CPH:DOX 2015 NB /1

Når jeg læser den velskrevne pressemeddelelse om de tre gæste-programredaktører knyttet til CHP:DOX 2015, Naomi Klein / Avi Lewis og Olafur Eliasson får jeg lyst til at sætte NB i margenen. Det har jeg gjort ud for vigtige og tankevækkende og smukke steder i tekster siden min geologi- og geografilærer Mogens Walther, som lærte mig så mange fundamentale ting om den konkrete verden, også lærte mig dette: det her er et sted, og så læste han op af lærebogen, hvor I skal sætte NB i margenen. Med blyant. I pressemeddelelsen fra CHP:DOX er der to sådanne steder, to afsnit, som får mig til først at nyde formuleringerne, dernæst forhåbentlig holde dem fast og finde ud af mere om problemstillingerne og om filmene som belyser dem, skildrer dem.

”POLITISK ENGAGEMENT OG FILMKUNSTNERISK ORIGINALITET

Den canadiske journalist og forfatter Naomi Klein er den væsentligste stemme i den handlingsorienterede, moderne klimaaktivisme. Klein slog igennem med bestselleren No Logo, der samlede miljø- og antiglobaliseringsbevægelsen i en international kritik af den neoliberale verdensorden. Og som slog fast, at aktivisme ikke (kun) handler om protest, men også om at angive konstruktive, praktiske og realiserbare løsningsforslag – og at leve efter dem. Hvilket skinner igennem i det kuraterede program af hende og filminstruktøren Avi Lewis.

Her finder vi 10 dokumentarer med bud på hvordan politisk engagement, filmkunstnerisk originalitet og stærke fortællinger kan gøre en forskel. Du kan opleve filmen Intet bliver som før, der er baseret på Kleins opsigtsvækkende bog This Changes Everything, der kontroversielt hævder at klimakrisen ikke blot er vor tids absolut mest presserende udfordring. Den er samtidig den største mulighed vi nogensinde har haft for at ændre verden.”

Programmet omfatter endvidere klassikere som Hour of the Furnaces og Harlan County USA og nye filmiske banebrydere som West of the Tracks og Leviathan. Desuden The Pearl Button og aktivistiske manifester som The Corporation og The Take.

”KLIMAET I DEN ANTROPOCÆNE TIDSALDER

Det kuraterede program af Olafur Eliasson er, i lighed med kernen i Eliassons egne værker, film der tager afsæt i den fysiske verden omkring os og menneskets sansning af samme. Programmet bevæger sig igennem naturen og ser på de enorme, menneskeskabte forandringer af både klimatisk og geologisk karakter, som har givet det relativt nye begreb, Det Antropocæne så markant en relevans i såvel samtidskunsten som filosofien og geovidenskaben.

Begrebet refererer til en tidsalder, hvor den traditionelle opfattelse af naturen er under afvikling. Den antropocæne tid refererer til en periode i Jordens historie, hvor mennesket påvirker omgivelserne i sådan en grad, at naturen ikke længere findes i ”naturlig” tilstand.

Det er denne nye tid, som filmene særligt bevæger sig igennem – det er film, der kalder på nærvær, sansning og engagement, men det er også film med et underliggende kritisk perspektiv på menneskets indflydelse på klodens landskaber, både de naturlige og kunstige. Filmene bevæger sig langt fra dogmatiske dagsordner, men tilbyder i stedet et frirum til refleksion og inspirerer til, at man som tilskuer træder i karakter og sætter sig selv i spil.” (Katrine Ravndal, CPH:DOX)

Programmet omfatter værker af Werner Herzog, Claire Denis, Zhao Liang, James Benning, Anouk de Clercq, Pierre Huyghe og Apichatpong Weerasethakul.

CPH:DOX 2015 / 5. – 15. november

Den fulde oversigt over programmerne Klein/Lewis og Eliasson har redigeret kan ses fra 16. oktober på www.cphdox.dk hvor også billetsalget starter.

The website includes an English version of the text about the guest curators:

POLITICAL COMMITMENT AND ARTISTIC ORIGINALITY

“The Canadian journalist and author Naomi Klein is a leading voice of modern action-oriented activism. Klein became known for her bestselling book No Logo that linked the environmental and anti-globalisation movements in a criticism of the neoliberal world order. She stated that activism is not (only) about protest, but also about providing constructive, practical and feasible solutions – and living by them. This sentiment shines through the programme curated by Naomi and the film director Avi Lewis.

The programme will consist of 10 documentaries with suggestions on how political commitment, artistic originality and strong narratives can make a difference. During the festival you will be able to experience the film This Changes Everything, based on Klein’s sensational book of the same name, which raises a controversial claim that the climate crisis is not only the most urgent challenge of our time, but also the biggest opportunity we ever have to change the world.

In the programme you will also find classics of documentary cinema such as Hour of the Furnaces and Harlan County USA and the cinematic and innovative West of the Tracks and Leviathan, the Berlinale winner The Pearl Button and activist manifestos The Corporation and The Take.

THE CLIMATE IN THE ANTHROPOCENE EPOCH

The programme curated by Olafur Eliasson, close to the core of Eliasson’s own work, consists of films that are based on the physical world around us and the human perception of it. The programme moves through nature and examines the important man-made changes of both climatic and geological character that have given the relatively novel concept of Anthropocene a marked relevance in contemporary art as well as philosophy and geoscience. The concept indicates an age where traditional views of nature are phasing out. The Anthropocene epoch refers to a period in the history of the Earth, when humans influence the environment to such an extent that nature is no longer in its “natural” state. It is this new era that the films explore in particularity – films that call for presence, sensory perception and commitment, but also films that underlie the critical perspective of the human influence on the planet’s landscapes, both natural and artificial. The films are moving far from dogmatic agendas, but instead offering a space for reflection and inspiration to man whom as the spectator gets into character and joins the game.

The programme is rich in visionary and innovative works by artists and filmmakers such as Werner Herzog, Claire Denis, Zhao Lang, James Benning, Anouk de Clercq, Pierre Huyghe and Apichatpong Weerasethakul.” (Katrine Ravndal)

http://cphdox.dk/en

CinéDOC Tbilisi 2015

 It starts October 21st and runs until the 25th – the documentary film festival in the Georgian capital. A quote from the website of the festival:

”After a long and difficult selection process, we are very happy to unveil the program of CinéDOC-Tbilisi 2015! We have received hundreds of interesting documentary films from all over the world. Our program department has watched all of them and carefully selected those films which will be presented in the five sections of the festival: International Competition, Focus Caucasus Competition, CinéDOC Young, Guest Country: Israel, and Women in Frame.”

Headed by Archil Khetagouri and Ileana Stanculescu, it is no surprise that the festival has a high quality in selection with Karolina Bielawska’s ”Call Me Marianna”. Giedre Zickyte’s ”The Master and Tatyana” (photo) and ”Twilight of a Life” by Sylvain Biegeleisen as just three of the 10 films in the international competition. The latter is the opening film, brilliant choice of the Belgian/Israeli film and also an introduction to Israel being the Guest Country in the programme of the three year old festival.

In the Focus Caucasus competition you find ”Double Aliens” by Latvian Ugis Olte, produced by Uldis Cekulis, a film that won first documentary prize at the festival in Batumi recently – and ”Be My Brother” by Olga Maurina – and ”Strange Particles” by Denis Klebleev.

Of course the festival has a section called CinéDOC Young, and a ”Women in Frame” with strong titles as ”A Separation” by Karin Ekberg, ”Belleville Baby” by Mia Engberg and ”Dreamcatcher” by Kim Longinotto.

Master Audrius Stonys from Lithuania has his ”Gates of the Lamb”, just awarded in Vilnius, shown in ”Special Screenings”.

Enjoy the festival, dear friends – and the khatchapuri, the khinkali and the chacha, writes a man who twice visited a wonderful Georgian restaurant in St. Petersburg last week!

http://www.cinedoc-tbilisi.com/

Chantal Akerman: La chambre

I går var der to facebookopdateringer og igen i dag en fra en følsom og klog filmproducent jeg ad den vej kender og følger, opdateringer vedrørende Chantal Akerman som døde i forgårs og om hendes arbejder. To nekrologer og et link til hendes film La chambre fra 1972.

Det er hendes første film efter hun har forladt filmskolen i Belgien og er flyttet til New York. Hun er 22 år. Det er et studium i filmscenens væsen. Én eneste optagelse, en panorering langsomt dvælende cirkelformet i værelset først den ene vej så den anden vej til sidst i kortere ruter frem og tilbage til en medvirkende formodentlig hende selv som ligger i en seng og spiser af et æble.

Filmen La chambre viser mig en scene som ikke er en historie, ikke er en del af en historie, ikke er en anekdote, der er ingen pointe, blot en naturlig afslutning. Den filmscene er en skildring af et værelse, et bestemt værelse, ikke et værelse som sådan, men det her værelse, netop som filmens præcise titel siger.

SYNOPSIS

In a 360° circular panoramic shot the camera slowly pans an entire apartment (or house). When it first passes the bedroom there is nobody there but each time it shows the room again Chantal Akerman is sitting on the bed, motionless first, then busy doing something (peeling an orange, eating an orange, etc.). When she is last seen she yawns and lies down on her bed. The camera continues panning but after 10 minutes and 21 seconds the film comes to an end and she can’t be seen asleep. (IMDb / by Guy Bellinger)

USA, 1972. 12 min.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AGakyb3eBU

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/postscript-chantal-akerman?intcid=mod-latest&mbid=social_facebook

Message2Man Awards and Results

The English version of the M2M in St.Petersburg awards and statistics was published today on the website of the festival. I have taken some clips from the long text, the whole press release you can find clicking the link below:

”At the closing ceremony, the festival juries announced the winners, the director of the festival presented overall results of this year’s Message to Man and set goals for the future. For the first time in festival’s history, the opening ceremony of Message to Man was held on Palace square. The grand celebration was attended by more than 20,000 people. Many Russian and international film stars took part in the 25th festival. Among the jury members and special guests of Message to Man were Nastassja Kinski, Brilliant Mendoza, Jean Roy, Mikhail Iampolski, Vladimir Posner, Rudolf Thome, Velimir ilnik, Alice Rohrwacher and 45 other guests from 22 different countries… Altogether more than 30,000 people attended the festival’s events between September, 26th and October, 2nd…

And the prizes that were given to documentary films:

The Danya Gurevich Prize went to the Director of Photography of THE CONVERSATION Pavel Skvortsov. The prize was presented by Ludmila, Gurevich family friend.

The Viktor Astafiyev Prize went to EDGES OF MEMORY by Anton Moiseenko. The prize was presented by the daughter of the writer Viktor Astafiyev Anastasia Astafieva.

The Pavel Kogan Prize went to IN SEARCH OF HAPPINESS by Dmitry Sidorov and Svetlana Demidova. The prize was presented by the President of Pavel and Lyalya Fund Ludmila Stanukinas. 

The Bellona foundation Special Prize went to SEE NO EVIL by Jos de Putter (Netherlands, Belgium).

The St. Petersburg Labour Union Federation Special Prize for best documentary film about the working man (RUR 100,000) was awarded to SIBERIAN FLOATING HOSPITAL by Tatiana Sobolewa (Russia).

Message to Man Honorary President’s Prize went to VARICELLA, short documentary film by Viktor Kosakovsky (Russia). The prize was presented by the Honorary President of Message to Man director Mikhail Litvyakov.

The Student Jury Prize was awarded to THE OTHER SIDE by Roberto Minervini (France, Italy).

The International Federation of Film Critics (FIPRESCI) Prize went to ABOVE AND BELOW by Nicolas Steiner (Sweden, Germany, Unites States).

The Russian Press Jury Prize was awarded to CALL ME MARIANNA by Karolina Bielawska (Poland).

Diploma of the National Competition “For breaking stereotypes” was awarded to IN SEARCH OF HAPPINESS by Dmitry Sidorov and Svetlana Demidova (Russia).

Centaur Prize and RUR 20,000 for best debut film in the National Competition went to YAMAHA by Inna Omelchenko.

Centaur Prize and RUR 30,000 for best short documentary film in the National Competition went to YAMAHA by Inna Omelchenko.

Centaur Prize and RUR 30,000 for best full-length documentary film in the National Competition went to CEREMONY by Elena Laskari.

Special Prize of the International Jury was awarded to FREE BULLET by Caroline Detournay and Paulina Pisarev.

Centaur Prize and USD 1,000 for best debut was awarded to THE SHEPHERD’S SONG by Vahram Mkhitaryan (Poland, Armenia).

Centaur Prize and USD 1,000 for best short documentary film was awarded to IF MAMA AIN’T HAPPY, NOBODY’S HAPPY by Mea Dols de Jong (the Netherlands).

Golden Centaur Grand Prix and USD 5,000 for best film was awarded to CALL ME MARIANNA by Karolina Bielawska (Poland).

http://www.message2man.com/en/news/6308-message-to-man-2015-winners-and-results/

Linda Wendel: Født til filmen

Det er en vidunderlig klog film, hvert sekund har en uudgrundelig dybde som går i mig som ordløs smertende erfaring af en fryd engang, og det har Linda Wendel klogt tænkende på mig, på tilskueren og omsorgsfuldt med materialet som er så følsomt for de medvirkende, både hver for sig og samlet i en gruppe af nær familie, nære venner og kolleger til Stine Bierlich, hvis liv det handler om, hvis liv er til stede i hver eneste af filmens scener, så omsorgsfuldt iscenesat.

Ja, det er filmscener, og filmen er klippet i scener, også de opklippede interviews med de medvirkende er blevet til scener, stykke for stykke, hver og et, de er autonome alle, deres dialog og lyd bliver i dem hver for sig, og de gør sig alle færdige før klippet afbryder. Og klippene forstyrrer ikke, jeg får tid til at se og lytte og tage ind, og rytmen forstyrrer ikke, tværtimod, rytmen er disse kloge valg i den længde, i den rækkefølge, i den sammenhæng, som så generøst følger min langsomme hurtighed. Hvor kan Linda Wendel da kende den fra? Men tak for at jeg udenforstående bliver så stilfærdigt lukket ind til denne meget private familie-, venne-, kollegaerindring. Jeg bliver ganske stille indeni.

Det er jo blevet til filmkunst. Hvert eneste smukke citat fra de mange film Stine Bierlich medvirkede i er naturligt føjet til interviewoptagelserne (samlet over lang tid, men så lig hverandre i udseende, at de fremtræder som ét nu, alle måske fra samme sikre fotografs blik på billedets begivenhed), så det hele synes lavet kun til denne ene frygtelige og dejlige film.

Danmark 2015, 45 min. Premiere på DR2 i aftes, kan ses, formodentlig nogle dage endnu på:

https://www.dr.dk/tv/se/foedt-til-filmen/foedt-til-filmen-stines-korte-liv

http://www.lindawendel.dk/index.html

Avi Mograbi Retrospective

Under the headline “Always The Trouble With Avi”, the Filmforum at the Museum Ludwig in Köln shows a retrospective of films by Israeli Avi Mograbi, introduced by this great text by the curator Rasha Salti:

“He is almost always in front of the camera, but the films are never about him at all; he films the commonplace, the everyday, even the prosaic – only to reveal with unsettling lucidity more profound and unseen truths about the paradoxes of contemporary Israeli society and ist occupation of Palestine. He seems to make films about making films that in reality are never made; he trumps documentary with fiction, performance with reality, back and forth, addling the codes of direct cinema. This is the trouble with Avi Mograbi’s cinematic and artistic practice: it is so essentially and literally subversive that it is impossible to classify. As is he: actor, sound recordist, second cameraman, singer, performer, director and citizen, he embodies all these roles dutifully, responsibly, without ambiguity or affect. And most remarkably, he never

displaces himself or his body from the ailing social body he films, deconstructs, challenges or provokes.”

The director is present at the screenings.

And this is what I wrote on this site, when Avi Mograbi was in Barcelona:

…A masterclass, a master’s class, Mograbi is exactly as his films are: tense, sometimes comic, but always dealing with the embarrassing reality of the country he lives in. A frustrated artist, as he says himself, who wants to move something, raise a debate in Israel, but does not succeed, he is met with total silence, no reactions, whereas he now is an estimated artist in Western Europe! In the next issue of Cahiers du Cinema, the headline is characterising him as ”Le Grand sculpteur de notre temps”. (DocsBarcelona 2009, masterclass with Avi Mograbi).

Photo from “Avenge But One of My Two Eyes”. 2005.

Check the website, fine introductions to all films.

https://www.academycologne.org/en/article/659_always_the_trouble_with_avi

Astra Film Festival 2015

One film festival follows the other and the months of October and November is high season. Tonight the veteran Astra Film Festival in Sibiu Romania starts and runs for 7 days with an exciting programme that is both looking back and reflects what goes on in documentary filmmaking of today.

For the looking back enthusiasts, the film historical interested, there is a series called ”NeoRealism and New Realisms” with films by Visconti (La Terra Trema, of course) and de Sica as well as ”The Death of Mr. Lazarescu” by Romanian Cristi Puiu and Portuguese Teresa Villaverde’s ”Os Mutantes”, to mention a few titles.

The festival has four competitive programmes: International, CE (Central and Eastern Europe) Europe, Romania, Student – all together 48 films. In the international section of 10 films you find ”I am the People” by French Anna Rousillon – it has this description:

“January 2011 in Egypt was marked by anti-government demonstrations. While tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Cairo, poor villagers in the country’s south followed the tense situation on Tahrir Square on their TV screens and in the daily newspapers. It is from their perspective that this documentary captures the political changes in Egypt, from the toppling of President Mubarak to the election and fall of Mohamed Morsi. The film reveals the villagers’ hopes and disappointments, and shows that despite the wild events, very little has actually changed in their lives, Anna Roussillon’s interviewees fretting more about their irrigation systems and pregnant wives than ideological struggles and political emancipation.”

And of course Oppenheimer’s “The Look of Silence” is there, as Nanau’s “Toto and his Sisters” is in the CE Europe category as is Tina Gudac’s Croatian “Naked Island” (PHOTO).

Take a look at the website and notice the many interesting side programmes, there is a lot of thought behind this programme.

http://astrafilm.ro/astra-film-festival-2015-starts-on-monday.aspx?theme=1

 

Message2Man National Competition/ 2

A non-urban selection, indeed. Most of the films in the national competition took place outside the big cities. And very often in Siberia. Films about people and culture, clashes between indigenous people and the so-called civilisation like in ”The Land Where Mammoths Slumber” (Eva Belova), that is an informative documentation about the Nenets culture, where the reindeers have almost disappeared, but where they still have their ”chums”, tents, now often with tv and internet. A man with a foot in both cultures is the one conveying the dilemmas they face, another one is an artist, a charismatic man, who claims that bureaucrats are the worst enemies for the nenets, ”human rats”! The film stays on the informative level far from the artistic ambition that we have seen from the hands of Estonian Mark Soosaar.

I am afraid that I don’t have many fine words for another film far away from big cities – ”Kamchatka – the Cure for Hatred” (Yulia Mironova) that follows a war correspondent, who takes refuge in this far east island filming himself and his spouse, they get a child, she returns to Moscow, he stays and one year later he is back in war in Syria! I don’t see or hear reflections on the traumas he is to have brought from the Chechen war. The title remains a postulate.

Talking about war – ”Edges of Memory” (Anton Moiseenko) is a film with

talking faces, war veterans, who remembers, personalities, who are good to watch and listen to, an absolutely non-heroic story, and yet why does the director include a young, mostly smiling soldier of today, who says nothing but pops up once in a while… is it to say that this is what is waiting for you? A forced element into the narrative, I think.

Also disappointing for me – more so as I am a big fan of what Marina Razbezhkina and her film school is doing – was ”Yamaha” (Inna Omelchenko) about the young man who can not find a place to perform his passion, because he is making noise with his yamaha… the film lacks energy, I find it flat, sorry. A pity as my first note on the paper was: Finally a film about young people!

AND NOW TO THE ONES I LIKED…

First of all Tatyana Soboleva’s ”Siberian Floating Hospital” (PHOTO) that I first met at the Baltic Sea Forum in Riga 2011 and that I now saw on the big screen that ”liked” the beauty of the images, the warm and respectful approach to the characters on the ship, these fine women, first of all, who are away from home for six months to travel to remote areas to offer the locals medical assistance. Soboleva has filmed for years, you can see that – time is quality.

But also ”In Search of Happiness” by Dmitry Sidorov and Svetlana Demidova about the couple, who ”left the big city in search of peace, solitude, and freedom” – almost 30 years ago. They have bees, goats – who have names – and themselves, and a son, Ilya, and that is where the trouble begins. Ilya takes beautiful photos, he helps on the farm, but he also has a girl friend, with whom he skypes and with whom he would like to live, much to the disappointment of especially the mother, who thinks that Katya, the girl in question, should just give up her ideas about studying and come and live with them. There is a great scene, where the three of them argue about this theme; it’s not difficult to have sympathy for the grown-up young man, who has no future with mum and dad in this far-away dream of their’s. Producer Viktor Skubey told me that the budget they had allowed for two weeks of shooting and three weeks of editing. On that background, a very fine result it is for a 70 minutes long film.

And Olga Maurina succeeded to create atmosphere and catch situations in ”Sons” about boys, orphans, in a foster family. There is a fine observed intimacy in the scenes and she dares to have long scenes where nothing happens – contrary to the wonderful symbolic scenes, where the new boy Igoryek learns – by himself – to bike. Touching and funny at the same time. 40 minutes long, fine for a documentary like that.

Form, think about form, how do you want to convey your theme as a film – Elena Laskari has done so with her ”Ceremony”, in stylistical terms the only original film (56 mins.) in the Russian competition at the Message2Man 2015. Boris Borisovich, the boss of the posh crematorium is the character of the film, the one who calls the funeral ceremony a theatre play, where you have to create a scenario of your own leaving this earth. And the director follows him superbly in this point of view. The film is staged as the procedures are, the clothes to wear by the performers of the ceremony intercut with small episodes where the relatives have to confirm that the name on the urn with the ashes is the right one. Some take the urn to have the ashes spread somewhere. There is also a sequence where you can test how it is to lie in a coffin and be lowered down in the ground! – And the question is put: Do you want to be beautiful in the coffin? You can of course have a pre-paid contract set up, the music to be chosen, the text to be read, all it tested, also in new uniforms. ”When children die”… is there as well in a film that is fascinating to watch, a theatre performance indeed at a special, rich place in Russia.

http://www.message2man.com/en/

  

Russian Police Attacks Documentary Director

Russian Georgy Molodtsov sent this message to be placed on filmkommentaren.dk:

Andrey Gryazev, director of the prominent documentary film “Tomorrow” was beaten up by police, who were waiting for him near his house after funerals of one of art group “Voina” members. “Tomorrow” was successfully screened and awarded all over the world and premiered in Russia within the Moscow International Film Festival, where it was noticed by head of the jury Pawel Pawlikovsky, recent Academy award winner.

The description of the film, taken from the website of idfa:

“The most striking sight in contemporary Russian art is Voina (“War”), a radical artist collective. The founders are Vor (“Thief”) and Koza (“Goat”), and they walk the thin line between art and crime. They paint a gigantic penis on the bridge across from the headquarters of the Federal Security Service and tip police cruisers over by night, as a protest against the force that they would also like to “topple.” Under the title “Palace Revolution,” they filmed themselves doing this, suggesting that their actions were only intended to recover the ball of their one-year-old son Kasper. Their little toddler is often in tow during their illegal acts, and when they get brutally arrested, he watches it all happen. A product of the squatter movement, Voina once boasted two members in its Moscow chapter who would go on to Pussy Riot fame. Director Andrey Gryazev passes no judgment on Voina’s view on life or its political actions, which the state considers to be vandalism and downright incitement. He spends time with two of the collective’s most outspoken members, who provide themselves with food by means of shoplifting and engage in some hefty arguments before carrying out their acts of anarchism. These people live in the moment, hoping that tomorrow they will be able to change everything…”

… link below to a short interview with the director:

http://www.bfi.org.uk/news/focus-andrey-gryazev-tomorrow

Message2Man National Competition

I came to M2M for Russian documentaries and have so far been watching 16 of the 23 in the ”National Competition of Documentary Films” in the Velikan cinema number 4 – good seats, almost full house for all screenings. With people walking in and out of the cinema, some even come for the last five minutes (!), quite disturbing, writes a grumpy man, who thinks respect for the filmmakers and their works is important. Do your zapping from one channel to the other at home in front of the television set. Not in the cinema, please!

The selection of films this year, one more reason to be grumpy, sorry, is pretty weak. Does this really qualify for a national competition I have asked myself several times. Is this an image of the general quality of Russian documentaries today? Or do other festival in Russia take the best?

The selectors show it already – a quote from the catalogue: The topics of the films vary widely, but of course include some of the favorite themes of Russian documentaries: village elders and city eccentrics, simple Russian workers and lonely philosophers, parents and children, children and school, a bit of politics, a bit of war…The National Competition always tries to embrace as many sides of our daily life as possible and show what surrounds us, whether hidden or obvious…

Themes are mentioned but no artistic criteria, for obvious reasons, as most of

the films I have seen are quite ordinary in narrative terms with bad editing and medium quality cinematography. I asked some Russian filmmakers why editing seems to be such a problem in Russian documentaries. The answer was that there are no teaching in editing and that the directors want to do the editing themselves: ”Keep your fingers away from my work”.

Yesterday at a lecture at the university I mentioned that 20 years ago – at the Balticum Film & TV Festival on Bornholm in Denmark – the filmmakers from Russia and the Baltic states said that an editor in their world was one with technical skills, not necessarily one with a creative function. A filmmakers at the university confirmed that this is still the case! At the university I also asked the 200 students, what they were aiming for. Most of them raised their hand for fiction films, 10-15 for documentary, and ONE wanted to become a producer. Yes, producers, how many are there in Russia or should I ask, how is the profession considered? Several have said to me ”a producer’s job is to bring money to the table”, they listen with respect, when I say ”… and to be the partner of the director, to be constructive and critical, to be involved”.

The films in this first report, that is the one with critical remarks, as I will get back in the second one to the few titles that have quality: ”The Conversation” (Anastasia Novikova) (PHOTO), short film school film about lonely man with mobile phone trying to get in contact with his wife in the hospital, nice but could have been shorter than the 22 mins. it is. ”Swimmers” (Kristina Paustian), different stylistical elements, a narrative mess, psychedelic, super-pretentious. ”Rebalda” (Elena Otrepieva), a visit to Solovki, where camps have been and people with criminal records still live, interesting it could have been, but the editing destroys it all. As does the bombastic music. ”The Countryman” (Anastasia Zverkova), black man in Irkutsk, tram driver and weather man on tv, he is sympathetic, the duration of 15 mins, is sympathetic, no big objections but at a National Competition, the best of the best… ”Grumant. Island of Communism” (Ivan Tverdovsky) (54 mins.), I might not have understood it totally, this film from Svalbard, made in an old-fashioned propaganda style, history and today, confusing…”Everyday Life of an Usual Peasant” (Ekaterina Dorofeeva) is sweet, as the protagonist is sweet. She lives half of the year alone in nature with her animals, the other half husband and son are there to help her with tourism. But again, sorry, poor story building, could have been so much better. As could ”Maria’s Home” (Alexei Lagerev), a sympathetic visit to a place for disabled, you can only have sympathy with the project and the people but as a film, maybe fine as a tv-documentary, will have an audience. ”Way to Charon” (Yury Manusov) is an insult to the audience, close-ups of dead Ukrainian soldiers being picked up by Russian soldiers, 10 minutes of disgusting reportage material wrapped in some philosophical comments in the beginning and end. Finally, ”Tsurtsula” (Alexei Nikolayev) has indeed production value but I don’t get why the director want us to be interested in going with him to Mongolia to a deserted Soviet military camp, where Mongolian soldier are based now. A nostalgic trip for the director, but what does he want to say? What is the message to Man?

I read that the three men jury consists of one film critic and two philosophers, interesting to know what they can take from the selection!

http://www.message2man.com/en/