Mikala Krogh: Scandinavian Star, episode 5

Episoden følger ikke en egentlig kronologi, den ser ud som bygget over den medvirkende Jan Harsems voksende erkendelse og den følger Mikala Krogs egen undersøgelse, voksende forståelse og nu snart samlede indsigt.

Så jeg vælger gennem dette bagvedliggende morads af forretninger og kriminelle handlinger, som Jan Harsem så præcist åbner for ved sine oplevelser i Southhampton, at følge denne mand med det civile mod og hans møder med slynglerne og deres særlige forretningsmodel som er at brænde deres skibe, nogle gange med mennesker ombord. Havde besætningerne, dele af besætningerne således en særlig opgave?

Det er hans og min naive måske, men i vores vrede helt faste opfattelse at forbrydelserne findes og ja der er flere og de ligner hinanden mere end det er til at tro, og slynglerne findes, ja der er også flere og de er fra samme kreds. Mikala Kroghs tv-serie og nu denne episode fjerner for mig al tvivl og kredser lige omkring sandheden. Som også findes.

Men det holder ikke i retten forsikrer mig Bjørn Elmquist så skuffende, denne mand så opgivende som en begrundelse for at hans parti støtter Folketingets beslutning om ikke at tage sagen op på grundlag af en privat og uafhængig ekspertgruppes kæmpestore materiale, herunder Harsems, med nye oplysninger som peger i én retning.

Efter Folketinget i Danmark som det sidste af de tre parlamenter en sen aften har vedtaget afvisningen, går Jan Harsem med den lille Halvor i midnatsmørke ud til Christines grav og fortæller hende tror jeg, at de ikke vil give op før sandheden er kendt og erkendt af de tre landes politikere, også dem der måtte mene, at dette finder forretningsfolk med intakte fem sanser ikke på.

Jan Harsem udtrykker det den nat ved graven i samtalen med Christine sådan: ”Jeg fik den tanke at jeg ikke kunne gøre mig selv afhængig af hvordan anklagemyndigheden i Norge, Sverige og Danmark håndterer sagen, jeg kan ikke gøre mig afhængig af et flertal som udløses i landenes ting, Stortinget, Riksdagen, Folketinget. Min opgave må være at stemme for det jeg mener er rigtigt. Så godt jeg kan og jeg tror at jeg har gjort hvad jeg kan.” Civilt mods grund.

Over for det livssyn står forretningsmandens, han som stillede énarmede tyveknægte op i skibenes casinoer, denne involverede investor, som ikke kan huske ”for det er så længe siden”… og ”jeg var ikke involveret”, og som, da han bliver spurgt til størrelsen på den udbetalte forsikringssum, siger ”det mener jeg er en latterlig antagelse, der er ingen forretningsfolk ved deres fulde fem som kunne finde på at gøre sådan noget…” Kameraets billede er – sandhedssøgende i sit væsen – en sigende kommentar til replikken og tegner i en række tilsvarende interviews billeder af forretningsfolk som med ind imellem mere velplejede sætninger formaliserer sig udenom. Og jeg ser i filmens sande billede at de er slyngler.

Det er det Mikala Krogs værk kan, igen ser jeg den fremragende montage som integreret i og sammen med musikken er som en speak (som jo ikke er der) sikker, sikker fører mig frem til en forståelse af det forfærdende omfang af en forbrydelse. Scenerne er klippet ind til ærlighed, klippet uden om al sentimentalitet og denne forunderlige story-line som dokumentarfilmen kan – også med sin dialog, konstrueret af sprogbrikker som den lille Halvors puslespil på gulvet, som faderens når han taler med gæsterne i rummet – samler billedet over årenes tænken og undersøgelser: sådan blev Scandinavian Star udsat for disse værdiforringende hændelser, planlagt dårlig vedligeholdelse, en serie af til nu uforståelige brande.

Ja, Mikala Kroghs tv-serie og nu denne episode fjerner for mig al tvivl og kredser lige omkring sandheden. Som findes og som vil vise sig som opsummering, som endelig afsløring måske, i hvert fald som votum. Det er meget, meget spændende.

Danmark 2020, 5. episode, 58 min. af en tv-serie på i alt 6 episoder. Mandag 5. april 2020 20:00 på DR 1. Kan også ses på DR TV.

FOTO: Gennem alle årene har sønnen og faderen været ved moderen og det ufødte barns grav.

DocsBarcelona 2020 Online

… and today came the news from Barcelona:

With regards to the health emergency caused by COVID-19 and the uncertainty of its evolution, DocsBarcelona changes its format to guarantee the health of its participants, the continuity of its team, the sustainability of the project and, at the same time, the quality and diversity of content for our audience and attending professionals. For this reason, we will turn the 2020 edition (23rd DocsBarcelona) into an online edition, both the festival screenings and the industry activities. DocsBarcelona online will take place on the same dates, originally planned, from 20th to 30th May 2020.

This change in format has taken place after a deep reflection, together with our main collaborators. Currently, we are intensively working to make our program available to our public and to give opportunities to projects in development, specially in these particularly difficult times for the audiovisual and documentary sector.

http://www.docsbarcelona.com/en/

Mohammed Naqvi: The Accused

It’s an understatement to say that I was shocked watching this film, that was part of the CPH:DOX Online program, that you can access until Sunday. Content-wise I don’t recall having been presented with so much hate and intolerance in 75 minutes, as this internationally financed documentary includes, rightfully, at the festival, placed in the section that includes films that are documentaries/investigative journalistic reports. ”Behead all blashphemers” is one of the first sentences you hear – later on (commenting the case of Asia Bibi, more later) some kids in the street say that they don’t need to eat anything today, “we are waiting for Bibi’s head”. Words to that effect. It’s painful just to write about it, so let me take an easy escape and quote the BBC intro:  

 

”In Pakistan, the blasphemy law prescribes a compulsory death sentence for disrespecting Prophet Muhammad and life imprisonment for desecrating the Qur’an. This (Storyville) documentary follows the stories and fates of four people accused of blasphemy. The most famous of them is Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who claims she was falsely accused by her Muslim co-workers after a disagreement. As the elections in Pakistan loom, the country is split between those who feel the law is being misused and want to change it, and those who believe it must be preserved at any cost. Its greatest advocate, cleric Khadim Hussain Rizvi, goes on a mission to do just this. As his campaign heats up, he gathers millions of supporters, sympathetic to his goal, and silences anyone attempting to change the law by condemning them to death. As the world awaits the outcome of Asia Bibi’s trial, Rizvi uses the blasphemy law as a key platform to run for prime minister of Pakistan in the upcoming elections. Amidst the hysteria, those who oppose him and even his own followers become pawns in the ultimate quest for power…”

The director Naqvi said the project was “the most dangerous film” he had ever worked on. ,“When I was initially approached to possibly explore this topic, I refused,” he explained. “As I saw my country falling prey to the political ambitions of a despot, one who was using Islam as a veneer, I wanted to expose Rizvi. Here was a cleric who did not speak for me or other Muslims, he only spoke for his own political ambitions. In doing so, he was also responsible for the lynching of several minorities and Muslims, who had been falsely accused of blasphemy. He had to be stopped and this was what motivated me to make this film.”

… to expose Rizvi (PHOTO); indeed the director succeeds. I have no words to describe what I think of him.

The film also follows the work of Gulalai Ismail, human rights activist, whose NGO is closed, and who is being threatened to death for her actions. She is now in exile abroad as is Asia Bibi, whereas many other mentioned in the film have been killed or executed according to the blasphemy law.

Naqvi, the director has previously taken part in CPH:DOX winning the F:ACT Award in 2015 for the fine “Among the Believers”, jury motivation:

“For its ability to show us a country with complex political situation, for unprecedented access to part of its educational system with far reaching consequences and to the dedication the filmmakers have shown in the following the story the jury has decided to give CPH:DOX F:ACT Award to “Among the believers” by Hemal Trivedi & Mohammed Ali Nagvi. (Filmkommentaren cph:dox 2015).

UK, Pakistan, USA, 2020, 75 mins.

The 60th Krakow Film Festival will take place!

It was expected… alas… but cheers to the festival team and the filmmakers that the festival will take place… online. I had expected – in my selfnishness – with my wife – to have celebrated our silver wedding in Krakow and follow the fine festival in persona. It will be at home in Copenhagen. Here is the press release that came in this morning:

The full film programme, KFF Industry events and a lot of special offers will be available online for the audiences all over Poland!

Exactly in two months’ time, on May 31, the 60th Krakow Film Festival will begin. Similarly to two other prestigious European festivals – CPH:DOX in Copenhagen and Visions du Réel in Nyon – the programme of the Krakow Film Festival will be moved entirely online! The most recent documentary, animated and short films from all around the world, long anticipated Polish premiers and meetings with filmmakers – they all will be available from the safety of your own home.

“We do realise that nothing can compare to the festival atmosphere, the collective experience of an audience in a cinema theatre or backstage meetings. However, as we’re facing an uncertain future, we’ve decided to organise the Festival in this new formula. We do it out of respect for the filmmakers who are impatiently waiting to present their most recent work to the festival jury and the audience, but also for the audience itself – we want to give them a worthy escape from the worries of everyday life and restore a tiny bit of normality in this trying times” – Krzysztof Gierat, the director of the Krakow Film Festival, explains. He adds: “There will come a time when we will all celebrate the festival’s anniversary together.” 

During the 60th Krakow Film Festival, just as in previous years, we will see around 200 films from all around the world. Among them documentaries, short films and animations which will take part in competitions: three international ones and a Polish one. Four international juries will choose the winning films and give away awards worth 238 000 PLN. Plenty of other films will be presented in the special sections. As opposed to VOD platforms, the festival films will be only available to watch in Poland, during the screening times specified in the festival schedule. After the film screenings, just like every year, the audience will be able to join the Q&As with filmmakers and film protagonists – this time through social media and festival website broadcast.

All festival pass, accreditation and single ticket holders will get an access to the films online. Due to the change of the formula of the Festival all tickets and passes are now being offered on our website in new attractive prices. The Q&As, debates and special events will be available online to everyone free of charge.

The KFF INDUSTRY section will be open solely to the accredited guests from Poland and abroad who will gain an online access to the digital video library as well as conferences, lectures, panel discussions and presentations of animated and documentary projects on different stages of development. Co-production market and Doc Lab Poland workshops, co-organised by Wladyslaw Slesicki Film Foundation, will be made available for them as well.

The Krakow Film Festival is on the exclusive list of the Academy Awards short film (live action, animated, documentary) and documentary feature qualifying events. It also recommends films for the European Film Awards in the same categories. 

The 60th Krakow Film Festival will take place from May 31 to June 7, 2020. The full festival programme will be announced mid-April. 

The Photo is from last year’s winner: Advocate by Rachel Leah Jones og Philippe Bellaïche.

Yasmin Fedda: Ayouni

First the short synopsis of the film, explaining the title and introducing…”Noura and Machi (who) search for answers about their loved ones – Bassel Safadi and Paolo Dall’Oglio, who are among the over 100,000 forcibly disappeared in Syria. Faced with the limbo of an overwhelming absence of information, hope is the only thing they have to hold on to. ‘Ayouni’ is a deeply resonant Arabic term of endearment – meaning ‘my eyes’ and understood as ‘my love’. Filmed over 6 years and across multiple countries in search of answers, Ayouni is an attempt to give numbers faces, to give silence a voice, and to make the invisible undeniably visible…”

… take a look at the photo above: Happiness. Noura and Bassel. A couple in 

 

love. Later you see a video from their engagement party and you hear about the actions taken by the two activists to draw attention to the Syrian regime and its brutalities. Contacts to the media. Together with a BBC journalist we – the audience – watch people being beaten up in the streets. Unbearable footage. 

A quarter of an hour into the film, the location shifts to a mountain area, to the beautiful Mar Musa monastery, not far from Damascus to introduce the priest Paolo Dall’Oglio… let me quote the director Yasmin Fedda from the press material:

„This started as another film. A film about a priest I knew in Syria – Father Paolo Dall’Oglio, who had set up a well known monastic community that focused on interfaith dialogue. In 2011, he became involved in the Syrian revolution and passionately called for the world to respond to the atrocities happening in the country, to support human rights. He was expelled from Syria, his home of over 30 years. He was loved by so many Syrians. I met and filmed him in Paris shortly after he had left Syria. We spoke about the situation, his position, his take on things. I didn’t think it would be the last time I saw him, but I knew he was committed to what he believed in, whatever the cost. A couple of months later, in July 2013, he had gone to Raqqa (briefly liberated, before its total takeover by Daesh) to negotiate for the release of journalists kidnapped in the city. He leaves for the meeting and is never heard from again – kidnapped, with only rumours about his fate. Forcibly disappeared… »

What a wonderful man and how beautiful it is to see how his sister and his Italian family start to make videos to put online, to get the fate of the respected Roman Jesuit priest known. 

The sister Machi also joins the London double decker bus that is „decorated“ with photos of just some of the tens of thousands of Syrians, who have been forcibly disappeared during the revolution in the country.

The main focus, however, is on Noura Ghazi Safadi. It hurts to see her change during the years of waiting for news about her husband – from 2015. Noura is a human rights lawyer and activist and « one of the establishing members of Families for Freedom, a Syrian women led advocacy group for detainees and their relatives ».

I take a look at the photo above again. And remember it when I see Noura talking to cameras in front of the double decker that also went to Paris. Or in studios. Or at the end of the film after she had got the news that Bassel had been executed. 

Needless to say that this documentary is emotional to watch, at the same time as it is a documentation of the campaigns performed by human rights activists, the protests, the videos distributed, the compassion from many but not many enough. Respect!

UK, 2020, 75 mins.

Mikala Krogh: Scandinavian Star, episode 4

Jeg tror, ser, mærker at serien er ved et vendepunkt. Den voldsomme brand pludselig om natten ved kajen i Lysekil er mystisk, men uden oprørthed, den overgår til eftertanken i denne episode med den langsommere klipperytme, den roligere montage. Fjerde episode handler omhyggeligt reflekterende om hævn, halvhjertethed, dovenskab, kærligheds indsigt og civilt mod. Det er – tror jeg – en nødvendig overgang for at bringe de grusomme scener på plads i sindets sortering, scenerne i ildhavet forrige nat hvor mennesker skreg i angstens kaos før smerten og døden. Kvalt og brændt ihjel.

Bisættelsen eller rettere mindehøjtideligheden i Frederikshavn Kirke rummer et drama og en elegi. At skibsrederen og den administrerende direktør fra rederiet kommer til stede med en fremmed magtkulturs arrogance er en vild provokation. Det er jo på den ene eller anden måde deres skyld. Et vidne som jeg kender godt gennem episoderne til nu, som har mistet hvad hun elskede, sit livs grundlag, og nu kun lever for retfærdighedens fyldest og skyldnernes straf og allerede er frustreret i dette, som derfor ikke tror på denne sammenhængskraft, erklærer til kameraet, at havde hun, havde hun haft et skydevåben, var hun gået hen til de to og havde dræbt dem, den ene efter den anden. I et hævnens drama.

Jette Andersen fra Grenaa mistede sin mand, lastbilchaufføren ved brandene, som han, hvis han havde overlevet var blevet sigtet for, da han i sin fortid havde alvorlige pyromanforhold. Hun kender hans fortid indgående og Mikala Kroghs for mig aldeles pålidelige interviews med hende folder et særegent kærlighedsforhold ud i en smukt skæv elegi som bringer en anden sandheds mulighed ind over for det norske politis halvhjertede indkredsning af gerningsmanden.

Det norske politi lukker det seende øje, lægger ubekvemme sagsakter til side, følger med kikkerten for det blinde øje pyromansporet, finder en overvældende række indicier pegende mod lastbilchaufføren fra Grenaa, han var jo allerede dømt for flere pyromaniforhold. Under mordbrandene nu er han omkommet. Sagen kan bekvemt henlægges. Det lyder som nøgternt ræsonnement, det ligner institutionelt dovenskab.

Jette Andersen er pyromanens hustru. Selvfølgelig tror jeg mere på hende end på det norske politi. Tv-seriens fornemme filmarbejde får mig til at tro det. De elegiske Jytte Andersen afsnit er et højdepunkt i episoden, måske seriens vendepunkt.

Det danske politi som sideløbende med den norske efterforskning af pyromansporet skal undersøge pengesporet er ikke dovent – i og for sig forstår jeg, det er bare ikke begavet nok. De økonomiske forhold bag handlen med Scandinavian Star er for indviklede for politifolkene i stationen på Frederiksberg, de giver op, afleverer en foreløbig udredning.

Så de som har kræfter blandt dem som er ramt af katastrofen uden egentlig opklaring må agere selv. Den lille dreng på fotoet foroven hedder Halvor Harsem, han overlevede i sin fars arme den nat med ilden på havet. han kan 30 år senere huske at faderen og han kort tid efter var Southampton. Faderen hedder Jan Harsem, jeg har kendt ham længe som den helt anderledes medvirkende som med præcise ord på sine følelser, handlinger og iagttagelser i sin fortælling tog mig gennem skibets mørklagte røgfyldte korridor- og trappelabyrint med Halvor på armen. Han begynder nu sin helt egen efterforskning i havnen der, hvor Scandinavian Star er slæbt hen. Han vil se skibet indvendig og det lykkes for ham, han er i gang. Når myndighederne svigter træder almindelige folk til i civilt mod…

Centrale personer, ja jeg tror nu lyssky personer er samlet der i Southampton. Jan Harsem finder dem ved mærkelige tilfælde, mødes med dem. En ung mand vil derefter følge Harsem på vej, har noget at betro ham og jeg får tanken om de to tre stykker som kom ud af en luge i skibssiden… episoden er forbi her, serien er blevet til en thriller med cliffhanger. Det handler også om at komme at komme med drypvise oplysninger, fortælle om hændelser jeg først vil forstå senere. Sådan var det, er det stadigvæk for Mikala Krogh som i en Facebook foromtale selv peger på dette sted: ”… nye spørgsmål stiller sig i kø for et svar: Hvem var f.eks. de tre mænd, som listede ud af en luge på siden af skibet og forsvandt i mørket, da skibet lagde til kaj Sverige.” De kom ud og forsvandt og ingen ved hvem de er og ingen har set dem siden. 

Jan Harsem er nu ved dette spørgsmål beslutsom og energisk tilbage ved sit livs tragedie, hans gravide hustru forsvandt for ham og han for hende i den brændende labyrint. Hun hedder Christine, hun vågnede først: det brænder, det brænder, du skal tage Halvor! De løb ud, Christine først, han efter med Halvor på armen. De kom væk fra hinanden, Christine og han.

Danmark 2020, 4. episode, 58 min. af en tv-serie på i alt 6 episoder. Mandag 30. marts 2020 20:00 på DR 1. Kan også ses på DR TV.

David Osit: Mayor

Musa Hadid is the mayor in Ramallah. A busy man, who goes around in his city, talks to his citizens, tries to solve smaller and bigger problems. With a focus on the smaller. He wants the city to be welcoming foreigners on visit and first of all a nice place to live in. We are not replacing political leadership, he says, referring to what is the job of the President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen). The film, shot in 2017, follows the mayor when he and his city council prepare for the xmas celebrations – how should the xmas tree look like, how is his fountain outside the City Hall to be lit, in colours, with music. But Musa Hadid can not avoid the occupation – and he does not, when a German delegation visits with proposals on how to solve the everlasting conflict with the Israelis suppressors ! And it does not get better when the message from Donald Trump is announced : We are are going to have an embassy in Jerusalem. The consequent demonstrations and confrontations with the Israeli army entering Ramallah give the film a dramatic shift with the e-cigarette smoking mayor behind the glass walls of his city hall looking at youngsters throwing stones with the usual answer from the occupiers : tear gas.

The film follows the sympathetic mayor closely, you can only respect him at the same time as you understand his more than difficult job. At a point he talks about « dignity ». How is that possible if I am asked to undress by a 16 year old soldier from the occupying country, when I am travelling outside Ramallah. 

USA, 87 mins., 2020

CPH:DOX 2020 Awards

Just watched the online award ceremony of CPH:DOX, very well performed with the festival director Tine Fischer and the two programmers Mads Mikkelsen and Niklas Engstrøm guiding the viewer from one competition category to another, with juries giving their motivations and filmmakers thanking – and with clips of films that will be seen in the coming days. Bravo!

The award winners – read https://en.cphdox.dk/nyhed/cph-dox-announces-its-2020-award-winners, the still is from the film that received, very well deserved, two awards: “Songs of Repression”. 

Projects awarded first ZagrebDoxPro online edition

Copy-Paste of a press release from a couple of days ago, written so well by Petra Blaskovic, who also worked for IDFA 2019. Here we go:

Hungarian project Queen of Chess by Bernadett Tuza-Ritter won the HBO Europe Award, the Al Jazeera Balkans Award went to The Other Side of the Pipe by Marko Kumer Murč from Slovenia, Ever Since I Know Myself by Maka Gogaladze from Georgia received the ZagrebDox Pro Online Mentor Award, and Forbidden by Anelise Salan from Romania picked up the DAE Mentoring Pitch Award. 

This also concludes the first online edition of Zagreb Pro that took place from 15-23 March. 

Following a four-day online workshop and the Pitching Forum at which the 

projects in the new format of pitching videos were presented online to the members of the international panel, the winners of the 16th Zagreb Dox Pro have been announced. 

The HBO Europe Award, a diploma and €2,000 for project development went to the Hungarian project Queen of Chess, by Bernadett Tuza-Ritter. Queen of Chess tells the story of the relationship and the tournaments of two minds: Judit Polgar, the greatest female chess player of all time and Garry Kasparov, the legend who believed that a woman and a man cannot fight one another. 

The project was presented by Tuza-Ritter, the producer and screenwriter Gabor Harmi and producer Peter Stern. 

For the first time, the Al Jazeera Balkans Award was presented at Zagreb Dox Pro and awarded to Marko Kumer Murč, director of The Other Side of the Pipe. Presented by Kumer Murč, screenwriter Eric Moses and producer Katja Lihtenvalner, the Slovenian project depicts what happens when abuse of power turns out to be a pipeline’s biggest export and when ordinary people fight tooth and nail to hold Europe to its values. The project was awarded €1,000 for further development. 

The Documentary Association of Europe (DEA) Mentoring Pitch Award, also given out for the first time at ZagrebDox Pro and consisting of a free one-year DAE membership and mentoring sessions for the director and producer, went to the Romanian project Forbidden. It follows the story of four same-sex couples, including the director, who decide to go to Romania’s Marital Status Department to register requests for marriage although the law doesn’t allow marriage outside the traditional man-woman relationship. Forbidden was presented by director Anelise Salan and producer Cristina Iordache. 

The ZagrebDox Pro Online Mentor Award, consisting of a diploma and a one-year online mentoring with Cecilia Lidin went to Maka Gogaladze, director and producer of the Georgian project Ever Since I Know Myself. The project shows how Georgians with a long Soviet past and strong traditional mindset are trying to adopt a new, European identity. 

The international panel consisted of Cecilia Lidin (Danish Film Institute), Hanka Kastelicova (HBO Europe), Lejla Dedić (Al Jazeera Balkans), Rada Šešić (Sarajevo Film Festival/IDFA) and Marion Schmidt (DAE/DOX BOX). 

The 16th edition of ZagrebDox Pro has successfully moved online, and held a four-day intensive training program as well as a the final Pitching Forum session. The programme included 12 documentary projects in different stages of development and production from 11 countries and the workshop mentors were Leena Pasanen, director of the Biografilm Festival in Bologna and former managing and artistic director of DOK Leipzig, and director and producer Stefano Tealdi. 

“After 10 editions of conducting our pitching lab in Zagreb, we were afraid the human interaction, so important in our work, would have been missing,” say Pasanen and Tealdi. “To our surprise, we did not loose the peer-to- peer and group feedback needed to give strength to the pitch of a project and therefore foster its development. This was done through various on-line discussions between us and the project teams. The fact that the participants were stuck in their homes or offices actually turned into an advantage and maximised their creative potential. They worked intensively with images and graphics in constructing an appealing and attractive pitch. 

“These pitching videos were recorded and presented to a panel of decision makers and project scouts: HBO, Al Jazeera, Danish Film Institute, Sarajevo Film Festival/IDFA and DAE. Overwhelmed by the results, we wanted to invite specific partners and potential investors for each single project. Unfortunately, the earthquake in Zagreb did not allow us to do so. This could have given immediate results to the teams, but still the project teams will connect with decision makers who will see the recording of the pitch.” Tealdi and Pasanen conclude. 

ZagrebDox Pro training programme is organized with the support of Creative Europe – MEDIA Programme of the European Union, Croatian Audiovisual Centre, City of Zagreb and Croatian Film Directors’ Guild (DHFR). 

Natalija Yefimkina: Garage People

I remember when it was pitched at the Baltic Sea Forum in Riga. My positive reaction was with a smile of surprise. And expectation to what the director would get out of it in the final film. Now the film is there and it keeps what it promised:

This is how Russian men in the snowy North of the country escape from the daily boredom to nurse a passion, to do something they like, to dream, to have a parallel life in a harsh mining area. The doors are opened to the garages and there you have the man, who suffers from the Parkinson disease but goes to work in his workshop. And there you have the group of friends, who have formed a band to play loud heavy-metal kind of music. And the grandson and grandfather at the garage, where the latter for decades – as his father – has dig out below to reach… yes, to reach what in the underground? And the ones who have turned the garage into a fitness centre! And the man (photo), who lost two wives but – we see that in the film – has a date that seems to turn out successful. 

Not to forget the man, who makes wooden icons and gets a visit from the priest, who wants an art piece for his church. As the only one we follow him (the artist!) to his home, where his wife scolds him for drinking too much. And yes, there is always a bottle in the garage.

There is a lot of vodka in the film; understandable under these weather and the poor living conditions you can imagine!?

This is a film, where no fingers are pointed. The director observes, she shows, but the way she shows, the building of the film, the cinematic choices she has made reveals clearly that she loves the protagonists, the characters, the participants.

Not long ago a filmmaker asked me why I am so fond of documentaries. My very banal short answer was: People, Life… This is one of those fims that gives me People and Life. Awarded at the Berlinale.     

Germany, 2020, 95 mins.