Martina Melilli: My Home in Libya

One year ago good friend, producer Stefano Tealdi sent me a rough cut of what is now a finished film that has been screened in Locarno, Chicago and is in the programme of DOKLeipzig, that starts next week. I found my immediate email reaction from then and am happy to state that it lives up to, what it promised:

“This is going to be a great film! Really… It is original, surprising in style and it has several layers: The world of today. The world of yesterday – the grandfather is excellent as
is his parrot. And the director makes very good shots from the apartment. To be away from each other, long-distance, maybe not a love but then a true friend story. You see Tripoli as it looks today, beautiful it was and is and then you see closed doors and shops.

You can see that this is made by someone, who comes with another “visual approach”, hurra for that… “

Yes, it is different, far from mainstream, sketchy, including the search for making the film, collecting material from the past in Tripoli, family archive, notes, drawings and first of all the internet conversation with the Libyan Mahmoud, a conversation that overtakes the narration more and more; unfolding the desperate situation of the young man, who formulates sentences like “Libya is Hell” from the other side of the Mediterranean Sea. He can’t leave, she can’t go there.

But it is also history – about the Italians in Libya until Gadaffi came to power in 1969 and the grandparents and their children had to leave the country. Libya today, well what do we know, it’s ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood and militias, we hear from Mahmoud. And wonderful images from the apartment of the grandparents, memories…

“Who is (not) missing something” is a question put in the beginning of the film. For this blogger, who is taking a lot of time of reorganizing family photos and papers right now, this sentence is quite relevant – my father was born in Buenos Aires, where my grandfather etc. etc. We all have these stories…

Italy, 2018, 66 mins.

https://www.dok-leipzig.de/

Rugilé Barzdžiukaitė: Acid Forest

I have been there. On the wonderful Curonian Spit in Lithuania: The dunes, the sea, the forest, a place to relax – and a place where you find drama and at the same time are invited to reflect on our relationship to nature. I remember running like crazy away from a true Donnerwetter at the sea with my wife, and filmmaker Audrius Stonys and his son. We took refuge in the car of the filmmaker and after a while it was quiet blue sky.

Another day we went to the cormorants at Juodkranté to study this amazing phenomenon of fallen and naked pine trees caused by the acid shit of the cormorants, who live and nest there, eat fish from he water, and can do so, protected as the species is by EU and national law.

This location is where this cleverly made, cinematically brilliant documentary essay takes place. The birds are there, they are filmed from a distance sitting as shadows on the branches with the sky in the background, in daylight, at dusk, at night – or in close-ups, or like small dark spots in the amazing drone images that break the almost motionless images of the trees – and US who are in the picture most of the time.

Meaning we tourists who come to watch and talk about the cormorants. The film has caught the conversations and they are fun to follow. Tourists who are filmed from a distance standing on a platform for viewing. What we get are comments in Japanese, German, Finnish, Russian, American etc. Many comments go in the direction of “this is like a nuclear disaster”; several say that it is the fault of the EU that this shit exists; some discuss politics (Russia is just around the corner), and a young couple in love has a great conversation – she adores what she sees, he says jokingly that he will bring his gun; photographic gun he corrects after his first comments.

The film lives because of this dialogue in the nature – and your own dialogue with a film that insists on its theme, and brings us visual tourists to see and experience the paradoxical situation. The birds are watching us, we are watching – and smelling – them!

To see what comes out of continuous poop, hatching, trees that are almost falling to the ground…

Another proof of the poetic, reflective documentary tradition in Lithuania. It was at festivals in Locarno, Riga and Ji.hlava – more will come. Of course.  

Lithuania, 2018, 63 mins.

Lithuanian Cinema Travels

Here we are – watch our films, meet our filmmakers. It seems like this is the policy of the Lithuanian Film Centre this year, where the population-wise small country celebrates its centenary. According to an article in Cineuropa – link below – … Over the past four months, thanks to support from the Lithuanian Film Centre, the heavy presence of both completed films and projects was evident in almost 20 countries worldwide…

The article mentions fiction films that have travelled, going on to mention documentaries that we deal with (mostly) on this site – … Moving onto documentaries, Rugilė Barzdiukaitė’s debut, Acid Forest [+], premiered at Locarno, whereas the co-production Bridges of Time [+] by Kristīne Briede and Audrius Stonys did likewise at Karlovy Vary. Previously premiered documentaries also pressed on with their festival runs. Lithuania’s Oscar submission, Wonderful Losers: A Different World [+] by Arūnas Matelis, was at the Belfast “Pull Focus” Documentary Festival and Ulju Mountain Film Festival, where it was also awarded, and The Ancient Woods [+] by Mindaugas Survila unspooled at the Sydney Film Festival…

I am still waiting to see “Acid Forest”, the three others have been reviewed on this site.

And when it comes to the so-called “industry presence” – …  the Lithuanian Film Centre was one of the partners in the Pula Film Festival’s Matchmaking Forum (see the news), while Lithuania was featured as one of the countries participating in Locarno Pro’s Match Me! producers’ networking programme (see the news). Also, Lithuanian producers Giedrė ickytėDagnė VildiūnaitėMarija RazgutėPaulius Juočeris and Andrius Lekavičius were included in the selection of the Europe-Latin America Co-Production Forum and the Glocal Meets the Baltics section of San Sebastián…

DOK Leipzig hosts an impressive retrospective of Lithuanian documentaries from next week – read http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4368/ – and apart from the retrospective two new Lithuanian documentaries are in the “Next Masters” section at the festival: “Animus Animalis (A Story about People, Animals and Things)” by Aisté Zegulyté and “Nijole” by Sandro Bozzolo, produced by Dagnė Vildiūnaitė, experienced Lithuanian fiction and documentary producer. Several directors from the country have been invited to Leipzig.

https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/362126/

http://www.lkc.lt/en/2018/10/cinema-spreads-the-word-about-lithuania-across-the-world-four-months-four-continents-leading-festivals/

https://filmfinder.dok-leipzig.de/en/?&section=284

IDFA Press Conference

There he was, Orwa Nyrabia, the new artistic director of IDFA, to be watched through streaming yesterday afternoon. I saw the first half of his presentation and could only nod, when he started telling us press people that documentaries are not made to answer questions, no they are there to raise and trace questions. Orwa stressed that the selection has not been made according to subject – subject is not enough, there should be much more. And journalistic documentaries should accordingly be more than mere reporting. Good to be reminded of basics of the artistic documentary, or call it the creative – in other words: documentary is an Art form.

Orwa showed clips and apart from looking forward to the Vertov-film, “The Sound of Masks” by Sara de Gouvela, placed in the Luminous category, of South African and Portuguese production background, is now a Must for me. Wow, for a clip. Anyway, go to the website and study the selection for the feature-length competition, for me new names but also films by Geyerhalter, Hungarian Eszter Hajdú, Israeli Tomer Heymann, Chilean couple Bettina Perut & Iván Osnovikoff, Indian Anand Patwardhan. Read this shortened clip from the press release:  

“IDFA, the International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam, has just announced the opening film for the festival’s 31st edition. In addition, the complete list of nominees for the Feature-Length Documentary, First Appearance and Dutch Documentary competitions can now be found online.

DocLab, IDFA’s new media program, has also published details of its competitions for Digital Storytelling and Immersive Non-Fiction. The projects participating in Spotlight, the non- competitive component of DocLab, have also been announced.

In its Serialized programme, IDFA will be focusing on the omnipresent series format. And finally, the 10 nominations for the Amsterdam Human Rights Award have also been announced today, meaning that the full IDFA program for 2018 is now complete.

Starting from 2018, IDFA is making inclusion a high priority. This means that gender parity and geographical and cultural representation across all the components of IDFA is an inherent part of the festival processes. 41% of the filmmakers selected for the program of IDFA 2018 are female, and the professionals attending the event come from 71 different countries. The next edition of IDFA takes place from the 14th through the 25th of November in Amsterdam.

IDFA opening film 2018: Kabul, City in the Wind
On Wednesday November 14th, the 31st IDFA will open in Koninklijk Theater Carré with Kabul, City in the Wind by Aboozar Amini. The film is a sobering, intimate and warm account of daily life in Kabul during the silent intervals between suicide bombings. The bombings that happened, and those that will, define life for the film’s characters; a father who works as a bus driver, and two young boys whose policeman father is away due to murder threats. “Amini introduces himself as an original uncompromising artist of film, he absorbed the work of Abbas Kiarostami and made it his very own,” Artistic director Orwa Nyrabia comments.

Aboozar Amini (Bamiyan, Afghanistan, 1985) arrived in the Netherlands as a teenager and graduated from the Gerrit Rietveld Academie in 2010. Amini returned to reside in Afghanistan after his studies in the Netherlands. Kabul, City in the Wind is a co-production between Afghanistan, Japan and the Netherlands and was made with support from the IDFA Bertha Fund.

IDFA Competition for Feature-Length Documentary

IDFA’s main competition consists of 12 titles by established filmmakers. This year’s selection is characterised by a great diversity of styles and forms – from intense visual experiences to sobering narratives.

IDFA Competition for First Appearance

For the first time, the IDFA Competition for First Appearance consists exclusively of first films. The opening film is one of the entries in this competition. The selection demonstrates the promising future of documentary film…

www.idfa.nl

No Eastern European projects at IDFA Forum 2018

Here comes IDFA’s response to the question of no Eastern European projects in the selection of IDFA 2018’s Forum, sent today by the artistic director Orwa Nyrabia:

The fact that there are no East European projects in IDFA’s Forum 2018 selection is simply bad and sad. This needs to be examined and analyzed indeed. At IDFA we are examining how this happened and why it is such a surprising zero in the year’s projects slate. We also note that this is the selection of one year. The share of Eastern European projects over the past 15 years has been between 2 and 7 projects per edition, 3 to 4 most of the time. One year does not represent a trend. It might also be relevant here to say that our process was inclusive, that our pre-selectors and jurors were widely-representative are diversified. They did a difficult job and for that we are thankful. The selection process was long and as thorough as possible, but this doesn’t mean that we don’t make mistakes. We could have missed on great projects, it is our loss too.

Then, and no matter how many projects from Eastern Europe are in this year’s Forum selection, our long-term collaborations with Eastern European partners guarantee a continuous representation of Eastern European producers and filmmakers. East European funds, festivals, workshops and broadcasters are always part of what the Forum is. This makes us proud. In November, we will be there again, as usual, to assist Forum participants and observers from Eastern Europe, make the best of their time, even if their projects were not selected, or not submitted, anyway.

This “bad and sad” absence this year is, of course, a three-way matter. Meaning that IDFA’s own process is relevant, but not in any way more relevant than those it mediates between: The filmmakers – the offer, and The Industry – the demand. We clearly see a leaning from filmmakers towards local funding whenever possible. International co-production, as it stands today, is advantageous but has many downsides to the creative process. On the other hand, financiers and broadcasters are under a lot of pressure nowadays, and their choices as to how they can survive this difficult moment are not necessarily strategic and wise, these also need to be re-examined; the openness towards risk, the common understanding of “international appeal”, the facile assessment of the audience and of the industry’s responsibility towards it. Then, it might be necessary that we re-examine an overrated culture of packaging film projects, of seeing openly through the packaging, good or bad, into the core, the value of film. However, this will take years, less years than it took to spread the Leitkultur of formatted “proposal” and “pitch”. We are discussing these factors every day at IDFA, and working towards a wider Forum setup, a setup that has more and more to offer to each unique project, with every new edition. Not an easy challenge, it won’t be done in one year, but we take it very seriously.

Furthermore, IDFA is not only the Forum, the Forum is an important element in a larger view of the reality of documentary film around the world. We try hard to make it so. The number of Eastern European films in IDFA 2018 Program is amongst the highest compared to any other region. Eastern European filmmakers make 20% of Masters section, Helena Trestikova is the guest of honor of 2018, the festival big highlight is a tribute to the pioneering role of Vertov, the share of new generation Eastern European filmmakers in IDFAcademy is about 25%, and also, naturally, East European projects have their share among IBF-supported films, since the fund was established. A serious analysis of this view as a whole picture, trying to find the right questions and challenges within the context, is more necessary today than ever. The question of why here and not there is not only a question for IDFA, it is also a question to filmmakers and to the industry at large. 

Finally, this issue is not limited to Eastern Europe… the world is big, and we are all the same. Seeing the universality of the problem might help all parties see a more objective view and by that, reach a wiser approach that would help everybody.

One last thing I would like to add: Please do keep on critiquing our work, we value that, we need it. We hope this critique would meet our sincere attempt to be helpful, rather than taking negative or aggressive forms, and especially rather than spreading unverified information. We are only trying, evaluating, then trying again.

IDFA Forum/ 2

Below you have the presentation from IDFA (International Documentary Film Festival) of the Forum, no doubt the gathering of documentary film professionals, who want funding and/or publicity of the film, that they are working on. The event has been there for decades, it’s been instrumental as a gathering for the documentary community to meet, exchange, network, tell each other that documentaries are important – and communicate that to the funders, the broadcasters, the politicians etc. The Forum – and the IDFA – is crucial, when it comes to stressing the importance of the documentary genre in a democratic world. I did not say in Europe because there we have a problem, dear IDFA Forum people:

Maybe you are not to blame, maybe it is a problem that mirrors the sad development within the EU and its surroundings: EU did not become what we (EUropeans like me) wanted it to become. There is a Western Europe as before and an Eastern Europe as before. There is a rich and a poor Europe. And there are conflicts within the EU, where Eastern countries are politically turning to the right – as is the case in Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania and I could go on exemplifying from Western countries like the one – Denmark – where I have my home and where intolerance and xenophobia are alive and kicking…

AND NOW TO MY QUESTION WHEN I LOOK AT THE LIST OF COUNTRIES REPRESENTED AT THE FORUM AT IDFA 2018, 51 COUNTRIES REPRESENTED, BUT ONLY ONE FROM EASTERN EUROPE IF YOU INCLUDE GEORGIA:

There are NO projects from Estonia, Latvia. Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Russia, Hungary, Serbia, Croatia, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Ukraine…

But of course I salute the selection of Georgian “The Platform” by Nino Orjonikidze and Vano Arsenishvili – I know them, they are sooo good!

AND HOW TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS…

Is it really because there were no more than one project good enough among the 768 projects submitted?

Is it because projects from Eastern Europe were very few?

Because they prefer to submit projects to – for instance – East Doc Forum in Prague?

Because the IDFA Forum is too expensive (submission fee, travel and stay, publicity…) for filmmakers from Eastern Europe?

Why… tell me

Because if you look at the IDFA festival and the films taken for the many sections, there is a lot of great films selected from the Eastern part of Europe – and beware it is not “only” Kossakovsky, Loznitsa, Mansky. The festival lives from excellent films from Eastern Europe, also this year; take a look at the selection for mid-length section, there are films from Serbia (Photo from Andrijana Stojkovic “Wongar”), Belarus, Poland, Russia… It seems there is a total lack of harmony this year between the Forum and the Festival!   

https://www.idfa.nl/en/article/105926/51-projects-selected-to-pitch-at-idfa-forum-2018

IDFA Forum/ 1

The Forum at IDFA is for documentary filmmakers the place to launch the new projects, they want the documentary community to be aware of, and eventually be interested in, eventually to invest in. Projects are presented/pitched followed by meetings. It is all very well organized and respected. “You have to be there”, filmmakers working internationally say, “otherwise “they” think that your company has died”. Words to that effect.

IDFA has announced that 51 projects have made it to the grande finale – the pitch that takes place November 18th-21st.

The press release – a long quote from that – says “…

“The selection process was particularly competitive this year: with a record-breaking 768 projects submitted. Of the 51 projects selected to present at IDFA Forum, 24 different countries are represented, reflecting the inclusive emphasis of IDFA and its continuous word-wild support of documentary filmmakers.

This year’s IDFA Forum selection casts a wide net, ranging from projects that examine pressing social issues to ones exploring the artistic boundaries of documentary filmmaking. Returning IDFA guests include Nanfu Wang (Untitled Cuba Project, United States), Camilla Nielsson (Democrats 2, Denmark), and Renzo Martens (A Gentrification Program, the Netherlands). Several selected projects demonstrate a clear interest in experimenting with documentary syntax, such as Lash by Yoonsuk Jung (South Korea) and The Way We Were by Marten Persiel (Germany).

The 2018 selection also features new projects by established filmmakers as well as emerging talents. Guy Davidi, co-director of the Academy Award-nominated 5 Broken Cameras, presents Senseless (Denmark/Israel). The renowned Mohamed Al-Daradji (Iraq’s Invisible Beauty, Belgium), and Hemal Trivedi (The Half Truths, India, United States), as well as up-and-coming talents Sun Hee Engelstoft (Forget Me Not, Denmark) and Ayse Toprak (The Other Half, Turkey) will also present their latest projects at IDFA Forum 2018…”

Questions raised in IDFA Forum/ 2 above.

Photo from “Democrats” by Camilla Nielsson, she is pitching a sequel.

https://www.idfa.nl/en/article/105926/51-projects-selected-to-pitch-at-idfa-forum-2018

ArtdocFest in Riga

Well, I should have been in Riga now, where the International Film Festival is one day old, and were it goes on until the end of the month. It is a festival with many sections: a tribute to Ingmar Bergman, a competition for fiction films, Latvian and Baltic films… and, the reason why I should have been there: Artdocfest Riga with 21 documentaries, competitive with legendary theatre director Alvis Hermanis as one of the jurors. The festival, founded and run by Vitaly Mansky, who now lives and works out of Riga, presents itself like this on the festival’s website:

ARTDOCFEST/RIGA constitutes the documentary section of the RIGA IFF. It’s not merely a programme of thought-provoking and outstanding documentaries from across the world, but also a platform for meetings, roundtable and panel discussions conducted by international media representatives. All the film screenings of this selection are Latvian premieres and the presence of the authors is ensured. Starting from 2018, this programme showcases the full competition programme of the most significant festival of documentary films in Russia – Artdocfest.

Let me mention some of the films that I would love to watch:

Sergei Loznitsa’s “The Trial”, the website description goes like this: “Moscow, USSR. 1930. The Pillar Hall of the State House of the Unions. A group of top rank economists and engineers is put on trial accused of plotting a coup d’etat against the Soviet government.   Unique archive footage reconstructs one of the first show trials, masterminded by Stalin, which unfolds as a theatrical performance with actors – prosecutors, witnesses, defendants, judges – lying to themselves, to the audience and to the world. The drama is real, but the story is fake. The film gives an unprecedented insight into the origins of a deadly regime, which made the slogan “Lie is Truth” its everyday reality.” Loznitsa’s way of dealing with archive is exceptional, luckily I can pick up this film at DOKLeipzig.

Other films are talented Dmitry Kabakov, who presents ”Circumstances of the Place and Time” with immigration as the theme, “Our Africa” by Alexander Markov about the Soviets in Africa to – as said on the website – “document the “glorious advance” of socialism on the continent”. I saw a rough version of the film and it is well made with wonderful use of archive.

And the touching – watch the trailer – “The Son” by Alexander Abaturov, described as this “Dima was killed on the 23rd of May 2013 at the age of 21. Enlisted in the Russian army, he was shot in the head during a military operation in Dagestan. His parents face the void following his death, whilst the army continues to train young soldiers for future missions. The two universes intertwine to portray what Dima’s life was like and its brutal end.”

I could go on but let me mention the films I have already seen and can recommend:

“Delta” by Olexandr Techynsky – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4073/

“Home Games” by Alisa Kovalenko – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4258/

“My Father is my Mother’s Brother” (photo) by Vadym Ilkov – have not reviewed the film but seen it and praised it to producer Darya Bassel.

All three are from Ukraine, “The Distant Barking of Dogs” is shot there by Danish director Simon Leeng Wilmont – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4268/

Impressive programme, unique chance for catching up on important and – in many cases – controversial documentaries.

https://rigaiff.lv/2018/en/artdocfest-riga/

Astra Film Festival

… in Sibiu, Romania celebrates its 25th edition. For that reason Cineuropa brings an interview with the founding director Dumitru Budrala. He looks back and makes a status on the state of the documentary art. Here is a quote – but read it all, link below – including a question:

You said that documentary films are “lifeboats in a sea of alternative facts”. Can you elaborate on this opinion on the power and usefulness of the genre?
The audience potential of documentary cinema is amazing, as it can reach both a wider public and a specialised, niche audience. At every edition, Astra Film Festival offers a host of thematic sidebars that explore reality by proposing an intimate, detailed portrait of humanity. These films are a shortcut to social consciousness and a tool for change, “a therapy for the mending of society”, as Cristi Puiu [a jury member at Astra 2018] puts it. Both in Romania and around the world, daily events in the social and political landscape leave a mark on the very essence of the human condition. Reality is more spectacular than fiction – or, as they say, “life beats film”. Documentary has become more and more relevant because people feel the need for an alternative source of knowledge and new tools for understanding reality in a world where fake news, intolerance, cynical dissimulation and the redaction of the past are becoming more and more invasive…

Looking at the programme a thematic choice catches my eye, “On the Road to Europe” that features 10 films that deal with how Eastern European countries have been dealing with the post-communism reality. I was reminded of the fine films by Vuk Janic “Last Yugoslavian Football team” (for a football freak what a great team it was and what a tragedy that all went into pieces, at least football-wise), Hungarian Tibor Kocsis “New Eldorado”, a perfect illustration of new capitalism, Latvian Kaspars Goba’s “Homo@Lv” from 2010 (homophobia, intolerance) and Marcin Latallo’s “Our Street” from 2006, the deroute of working class family.

A clever so-called side-bar in a cleverly curated festival that runs until the 21st of October.  

https://www.astrafilm.ro/films/

https://cineuropa.org/en/interview/361723/

Ingmar Bergman 100 år /12

MARGARETHA VON TROTTA: SEARCHING FOR INGMAR BERGMAN (2)

Forrige blognotat sluttede: “… Margarethe von Trotta folder sine hænder netop som jeg ser Max von Sydow gøre, med håndfladerne mod hinanden: ”Først meget alvorligt, men så mærker man, at han nok ikke kan bede så intenst som han gerne ville, vi forstår senere i filmen hvorfor. Så rejser han sig igen og i en lang optagelse går han tilbage til dette sted, hvor vi allerede havde set skakbrættet. Han går ud af billedet og kameraet panorerer til skakbrættet med den sorte klippe i vandet i baggrunden som et advarselstegn. Dønninger vasker over skakbrættet som udviskes. Og så viser en sort skikkelse sig: Max von Sydow ser op: ”Hvem er du?” Anders Ek: ”Jeg er døden.” Max von Sydow: ”Kommer du for at hente mig?” Anders Ek: ”Er du beredt?” Max von Sydow: ”Min krop er beredt, ikke jeg selv.”

Og jeg kan nu vælge at se von Trottas vidunderlige film med Bergmans mesterværk parallelt i tanken…”

KONTRAPUNKT

Og det kan så nu igen lade sig gøre. I Cinemateket i København torsdag 18. oktober hvor filmen vises første af fire gang som månedens film. Og om denne særlige manuskript-parallelitet er jeg siden kommet på dette citat om manuskripttilblivelse i en bestemt af de nye franske film som von Trotta i det følgende afsnit fortæller hun i sin ungdom opsøgte i Paris:

“… Alain Resnais bad Marguerite Duras om at skrive manuskript til en fiktionsfilm, efter at han var gået i stå med en dokumentarfilm om atombomben. Han foreslog hende filmens struktur, nemlig at en nutidig kærlighedshistorie i Hiroshima skulle gribe tilbage til begivenheder i Frankrig under den tyske besættelse, men han understregede samtidig, at han ikke ønskede et traditonelt filmmanuskript. Han bad hende tværtimod om at udforme manuskriptet, som om det var en roman, eller som om hun skulle ’kommentere billederne i en film, der allerede er optaget’. Med udgangspunkt i hendes tekst ville han derpå skabe en lyrisk billedside, der forholdt sig kontrapunktisk til ordene.” (Christian Braad Thomsen)

FILMKUNST

Margarethe von Trotta slår det fast med det samme, hendes nye film Searching for Ingmar Bergman handler om filmkunst; og så handler den om hendes møde i sin ungdom med Bergmans cinematografi, allerførst Det syvende segl, som hun så i Paris hvor hun som nævnt opsøgte den nye bølge og opdagede disse franske instruktørers glæde ved Hitchcocks metode, og ved siden af den Bergmans særlige stil.

Det er nu i dette filmessay Bergmans arbejde hun undersøger, og hun gør det beslutsomt og roligt. Hun tager udgangspunkt i sit eget udgangspunkt og lader sit eget arbejdslivs erfaring i tilbageblikket på Bergmans gå i dialog med vidne efter vidne, kender efter kender af det værk og baggrunden for dets tilblivelse.

Det bliver til dejligt lange dybt interessante interviews som alle står som filmscener klippet i samtalens blidt langsomme rytme, fotograferet i ophøjet ro i det ene stilfærdige og ærlige set up efter det andet. I et kontrapunktisk system, måske en cinematografisk fuga skydes dels de meget smukke klip med citater fra Bergmans film, dels de tætte billeder fra hans privatarkiv, dels andet arkivmateriale fra aviser og tv (især et par enkelte steder, hvor det måske forstyrrer lidt, tror jeg) ind i forløbet og ligger så ligesom melodistemmer ved siden af samtalernes fremadskriden i egne forløb og variatoner; og dette, filmklipperens og instruktørens fortællelag, som  er det vigtige og som direkte udbygger filmens emne, det kunstneriske arbejde, mens især de dokumentariske optagelser fra indspilningerne tydeligt illustrerer eller rettere demonstrerer mesterens metode, hans ganske særegne samarbejde med skuespillerne, som han knytter tæt til sig i største respekt for deres kunst.

EMPIRI

Filmens to emner, som således for det første er filmkunsten og for det andet er dens levende krop, oplever jeg på den måde at det andet emne i sit empiri så at sige belyser det første og funderer dets skildring af Bergmans poetik.

Den første samtale von Trotta opsøger er næsten naturligvis et møde med Liv Ullmann. Hvad er det så der sker med denne lange filmscene, hvor hun er medvirkende vidne? (STILL ovenfor) Er dens emner så det kunstneriske og skuespillerens arbejde? Hvad er det der sker med mig undervejs? Jo, sandelig, jeg vokser i et nyt kendskab til dette menneske, denne centrale kvinde i Bergmans værk, som ung og gammel, i et arbejde med rollen som har haft mange navne, senest Marianne i Sarabande, 2004, Jenny Isaksson i Ansigt til ansigt, Eva i Høstsonaten, i Marianne i Scener fra et ægteskab, Maria/Marias mor i Hvisken og råb, Anna Fromm i En passion, Eva Rosenberg i Skammen, Alma i Ulvetimen og allerførst i 1965 Elisabet Vogler i Persona, hvor hun stum i et tæt kammerspil, en “sonate for to” med Bibi Andersson i den anden rolle, er i billedet hele tiden og mod slutningen har denne eneste replik ”Ingenting”.

Liv Ullmann og Ingmar Bergman under indspilningen af Persona

Hvis du skal se én film om Bergman må det være Margarethe von Trottas Searching for Ingmar Bergman. For den handler om hans kunst og egentlig kun det:

https://www.dfi.dk/cinemateket/biograf/filmserier/serie/manedens-dokumentar-i-oktober-searching-ingmar-bergman

(Cinematekets Margarethe von Trotta program)