The future of Festivals after Covid-19

Just watched the one hour online discussion initiated by DocuDays ua, here is the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZUMw3nEwF0&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3kxqPXIBBRRAelRQLkO-e6Fu8-sFTzXgDTQDModXkGbFPzzmV6XNphuR0

with these people taking part: Ondřej Kamenický – director of International Human Rights Documentary Film Festival One World; Melanie Iredale – deputy Director of Sheffield Doc/Fest; Victoria Leshchenko – programme director of Docudays UA; Iryna Tsilyk – filmmaker, writer; Tine Fischer – a founder and festival director of CPH:DOX. Martin Horyna – programmer of Karlovy Vary International Film Festival; Orwa Nyrabia – moderator, artistic director of IDFA…

It was good, with Nyrabia as the always gentle and competent moderator, see and listen for yourself, many important topics came up like ”do we need big screen shows at festivals, the theatrical aspect, are some films ”obligatory” for the big screen and could many just as well ”stay” online, because of the films in question and for people who are not travelling, festivals – after the online situation due to covid-19 – become hybrid, online/live, how do we advocate for the theatrical…some panelists did and I will join with a quote, according to the discussion quite conservative:

But in the end, after this is all over, people will want to go back to the flesh and blood experience, to see the films on the big screen, that sense of occasion that is the vital curatorial tool for focusing minds on a new film. And people will want to talk about films: talk about them over coffee, over lunch, in the street outside in the cinema. That is the festival experience. Peter Bradshaw, Guardian

And some more quotes picked from before the Docu/Class in Kiev:

“CPH:DOX has been transformed forever. There is no doubt that we will exist both physically and digitally next year. The transformation process has shown that it is possible to go digital, and that this has enormous value, and so the role of festivals will change.” Tine Fischer, CPH: DOX

“At the same time, a great deal of our content at CPH:DOX is obviously hugely relevant online, because it is not intended to be contemplative art but to make contributions to debates. From a democratic aspect, the digital is ripe with potential. Everybody can access it, and it serves as a forum for the future because it archives and amplifies the potential for debate. Tine Fischer, CPH: DOX

Quote from Orwa Nyrabia (Artistic Director): 

The exceptional surge of interest in watching documentary film online that we’ve experienced in the past few weeks said a lot about audiences’ interest. This will never replace the social experience of going to the cinema, of being together, when that becomes possible again, but it will offer films a better chance at a second life after their initial cycle in the market. The interests of the filmmakers and those of the audience are more aligned now than ever, and this will not be limited to this time of crisis. Orwa Nyrabia, IDFA 

https://www.dfi.dk/en/english/how-cphdox-survived-its-biggest-crisis-festival-has-been-transformed-forever?utm_campaign=How%20CPH%3ADOX%20survived%20its%20biggest%20crisis%20%2F%2F%20Facts%20%26%20Figures%202020%20ready&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Newsletter

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/apr/28/online-film-festival-we-are-one-cannot-replace-cinema?CMP=share_btn_fb&fbclid=IwAR386SBssb4IM1f74jtpw_318HmSBurOvsPwMiozz9TuXjUHAr_pgqQNCzU

https://www.idfa.nl/en/

Visions du Réel Award Ceremony 2020

From one award ceremony to the next, thanks to Online. Two nights ago I was in Kiev for the Docudays ua, last night I was in Nyon for the ceremony of the Visions du Réel, where many awards were given out, big money compared to what is possible at the Ukrainian festival.

And quite a different style of a show : It started with a man (did not get his name, head of the Board ?) talking directly to the camera, welcoming and thanking everyone around the festival, giving statistics, summing up what he characterised as « un grand succes ». Followed by Emilie Bujès, the festival director, who, joined by a colleague, was taking the viewer through the awards, introducing juries and filmmakers and clips. They did but failed a lot of times as one award was announced and another one came on the screen. Luckily the two ladies ended up laughing of their messy, unprofessional situation, where a coordination between technique and speeches was not prepared. 

First time mistakes… but what functioned well was the presentation from the side of jurors, who had – some of them – prepared small original videos to introduce the winners. The same with some of the winners, when they were to express their « thank you´s ». And bravo to the organisers for having asked the winners to make their own trophées. Great fun to see the different versions, all should have a fish included as Nyon is close to water, lake Geneva.

The winners… I have not watched in beforehand, except for the two I had as links (Traces of a Landscape http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4743/

and Mimaroğlu http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4744/ )

but I will catch up and watch at least some of them. Two of them for sure: Legendary Finnish master Markku Lehmuskallio (81 years old) and his son Johannes with „Anerca, Breath of Life“ (Photo) and Polish Tomasz Wolski’s „An Ordinary Country“. I have with pleasure seen other works of both filmmakers.

All awards are listed below in the list from the festival’s website. 

https://www.visionsdureel.ch/programme-2020/palmares-2020

DocuDays Award Ceremony

I have been to many award ceremonies at the Docudays ua festival in Kiev. I was there again last night. Online. Which was of course different from being in a cinema hall with hundred of other film enthusiasts. Who express their support with the winners through the atmosphere the always innovative organisers create in a tone that is far away from officialism.

No, I was sitting in a comfortable chair in a garden house in Copenhagen watching and listening. And it was nice and worked – when I had found out how to avoid having both the Ukrainian and English language in my ear!: two moderators in an isolated room leading the show, a phantasy character being the delivery guy to bring the awards to the post office, clips from the films, small “thank you”s from the award winners, artificial applauses, and the juries saying why they decided this and that film… Funny to see my countryman Mikael Opstrup, one of the jurors, motivating a choice from his home 20 minutes bike ride from where I was last night. Crazy world situation!…

 

And if I had been there, in Kiev, I would have invited him to go to have vareniki & vodka as I have had with – among others Lithuanians Arunas Matelis and Audrius Stonys and the dear friends from the festival, Dary’a Averchenko and Roman Bondarchuk. Or do as I did with Roman and one of his daughters, Agatha: go to the Georgian restaurant to have chacha and khinkali! Memories!

Back to the awards – the whole list you can get below via the link from the festival webpage, but to be noted: two awards to Hassan Fazili’s „Midnight Traveler” that is  available on online platforms, for professionals on IDFA’s Docs for Sale and in Denmark on Filmstriben. Did not see it yet. One award was given by Current Time TV, always helpful and committed Natasha Arshavskaya motivated the choice.

And as always the teenage jury not only made an excellent choice, but also an excellent motivation to award Russian “Immortal” by Ksenia Okhapkina (http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4572/) – my review, the motivation, click the link below from the website.

The Ukrainian “War Note” – have not seen it – received two awards, including that of the audience, and could have had one more but as Oleg Sentsov said, words to that effect, we took it away from competition as “all films from Eastern Ukraine are important, we don’t want to evaluate them”.

AND – of course – there were awards to the masterly “The Earth is Blue as an Orange”. Two: One in the competition for Ukrainian new docs, and the main award in the international competition. Iryna Tsilyk, the director, was thanking and told us that she has not yet shown the film to the mother in the film – who has resisted to watch it on her smart phone. The mother… the hero of my review, here is the beginning, were I declare my love:

“It is an emotional journey that director and writer Iryna Tsilyk takes the viewer on. For 74 minutes. One full of beauty. Very much because of the mother in the film, Anna, the protagonist, whose face expresses, what it means to live in the war zone in Eastern Ukraine with four children, and her mother. You see her alone in the kitchen, worried, in a melancholic mood, that is understandable on the background of the war – she decided to stay with the family; they could have moved. You see her smilingly tell one of her small boys how to pull out a rock tooth! You see her fighting with the stove to make the house warm. You see her taking the train with one of her daughters, Myroslava, who wishes to study cinematography. They come to an eximanation – in Kiev it must be – the girl thinks she failed. They get a phone call, she did not fail, daughter and mother cries of happiness. So did this viewer!…”

Go to the website, there are recordings of conferences, interviews, the festival is strong on the industry side as well. 

https://docudays.ua/eng/2020/news/kino/winners/

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4702/(the Earth etc.)

Peter Mettler Online

Being on many mailing lists… these days I get bombarded with online offers for films to watch, conferences to follow, from festivals or production companies or distributors. It is indeed overwhelming, and lovely at the same time. Overwhelming, because how do you navigate, how do you organise your screening time. Lovely, because it shows how energetic a generous documentary community is to share, what is to watch out there – so much quality.

Yesterday I decided to meet Canadian/Swiss director Peter Mettler. Online. On the Visions du Réel website. In conversation with two film critics, Jean Perret (former festival director) and Emmanuel Chicon (from the festival selection committee). The two in Switzerland, Mettler in Toronto.

 

I have too little knowledge about this important name in modern documentary; I saw and loved „Gambling, Gods and LSD“, when it came out in the beginning of this century… and voilá… in the beginning of the online masterclass, a 17 minutes long excerpt of the 3 hour long film was shown, followed by a discussion. I stayed an hour to follow, the whole session was 3 hours long and Mettler gave an excellent talk about his way of working on a film that was shot on Super 16, 20 years ago. On a good rainy day during this isolation time, I will watch the three hour long film that is available on DAfilms, link below, together with many other films by Mettler. Here comes the description of the film on DaFilms:

”A filmmaker’s inquiry into transcendence becomes a three-hour trip across countries and cultures, interconnecting people, places and times. From Toronto, the scene of his childhood, Peter Mettler sets out on a journey that includes evangelism at the airport strip, demolition in Las Vegas, tracings in the Nevada desert, chemistry and street life in Switzerland, and the coexistence of technology and divinity in contemporary India. Everywhere along the way, the same themes are to be found: thrill-seeking, luck, destiny, belief, expanding perception, the craving for security in an uncertain world. Fact joins with fantasy; the search for meaning and the search for ecstasy begin to merge.

Mettler blends documentary observation with lyrical camerawork, location sound with aural sculpture. The result is an audio-visual composition whose movements challenge our preconceptions, evoking in us the wonder and awe of our daily existence. It is a mosaic of moments where the whole is much greater than the sum of its parts. Gambling, Gods and LSD invites the viewer to actively participate in the making of meaning, so that the central theme of the film and the experience of watching it become one and the same.”

This morning I tried to find the recorded masterclass from yesterday, without success, I guess it will end up on YouTube like other conferences from the Nyon-based festival that ends today.

https://dafilms.com/film/7719-gambling-gods-and-lsd

https://www.visionsdureel.ch/programme-2020/118-atelier-peter-mettler

DocsBarcelona 2020/Treštíkova/Østergaard/Ai Weiwei

I have copy-pasted a part of the press release text about the competitive Panorama program, naming the top director names that will have their film presented in the online festival – reserved for the Spanish audience. Check the festival page for when the films are available. Between the 19th until the 31st of May. Here is the text, more about the program in the following days:

”13 works will compete for the DocsBarcelona Best Documentary Award in the Official Panorama Section: titles such as Vivos, by the Chinese artist, activist, and dissident Ai Weiwei, stand out. After focusing on the issue of migration in Human Flow (2017) and The Rest (2019), the filmmaker now travels to Mexico to report systemic corruption in institutions by focusing on the disappearance of some forty students who one September morning in 2014, while travelling to Mexico City to commemorate the 1968 Tlatelolco Massacre, were attacked by police.

Renowned for her original and poignant look at the subjects she deals with in her films, the Czech filmmaker Helena Třeštíková is the co-creator of Forman vs. Forman along with Jakub Hejna. A documentary about the figure of the Oscar-winning director of Amadeus and Someone flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest, which is also a look at communism, the American Dream and the Czech independence process. Also a portrait of an artist is the first feature film (and film testament) of the recently deceased producer Artemio Benki: Solo accompanies the composer and pianist Martín Perino, witness of the struggle between his own genius and the effects of the mental illness he was diagnosed with .

Another centrepiece of the festival is Winter Journey, by Danish filmmaker Anders Østergaard. A hybrid, a fiction disguised as a documentary or vice versa, which reveals the existence of the Jüdischer Kulturbund, or Jewish Cultural League with which in the early 1930s Goebbels’ Nazi Ministry of Propaganda allowed Jewish artists to perform for Jewish audiences. A film about the meaning of being German, and how the children of the generation that lived through the war had to face its consequences. And with an added bonus: the legendary Swiss actor Bruno Ganz (Downfall, Wings of Desire) shines through in the dramatisations that the story incorporates, in what was his last film work.”

The photo above is from the film “Zona Arida” by Fernanda Pessoa, also at the festival.

https://docsbarcelona.com/en/noticies/descobreix-tota-la-programacio-del-docsbarcelona-2020

 

DocsBarcelona 2020 – SOLO

DocsBarcelona has launched its program for the 23rd edition of a festival with an industry section. I will with other posts get back to the industry activities – conferences, masterclass, speed meetings, public pitch, rough cut session.

The festival includes 35 documentaries from 22 countries.

One of the films is SOLO by Artemio Benki, who sadly passed away April 15. His masterpiece can be seen during the festival – by an audience in Spain. From May 20 8.00 pm until May 23 8.00.

At the fine new web page of DocsBarcelona you can see the superb trailer of SOLO:

https://docsbarcelona.com/en/movies/solo

And here is the review I made of the film on this site in May 2019:

 

“Towards the end of the film, Martìn Perino is in a school class with his friend, the dancer Solé. He talks to the students: ”Solé and I would like you to write down, what you feel or think, when you listen to the music, I am going to play. Please put your words down on a piece of paper”.

They do so. Now it is my turn to put down, what I feel and think after having watched ”Solo” – for the second time. I feel that I have been given the gift of getting very close to a man with an extraordinary musical talent. For playing and composing. A very generous move from a fragile man, who spent 3 years at el Borda, the psychiatric hospital in Buenos Aires, gets out from there but is still under treatment. He lets me suffer with him, be happy and enjoy, when he is at the piano. And a very – towards him – respectful and compassionate move from the filmmakers to convey, what they got from Martìn Perino. There is energy in every scene, you are invited to follow the ups and downs of the pianist, you often have the same tense feeling as he has, when he is fighting for the freedom, that he fears. Chain-smoking and if his hands do not carry a cigarette, they are searching for a piano to play on. Classical pieces or his own compositions.

The construction of the film is excellent. The opening tells the viewer, where we are: El Borda, where the patients are fragile and where Perino is playing the composition that he has made for the hospital, its personnel and patients. Enfermaria, he calls it. And then, step by step, you get to know Martìn Perino. Often through conversations or situations with friends at the hospital, like Luis, who says “with your music you can tell your whole story”. Perino, no let me call him by first name as I think I now know him so well, Martìn tells at a lunch scene that at a moment, he was so scared to be alone in the streets that he had to ask Luis for support. The charismatic therapist has through the film several conversations with Martìn, scenes full of atmosphere, both when they take place in the hospital or at the home, where Martìn lives after being released from Borda. A messy place, the home, it was before the place of his parents, and Martìn has obviously problems in coping with making it orderly. Or he does not care. He visits his former teacher, giving her his story about “all that happened in  my head”… and then the music “started from my chaos… I didn´t suffer in vain!”. He has a lot of humour at the same time as he is desperate to get permission to play. Or to get to a piano. It is “a psychological urge”.

He walks the streets of my wonderful Buenos Aires – my father was born there, could not help thinking about it when watching and I write these words with tears in my eyes… – as I had so many times through “Solo”. You can have tears, when you feel sadness but also when you watch and listen to the music of a great pianist like Martìn. And – thanks for holding back that aspect – there was a mother, who thought Martìn was a genius… As he says to the therapist, “I have to get rid of the genius”. Nevertheless, when he plays for the bourgeoisie of BA: “My mother was a pianist and when she was very ill, I played her favourite piece for her, Alberto Gianestra´s “Dance of the Beautiful Maiden”. And he does that in the film. Formidable!

As is the film by Artemio Benki… and the camera work of Diego Mendizabal. The pain, the suffering, the joy, the introvert side of Martìn. Through many close ups. Did not know the dop, checked his filmography, he has quite a track record. Thank you first of all to Martìn Perino for letting me into your life.

2019, Czech Republic, France, Argentina, Austria, 84 mins.

https://www.slingshotfilms.it/solo/

https://www.lacid.org/fr/films-et-cineastes/films/solo

Jørgen Leth læser Ebbe Traberg

Postkort 2: Kære Jørgen. Du ryster mig, du rammer mig så præcist. Nu din Traberg, jeg må give skriften til Mogens Rukov: ”Det er en stor film. Den samler flere af Filmens traditioner. Det er en surrealistisk film. Man kommer til at tænke på Buñuels ‘l’Age d’Or’ fra 1930, som handler om Roms grundlæggelse, statsmagten, banditter, borgerskab og et seksuelt-sadistisk præsteskabs kristendom. Alt kan ske i denne film, fordi alt kan ske i virkeligheden. Der er så mange logikker, der insisterer på at være reelle. Der er mange logikker, der er faktiske, og som mennesket får gennemført. Det er sjældent, at en film giver plads til dem alle. L’Age d’Or gjorde. Traberg gør.” 

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/421/ (min anmeldelse på Filmkommentaren)

Serdar Kökceoglu: Mimaroğlu:

… subtitle: The Robinson of Manhattan Island… 

The Happy Woman and the Sad Man… that’s how the couple Güngõr and Ilhan Mimaroğlu has been characterised, tells the son of Güngõr, Rüstem Batum. He says so in the third and last chapter of the multilayered documentary that (also) is a love story. The couple was together for more than 50 years. Ilhan died in 2012, in New York, as the title says; after his death Güngõr returned to Istanbul. 

In New York, at the Columbia University, Ilhan Mimaroğlu studied music, became a pioneer in electronic music, published avant-garde music, set up his own record company Finnadar and worked with – among others – Charles Mingus. Güngõr Mimaroğlu was a very active leftist in the 1960’es and 1970’es, took part in many demonstrations and ended often, arrested, in police stations, where her husband picked her up! When computers ”took over” his kind of music, Ilhan Mimaroğlu gave up composing and went for street photography, while she became a business woman.

Apart from in the 3rd out of 3 chapters you don’t see Güngõr but hears her voice telling about the two and their life – and some music historians bring the necessary information to image from New York and Istanbul… Ilhan was also a fine filmmaker as the film shows in a brilliant way using his 8mm material in such an appealing way that you want to go back to the two metropoles right away.

The scoop of the film – the multilayerism – is that the filmmakers have succeeded to make sound and image go together to create an atmosphere that conveys the greatness of the artist combined with voice-off’s and the few but important pieces where you see him perform. Plus – again few – footage from NY of today and of Güngõr, now a fine old lady alone in her appartment in Istanbul.

Cinema for the ear was what Ilhan Mimaroğlu called his composed music, ”rebellion against tradition” was his mission, also expressed on the back of a t-shirt that says: ”Measly Mozart”!

He was not happy with the lack of interest in his art. When he closed Finnadar, the record company, he says “thanks for not listening. I am Ilhan Mimaroğlu. And that’s it.” 

Let me say ”that’s it” as well – thank you for a fascinating look at a fine multi-artist, who deserves much more attention.

http://mimaroglufilm.com 

Turkey, 2020, 77 mins.

Petr Záruba: Traces of a Landscape

I will try to avoid too many superlatives in this review of a brilliant documentary that is currently being shown at the online Visions du Réel festival in Nyon. So I have chosen to start with a copy-paste of the festival’s precise synopsis taken from the Cineuropa magazine:

 

“The film’s subject is Czech painter, photographer and experimental filmmaker Jan Jedlička, whom the Visions du Réel website calls “one of the best-kept secrets in the world of art”. Due to the political situation after 1968, he emigrated from Czechoslovakia and settled in Switzerland. For almost ten years, he was looking for new inspiration when, suddenly, during a holiday trip, he fell in love with the flat landscape of the Maremma region in Tuscany. He found his new artistic home there, and as an artist, he began from scratch. The documentary follows Jedlička at work in the present and dives into the past in order to help us understand his artistic career. The film tries to capture how he rediscovered his landscape – this time his inner one.”

To meet sympathetic Jedlička is a wonderful experience in a film that follows his daily rythm, takes its (his) time, goes with him in the landscape of Maremma in Tuscany, where he finds the motives and brings back pieces of rocks and stones from where he, with his mortar stone grinding and with water, brings forward colours that he uses for his interpretation of the wetland that is Maremma. “I need to have the reality next to me… the presence of reality keep us awake”, he says. He also reflects on loneliness and silence as he could experience in a house in Maremma – “that is not freedom”. He stands on the beach next to the anthropomorphic – as he calls them – wooden sculptures formed by the waves of the sea. He is in his atelier and his home in Zürich and Prague, he makes mezzotints, he is a fabulous photographer, playing with lights and darkness, he is with famous Steidl that publishes a photo book with his works, he praises b/w polaroid.

The film camera (maestro Czech cameraman Miroslav Janek) observes and interprets, I would say paints synchronically with the great artist Jan Jedlička is. It’s all about curiosity, he says, keeping the tension and interest  (good advice to documentarians from a modest man) who – shows the film with archive material, a lot shot by him – has an eye for nuances and a very gentle way of looking at the world.

Making portraits of artists is about finding a tone that fits and characterises the artist without staying on the surface and limit yourself to biography. Petr Záruba cleverly leaves the story about Jedlička leaving Prague in 1969 in the background to let the audience be with him in the creative process. It was a lovely journey to be taken on. Thanks.  

Czech Republic, 2020, 66 mins.

Jørgen Leth læser Morten Nielsen

Postkort: Kære Jørgen, du ophæver tyngdekraften – du svæver. Tue sagde 10 linjer, jeg sagde ok og jeg begynder med, hvad jeg så i forgårs. Du var på den store flyrejse og læste Morten Nielsen så dejligt at hans digtes poesi vred sig fri af min forglemmelse i biografi og danmarkshistorie. Lyslevende i din mund. Men så er der også det at alt skal med i din reportage, tumult før åbning af gaten, jeg bliver nervøs med dig. Men ikke bare det, at du er tro mod den dokumentariske pligt, også mod poesien i dit tidlige værk, i Dansk Litteratur, i Sanct-Hansaften-Spil, i Lyrikporten for ikke så længe siden. Du sætter mig i gang med vigtige gensyn og genlæsninger. Mange hilsner Allan

https://www.facebook.com/J%C3%B8rgen-Leth-54524431421/ (sender live)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3540/ (Lyrikporten)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/427/ (om Sanct Hansaften-Spil)