive fortrolig med vidnerne, så fortrolig, at deres udsagn om det frygtelige vokser ind i mig og bliver en del af min erfaring, min forståelse af livet.

Det roligste vidnudsagn fra den anden hovedperson, Tim Spicers modsætning, forfatteren og journalisten Stephen Armstrong, som jeg hele vejen igennem støttede mig mest til, formulerer i filmens slutning dens sammenfatning: ”Den private sikkerhedsindustri vil fortsat arbejde for regeringer. Vi vil se private firmaer føre krig. Firmaerne ligger i vores lande. De vokser takket være vores penge, og de er registrerede på vores børser. Bor man i et demokrati og er utilfreds med regeringen, kan man stemme på oppositionen. Hvis man er utilfreds med et firma, kan man ikke gøre noget.” Jeg er sikker på at Nagieb Khaja i aften vil se at han havde ret, det er en hårdtslående og vigtig dokumentar.

Mads Ellesøe: Børnesoldatens nye job (The Child Soldier’s New Job), Danmark 2016, 68 min. Foto: Henrik Bohn Ipsen, Nadim Carlsen og Thomas Jensen. Klip: Bodil Kjærhauge og Steen Johannesen. Produktion: Mette Heide / +pluspictures for DR. Premiere i DR2 Dokumania i dag 19. april 20:45.

SYNOPSIS

It is a well-known fact that private military companies are becoming significant players in conflicts around the world, supplying not merely the goods but also the services of war. Large parts of both the logistics and the actual warfare have been outsourced to private companies who want to maximize profit. They hire cheap labour from the poorest parts of the world. The gravest example is the employment of former child soldiers. The film explores how the globalization has changed the industry of warfare. How is it possible that companies can hire former child soldiers despite the codes of conduct that have been formulated for the private military industry? (DFI Fakta)

”… A former senior director at a British firm says that it employed mercenaries from Sierra Leone to work in Iraq because they were cheaper than Europeans and did not check if they were former child soldiers. James Ellery, who was a director of Aegis Defence Services between 2005 and 2015, said that contractors had a “duty” to recruit from countries such as Sierra Leone, “where there’s high unemployment and a decent workforce”, in order to reduce costs for the US presence in Iraq.”

“…Aegis Defence Services, which is chaired by Sir Nicholas Soames, a Tory MP and Winston Churchill’s grandson, had a series of contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars to provide guards to protect US military bases in Iraq from 2004 onwards. From 2011 the company broadened its recruitment to take in African countries, having previously employed people from the UK, the US and Nepal.

Contract documents say that the soldiers from Sierra Leone were paid $16 (£11) a day. A documentary, The Child Soldier’s New Job, to be broadcast on Monday in Denmark alleges that the estimated 2,500 Sierra Leonean personnel who were recruited by Aegis and other private security companies to work in Iraq included former child soldiers.

“When war gets outsourced, then the companies tries to find the cheapest soldiers globally. Turns out that that is former child soldiers from Sierra Leone. I think it is important that we in the west are aware of the consequences of the privatisation of war,” the film’s maker, Mads Ellesøe, said.” (The Guardian 17. april 2016)

http://www.dfi.dk/faktaomfilm/film/da/96536.aspx?id=96536 (DFI Fakta)

http://www.madsmedia.dk/#intro (Ellesøes hjmmeside)

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/apr/17/uk-firm-employed-former-child-soldiers-as-mercenaries-in-iraq (The Guardians foromtale)

Litt.: Stephen Armstrong: War Plc. The Rise of the New Mercenary. (2008)

http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2008/jul/06/review.features (Interessat kritisk anmeldelse af Stephen Armstrongs bog)

Salomé Jashi: The Dazzling Light of Sunset

A magic sense of piousness is what Georgian Salomé Jashi creates at the beginning in her new documentary film, that has its world premiere at the Visions du Réel in Nyon this coming Wednesday April 20. A traveling shot from above in a run-down theatre building is accompanied by the performance of a passionate melancholic love song. The sequence ends with the four singers on a stage followed by the title of the film; voilà, the journey into the small society of the Tsalerijikha region of Georgia can start with the local tv journalist, anchor- and camerawoman Dariko Beria as the character, who is present at the events which are filmed by her – and by Salomé Jashi.

From the small tv studio with the wallpaper photo of trees and sea, paradise on the wall in a working place that otherwise communicates no luxury, to youngsters preparing catwalk for a fashion show or is it a beauty contest, villagers performing on stage, as the politicians do at the meetings before the local elections in the town hall or when they are on television interviewed by Dariko Beria, the name of the journalist, who is full of life and finds the right mood, when she is to read obituaries and chose music that fits. She hurries out when a giant owl has been found, to film and interview, and she is present, when the importance of going to church is discussed, and at the ceremony in the church building.

Tradition meets modern life in this film with many layers, old and

young people, sad landscapes with ruins and a modern conference centre, the threat of survival for the small tv station in a digital media landscape. A visual interpretation is provided full of empathy and respect, and humour without making fun of the characters performing in funny situations. Godard it was, who said that every camera angle is a question of moral.

Salomé Jashi, whose work we have followed on this site (“Their Helicopter”, “Speechless”, “The Leader is always Right” and “Bahkmaro”) demonstrates again her big talent for composition. Every image is a like a nature morte that invites you to discover details and colours, that play a significant role as they also did in “Bahkmaro”. It seems like Jashi thinks in colours. Scenes like the ones around the wedding preparations and the filled up tables with food, bottles and people in different stage of soberness, bring me to think about Brueghel.

At the end Dariko Beria and her colleague Kakha Kvaratskhelia express to Salomé Jashi their hope for what the film will show and to what effect. For someone far away from the region and with big admiration for the cinematic skills of the director, my answer would be: This is a beautiful vision du reel from our common, universal “Theatre of Life”.

Georgia, Germany, 2016, 74 mins.

Peter Greenaway: A Medium for Visual Intelligence

Always provoking, always exaggerating as part of the provocation, and yet there is always some truth in what he says – Peter Greenaway, this time as part of his getting a BAFTA recognition for his work at an event in London. I take a couple of citations from the article in Guardian of today:

… “I always think, and this is probably a very unpopular thing to say, that all film writers should be shot. We do not need a text-based cinema … we need an image-based cinema…”

Greenaway said text has so many opportunities. “For 8,000 years we’ve had lyric poetry, for 400 years we’ve had the novel, theatre hands its meaning down in text. Let’s find a medium whosetotal, sole responsibility is the world as seen as a form of visual intelligence. Surely, surely, surely the cinema should be that phenomenon…”

… “I believe that cinema died on the 31 September 1983 when the zapper or the remote control was introduced into the living rooms of the world. “Bang! Cinema ceases to be passive and becomesactive, you the audience are now in some senses in charge of the filmmaking process. You have all got mobile phones, you have all got cam recorders, and you’ve all got laptops, so you’re all filmmakers…”

Read the whole article on The Guardian: link

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/apr/14/film-director-calls-for-image-based-cinema?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Film+Today+-+automated+vB+most+recent&utm_term=167178&subid=14913340&CMP=ema_861a

Sine Skibsholt: Dem vi var

Manden og kvinden forsøger i en træt tilgivelse at nå hinanden. Han er under rekonvalecens efter en voldsom hjerneblødning, hun er i forvejen overarbejdet i et samliv, hvor hun alene tager sig af de to børn og husholdningen og et lønarbejde. Han har til den frygtelige dag han falder om passet sin karriere, sit firma og familiens ekstraordinære økonomiske grundlag i et stort nyrenoveret hus. Den dag, hun fortvivlet ringer efter hjælp, begynder Dem vi var.

Filmen er bygget over mandens genoptræningsforløbs på alle måder vanskelige måneder i velordnede afsnit med en række øjebliksskildringer af iscenesatte begivenheder som møder med læger og plejepersonale og så særligt: samtaler mellem de to. Der kan være enkelte scener, som hviler på observerende kamera, men både han og hun er beundringsværdigt disciplinerede og medskabende i deres ekstemporerede gennemspil af den langvarige konfliktudviklings fine nuancer i replikker og bevægelser og stemningsskift. Den tekst kan de i hvert fald udenad. Et vigtigt andet lag i konstruktionen er en række steder, ofte i slutningen af en scene, hvor dialogen forsvinder, ikke altid fordi de to bliver tavse, men fordi Sine Skibsholt simpelthen fader dialogfilen ud mens musikken og vel lyddesignet i øvrigt fortsætter eller tager over. De gribende samtaler mellem ham og hende udvikler sig til de forsvinder i en fortvivlelsens magtkamp i en ulykkelig kurve, som bliver filmens storyline, en helt enkel fortælling om et ægteskab i almindelig krise…

Hjerneblødningen og den uhelbredelige hjerneskade er en stor og omfattende kendsgerning, der selvfølgelig danner en særlig og dominerende baggrund, men alligevel er det altså et ægteskab i en almindelig krise. Forskellen til andre ægteskaber i opløsning er at disse ægteskabers mænd og kvinder føler og handler på baggrunde uden denne dominerende enkeltsituation, som er sygdommen, de (det vil således sige vi, der ser filmen) har kriser, hvis årsager blot ikke er tydelige, som regel ikke erkendes. ”Det er ikke ham, det er hans hjerneskade, som siger sådan”, sådan trøster en sygeplejerske kvinden efter en af mandens brutalt sårende replikker. Som månederne går, som filmen skrider frem, som mandens førlighed bliver bedre og de glider længere og længere fra hinanden, tvivler jeg på at sygeplejersken har ret.

Kvinden er på et afgørende tidspunkt nødt til at sige til manden, at hun ikke vil have, at han kysser hende på munden. Hun elsker ham ikke mere. Men jeg venter på et mirakel, på et kærlighedens, på et erotikkens uventede gennembrud på ny. Men det sker ikke. Tilværelsens dramaturgi er en serie points of no return, filmen er én lang elegi i ét langt decrescendo. Det er et ægteskabs forsvindende dialog, som slutter i tavse scener i to adskilte boliger under indretning i to adskilte nye begyndelser. Men jeg leder ved de sidste scener endnu efter et ikke sygdomsforårsaget, et ikke psykologisk udredt grundlag for det gensidige kærlighedstab, finder det måske, når fremstillingen opgiver rationaliseringerne, når replikudvekslingen tones ud og jeg i de smukke tavse scener får mulighed for at tænke mit over filmens sådan var vi. Hvordan var de, da de var dem, de var? Hvordan var vi? Hvordan var jeg? Jeg er en mand uden hjerneskade, men er mit kærlighedsliv lykkedes?

Dem vi var er som socialrealistisk skildring i min læsning mere end en særlig fortælling om en hjerneskades indvirkning på et kærlighedsforhold, den er som en første begyndelse til en meget nutidig filmisk undersøgelse af ægteskabets, samlivets, , samlivets, forelskelsens, erotikkens, altså kærlighedens almindelige forvandlingsformer i moderne tid. Sådan tager jeg den i hvert fald til mig, og det gør ondt at se den film.

Sine Skibsholt: Dem vi var, Danmark 2016, 81 min. Filmen får DOXBIO premiere 20. april 2016 i 50 biografer landet over:

http://www.doxbio.dk/kob-billet/

Jeg giver den solide film 3 penne og én mere for mandens og kvindens beundringsværdige personlige dobbelte indsats, så i alt 4.

SYNOPSIS

Their life looks like that of so many others: Kristian and Mette Line met 12 years ago. They fell in love, travelled, and focused on their careers. Later ”you and me” became a family when they had their children, Celeste and Cyron. Two years ago they bought their dream house outside Copenhagen where they were supposed to live out their many dreams and ideas about life. But one day, 39-year-old Kristian collapses from a blood clot that destroys one third of his brain. The damage is irreversible, and life as they know it comes to an abrupt end.

 Kristian spends the first year in intense rehabilitation so he can move back home. Mette Line supports him, remodels the house to accommodate Kristian’s new needs, takes care of the children and goes to work. At the same time, she struggles to recognise the man she married, because the brain damage has changed Kristian. And who are “we” when one of us is no longer there?

WHO WE WERE follows the young family during the first year after the fateful accident and is a portrait of love in the face of catastrophe. (Made In Copenhagen site)

http://www.madeincopenhagen.dk/en/content/who-we-were

Don Edkins – EDN Interview

We have had several posts including Don Edkins, described in one of them as ”…a true gentleman in the world documentary community, and a man who in his work in a true Griersonian way seeks to combine the documentary art form, campaign and information…”

Edkins is member of the month of EDN, that presents a fine informative interview with him. Here is a taster (on his background) and a link to where you can find the whole talk:

I became interested in photography during my high school years and used it to document whatever situation I was facing in my life. Having to leave South Africa because of refusing to fight in the Angolan war in 1975, I ended up photographing life in Guatemala during the military dictatorship, an LSD conference in Santa Cruz, California, the effect migrant labour had on families in Lesotho, and refugees from the Rwandan genocide. I was a member of Afrapix, a collective of South African photographers documenting life under apartheid, and then moved to Germany in 1988 where I joined a media collective, the Medienwerkstatt Freiburg. That is where I started working in documentary film, and the first two films I made – Goldwidows and The Colour of Gold – were about migrant labour in South Africa and Lesotho. Affordable video projectors became available in the early ‘90s, and so we took these films to show in rural communities in Lesotho: the experience of the incredible discussions that took place after the screenings has influenced much of my work since then. The mobile cinema we started in Lesotho has now been runningcontinuously for more than twenty years.

www.filmkommentaren.dk

www.edn.dk

Visions du Réel – Barisone, Stonys, Greenaway

… takes place in Nyon Switzerland from April 14 to 23 and presents as usual – under the direction of Luciano Barisone – a strong program with the emphasis on the artistic documentary.. Barisone was interviewed by cineuropa (by Muriel Del Don) and here is a citation of what he said:

“The idea of the act of resistance is part of human nature, with which it develops. We resist, physically and spiritually, trying to maintain internal continuity. For me, the mission of art is to throw up questions, to make human beings constantly call things into question. Film exists as testimony to the resistance of human beings, to draw it out of them. It’s not a question of ideology, it’s a question of fighting for humanity. When we put the programme for the Festival together, we choose films based on their aesthetic value. Every year we try to bring together two types of audiences and viewers: a wider audience interested in the narrative, and another, more intellectual audience, that’s drawn in by what we could call the “movement of thought”. Visions du Réel always tries to create a line of contact, of communication and a strong link between the films, the filmmakers and the viewers… We tend to associate the term ‘resistance’ with armed struggle (which is one manifestation), but resistance is an internal movement of the spirit, the conscience…”

And some take-outs from the program that is divided into several

international competitive categories (short, medium, long), new vision, grand angle… and with a focus on two – very different – masters:

Audrius Stonys, 18 of his films will be screened in Nyon, he is presented with these words on the site of the festival: ”The work of Audrius Stonys takes the form of a quest opening onto an imagination composed of fragility and poetry. Heaven and earth, above and below, the immanent and the transcendent inhabit his filmmaking.”

The festival will also pay tribute to Peter Greenaway (photo), ”filmmaker of the system and of excess”, who has made over 60 films. His latest film ”Eisenstein in Guanajuato” (2015) will be screened.

A quick look at the competitive categories makes me notice a new film by Peter Entell, ”Like Dew in the Sun”, shot in Ukraine. And the one by Serge Tréfaut, ”Treblinka”, cinematography by Joao Ribeiro, the Norwegian ”Brothers” by Aslaug Holm, and the new film by Salomé Jashi, ”The Dazzling Light of Sunset” in the ”Regard Neuf” section.

https://www.visionsdureel.ch/en

http://cineuropa.org/it.aspx?t=interview&l=en&did=307311 

50 Documentaries You Need to See…

… according to Joshua Oppenheimer, Lucy Walker, Alex Gibney, James Marsh, Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy, Franny Armstrong, Khalo Matabane, Molly Dineen, Angus Macqueen and Kim Longinotto, is a good read from The Guardian end of March. I have taken three statements from three of the mentioned directors, but click the link and check more:

Molly Dineen: I saw this when I was on a jury at a documentary festival in Nyon, and it was really unexpected. It’s about Finland burying its nuclear waste in a deep, deep cavern, with two diggers silently burrowing into the bedrock. That’s intercut with interviews with scientists talking about how you can leave a signal for future civilisations not to go into this burial chamber. This stuff is so toxic for 100,000 years, so we’re not talking about any sort of signposting we will understand; there may be whole different ways of communication. There was something really affecting about that. And the interviews are fabulous, because they’re very unpromising – just straight-on head-and-shoulders shots of scientists – but they’re humorous and warm and compassionate. (Into Eternity, Michael Madsen, 2010)

Lucy Walker: I’m fascinated by longitudinal film-making and this series, which has followed the lives of 14 British children since 1964, when they were seven years old, showed me what the medium was capable of. This series is head and shoulders above any other attempt to record dramatically a whole human life. And because it’s a whole group of people, you learn not just about the individual but also about the system in which they’re living. I can’t think of any other artefact in our culture that can tell us so much about Britain in our lifetime and how society is evolving as this body of work. It’s illuminating and fascinating and it’s one of the things that inspired me to do my work… (SevenUp, Michael Apted, 1964)

James Marsh: In this film, Watkins takes a possible scenario – a nuclear attack on London – and shows you very carefully, each step of the way, what is likely to happen…This was in the middle of the cold war and at the time there were dozens of warheads pointing at us. It’s like a documentary made by Brecht – you’re staging something to flush out a reaction in the audience, and that reaction is one of utter horror. Some people would say this is not a documentary because everything was staged, but it’s a speculative documentary – the director is saying: “This is how it could be and I’m going to show you this in a way that’s very truthful.” It’s very responsible, even if the imagery is very disturbing: you’re seeing bobbies firing at people in the street, people with their clothes burned off. His information is sourced directly from the government and based on scientific fact, so the bed of it is factual, and people responded to it as if it were a real documentary.

It’s a brilliant and bold piece of film-making. He’s reinventing the documentary and subverting it. In my view there should be no rules and no boundaries to film-making, and the impact this film had shows you how much he got right. (Wargame, Peter Watkins, 1965)

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/27/50-best-documentaries-alex-gibney-joshua-oppenheimer-james-marsh

Photo: Peter Watkins instruerer La Commune (Paris, 1871), 2000.