CPH:DOX 2018/ Intro

Well, how can I introduce the 15th edition of CPH:DOX that takes place March 15-25, with a programme that was launched yesterday? It’s impossible to give you the full picture of such a huge event, an hommage to the documentary genre.

The best for you is of course to make you check it yourself on one of the links below… More than 200 films with more than 100 being premieres with visiting directors. And an industry section with information on a forum for projects to be pitched, another forum dedicated to science documentaries, a conference on film related themes, training, the doc-lab, VR etc. etc.

It is overwhelming, you can spend a lot of time surfing on the internet links offered to you to try to find out where and what to do!

Profile? The best to get closer to that is maybe to quote the loglines for each of the competition programmes:

DOX:AWARD is our international main competition for the best and brighest in contemporary filmmaking. The F:ACT Award is dedicated to auteur filmmaking in the field between research-based, investigative journalism, activism and cinema. The Nordic:Dox Award is a selection of the best and brightest in cinema from the Nordic countries.

The New:Vision Award is dedicated to artists’ films in the field between documentary and visual art. Take a walk on the wild side! Our brand new Next:Wave Award is dedicated to emerging filmmakers with the courage to take chances.

Films nominated for the Politiken Audience Award in support of artistic freedom.

It’s difficult to disagree with what is in bold – auteur filmmaking, thanks for putting these words in to give a historical perspective and stress the personal and that documentary is an art form.

https://cphdox.dk/en/

https://cphdox.dk/en/programme/program-a-z/

https://cphdox.dk/en/competitions-2018/

Veronika Kaserer: Überall Wo Wir Sind

– with the English title “Everywhere We Are” has this catalogue description:

Heiko, 29, is a fun-loving dance teacher from Berlin. For the past seven years he has battled with a fatal illness. Just when his family and his friends had begun to get used to Heiko’s continued survival in spite of all the prognoses, he receives the diagnosis that he does not have much longer to live. He decides to return to his parents’ house to die. But even now, Heiko and especially his father, Jürgen, refuse to give up hoping for a miracle. His mother, Karin, on the other hand tries to prepare him for what is to come. She would like to tell her son about her own near-death experience but can’t seem to find the right moment. Day and night, so many of Heiko’s friends and relatives come to the house to spend time at his bedside, wanting to be near him again, to cry, but also to laugh together. Heiko’s sister preoccupies herself with the organisational side of things and tries to hold up by keeping her distance. The ways in which all of these people cope with loss and grief are as diverse as they are.

Screenings 21st and 25th of February as part of Perspective Deutsches Kino

Germany, 2018, 92 mins.

www.berlinale.de

Zalmanson-Kuznetsov:Operation Wedding

Master of documentary film Herz Frank made in 1989 “There were Seven Simeons”, a film that deals with a famous jazz family, who during Soviet time hijacked a plane to get out of the USSR.

They were not the only ones as shows the fine first film of Anat Zalmanson-Kuznetsov, “Operation Wedding”. The director tells the dramatic story about her parents, who were part of a group of Russian Jews who planned to kidnap a plane and get out of the USSR. From Leningrad. In 1970. They were arrested before getting into the plane, the parents were sentenced to be sent to Siberia (the mother) and the father got death penalty.

The daughter/director tells the story by talking to them in their homes in Israel and by going with the mother to Leningrad, now St. Petersburg, and to the disgusting prison in Riga, where she was before being sent to the Gulag.

Archive material are introduced that reveal how international protests freed them – Golda Meir played an important role in an exchange deal with the Soviets – and – very interesting – there are clips from recent Russian propaganda tv shows, where the parents and the other members of the group are characterised as “terrorists”. The last of these “documentary fairy tales” as the father calls them was made in 2010.

The film is emotionally strong first of all because of the mother whereas the charismatic father is the one who comes up with the sarchastic analytical comments, while he is pouring another good glass of vodka.    

The film will be screened as Documentary of the Month at
the Cinemateket in Copenhagen February 20 – March 2. In a
collaboration with Copenhagen Jewish Film Festival.

Israel, Latvia, 2016, 63 mins.

www.dfi.dk

Docs & Talks /5

PABLO IRABURU OG MIGUELTXO MOLINA: WALLS

The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 raised hopes of a world with no more concrete borders dividing populations. But today we see the exact opposite, and walls have been erected all over the world to set the boundaries between poverty and prosperity. On the U.S.-Mexican border, we meet a Vietnam vet placing crosses where Mexicans lost their lives trying to find a better life. On the other side, a Mexican couple is waiting for the right moment to attempt a climb over. A sentry patrols the banks of the Limpopo River along the border of Zimbabwe and South Africa, where many refugees drown trying to cross. At the Moroccan-Spanish border, we see a woman carrying huge packages on her back. The border scenes flow effortlessly into one another. Directors Pablo Iraburu and Migueltxo Molina add new meaning by placing the tableaux in split-screen compositions such as a Mexican tunnel placed beneath an African baobab. Meanwhile, a voice-over explaining the situation in Mexico accompanies scenes from the Moroccan border. The countless partitions all over the world form a universal problem. (Docs & Talks’ programme)

KOMMENTAR

Jeg har disse dage når jeg fulgte den flittige lancering af arrangementerne i Docs & Talks festivalen været så mærkelig optaget af dette still med de to unge ved hegnet, tænkt over det, hver gang jeg så det. Jeg havde ikke egentlig ondt af dem, for deres gensidige energi og målrettethed så jeg eller digtede jeg, var jeg i hvert fald sikker på. De forblev mine udtryksfulde og sikre helte.

Og nu har jeg så set filmen og forstået, at hver scene med de to netop er fyldt med deres kræfter og hengivenhed for hinanden. Og jeg skriver så nu en blogpost så godt jeg kan om Walls og om, at denne scene ved hegnet er selve sindbilledet på ømhed mellem de to, som hjælper hinanden. Han løfter hende op på sine skuldre, hvor hun balancerer ung og adræt og fuld af tillid, og så er de dobbelt så høje og erfarne. På en måde hver for sig, da de begge nu ved, hvad hun ser fra den højde: kameraer og vagttårne, som de skal undgå, men også muligheder, som de kan slippe igennem, klatre over. Mulige gennemgange, som de kan undersøge nærmere.

Så meget kærlighed udtrykt ved at lave kaffe til sin kone, så meget kærlighed i taknemmeligheden, i at tage imod kaffen, som hun viser, som hendes udtryksfulde krop fortæller i hvert billede, i hver scene i de tos historie, som i afbrudte små kapitler fortælles gennem filmen. Historien om det unge pars rejse til muren er, som jeg nu ser det selve billedet på godhed. De to som hjælper hinanden og deres fortælling er en legende, ikke en middelalderlig om helgener, men en langt senere fra min barndom: ”Der venter dem en syvdobbelt død, tænkte palmen. Løverne vil sluge dem, slangerne stikke dem, tørsten fortære dem, sandstormen begrave dem, røverne ihjelslå dem, solstik opbrænde dem, angsten tilintetgøre dem.” (Selma Lagerlöf)

Sådanne brudstykker af handlinger gennemvæver filmens parallelle fortællelinjer, som i klippet fortsætter hinanden, kommenterer hinanden, belyser hinanden, vel i samme tid, men på forskellige steder, ja, i flere verdensdele, på begge sider af stedernes ufattelige, ja, jeg griber mig i at tro det da må være løgn, men nej, rent ud ufattelige grænsemure og pigtrådsspæringer. Og så forunderligt, på begge sider af grænserne alle stederne opfører virkeligheden dramaer om den brutale virkelighed belyst ved den medfølende ømhed. Blandt mennesker, som lever i den samme egn, men adskilt af fjerne magthaveres begrænsninger af deres liv.

Der instuderes en teaterforestilling under det solitære træ midt på savannen, stykket forbereder i humorens distance, i dilettantgenrens velkendthed voldtægten af kvinden, denne voksne handling, hvis gru ikke kan mimes foran børnene, der som tilskuere morer sig over de voksnes forestilling, som forekommer dem at være en leg. På den anden side af en befæstet grænse et andet sted i verden, men måske samme dag, vandrer to alvorlige hvide mænd oppe i årene. De stiller dunke med frisk vand ud i ørkenen, hvor ellers ingen palme ville bøje sig med saftige dadler til de rejsende på dødsens farlig færd. Et tredje sted står en veteran fra krigen i sit værksted og laver gravkors som kunstværker, som han bagefter placerer, hvor et menneske omkom under rejsen. Den venlige og ordentlige grænsebetjent et fjerde sted i verden har anholdt to migranter et forbudt sted, forklarer dem, at han ikke vil se dem der mere, men sender dem ikke videre i ørkenens visse død, sætter dem bag i sin pick-up og kører dem tilbage til beboet område.

Altså at spille dilettant under træet, at stille dunke med frisk vand ud i ørkenen, at være venlig og ordentlig, men fast i mælet som grænsebetjent, tableauer af grusomheden og godheden, begge til stede på begge sider af grænsen. Filmen har foræret mig en række billeder som prægnante altid vil dukke op når jeg læser om grænsemure og hegn. Jeg forstår det sådan, at migranterne må vælge de mest øde og ufarbare ruter til rejsen og der er det mere naturen end grænsevagterne, som er deres udfordring, naturen er uden nåde, den er den farligste for dem.

Iscenesættelsen og fotograferingen i disse skildringer, ja, vel især kameraarbejdet er aldeles flot og uden overdrivelser, men måske også uden egentlig kant, men uangribeligt konventionelt akademisk som det er nødvendigt for en så bred henvendelse til et stort internationalt publikum. Mange vil kunne lide det, fremhæve det, beundre det, og således hænger det nøje sammen med filmens sympatiske propaganda, som er forbilledlig som de medvirkendes handlinger, som kamerafolkene skildrer som ét stort moralsk sindbillede. Til eftertanke. Som en nutidens Legenda Auria. Til efterfølgelse.

TXALAPARTA

Tue Steen Müller skriver i dag denne vigtige kommentar og fine erindring på sin Facebookside: “I fell in love with these Basque filmmakers many years ago at the Magnificent7 festival in Belgrade 2008 and later in Damascus at the DoxBox – both places they showed ”Nomadak”, a music documentary with a global humanistic point of view. The film is about the music instrument from their country, the txalaparta, that they take around the world to create music with locals. In Belgrade we had a concert before the film, one of memorable moments in my documentary film life. Now their film film ”Walls” (”Muros”) is part of the Docs and Talks festival and will be shown in Copenhagen and Aarhus followed by a debate about the many borders we humans set up in the world. One of the creators behind the film pays hommage to the collaboration between the two companies, one situated in Pamplona, the other in San Sebastian: ”Making movies is like playing the txalaparta. It’s a dialogue, it’s a two-person thing. Arena and Txalap.art have created together for a long time. Listening to our txalaparta in the end credits reminds us that we still share the same passion for telling stories with a purpose…”

RESUMÉ / DEBAT

Walls er en visuelt stærk film, der zoomer ind på de mure, der skærer sig igennem landskabet rundt omkring i verden, og på nogle af de menneskeskæbner, der udfolder sig omkring dem. Filmen udforsker grænseovergangene mellem Mexico og USA, Marokko og Spanien samt Zimbabwe og Sydafrika ved at sidestille historierne om dem, der befinder sig på den ene side, og dem på den anden side.

Filmens klare budskab er, at mennesker uden for murene og dem indenfor har mere tilfælles, end de tror. I EU, Trumps USA, Afrika, Mellemøsten og Asien skyder flere og flere grænsemure og hegn op, selv om den politiske vision efter Berlinmurens fald var en verden med færre grænsehegn.

Hvordan er grænser i stigende grad blevet svaret på en global verdens problemer? Hvem tjener penge på dem? Hvad er konsekvensen globalt og i de lokale grænseområder? Efter filmen debatterer migrationsforskerne Ninna Nyberg Sørensen (DIIS), Gabriella Sanchez (EUI) og Martin Lemberg-Pedersen (AAU) implikationerne af den nye globale grænsevirkelighed. Debatten foregår på engelsk. (Docs & Talks’ program)

FRE 23/02 16:30 i Cinemateket i København og TIR 27/2 14:00 i Øst for Paradis i Aarhus / MIGRATION / WALLS / Muros / Pablo Iraburu, Migueltxo Molina, 2015 / eng. tekst / 132 min. inkl. debat. Her er program og billetbestilling:

http://www.dfi.dk/Filmhuset/Cinemateket/Billetter-og-program/Serie.aspx?serieID=15914 (Cinemateket)

http://paradisbio.dk/NextDaysProgramme.aspx?offset=0 (Øst for Paradis)

http://wallsmuros.com/en/credits/?aux=3 (producentens side, lange udførlige credits)

Cineuropa Interviews EDN’s Paul Pauwels

Cineuropa is a good source if you want to know, what happens in the film world. In the latest edition of the newsletter you will find a brief but informative interview with EDN director Paul Pauwels, who talks about the Media and Society initiative that he and the organisation has launched, including meetings with professionals – next week one is announced at the European Film Market of the Berlinale. I steal a quote from the interview, link to the whole text below:

PP: For 20 years, EDN has been supporting the European documentary sector, and I dare say that we have done this very successfully. However, digital technology has allowed new players to enter the market, and this has turned the power structures within the media environment around. The result is that the “old” business model has been disrupted; the model that for decades has allowed independent documentary producers and directors to contribute in a significant way to the European media landscape. Increasingly, we have noticed that the model that worked so well in the past is now being challenged, and the position of the independent creative documentary is under pressure. This is happening at a time when the media’s influence on the audience’s thoughts, values and behaviour is stronger than ever. We are experiencing a paradigm shift that forces us to reflect on how to protect the position of the independent documentary in a global, mediatised society. EDN is not impervious to this challenge: we, too, have to think about the needs of our community and how best to serve it. We are convinced that we can only successfully protect the interests of the independent European documentary community if we have accurate facts and figures at our disposal, something that our community has never been good at providing. Taking stock of the current situation of the European documentary environment and preparing to defend its position within the European audiovisual landscape are what made us decide to launch Media & Society.

http://cineuropa.org/it.aspx?t=interview&l=en&did=346968

www.edn.network

ZagrebDox 2018 Program Ready

It’s the 14th edition of ZagrebDox that starts in the Croatian capital February 25th to run until March 4. And it is as usual well edited, the best of the best for the audience, with an international and a regional competition, and under the umbrella “Official Program” biographies, music documentaries, “happy dox” (seven this year out of 125 films!) and a masters program with films by Claude Lanzmann (“Napalm”, that I have not seen), Alex Gibney (“No Stone Unturned”, not seen), Joe Berlinger (“Intent to Destroy”, seen, good), Erik Gandini (“The Rebel Surgeon”, good, but is Gandini a master, sorry!) and Frederick Wiseman’s masterpiece “Ex Libris – the New York Public Library” – Wiseman who recently published that all his films will be available through an online service. Bravo! More sections can be discovered on the fine website of the festival that provides you with trailers to watch.

1386 films came in for consideration, 125 were taken, 21 of them for the

international competition, where it is a joy to see that the festival includes short films like the Belorussian director Aliaksei Paluyan’s “Country of Women” that charmed me at DOK Leipzig this year. A fine tribute to a young talent. It is reviewed on this site. As are of course Ai WeiWei’s “Human Flow”, Talal Derki’s “Of Fathers and Sons”, Marta Prus “Over the Limit”, Simon Lereng Wilmont’s “The Distant Barking of Dogs” and Arunas Matelis “Wonderful Losers: A Different World”.

From a Danish perspective nice to see that films praised by colleague Allan Berg in his Danish language reviews, “The Stranger” (“En fremmed flytter ind”) by Nicole Nielsen Horanyi is there as are Eva Mulvad’s “A Modern Man” and “Big Time” by Kaspar Astrup Schrøder about the Danish architect Bjarke Ingels.

I could go on with the name-dropping – and I do so with some fine titles from the Regional competition: of course the IDFA winner, Serbian Mila Turajlic’s “The Other Side of Everything” is there together with “A Woman Captured”, the shocking Hungarian film about modern slavery by Bernadett Tuza-Ritter and the charming Macedonian “Avec l’Amour” by Ilija Cvetkovski and Atanas Georgiev, not to forget the extraordinary “In Praise of Nothing” by Boris Mitic.

Masterclasses with Claude Lanzmann and Talal Derki… of course! And the ZagrebDox Pro with Leena Pasanen and Stefano Tealdi continues to be a strong element in the festival. Summing up. No objections!

http://zagrebdox.net/en 

Docs & Talks /4

VIVIANE CANDAS: ALGÉRIE DU POSSIBLE / A POSSIBLE ALGERIA

French director Viviane Candas grew up in Algiers, where her father, the lawyer and anti-colonialist Yves Mathieu, worked for the Algerian government after the country’s independence in 1962. Following eight years of war against France, one of the most brutal in colonial history, the reconstruction of Algeria was a political experiment striving to create a fair and equal society, notably through extensive land and school reforms. Yves Mathieu died under mysterious circumstances in a car accident in 1966, shortly after Ben Bella’s revolutionary regime had been overthrown by a military coup. Guided by her personal story and through the superb editing of rare archive material and recently recorded interviews with key figures, Candas introduces us to the unique moment of Algerian history just after the revolution.

Senior researcher at DIIS Rasmus Alenius Boserup introduces us to the subject before the film, and after the screening, the director and he will discuss the significance that French colonial history has had and still has for both Algeria and France even today – and they will talk about the role the Algerian revolution played at the time. This is the film’s Danish premiere. The debate is in English. Tickets: 95/65 kr. The event is supported by the Institut français. (Docs & Talks’ programme)

Algérie du possible / Viviane Candas, 2016 / eng. subtitles / SUN 25/02 14:00 / Cinemateket, Copenhagen

KOMMENTAR

Filmen bygger på stemmen, filminstruktørens egen stemme. Den fortæller historien. Det kan jeg altid godt lide, det er reelt, det er litterært, tæt på skrift, tættere end en ren billedside. Og Viviane Candas stemme gør mig tryg og lyttende selv om, hvad den fortæller mig er forfærdende. Dernæst bygger hendes film på arkivmaterialet, en sjælden samling historiske optagelser klippet sammen med et privat arkiv. Det kan jeg også næsten altid godt lide, i hvert fald, når det er poetisk konstruktion som her og ikke et formidlende pensum. I Candas’ værk er det selve forbindelsen mellem verdenshistorie, Algeriets historie, Frankrigs historie og undertitlens Yves Mathieus biografi. Han var Viviane Candas’ far, fransk som hun, men dybt forbundet med Algeriet i landets skæbnetime. I titlens og undertitlens indhold ligger filmens fortælling, og i modstillingen samfund / nation / folk og person dens ekstistentielle drama, dens identitetsovervejelse. Endelig bygger filmværket på Candas’ enestående følsomt ærlige interviews med nogle få af fortællingens nøglepersoner, som i den litterære ånd mere er søgende samtaler end faktuelle spørgsmål/svar scener. De er lavet helt uensartede, og de vidner om en langvarig indsamling af filmens optagelser, som kædes sammen af vignetter fra researchrejserne i en rekonstruktion, som har en fast billedmæssig ensartethed, som et eftertankens hvilerum. Men mærkeligt nok gør det dem ikke til filmens, fortællingens nu. Det gør Candas’ fortællestemme, og det gør de medvirkende, som fører ordet i interviewscenernes samvær, samtaler hvor instruktørens stemme oftest er klippet fra, men mærkeligt er hun meget til stede. Det bliver til mit møde med disse mennesker, og mødet med en gammel Ahmet Ben-Bella er et emotionelt chok. Her er filmværkets nu, her er selveste verdenshistorien til stede i denne skrøbelige krop, som taler om sig selv som socialist. I dag, nu…

2

Krigen i Algeriet var et fransk anliggende, som jeg husker den, og krigen var det franske militærs brutalitet. Jeg læste om Djamila Boupacha i tidsskriftet Perspektiv, en bestemt replik fra hende under retssagen, en oplysning, hun kom med, sidder i min hukommelse endnu, ryster mig endnu, fordi jeg husker, hvordan det var med mig og viden om voldsom brutalitet dengang, og hun var altid Picassos tegning, men det handlede ikke om Picasso, i stedet fæstnede hun sig; hun, modellen indprentede sig ved det lille portræt tegnet efter et fotografi stærkere end tegneren på en måde modsat Guernica, som altid var den berømte maler mere end den ulykkelige by. Og jeg læste i Simone de Beauvoirs roman Mandarinerne om det franske intellektuelle venstre i 1940-erne, om Camus og Sartres kreds. Og jeg læste om krigen og om general Jacques Massu og hans faldskærmstroppers sejr i 1957 over modstandsbevægelsen FLN i hovedstaden, som han trevlede op ved vilkårlige arrestationer og brutale forhør og systematisk tortur. Det var Slaget om Algier, som i 1966 også blev en film af Gillo Pontecorvo med Jean Martin i rollen som oberst Mathieu, som nok er et portræt af general Massu, en spillefilm i dokumentarisk sort-hvid billedstil med amatører lige fra gaden i de fleste andre roller. Den mimisk dokumentariske kvalitet i Pomtecorvos film er så forbavsende, at Candas har kunnet bruge scener derfra som en del af sit  arkivstof, for eksempel henrettelsesscenerne. 

3

Titelsekvensen, de første billeder, broen med bilerne i bjerglandskabet, vejene set fra bilen, jernbanestationen med toget en almindelig dag og billedernes hele stil og deres særlige tekniske kvalitet definerer filmens tid som nutid, netop nu, hvor den optages og nu, hvor jeg oplever, den erindrer historien om Algeriets frihedskrig som spredte fragmenter bundet i arkivets film, fotografier og dokumenter, som bliver gennemgående lag i dens arkitektur, dens datid.

4

De medvirkende i samtalerne er i dette nu, instruktørens stemme er i dette nu, vignetternes scener er dette nu, de rammer det ind med nutid, også arkivoptagelsernes lag, som i den fornemme klipning skrevet i filmens datid. Det er hukommelsens svage billeder, brudstykker af dengang, som stemmerne føjer detaljer til. Alt det forfærdende. Men også opklaringer, hvordan, det virkelig skete. Guillotinen i fængselsgården, henrettelsen af en algerisk modstandsmand, hvordan en afkørsel ved en hovedvej rummer viden om, på hvilken måde Yves Mathieu sandsynligvis blev myrdet, støtter som indicium, at sådan var det muligt, sådan som bilvraget blev fundet. Det er en erindringsfilm på arkivstof mere i slægt med Chris Markers Level 5 (1997) skrevet i et redigeringsrums nutid med sine minimalt få og utydelige, men aldeles afgørende arkivscener og fotos end, den er i slægt med Emile de Antonios Millhouse (1971), som udelukkende er lavet på arkivklip og, som jeg husker det, skrevet i datid som alvorlig underholdning, mens Chris Markers film er en moralfilosofisk opgave i nutid, netop som kernen i Viviane Candas’ værk, som derved er en tilsvarende forpligtelse for mig, en udfordring til min tanke, netop hvad festivalen, den indgår i, har til formål.

5

Candas’ film dokumenterer ikke dette korte, men voldsomme afsnit af Algeriets historie, filmen dokumenterer en kvalificeret tanke om det afsnit af historien, en tanke kvalificeret af en statsleders erindring, en ministers erindring, en datters erindring om sin fraværende far. Hun har nu brug for at dele deres erindringer, for at forstå sine velordnede brudstykker som en historisk viden, for at komme til at elske sin revolutionære far langt borte begravet i arbejde, forstå ham og elske ham uden forbehold nu trods det, at han har været død i mange år. Hun står i nutiden med pladen med gravindskriften i hånden, overvejer den rette lapidariske sammenfatning af dette menneskes liv.

6

Filmens undertitel er La révolution d’ Yves Mathieu læste jeg på skiltet efter titelsekvensen. Det er i dag et par dage siden, og først i dag forstår jeg efterhånden titlens så vigtige sammenfatning. Jeg er ved at være parat til at se den fornemme film igen, parat til at lytte til Rasmus Alenius Boserups introduktion og til hans samtale med Viviane Candas i Cinemateket.

SØN 25/02 14:00: ALGERIET / A POSSIBLE ALGERIA / Algérie du possible / Viviane Candas, 2016 / eng. tekst / 88 min. / 138 min. inkl. debat. Debatten foregår på engelsk. Billetpris: 95/65 kr. Arrangementet er støttet af Institut français.

SYNOPSIS

Den franske instruktør Viviane Candas boede som barn i Algier, hvor hendes far, advokaten og antikolonialisten Yves Mathieu, arbejdede for den algeriske regering lige efter uafhængigheden i 1962. Efter otte års krig mod Frankrig, en af kolonihistoriens mest brutale, var genopbygningen af landet et politisk eksperiment, hvor man forsøgte at skabe et retfærdigt og lige samfund, bl.a. ved hjælp af omfattende jord- og skolereformer. Yves Mathieu døde under mystiske omstændigheder i en bilulykke i 1966, kort tid efter at Ben Bellas revolutionære styre var blevet afsat ved et militærkup. Med den personlige historie som ledetråd og med en eminent sammenklipning af sjældent arkivmateriale og nyligt optagede interviews med datidens nøglepersoner indfører Candas os i Algeriets historie lige efter revolutionen.

Seniorforsker ved DIIS Rasmus Alenius Boserup introducerer os til emnet inden filmen og taler efterfølgende med instruktøren om, hvilken betydning den franske kolonihistorie har haft og stadig har for både Frankrig og Algeriet op til i dag – og om den rolle, den algierske revolution spillede i samtiden. Filmen har danmarkspremiere. (Docs & Talks’ program)

PROGRAM OG BILLETTER

http://www.dfi.dk/Filmhuset/Cinemateket/Billetter-og-program/Serie.aspx?serieID=15914 

Docs & Talks/ 3

DYLAN BANK, DANIEL DiMAURO, MORGAN PEHME: GET ME ROGER STONE

MARC EBERHARDT: MEUTHEN’S PARTY

There are still some weeks before the kick-off of Docs & Talks but I have had the chance to watch two of the films, that will be shown at the festival accompanied by talks. They are both on politics of today. In the US and in Germany.

One – ”Get Me Roger Stone” –  with a debate before, in English, where one of the participants is the competent Niels Bjerre Poulsen, who is often on Danish television to talk Trump. It’s on the 21st.

The other – ”Meuthens Party” – where the debate is in Danish after the film: Seniorforsker ved DIIS Cecilie Stokholm Banke og forfatter og journalist på Weekendavisen Jesper Vind debatterer baggrunden for højrefløjens fremgang i Tyskland og resten af Europa og forsøger at give svaret på, hvorfor flere af højrepartierne er plaget af fløjkrige, efter de har etableret sig. It’s on the 22nd.

”Get me Roger Stone” (100 mins.) is not only a portrait of the flamboyant dandy, who for decades have ”made” presidents like

Nixon, Reagan, Bush and now Trump. According to himself – and many others. He is been in and out of the limelight, he adores to be there and he knows how to deal with the media. And he is in total control of this film. A good characteristic comes from the NY Times review (by Manohla Dargis): ”Movies about colorful characters, be they saints or sinners, are often hijacked by their subject, so it’s unsurprising that Mr. Stone, with his bespoke suits and Nixon tattoo, owns this one…”. What you get with this film is an entertaining insight (lots of archive from tv, interviews) to a cynical world full of lies; what you don’t get is a journalistic analysis of what is right and wrong. Everyone, and there are many, talking about Stone either shake their head with a smile or characterise him to be like the president: a crook.

German Marc Eberhardt’s ”Meuthens Party” is classical observational documentary in the genre that we know so well from direct cinema – ”Primary” (on J.F.Kennedy and Humphrey), ”Citizen Havel” – getting close to a politician during his election campaign for the right wing party Afd (Alternative für Deutschland), where he wins a seat in the parliament in Baden-Würtemberg and thus gets into the German Bundestag as one of the chairmen. The director, who is also the cameraman, follows him for a couple of months, Meuthen being the man, who denies that there is antisemitism being expressed by members of his party, well denies racism in general… but but when he is in a full hall for the party gathering, he receives standing ovations for his nationalistic anti-immigration formulations. Would it be wrong to compare him to the Danish righ wing party leader Thulesen-Dahl: Academic, always well-dressed and polite in communications, with pretty clear anti opinions… The film, made by a film student, probably a diploma work, is quite impressive, and has a standpoint. Look for yourself.

http://www.dfi.dk/Filmhuset/Cinemateket/Billetter-og-program/

Sergei Loznitsa to Receive Award in Krakow/ 1

A press release came in from Krakow Film Festival two days ago. Here comes the essence of it, followed by a post of some references, we have made to films of a very productive and excellent director of short and long documentary and fiction films:

This year, the Krakow Film Foundation Programme Council decided to honour the eminent director of documentary films, Sergei Loznitsa, with the Dragon of Dragon award in recognition of his exceptional contribution to the development of the international cinema. The 21st laureate of this prestigious award is at the same time the youngest winner of the award in history… big names like Jonas Mekas, Werner Herzog, Marcel Lozinski, Albert Maysles are among previous winners as are Priit Pärn, the Quay Brothers, Jerzy Kucia and Paul Driessen – remember that the festival is also the place for artistic animation films.

The President of the Programme Council, the film critic and film theorist, Prof. Tadeusz Lubelski, gave three main reasons for the nomination: “First, the consistent, extremely original and fruitful explorations of the form. Loznitsa created his own style of documentary film, resulting from patience and distance to the world, based on long shots and brilliant soundtrack. Kracauer would have had an insoluble problem with his works, because this is the cinema of pure recording, at the same time completely created. And the end result tends to be worthy of the dramas by Beckett.

Secondly, Loznitsa as a film-maker is an inquisitive and unyielding explorer of Russia. He discovers the weight of its past (often bringing archival tapes to life), but also its unique, sometimes shocking present. To this aim serve him the explorations of the documentary film’s form, though he often uses them also in feature films, such as the recent brilliant film “A Gentle Creature.” Thirdly, this is a film-maker who is connected with our festival since the very beginnings of his artistic work, that is, for over twenty years. So we can almost view this director – born in Baranavichy, educated in Kiev, residing in Germany for many years – as a film-maker from Krakow.”

http://www.kff.com.pl

Sergei Loznitsa to Receive Award in Krakow/ 2

… and here are some quotes from Loznitsa films, we have been writing about on filmkommentaren. It’s very few, only documentaries. If you want to see the full filmography go to Loznitsa’s own website, link below.

The Event (2015) – … Loznitsa is not in Moscow in this film, he is in Leningrad and gives me exceptional material from what happened in the streets and the squares, that I love so much today, where people gathered to try to understand what is going on in 1991. +  he gives me the legendary mayor Sobchak and his impressive speeches, “the sea of faces” listening to him, the USSR flag being substituted by the Russian, the slogans used like “fascism will not prevail”, bring the “coup gang to justice” and the name of Yeltsin shouted again and again. Fascinating…

Maidan (2014) – He is distantly observing and not involved (not meaning that he does not have a point of view, indeed he has), he makes the viewer observe and have the eyes go around his images, that are like paintings, as the jury stated in their motivation for giving an honorary award to the film (in Leipzig, ed.). Several long shots included the singing of the Ukrainian anthem, where you let your eyes wander within the frame, as was it a work by Brueghel! Unique moments they are.

My personal favourite is ”Blockade” (2005) about the 900 days siege of Leningrad during WW2. Will watch again and write…

Austerlitz (2017) – Loznitsa´s construction of the sound score is a superb alliance to the black & white images, where there is no camera movement and where every frame is precise and full of meaning in its composition. Back to the sound… it goes on my nerves when I am confronted with the sound of steps of all the tourists, who are visiting the camps – after visiting several, Loznitsa decided to concentrate on Dachau and Sachsenhausen – in their almost naked summer dress with their smart phones clicking all the time, their audioguides linked to the ear, and their selfie-photo-taking.

http://loznitsa.com/