Italian Director Meets Russian Police

Less than 24 hours after she arrived in Moscow Italian documentarian Claudia Tosi (“I had a Dream”, DOKLeipzig winner 2018, http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4389/) ran into trouble… We were having lunch in the Tretyakov Gallery, dumplings, preparing for watching world class art.

Tosi looked at her cell phone, said something in Italian that I did not understand, in English it was the f… word, she explained: Someone has taken money from my credit card, €400. She left the lunch, went to a café on the other side of the street, that had internet, called her father to ask him to contact the bank to block further activity.

Well, that has happened to many of us but when Tosi came back, she knew what had happened! It’s the guy outside the gallery, who is going around with his mobile in his hand. Russian hacking, I said, having no clue how a thing like that is possible. And maybe the Italian director was writing a drama.

But back in the café Tosi met a Russian woman, who understood English, understood and recognised the drama – We have to call the police…

On the photo taken by me you see four policemen, two police cars and two women, the one to the right the helpful woman and the one with her back to the camera, Claudia Tosi.

The young man with the mobile phone was taken to the police car, driven away and Tosi was asked if she would give a statement. Of course!

Our guide, Tatyana Soboleva, came back to us after a tv interview, got the story, we three left the café and the young man was back in action with his phone. How he can access a bypassing foreigner’s bank account, is still an enigma, at least for me.

Reality wrote its script!

DOKer Shorts and Diagnosis

Getting into the October cinema from the noisy boulevard with the constant traffic jam in Moscow is a blessing. Again a lot of people were there to watch the first competition program of short films, and they were not disappointed. Four films of high quality, that’s all I can write as a member of the jury.

I was thinking back in time, where I attended the short film festival in Clermont-Ferrand year after year, which mostly showed short fiction. Here in Moscow it’s short documentaries that reach the screen and/or hybrid works. Film history has often pointed out that short films are the step to making longer films, feature length, it might be but I did not sense that with the four films I saw yesterday. They were finished works in themselves, strong stories, well shaped with sense of the cinematographic possibilities. Each with their own handwriting. Far from being student films. I congratulated the selector Nastia Tarasova for her choice and look forward to the films of today Friday.

After a good meal into the darkness again to watch a film from Poland, “Diagnosis”, a documentary feature film debut of the director Ewa Podgórska and producer Małgorzata Wabińska. From Lodz, and that is an important piece of information as the film ” is a journey into the depths of subconscious of a city formed by human beings”, where some inhabitants undergo sessions on a couch, performed by a Frenchman – and from there the film takes its audience into the lives of the chosen characters, and slowly – in a puzzle-like narrative, where the characters through the editing are put to communicate with each other – you get to know that this is a film about la condition humaine. You are surprised, when watching the film and that’s a compliment, the film director dares to break dramaturgical rules, it plays with emotions, it is fragmented, maybe the form takes over once in while but I was impressed and entertained (company name Entertain Pictures!). I was there with Finnish film couple, Iiris Härma (who made the wonderful ”Leaving Africa” – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3154/ – and Visa Koiso-Kanttila, the latter director and cameraman praising the quality of the cinematography. Agreed! A Q&A afterwards focused on the film as a post-Soviet interpretation, not at all, it’s the universal theme of Life and Love that is at stake.

http://en.pisf.pl/news/polish-creative-documentary-diagnosis-goes-to-idfa?wcag=1

https://www.midff.com/

Films at CAFX

… which means Copenhagen Architecture Festival that includes a lot of interesting documentary films, two of them can be seen at the art house cinema Grand Teatret in the centre of the Danish capital.

Both have been reviewed on this site. Thomas Riedelsheimer’s “Leaning into the Wind” with fantastic landscape artist Andy Goldsworthy was at the Magnificent7 festival 2018 in Belgrade, where Svetlana and Zoran Popovic presented the film as “Riedelsheimer’s sophisticated filmmaking proceeds from breathtaking physical matter and goes beyond trying to reveal the ideas that move the artists. And before our very eyes these ideas are transformed into remarkable forms pervaded by the rhythms of nature.” http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4266/

And staying in Belgrade I reviewed Nicolas Wagniere’s “Hotel Jugoslavia”, a quote “…Wagnières says that he during a decade has come back to the city and the hotel and that he has filmed “pour garder and pour regarder”. He conveys his point of view very much through his personal voice off – one of the best sequences is the interview with the mother, who remembers how people stood together after the ww2, eager to build a new society of unity and brotherhood, values that are no longer part of the Serbian society. Wonderful propaganda footage…” http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4301/

The festival has an amazing program to offer, it runs until the 14th of April.

http://cafx.dk

DOKer Opening Day

… was full of sunshine from early morning in Moscow. I walked from the hotel accompanied by director Tatyana Soboleva. I had asked her to take me to the Pushkin Museum to have a look at the exhibition of Francis Bacon, Lucian Freud and The School of London.

On the way we passed the House of Journalists, where the founder Irina Shatalova organised the first public documentary screening of what became DOKer. It was also here, Soboleva told me, that the first edition of the festival took place – it was the one, where I was member of an online jury that had Victor Kossakovsky as the chair. The festival, now having its fifth edition, writes this about itself on the website: «Moscow International Documentary

Film Festival DOKer has stemmed from the project of the same name which screens independent non-fiction. DOKer is aimed at analyzing and screening in Russia various genres and forms of the world’s documentaries as a separate line of cinema in all its aesthetic and socio-cultural diversity. The Festival focuses on independent documentary cinema that incorporates both poetic narrative and social blockbusters; footage and mockumentary; art-house and science-fiction; classic and experiment.»

I have difficulties in placing the opening film, German “Russia from Above”, in any of the mentioned classic – well, it should be «classic» nature film, filmed from helicopters «and with the best aerial cameras worldwide» as the catalogue text says. And it IS spectacular, with narrative problems, I think, when it comes to the duration, it feels very long, with a voice over speak that is full of clichés, and the music, at least some of it, that is more noise than music.

Maybe it suffers from being 90 minutes – on television, and it is a high budget television product, the representative from ZDF Peter Ahrens said, it was presented as a series. And gosh – 30 millions people have seen it in Germany. On arte the film or program if you like had 4% audience share, where arte normally is down to around 1%.

The big hall of the October Cinema was full and of course it was joyful to watch ice bears, and brown bears hunting for salmon, and to watch St. Petersburg from above as well as Moscow… An opening film for a big audience. About their own country and its beauty.

www.midff.com

synopsis for the opening film: https://www.midff.com/product-page/russiafromabove

Photo taken just before the hall became full of the premiere audience.

DOKer – and Uncle Sasha or One Flew over Russia

I am off to Moscow tuesday to visit the DOKer festival, to be correct the Moscow International Documentary Film Festival, to be a juror for the short film festival. To be honest I pushed for this invitation. In the first edition in 2015 I was in the jury for long documentaries but it was a jury of members, who watched the films on their own at their respective homes and made the decisions via mail and phone. I want to come to the festival, see films in a cinema, feel the atmosphere, I told the organisers and this is what happens, thanks to Irina Shatalova, Nastia Tarasova, Sergei Kachkin and Tatyana Soboleva. The organisers of a festival that is independent of state funding, a filmmaker’s festival with an impressive program: https://www.midff.com

And good filmmakers they are. I have written about “Linar” way back in 2013, http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/2447/ By Nastia Tarasova with Irina Shatalova as the cinematographer.

… and Sergey Kachkin’s “On the Way Home”, http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/1717/

… and Tatyana Soboleva’s “Siberian Floating Hospital”, http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3309/

Today I watched “Uncle Sasha and One Flew Over Russia” by Soboleva, quite a meeting with a man with a big Family as you see in the beginning of the film, a man who would like Russia to be a monarchy, who lives with his wife in a village, that is empty, surrounded by water, an island it is, a charismatic , knowledgeable man with several bon mots, who suddenly starts singing, a man with a big love to his wife, and a filmmaker with a sense for details, who is able to convey the atmosphere at the place, where crooked houses stand alone in snow and sun, and where Alexander Nikolayevich fights to make a connection to the other bank of the river, where relatives live and where he can shop and have a vodka or two like some of his neighbours. A Russia disappearing, thanks for taking me there!

And to Moscow.

2018, 58 mins. Russia

CPH:DOX 2019 Awards

DOX:AWARD: ‘Ridge’ by John Skoog (Sweden)“We would like to honor a film that takes formal virtuosity to new heights, yet never loses sight of the human experience. If Tarkovsky had played video games and was a Swedish farmer, this might be what his films would have looked like. Sculpting with time and space, this new director creates a unique field of experience for the audience, steering away from familiar dichotomies such as man versus machines, science versus nature, immigrant versus local. Instead this film creates a haunting environment where all of these elements are playfully activated, and the result approaches a uniquely jagged kind of sublime. (PHOTO)

Special Mention: ”Searching Eva” by Pia Hellenthal (Germany) “The jury would like to make a special mention for a film that takes an innovative approach to a profile of an artist. Its cinematographic language is very much in line with the artistic and life experience of a character who continuously searches for alternative approaches to everything, constantly detaching from common reference points and notions of stability. And so does the film, which adopts its own playful ethos, never falling into expectations for how this story, or this life, should be told. Above all, it’s a film of great risk, on screen and behind the camera, and we found that both commendable and compelling.

NEW:VISION: ‘A Moon for My Father’ by Mania Akbari og Douglas White (Iran) “‘A Moon For My Father’ is a complex and generous film about bodies. Bodies of work, bodies of politics and history – an extraordinary artist’s body as host of disease and transformation under pressure – and as the subsequent carrier and giver of life. Like a punch in the gut or a needle in the abdomen, this film demonstrates that as a viewer, the medium of moving images is far more than a retinal and cognitive experience, but one of strong affect and of somatic involvement of your very own body.”

FACT:AWARD: ‘Dark Suns’ af Julien Elie (Canada) “The F:ACT AWARD goes to a film that gives voice to people who have suffered unbearable losses and have been neglected and ignored and forgotten by their government and authorities. In fact, the film convincingly suggests that those very authorities are themselves deeply involved in the immense tragedy that has been quietly unfolding through more than 20 years. The filmmaker has invested almost as many years of his life and work to bring the story to us and he does it with a huge solidarity with his characters and with a patience that gives the audience a deep sense of the complexity of this tragedy. He does not seek easy answers but let one witness after the other take us deep into the heart of darkness.

NORDIC:DOX: ‘The Men’s Room’ af Petter Sommer & Jo Vemund Svendsen (Norway) “We agreed unanimously on the winner. The NORDIC:DOX AWARD goes to a film that made us both laugh and cry. A tribute to friendship and male vulnerability. A film that powerfully conveys the basic human needs for belonging propelled by a clear cinematic vision and a big heart. »

NEXT:WAVE: ‘Kabul, City in the Wind’ af Aboozar Amini (Afghanistan, Holland, Japan, Tyskland) “For us in the jury it’s been an immense pleasure to experience the incredible variety in the NEXT:WAVE category and we’ve been traveling around the world in the cinemas of Copenhagen. Our main award goes to a movie that took us to the heart of a hurt city that we’ve never experienced like this before. An impressive, artistic and breathtaking documentary that goes beyond war and death and is a deep, devastating and deeply moving portrait of life and characters which you won’t forget. This is only the debut feature of the director but it shows an incredible sense of artistic ambition and a brilliant, bold use of cinematography, editing and sound. A wonderful film that shows that hope will survive.”

Politikens Publikumspris: ‘Push’ af Fredrik Gertten (Sweden). Politiken is the primary Danish newspaper for culture and is a strong supporter of the festival. With the award follows 50.000Dkr. https://cphdox.dk/en/programme/film/?id=968 for more about the winning film.

https://cphdox.dk/en/

DocuDays UA 2019 Awards

Look at the photo, the awards which were distributed in Kiev on March 28 – the two last days of the festival, that stops today, are called Audience Days, where films from the festival will go to locations i.e. ”cinemas in different Kiev neighbourhoods”.

Tomorrow is also an Audience Day – Presidential election, first round, in Ukraine!

Here follows a copy/paste of the list of winners from a festival that I visited for the seventh time this year and which stays close to my heart because of the program, the atmosphere, the dedication of the staff and their ability to surprise its audience:

DOCU/WORLD

Main Prize

Voices of the Sea by Kim Hopkins, UK

The main prize goes to “The Voices of the Sea”, for the powerful and touchy and warm characters, for the love that wins above everything, for the sensitive camera that brings harmony of characters within the environment.

Special Mention

White Mama by Zosya Rodkevich, Evgeniya Ostanina, Russia

For the protagonist that gives us hope and believe that we have enough strength to deal with the hard issues in life.

DOCU/UKRAINE

The Winter Garden’s Tale by Simon Mozgovyi, Ukraine

A woman’s life work flowers into a portrait of the cycle of nature and inevitable change.

DOCU/SHORT

Main Prize

A Friendship in Tow/Toe by Atsushi Kuwayama, Portugal

Mounting the stairs becomes a story of love, friendship and a promising dinner executed with charm, style, heart and humor.

Special Mention

Above the Styx by Maria Stoianova, Yulia Danylchuk, Maria Terebus (story editor), Liudmyla Paraskiva, Kateryna Rybachuk, Anastasiya Feshchuk, Ivan Bershadskyi, Alla Onopchenko, Ukraine

For a fine example of how a collective of emerging filmmakers come together and manage to create one whole story from multiple viewpoints of society.

RIGHTS NOW! AWARD

Main Prize

The Cleaners by Hans Block, Moritz Riesewieck, Brazil, Germany

For encouraging discussion about privacy, freedom of choice and human rights protection in the world where the internet and social media take up ever more of our private space, and we ourselves become a part of the global network. Where is the balance between the desire to protect the society from cruel content which incited hate and the freedom of choice and self-expression? Will the internet of the future be an instrument in the hands of dictators and global corporations, or a territory of boundless democracy and individual freedoms? Who has the right to define what should be “ignored” and what should be “deleted”? The film raises many questions to which the humanity has yet to find the answers.

Special Mention

Still Recording by Ghiath Ayoub, Saeed Al Batal, Syria, Lebanon, Qatar, France, Germany

For the human stories hidden behind military news reports. For the courage of the people who did not flee from armed conflict, but picked up a camera instead of weapons and showed the real events happening in Syria to the entire world. Despite all the horrors of the war, they still have strength, not just to live and maintain their dignity, but also to give others the feeling of peacetime life. It’s a reminder to every one of us: nobody can be sure that they are safe from war – we have to take the responsibility for preserving peace.

When Lambs Become Lions by Jon Kasbe, USA

The director has succeeded in combining the personal dramas of ordinary people and the global environmental disasters which concern everyone. Corruption, the violation of socio-economic rights, the damaging effects on the planet’s environment are all intertwined in the storyline and paint a whole picture – not just of Kenya, but also of the whole modern world, where states sometimes leave people no choice and force them to face difficult moral dilemmas.

ANDRIY MATROSOV AWARD

I Grew Up As You Slept by Marcin Sauter, Poland

For boundless love and tenderness between worlds and generations!

STUDENTS’ JURY AWARD

Reserve Askania by Andriy Lytvynenko, Ukraine

Fresh reminder about our nature. The rhythmical and sensual narrative of the film can fascinate and move the audiences with any background, and the protagonists win you over with their sincerity and dedication to their work.

AUDIENCE AWARD

White Mama by Zosya Rodkevich, Evgeniya Ostanina, Russia

And go to the website and see trailers, interviews, statements, etc.

http://docudays.ua/eng

Eva Mulvad: Kirsebæreventyret

Filmen havde under CBH:DOX festivalen premiere 21. marts i Grand Teatret. Den vistes på Charlottenborg 27. marts og i Dagmar 31. marts.

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=983 (CPH:DOX program)

Eva Mulvad har atter en gang lavet en smuk og tydelig film om et moderne menneske. Han er godsejer, han hedder Harald Krabbe, han har et projekt ved siden af gårdens grundlæggende landbrugsproduktion, han vil optimere de mange kirsebærtræers udbytte, lave fornem vin i stedet for almindelig marmelade. Eva Mulvad vil skildre udvidelsen og fornyelsen, forsøget. De er energiske mennesker de to, de klæder hinanden de to.

Hvor kommer det overskud fra? Jeg tror det kommer fra elegancen – det elegante menneskes sikkerhed, det sikre professionelle greb, som igen kommer af en ubøjelig tro på det sikre valg.

Om kirsebæreventyret lykkes fortæller filmen i den tilbageholdte videns form, det udvikler sig til en thriller, jeg sidder og frygter tilbagegang, uheld, nemesis, dramaturgiens vendepunkt. Hvordan er det nu med eventyr? Det betyder jo i grunden det som vil komme. Jeg tænker på violinisten i instruktørens forrige film, tænker på godsejeren i denne, Eva Mulvad har atter skrevet et tidens dokument, denne gang om det nye modernes elegance, skrevet så klogt og klart om det som vil komme.

Danmark 2018, 85 min

SYNOPSIS

A Cherry Tale. Three Danish entrepreneurs embark on making cherry wine on the island of Lolland. An adventure about taking the leap from hobby to risky business. When Harald Krabbe inherits a manor house on the Danish island of Lolland, he wants to try something new. And sometimes you just have to find the right people at the right time. The Nordic wave is rolling, food and wine produced locally are in. And with the wine connoisseur Morten and the master chef Jan, Harald sets about making wine from the cherries of his own grove. A hobby and a passion, which quickly grows into an ambitious business venture for the three adventurers. Even the Queen pays a visit to the vineyard. But the adventure also meets some challenges, as the ambition levels and the pressure increases. Millions are at stake, and the three friends also have their disagreements. Plus, the world of wine is not for amateurs. Snobbery and hierarchies are the order of the day, but there are also fresh opportunities to market oneself as an alternative to the established producers in France. However, the greatest market – and the biggest gamble – is eastwards, in China. Eva Mulvad has followed the three friends during three years of ups and downs in a film about betting everything on a good idea. (CPH:DOX programme)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4486/ 

Pernille Rose Grønkjær: Hunting for Hedonia

Som altid er jeg glad for fortællestemmen når den er der. I denne film er jeg simpelthen lykkelig ved at blive ført ved hånden i dette tilsyneladende uvejsomme terræn af chokerende oplysninger som hæver sig til landskaber. Ført ved hånden af Tilda Swintons rolige, omhyggelige, aldeles indforståede stemme. 

Som altid er jeg derimod skeptisk ved dækbilleder og vignetter. Imidlertid i denne film har jeg brug for de overdådigt fotograferede sumplandskaber, mangroveskove og isdækkede grene som i deres uoverskuelighed ikke kan tydes i en forståelse, men bliver åh, så velkomne tænkepauser i filmens lange komplicerede tankerækker. Grafikken hjælper også. Den er fornem, de tegnede sekvenser er umærkeligt medfortællende.

Og så er der arkivmaterialet, så flot fundet frem, så omhyggeligt restaureret og anbragt i en ny cinematografisk omgivelse af nye rene levende arkitekturoptagelser fra den fraværende hovedperson doktor Robert Heath’s kontor, laboratorium; og mest indtryksfuldt lige så velovervejet og rystende sikkert uforglemmeligt skildret i hver bevægelse af kameraet: hospitalet. Dette hospital i tiltagende ruinering vil med dette filmværk blive stående som videnskabeligt monument. Og i ruinen er det netop det vigtigste som bliver stående i århundreder, bemærkede Per Kirkeby engang, de bærende og de bårne elementer.

I alt dette er musikken her autoritativ medfortællende og filmens journalistiske fremstilling og dens præcise, nøgne sprog tilføjer Rose Grønkjær disse andre sprog i konstant ligevægt, så jeg forvirret først samler mig til en forståelse af dette voldsomt ufattelige og hvad den viden og praksis medfører, når doktor Kelly Foot, min yndlingsmedvirkende og allerbedste vidne slår fast at ”… your brain is you.” Her sætter jeg midt i min anmeldelse et link til et ganske kort klip med dette rigt charmerende menneske, som var min trygheds fundament på min usikre rejse gennem 90 minutters vildt terræn af ny viden og forståelse af eksistentielle emner som Parkinsons sygdom, epilepsi, depression, psykose og deres mulige nye behandling ved kirurgi, dyb hjernestimulation. Ved alle sine midler en overvældende film.

Men egentlig er konstruktionen en enkel videnskabshistorisk fremstilling, som jeg forstår også ligger i filmens medforfatter Lone Franks nye bog Lystens pioner, en biografi over denne geniale hjerneforsker, Robert Heath som ved diskutable metoder nåede så opsigtsvækkende resultater tilbage i 1950’rne at faglig og politisk modstand lukkede dem ned til fordel for det midlertidige psykiatrisk/psykologisk paradigmeskifte, som jeg lærte af og levede med i min ungdom, men som så nu et halvt århundrede senere her og der og overalt tages frem igen af forskere som dem, der medvirker som vidner i filmen! Altså en forrygende, men almindelig fortælling om tabt, men genfunden viden og kunnen og så med dette værk omhyggeligt genskabt som aldeles brugbar filmkunst.

Det er hvad Pernille Rose Grønkjær kan, og det ved hun godt, så dejligt selvbevidst lige i dette citat: “To me, real life has to be marvellous before it can be cinematic. That only happens when you add an extra dimension: someone’s unique vision. Someone who views the world with intentional eyes. Only then, does the real world become interesting as a cinematic experience.” Og så skriver Pernille Rose Grønkjær følgelig sin Hunting for Hedonia som en cinematografisk oplevelse og jeg skriver bare tak…

Danmark 2018, 90 min.

Hunting for Hedonia bliver vist endnu en gang under CPH:DOX festvalen, søndag 31. marts 14:15 i Grand Teatret. Program og billetter her.

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=888 

SYNOPSIS

Hunting for Hedonia. Bor lykken i hjernen? Og kan man kurere depression med elektroder? Dansk film om hjernens mysterier stiller de store spørgsmål. Hjernen er et af den moderne medicins helt store mysterier. Vi ved mere om, hvad vi ikke ved, når det kommer til dette komplekse organ. Vor viden om hjernen er imidlertid i stor vækst – og det samme er både psykiatrien og medicinalindustrien. Vi nærmer vi os (måske!) endda et punkt, hvor vi ikke blot kan kurere depressioner, men ligefrem øge lykken og måske endda forbedre vores hjerner gennem teknologien. Spørgsmålet er, om vi skal gøre det, bare fordi vi kan? Og hvem bestemmer, hvad der er normalt? Den såkaldte Deep Brain Stimulation blev først udviklet helt tilbage i 1960’erne, men blev siden frosset ud i et stadig mere politiseret forskningsmiljø. Nu er den tilbage, og i mellemtiden har teknologien indhentet visionerne. Pernille Roses film med manus af videnskabsjournalisten Lone Frank ser på udviklingen og stiller de store spørgsmål – og lader de skarpeste hjerner svare på dem. En på alle måder tankevækkende film. (CPH:DOX PROGRAM)

Hunting for Hedonia. Does happiness live in the brain? And can depression be cured with electrodes? A Danish film about the mysteries of the brain asks the big questions. The brain is one of the great mysteries of modern medicine. We know more about what we don’t know when it comes to our most complex organ. Our knowledge of the brain, however, is growing fast and so are the fields of psychiatry and pharmaceuticals. And now we are (maybe!) approaching a point where we can not only cure depressions, but can actually increase happiness and maybe even improve our brains through technology. The question is whether we should do something, just because we can? And who decides what is normal? The so-called Deep Brain Stimulation was first developed back in the 1960s, but has since been left in the cold by an increasingly politicised research environment. Now, it is back, and in the meantime technology has caught up with the visions. Pernille Rose’s film with a screenplay by the science journalist Lone Frank looks at this development and asks the big questions – and lets the brightest minds answer them. A thought-provoking film, in every sense of the word. (CPH:DOX programme)

PS

jeg så filmen i Underværket i Randers i det multibrugbare fornemt råt indrettede auditorium, i CPH:DOX filmenes anledning sat op som café med bordlamper og vinglas – og fuldstændig adækvat til den her films tekniske formfuldendthed upåklagelig billed- og lydgengivelse og kørsel og transmission uden mindste forhindring. Alt var professioneelt håndværk.    

FILMKOMMENTAREN.DK

Tue Steen Müller har skrevet en del om Pernille Rose Grønkjær gennem årene, men til min bekymring har vi blot anmeldt to af hendes film:

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3909/ (Den Anden Side, 2017)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/73/ (The Monastery, 2007)

Sidse Torstholm Larsen, Sturla Pilskog: Håbets Ø

En ung kvinde får ordet, forstår jeg, i en samtalekreds for alkoholikere som ikke drikker. Hun er smuk, fotograferingen er smuk, det hun siger er smukt at lytte til, dette vidunderligt langsomme sprog, som i underteksterne burde være oversat omhyggeligt litterært filmen igennem (jeg så på Randers bibliotek en engelsk version med undertekster, som gjorde mig skeptisk), men scenen er smuk, Henrik Bohn Ipsen har fotograferet, og jeg kan ikke rose ham nok, alene i sin cinematografi har han lagt grunden til endnu en klassisk bysymfoni. Her om Maniitsoq i Grønland. Med fotografiet til denne film og tidligere kameraarbejde som til Inuk Silis Høeghs Sume, 2014 og Lene Stæhrs Eskimo Diva, 2015 uddyber Bohn Ipsen det dokumentarisk filmfotografiske og danske blik på det almindelige liv i Grønland i linje efter fotograferne Jette Bang, Jørgen Roos og Teit Jørgensen.

Kvinden i samtalekredsen er på vej ud af alkoholens lås og jeg følger hende opmærksomt, for karakterudviklingen af hende er tydeligst blandt de tre som medvirker filmen igennem. Hendes spontant fascinerende nærvær og Bohn Ipsens lydefri sikre kamera og opmærksomme blik på alt i og uden for billedet, dette filmfotografi er alene denne vigtige film værd. (Henrik Bohn Ipsen har i Nicole N. Horanyi: En fremmed flytter ind, 2017 fotograferet en fuldstændig lignende scene som jeg oplever med samme følelsesindhold. Det bevægede mig mærkeligt forleden aften i bibliotekets sal).

I Håbets ø er der med denne kvinde mere at nævne. Der er scenerne hjemme på værelset med nænsom skildring af ungt liv, (hvor ville jeg dog gerne forstå dialogen ordentligt via omhyggeligt oversatte undertekster. Til norsk eller dansk), men altså en skarpt fotograferet og præcist instrueret scene i fiskefabrikkens kantine, hvor kvinden taler alvorligt, og vigtigt må jeg forstå, med en arbejdskammerat. Og der er en munter scene en sen aften blandt venner på gaden, hvor jeg i hvert fald opfatter at den unge kvinde er optaget på en videregående uddannelse i Nuuk. Og med den tro på fremtiden i hendes afrejse: jeg kommer hjem igen med viden og ny energi, former filmen sin højtidelige slutning.

Der har ellers været bekymring undervejs. Ud over den unge kvinde bygger instruktøren Sidse Torstholm Larsen sin beretning om den store skuffelse i Maniitsoq på to medvirkende mere, en socialarbejder, det er ham, som energisk følsom leder alkoholkurset, og en kommunal koordinator, som omsider frustreret må se i øjnene, at byen efter mange års arrogant påtvunget venten er blevet snydt af et stort amerikansk aluminiumsselskab. Det har ikke i sinde at bygge den fabrik i byen, som det har optioner til, selskabet har blot villet holde et norsk selskab væk. Og nu er det for sent for bystyret at skifte partner. Noget helt andet må gøres – og jeg mærker at turisme ikke er dette helt andet. Der må gribes tilbage i historien, til de grundlæggende eksistensbetingelser.

Det læser jeg af de iscenesatte samvær, af de spontane møder og især af interviewene som alle er smukke, men afgjort mest givende når jeg har ansigtet og kroppen i billedet og dialogen ikke lægges under dækbilleder (selv om de i sig selv er skabende) og der mister sit poetiske indhold og står faktuelt nøgne.

Jeg ville så gerne ordentligt og i en omhyggelig oversættelse til dansk eller måske norsk i underteksterne forstå hvad de to egentlig snakker med hinanden om dette fortrolige sted… engelsk er for skønheden netop her en farefuld omvej.

Norge 2019, 75 min.

Filmen havde under CBH:DOX festivalen premiere 21. marts i RANDERS BIBLIOTEK og vistes i Aveny-T samme dag 21:30. Den vistes endvidere 26. marts 16:40 i Grand Teatret og vises til slut 31. marts 19:00 i Dagmar.

https://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=918

SYNOPSIS

Håbets ø. Løftet om udvikling tænder håb for fremtiden i Grønland, i en smuk og stemningsfuld film om drømmen om uafhængighed. Drømmen om uafhængighed lever i Grønland. Håbet får nyt liv i 2006, hvor et stort amerikansk aluminiumselskab annoncerer sine planer om at åbne en fabrik til flere milliarder dollars i den lille, isolerede landsby Maniitsoq på landets vestkyst. Projektet ville medvirke til at gøre landet økonomisk uafhængigt af Danmark. Fremtiden ser lys ud, og projektet mødes med forventningsfuld begejstring af byens indbyggere. Men årene går. En socialarbejder, en ung kvinde og byens aluminiumskoordinator er vores ankerpersoner i en film med blik for både kompleksiteten i de store perspektiver, og for den menneskelige skala i tingenes gang. Mens indbyggerne i Maniitsoq venter på fremtiden – og på at foråret skal komme – lægger vinteren sig over dem, mens håbløshed og en destruktiv livsstil er konstante trusler. Den storslåede grønlandske natur er et tavst og stoisk vidne til en stemningsfuld og cinematisk historie om håb, drømme og viljen til uafhængighed. (CPH:DOX program)

Winter’s Yearning.The promise of development sparks hope for the future in Greenland in a beautiful and evocative film about the dream of independence.The dream of independence lives on in Greenland. Hope is given a breath of fresh air in 2006, when a large American aluminium company announces its plans of opening a multi-billion-dollar factory in the small, isolated village of Maniitsoq on the west coast of the country. The project would help make the country financially independent of Denmark. The future looks bright, and the project is met with expectant enthusiasm by the town’s inhabitants. But the years pass. A social worker, a young woman and an aluminium coordinator are the anchors of a film that has an eye for both the complexity of larger perspectives, and for the human scale. While the inhabitants of Maniitsoq are waiting for the future – and for spring to arrive – winter sets over them, while hopelessness and a destructive lifestyle is a constant threat. The magnificent Greenlandic nature is a silent and stoic witness to an evocative and cinematic story about hope, dreams and the will for independence. (CPH:DOX programme)

LINKS

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/2886/ (Om Inuk Silis Høegh: Sume, 2014, som Henrik Bohn Ipsen fotograferede)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4026/ (Om den omtalte scene i Nicole N. Horanyi: En fremmed flytter ind, 2017, som Henrik Bohn Ipsen fotograferede)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3263/ (Om Henrik Bohn Ipsen retrospektivt)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3358/ (Om Teit Jørgensen og Da myndighederne sagde stop, 1972)