Andreas Koefoed: At Home in the World

 

Before the review you will first get a slightly shortened version of the precise description of the film taken from its website. In the post below you will find information about the upcoming distribution during the CPH:DOX. The international premiere takes place later this month at IDFA.

”The film is an intimate depiction of the everyday lives of five refugee children on a Danish Red Cross asylum school.

The children; Magomed, Sehmuz, Heda, Amel and Ali have different nationalities and backgrounds, but they have all fled their homes with their families, arriving in Denmark with the hope of starting over.

Over the course of one year, there is an 80% replacement in one class on the asylum school. Few are granted residency in Denmark, and move out of the asylum centres to become part of the Danish society. Others are rejected and sent back to their country of origin. Some go underground and continue their lives on the run from the atrocities in their home country.

Over the course of a year, we follow the children in an ever-

changing environment. It is hard to create bonds and friendships, and the tone is often harsh amongst the kids, as they all fight inner battles with traumatic events of their past. We follow their attempt to learn a new language, create friendships and prepare to form a new home in Denmark…”

Review: I chose the photo of a smiling Magomed, the boy from Chechnya, who is the main character of the five. He is in a bus on his way to a home in the world. In this case Denmark. In the film he is given residency and is moved to a Danish public school from the asylum centre, where we as an audience have followed him and the other four children. We have not seen a smiling Magomed, we have seen him shy and worried, and getting important praise by the fabulous teacher Dorte, who has conversations with his mother and father and declares her love to the boy (and his sister). Magomed and his mother and sister get residency, they can stay in Denmark, whereas the father’s explanation to the authorities that he has been tortured by the Russians are not trusted, so he is to be sent back! Luckily we are by text at the end of the film informed that also he can stay.

Andreas Koefoed is a brilliant observer. He is able to create atmosphere in scenes and sequences with a constant gentleness towards the kids as he did in the films “Albert’s Winter” and “12 Notes Down”. There is a musicality in the way the film is built (Jacob Schulsinger is the editor as he has been on the previous films mentioned and as he was on the Efterklang-documentary “The Ghost of Piramida”) and he dares to make nature scenes be music-filled reflection pauses in-between the observations of the children. From one to the other. It is a scoop to have the sentence “do you have any questions” come back several times, questions that the teachers put to the kids when they are to change to a school or when they arrive at the new place. They have no questions, they hope without really knowing what they can hope for.

Yes, you sit there with tears in your eyes watching a film that takes its time to make us watch children, who come from a place in the world, from where their parents had to flee. And you sit there watching Magomed asking his father, what the Russians did to him and what would happen if he was to be deported.

There is no aggression, no anger in the film – there is Love. And respect for the work that the asylum centre and its staff is doing. The anger comes with the viewer’s knowledge of current Danish policy towards refugees. Magomed, hopefully you will get many reasons to smile!

Denmark, 2015, 58 mins.

http://cphdox.dk/en/programme/film/?id=3009

http://www.athomeintheworldfilm.com/#a-home-in-the-world

https://www.facebook.com/ethjemiverden

Andreas Koefoeds tidligere film anmeldt på Filmkommentaren.dk: Våbensmuglingen (2014), Piramida (2012), Ballroom Dancer (2011)

Andreas Koefoed: Et hjem i verden/ Visninger i DK

Se det er filmformidling af høj klasse på bagrund af en smuk film lavet af et af de fineste talenter i dansk dokumentarfilm – læs anmeldelsen ovenfor. Og det er – skriver én der var ansat i Statens Filmcentral (SFC) – en flot videreførsel af en tradition, som blev grundlagt af netop denne institutions samarbejde med bibliotekerne landet over. Her er hvad jeg har kopieret (i en redigeret udgave) fra CPH:DOX hjemmeside:

“CPH:DOX præsenterer i samarbejde med Det Danske Filminstitut og Sonntag Pictures simultan dokumentarfilmvisning og debat på de danske folkebiblioteker, højskoler og asylcentre.

I anledning af FN’s Internationale Børnedag og som afrunding på CPH:DOX viser vi den 19. november 19:00 Andreas Koefoeds ‘Et Hjem i Verden’ simultant – over hele landet!

Arrangementet er et gratis tilbud til danskere i hele landet i et forsøg på at menneskeliggøre den meget svære flygtningedebat, og filmen følges til alle visninger op af lokal debat og refleksion.”

Klik på linket nedenfor – over tredive visningssteder – EFTER filmens mange biografvisninger under festivalen.

http://www.dfi.dk/Nyheder/Nyheder-til-biblioteker/Nyheder-til-biblioteker/2015/Et-hjem-i-verden.aspx

http://cphdox.dk/simultanvisning/

Nix, Bichlbaum, Bonanno: The Yes Men are Revolting

 

It’s not every day that a documentary makes me cry with laughter, I cherished the moment!

For 20 years the social activist duo The Yes Men have performed their happenings around the world. The Yes Men are Revolting is their third film coming after The Yes Men (2003) and The Yes Men Fix the World (2009). I haven’t seen the two previous films, so I wont be able to relate, which I think is not necessarily neither, the third film stands very well alone. This time they have gotten help from a friend, producer and director Laura Nix, and the result is a film that, with success, gets closer to the real life persons behind the activists.

The Yes Men, Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonanno, do brilliant stunts when they go after big corporations or organisations by turning their own “weapons” against them: suits, business cards, press conference, PR, communication and media strategies and sweet rhetoric. They create fake websites (for example Yes, Bush Can, the fake 2004 George W. Bush campaign) or press conferences and act as spokespersons announcing false positive news, surprisingly green or social politics, on behalf of the targeted company. When the hoax is revealed, it is a great story for the medias and all there is left to do for the company is damage control and eventually make concessions. It’s not just for the awareness of the cause, the Yes Men can do real harm to their prey as was the case in the 2004 hoax linked to the Bhopal disaster (India 1984, considered the worlds worst industrial disaster, thousands of dead after gas and chemical leaks) where Andy Bichlbaum, posing as spokesperson for Dow Chemicals, announced huge compensations to victims live on BBC! (See the clip here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiWlvBro9eI ). In less than 25 minutes the company had lost billions of dollars due to falling share prices (and BBC’s reputation suffered as well). They call it “Identity Correction” defined as: Impersonating big-time criminals in order to publicly humiliate them, and otherwise giving journalists excuses to cover important issues (from the Yes Men Website).

In the film they are tuning in on the issue of climate change. We see them in front of the UN with their survivaballs (picture), amongst Occupy Wall Street and working a stunt at COP15 in Copenhagen. We should be freaking out but instead we are celebrating the melting arctic as a business opportunity! they note (well hello Hillary Clinton and Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs at the time Lene Espersen, bonding in Greenland), before going after Shell who’s planning to drill the arctic and pair up with Russian Gazprom.

I’m not going to reveal the plot of the last great stunt in the film, but let’s just say that it involves a bunch of defence contractors dancing hand in hand in a circle not fully realizing that they are singing to the praise of the total of Americas energy production turning green and being handed over to native Americans as a second Thanksgiving! It is very very funny.

But we also get behind the scene, in the control room where strategy is laid and even the storage where they keep all the props and costumes. We meet Jacques Servin and Igor Vamos, as the Yes Men are called in private, and address the questions like how do you reconcile high-level activism with family life and how do you pay your bills?

Laura Nix and The Yes Men have made a sympathetic and entertaining film about the duo and their, often highly visual, actions. But the light and entertaining form doesn’t mean that it’s not about serious business. Besides being a study in the art of ultramodern activism, it is also very effective and instructive in highlighting the power of the oil industry and its lobbyists, the number one obstacle on the way to finding solutions to fight climate change.

The Yes Men will be in Denmark themselves during CPH:DOX participating in various events. Somebody should ask them if they could help us with the Dong scandal (last year the Danish government sold a fifth of the shares of the public energy company DONG to Goldman Sachs under obscure circumstances and at a ridiculously low price) – maybe there is material for a fourth film…

Absolutely, yes to The Yes Men!

Laura Nix, Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonanno: The Yes Men are Revolting (2014, 91 min.)

Photo: Nate Igor Smith

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tSEjepPNgc

Danish premiere at CPH:DOX November 7th.

See the program here: http://cphdox.dk/en/programme/film/?id=3177

For more on The Yes Men: http://theyesmen.org/

Five pen heads from me, the last one for laughing out loud…

Anne Wivel: Mand falder

 

Det begynder stille og roligt med Anne Wivels stemme, som nænsomt fra bag et fortæppe af Per Kirkeby lærreder ganske kort fortæller den personlige baggrund for filmen: Kirkeby er en forårsdag 2013 faldet ned ad en trappe, har fået en hjerneskade, som alvorligt forstyrrer hans syn og hans bevægelighed, han kan ikke male, han kan ikke gå. Hun kan omsider besøge ham og aftenen før ringer hans hustru og siger, at han gerne vil at Anne Wivel tager sit kamera med. Hun bevæges, hun har ikke brugt kameraet siden hendes mand to år tidligere faldt og slog hovedet og kort efter døde, og hendes dæmpede stemme fortsætter herefter med hendes ja, dette fortrolige og ægte ja til sætningerne fra maleren og vennen, fortsætter og fortsætter. Anne Wivel er i den her film til stede hele tiden, i optagelserne, i samværet som vokser til filmværket som Per Kirkeby vel sådan har ønsket de endnu en gang kunne lave sammen.

Titelsekvensen klipper til atelieret, Kirkeby sidder og taler med kameraet og lidt med sin hjælper som også er der, og lidt med hustruen som også er der, der er hele tiden mennesker omkring ham, og han taler med kameraet og med Anne Wivel bag det, taler om situationen: jeg kan ikke gå, jeg kan ikke male, jeg kan ikke se, jeg kan ikke genkende ansigter. Det er ærgerligt siger hun, det er godt nok surt siger han og så går de i gang med at lave filmen. Filmens kurve bliver som Kirkebys kurve, den må skabe et nulpunkt, tror jeg det er han siger, og så må den med ham bevæge sig frem gennem en række af stemninger, som bliver til filmens afsnit. Sådan aftaler de konstruktionen, så enkel er den, de to erfarne ved hvad de gør. ”Jeg magter det ikke helt, det ved jeg godt, det må være som det er,” udbryder han et sted i gang med et billede, et værk trods alt, og klaverkoncerten triumferer ved de kunstneriske sejre, ved indsigtens gennembrud.

Per Kirkeby tegner, Anne Wivel filmer. De arbejder sammen, nu ved farvetuberne og så er vi ved lærredet, ”jeg mister orienteringen”, siger han, og han kigger på lærredet, ”… det er som et tapet”. ”Du er hård, Per” siger hun. Sådan taler de med hinanden, mens de arbejder på værkerne, arbejder sig gennem scenerne, stemningerne. Med Minik Rosing på Louisiana, Kirkeby kan ikke huske, ”det er så mærkeligt ikke at kunne genkende sine egne billeder”, siger han. Så hjemme i villaen i Hellerup, træning i et få synet på plads igen. Samtalen med Anne Wivel er så enkel, så kortfattet, så fin: ”Er du ked af det?” ”Ja.” ”Det kan jeg godt forstå”. En anstrengende rejse til Aars til afsløring af en stor skulptur, en tilsvarende nøgtern samtale med dronning Margrethe. Hjemme i Hellerup igen, han modellerer i lille format. Alligevel: ”Jeg magter det ikke helt. Det ved jeg godt.” Og så befriende fast: ”Det må være som det er.” Samtalen med Anne Wivel kommer til at handle om tålmodighed og dovenskab. Han vil godt lære tålmodighed men kan ikke med dovenskab. Hun synes han skal give sig hen i den. Nye dybe indsigter kan det føre til. ”Dem er jeg ikke stødt på”, replicerer han tørt. Og så alligevel, jo, han er stødt på kærligheden og på evnen til at tilgive ”og sådan noget, det har aldrig været min stærke side”. Det virker måske banalt i mit referat, i filmen er det aldeles ægte og vigtigt og meget smukt. Og han taler spontant om hustruen og spørger om det ikke også var sådan med Svend, hendes mand? Og jeg lukkes som en generøsitet ind i et nyt rum.

Han tegner pludseligt energisk med et stykke oliekridt, han tegner faldet på trappen, tegner først trappen, ”en rigtig Kirkeby-trappe”, siger han og både Anne Wivels kamera og jeg kan se at det er det netop, se det langt tilbage i hans værk. Og han tegner med sikre, sikre bevægelser faldet og senere skrammerne og så det der neden for trappen. En tegning bliver til og koncertens orkesterstemme triumferer. Han tegner videre på et nyt ark og hun siger: ”Det er skønt, Per. Du skal blive ved…”

Der kommer nye afsnit, nye stemninger, nedture mod nulpunktet og flere og flere sejre, mange hos de trofaste kolleger i det grafiske værksted.

Anne Wivel har gemt en vældig overraskelse til sidst, jeg bliver bestemt overrasket og ved eftertanke på en måde ikke: jeg er igen med Anne Wivel og Per Kirkeby på slottet i Italien, igen på det sted efter 15 år og jeg er tryg. Landskabet i bjergene er der, den ærværdige kolossale bygning ligger der, de gamle fresker så åbenbart øget siden sidst med Kirkebys talrige nye sidder der på væggene. Vennerne og kollegerne er med, lærrederne står parat i atelieret. Men atelieret ligger øverst ved slutningen af en høj stenbygget trappe, en hel del vanskeligere at gå på end trappen til træning hos fysioterapeuten, også fysisk vanskeligere, men filmen handler om den anden vanskelighed, trappens begivenhed som motiv ”den rigtige kirkebyske trappe” og senere er motivet Sebastian bundet til træet døende med de mange pile i kroppen, men jeg ved at en kvinde vil pleje hans mange sår og han vil komme sig. For en tid.

Som hos Platon er der indlagt taler i fremstillingen. Der er faktisk indlagt to. Jeg ser det blive til tre. En tredjedel inde i filmen taler ved en fest på et galleri Hans Edvard Nørregård-Nielsen. Det er en tale om det danske og om to digtere, Thøger Larsen og Poul Martin Møller. I sin stemmes myndighed viser han digtlinjernes lighed med træk i Kirkebys malerkunst, lighed i en særlig danskhed og i en udødelighed. Ved en anden sammenkomst, det er i huset på Læsø, læser Peter Laugesen et digt og det er et digt om kunstnerisk størrelse og sindets vejrlig: ”… Det format, der kan rumme de drejende lavtryk, de dybe huller, hvorfra vindene kommer / de nedre og øvre passater, monsuner, kulinger, storme og orkaner. / Drømmenes skypumper.” Og Anne Wivel laver på en måde sin film som en endnu en tale om at fremstille dyb, indsigtsfuld kunst i trodsigt mod på trods af, en hjernes skade.

Et tidsrum i Per Kirkebys liv hedder filmens undertitel på plakaten. Tidsrum… Det er et smukt ord det danske sprog aldrig må miste. Tidsrum, tid og rum, tid i rum, rum tid som betyder rummelig tid, omfangsrig tid, tilstrækkellig tid. Her er tid nok. Sådan er Anne Wivels nye films vigtige erkendelse af livet, menneskets liv. Uanset det tidsbundne i filmens biografiske udgangspunkt vil Anne Wivels Mand falder blive stående længe som umisteligt hovedværk i dansk film, endnu et hovedværk fra hendes hånd, endnu et værk om mandigheden og Eros’ stadige jagt på skønheden.

Danmark 2015, 108 min. PREMIERE I AFTEN ved åbningen af CPH:DOX 2015

SYNOPSIS

”Man Falling” (Mand falder). Per Kirkeby’s struggle to return to art after an accident. An honest and personal portrait of a headstrong artist. What happens when a world-famous artist suddenly loses his natural abilities? The director Anne Wivel has followed her friend, painter Per Kirkeby, up close after he fatally fell down a flight of stairs, gravely injuring his head. Kirkeby had previously recovered from a brain haemorrhage and two blood clots, but the fall resulted in a brain injury that still prevents him from working as before. He has not just lost his mobility, but also the ability to recognise colours and even his own art works. Anne Wivel is there both as a friend, an interlocutor and as a discretely observing filmmaker that follows a struggling Per Kirkeby while he is fighting for a comeback while constantly confronting his own lack of progress. There seems to be a long way to go. as art is not just a question of being able to paint and create beauty, but rather in transgressing good taste. It is this transgressive gesture that Kirkeby is missing and longing for. In addition to the artist, we also meet his wife, friends and collaborators, but the absolute protagonist is Per Kirkeby in an unusually open and frank portrait. Everything – from everyday rehabilitation to emotional insights – is presented in a sober, accurate way. (CPH:DOX programme)

CREDITS

Manuskript, instruktion, foto: Anne Wivel, medvirkende: Per Kirkeby, Mari Anne Duus, klip: Peter Winther.

FILMOGRAFI

Anne Wivel. Director and producer. Born 1945.Graduated in painting from the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, 1977. Graduated from the National Film School of Denmark, 1980. Founder and leader of the production company Barok Film from 2004. Anne Wivel has won a lot of awards, among others Prix Italia, Special Price by Frederic Wiseman, Nordiska Filmpriset and the Roos Award from the Danish Film Institute. (DFI fakta)

Giselle (1991), Slottet i Italien (2000), Svend (2011), Mand falder (2015)

LITTERATUR / LINKS

http://cphdox.dk/en/programme/film/?id=3107  (Programme with screenings: date, time and location)

http://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=3107  (Program med visninger: dato, tid og sted)

http://www.dfi.dk/faktaomfilm/person/en/2964.aspx?id=2964  (Anne Wivel)

Johannes Sløk: Platon (1960), 65ff

DOK Leipzig/ 11/ Being at the Festival

I am writing this in the train back to Copenhagen from Leipzig. The journey is 8 hours long but for one, who has done enough airports in the last 25 years it is just a nice and relaxing experience that gives you time to think (and write) about the last days at DOK Leipzig, four nights, three full days for films and meetings with those, who have made films and those who tell others about them either by making festivals or write about them or sell them.

They treat you well at the festival. The cost for the four nights were covered at the brilliant hotel Arcona Living Bach14, a new one opposite the Thomas Kirche and the sculpture of Johan Sebastian Bach, including the restaurant WeinWirtschaft, where breakfast is taken, and where evening meals with a superb wine list can be enjoyed.

From there the walk took me to the Festival Centre at the Museum and the

DOK Market on the second floor with a digitized system, where you can choose between 263 films from 64 countries. You just sit down, put on your headphones, sign in with name and password and voilà the film wanted is there. It is efficient and there are booths enough to cover the demand and it is comfortable – and actually available for screening at home after the festival, until April next year.

But don’t you go to the cinema? I did and wished I had more time as the quality of the screenings at the Cinéstar cinemas is excellent and of course (also) documentaries should be watched on a big screen. I watched Marianna Economou’s ”The Longest Run” there and Polish Krzysztof Kopczynski’s impressive socio-cultural-historical ”Dybbuk” from Uman in Ukraine, where Hassidic jews go every year to honour Rabbi Rachmann and where Ukranian nationalists oppose them visa versa; it was shown at the Polnisches Institut on the big square, a very good address and an ok screening place.

Otherwise the films were screened on big flat screens in the booths at the market that you get to via a 4,5 meter high lift that is very often serviced by an elevator man/woman!

Four nights are too little to do the work of watching for Magnificent7 in Belgrade, DocsBarcelona and filmkommentaren.dk, I did not get time enough for more cinema experiences and to enjoy the wonderful autumn colours of Leipzig. I will be back for longer next year.   

DOK Leipzig/ 10/ Guevara Namer

 

Last Wednesday I got off the train in Leipzig and walked to the Museum of Bildende Kunst, that serves as Centre for the DOK Leipzig festival, also this year, with space to meet for a coffee or a fine lunch provided by the cuisine of Hotel Michaelis. Top standard.

Repeat… I got off the train in Leipzig and walked to the Museum and the first one I meet is Kurdish Syrian Guevara Namer, one of the courageous and entreprenant persons behind the DOX BOX festival in Damascus that I visited the last time in 2011 three weeks before the revolution started. She now lives in Berlin and is part of the team that has continued the Dox Box that now supports filmmakers from the region, among many initiatives with a Residence Fund, under the leadership of Diana El Jeiroudi.

Guevara Namer was in Leipzig to do camera interviews with sales agents, festival people etc. for the Dox Box. I knew from Damascus times how talented a photographer she is and asked her to send me a photo to put on this site. She did with these words attached:

”… this photo is from Damascus City Center, ”Marjeh Square”. One of my favourites”.

Guevara Namer describes herself: Has degrees in photography and drama studies from the Higher Institute of Dramatic Arts in Damascus, Syria, and has years of experience in documentary film production and training.

DOK Leipzig/ 9/ Daddy’s Girl

… directed by Melisa Üneri, who has a Finnish mother and a Turkish father, the protagonist of this unpretentious, light in tone and yet tough and moving, well told story about the relationship between the young girl (the director) and her father, who lives in Finland and who has brought up his daughter with love and strictness. He is a charming man, he knows when the camera is on, he is apparently obsessed by cleaning his house (!), he is single, wants to find a partner, daughter wants to help build up a profile for the dating service on the internet, he has a job as an eye specialist – and drinks too much. With consequences in the relationship to the daughter.

Melisa wants to move to Turkey, she does, she is in contact with her grandmother, the mother of the father, the two of them have not been in contact for long, but although he has been living in Finland most of his life, you understand from where his wish to protect/control his daughter comes. From his mother! It does not take long, according to the film, before grandmother and father get into arguments, when the latter arrives in Istanbul to visit. ”I want you to be nice and lady-like” is one of the sentences said by the father to his daughter, and when he does not hear from Melisa for some time, he knows that something must have happened. It has, she has got a boyfriend and the father is to meet him…

And then… no, I will not tell you, watch for yourself. Producer is Finnish director Mika Ronkainen, you sense his touch in the film, that has an appeal to a big audience, Rise and Shine has the sales rights.

Finland, 2015, 52 mins.

www.riseandshine-berlin.com

DOK Leipzig 2015/ 8/ Vitaly Mansky in North Korea

Vitaly Mansky has been in North Korea. If I understand it correctly called in as a professional helper of a local film team that is to make a propaganda film for the regime. He helps, I guess, but he also makes his own film, ”Under the Sun”, that was shown at DOK Leipzig and praised there by several of my professional colleagues as well as by representatives of the local funder, MDR. It is beautifully shot, has amazing sequences of modern civilation, human beings in the streets fighting their way to work, on rolling stairs in the metro, with empty faces and hopelessness in their sad eyes. Images that could have been taken anywhere – for a Dane it brings back memories of our late graphic art master Palle Nielsen and his descriptions of modern urban life: No hope. Despair.

Mansky deserves credit for that. My doubts come when he wants to make a personalised story out of his shooting in North Korea. I could not help feel scepticism while watching, and it changed to irritation over the kliché language that he uses, to say what he wants to say. Yes, what does he want to say? That North Korea cultivates a culture of total adoration for the great leaders, that this indoctrination and brainwashing take place from early childhood, that huge parades are organised, that the people suffer? One thing is that we already knew that, we have seen it many times before, another is that Mansky builds a story through small observations that he has made: In the school class some students moves their hands nervously, a student is on the edge of falling asleep while a military veteran makes his speech, the main protagonist, the girl in the family that plays in the propaganda film, has tears in her eyes while training the dance, so on so forth. The director apparently wants us to suffer with her, when he cuts from her face in the window of the dull appartment building to the parade on the big square, and back again, and back again; to be interpreted as ”this is her future”. Not difficult to understand!

Mansky wants us to see the means of suppression of a country’s population. He assists at the shooting of a propaganda film and that is in itself interesting and illustrative. You see the North Korean director(s) go in and out of the picture to direct the family members, who have been chosen to be the perfect patriots, who in all contexts celebrate Kim Il-Sung and the son, who has followed him on the throne. These scenes are fine, so why do we need Mansky’s squeezing tiny details out from the material shot to prove what is obvious through the whole propaganda circus that is set up? Could it not have been enough – and honest – to communicate that we are invited to follow the making of a propaganda film for North Korea. Mansky insists on making the little girl a tragic character – look she is crying when she dances, look she cries when she can not remember some propaganda lines… Sorry, I do not trust the autenthicity of that. And does Mansky really care about her?

Sorry for being so long about this film. Ethical questions are not often raised around films, in this case also not in Leipzig. Schade, as they say in German!

Russia, Germany, Czech Republic, North Korea, Under the Sun, 2015, 110 mins. 

DOK Leipzig/ 7/ Main Competition Programme

I have already saluted the jury’s choice of Wojciech Staron’s ”Brothers” as the winner of the feature length competition. I would also like to salute the festival for making a good selection of films for this section. I agree that a festival like this should go – as DOK Leipzig does – for diversity in themes and storytelling. I saw all 12 films and ended up having ”Brothers” as my favourite with Crystal Moselle’s ”The Wolfpack” and Korean Hyuck-jee Park’s ”With or Without You” as runners-up for the Goldene Taube, the Golden Dove. ”The Wolfpack” is an amazing story about six brothers being raised in an apartment on Manhattan with their mother teaching them and their father securing that they do not leave home, where they stay and as said in the catalogue ”liberate themselves through the power of cinema”: they watch and they make their own movies. Until one day, where one of them gets out… The Korean documentary, filmed over many years, is a lovely portrait of two old women, who have been living together all their lives, having had the same husband. A beautiful follow-up to ”My Love, Don’t Cross that River”.

I have written about the quality of the two timely films, ”Lampedusa in Winter” by Jakob Brossmann and ”The Longest Run” by Marianna Economou, as well as ”The Event” by Sergei Loznitsa. ”Under The Sun” by Vitaly Mansky will have a post of its own – ”Francophonia” by Sokurov, well you can discuss why it is there, is it not for feature film festivals, but Sokurov is a good name and I guess this is also the reason why Roberto Minervini’s ”The Other Side” has been included. He got the main prize last year for ”Stop the Pounding Heart”, which had qualities. ”The Other Side”, as a colleague said to me, is just a bad fiction film, which is crossing all borders of decency for me.

Decent with a high level of respect for those involved is ”Wie die Anderen” (”Like the Others”) by Constantin Wulf shot in an adolescent psychiatric centre in Vienna, classic observational documentary style, as – including interviews – is local Andreas Voigt’s ”Time Will Tell” that goes back to the end of the 80’es to show to the viewer what has happened with three characters. The film that was shown in the railway station at the opening night, is interesting for many reasons – the characters and what has happened to them and the city of Leipzig as it looked at that time and today. At least in the ”innenstadt” Leipzig is today a welcoming modern city, eine Kulturstadt, and documentary films are culture. Right? Especially interesting for me, as I was at the first DOK Leipzig ”nach der Wende”.

DOK Leipzig/ 6/ Awards

I just came from the award ceremony of the 58th edition of DOK Leipzig with a smile on my face, happy that the jury chose, what I also found the best film in the main competiton, “Brothers” by Wojciech Staron. And happy for Marianna Economou, who was on stage twice to receive acknowledgement for her “The Longest Run”. If anyone deserves this it is Economou, who went to many international pitching sessions without getting any funding. Goes without saying that in Greece film funding does not really exist in times of crisis… Also bravo that Hungarian Klara Trencsényi was awarded in the “Next Masters” category. I have seen beautiful material from her winning film “Train to Adulthood” and look forward to watch the final result, and write about it. Below the press release of the festival, more reporting and reviews will follow from me in the coming days:

The Golden Dove in the International Competition Long Documentary and Animated Film was awarded to “Brothers” (“Bracia”) (photo) by Polish director Wojciech Staroń. The prize is endowed with 10,000 euros, donated by the Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk, and was presented by Dr Claudia Schreiner, Head of Programme Culture and Science at MDR Television.

In the International Competition Short Documentary and Animated Film, the Russian entry “The Conversation” (“Razgovor”) was awarded the Golden

Dove for the best short documentary film. Director Anastasia Novikova receives prize money to the amount of 5,000 euros, donated by TELEPOOL GmbH. The Golden Dove for the best short animated film, endowed with 5,000 euros, was awarded to the Swiss entry “Erlking“ (“Erlkönig”) by Georges Schwizgebel. The Silver Dove for the best short documentary and animated film, endowed with 2,000 euros, went to Lei Lei from China for his film “Missing One Player“.

The Golden Dove in the German Competition Long Documentary and Animated Film, endowed with 10,000 euros, was awarded to “Land on Water” (“Land am Wasser”) by Tom Lemke. The Golden Dove in the German Competition Short Documentary and Animated Film, presented for the first time at this festival and endowed with 5,000 euros, was received by Benjamin Kahlmeyer for his film “Eisen”.

The Golden Dove of the Media Foundation of the Sparkasse Leipzig in the Next Masters Competition went to Klára Trencsényi from Hungary for “Train to Adulthood” (“Reményvasút”). The prize money of 10,000 euros is intended as startup funding for the director’s next documentary film project.

The Golden Dove for the Best Animated Documentary was awarded to the German entry “Spirit Away” (“Wegzaubern”) by Betina Kuntzsch. This prize for a hybrid of animated and documentary film, which is unique in the world, is endowed with 3,000 euros.

The Healthy Workplaces Film Award, endowed with 5,000 euros donated by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), was awarded ex aequo to the German production  “Automatic Fitness” by Alejandra Tomei and Alberto Couceiro and the German entry “Work For One Day” (“Tagelöhner Syndrom”) by Rita Bakacs.

The MDR Film Prize for an outstanding East European documentary, endowed with 3,000 euros, went to the animated documentary “The Magic Mountain” (La montagne magique”) by Romanian filmmaker Anca Damian.

The DEFA Sponsoring Prize for an outstanding long German documentary, along with a grant to the amount of 4,000 euros, was awarded to Matthias Koßmehl for his film “Café Waldluft”.

The Documentary Film Prize of the Goethe Institute, endowed with 2,000 euros, went to Lutz Dammbeck for his film “Overgames”.

The Prize of the Ecumenical Jury, endowed with 2,000 Euros donated by the VCH-Hotels Deutschland GmbH – im Verband Christlicher Hoteliers e.V., including the MICHAELIS Hotel in Leipzig, went to Wojciech Staroń (Poland) for “Brothers“ (“Bracia“).

The FIPRESCI Jury awarded its prize to Crystal Moselle (USA) for “The Wolfpack”.

Greek director Marianna Economou received the Prize of the Trade Union ver.di, endowed with 2,500 euros, for “The Longest Run“ (“O pio makris dromos“).

The Young Eyes Film Award of the Youth Jury of the Filmschule Leipzig e.V., endowed with 2,000 euros, went to US American director Patrick O’Brien for his film “TransFatty Lives”.

The DOK Neuland Audience Award for the public’s favourite work in the interactive exhibiton was determined by audience vote and went to the Virtual Reality Installation “Deep (Multiplayer Version)” by Owen Harris and Niki Smit (Netherlands / Ireland).

The mephisto 97.6 Audience Award was determined by audience vote and went to German director Florian Grolig for his animated film “In the Distance”.

The “Leipziger Ring” Film Prize of Stiftung Friedliche Revolution, endowed with 5,000 euros, was awarded on Thursday night at the Nikolaikirche (St. Nicholas Church) in Leipzig. It went to Ukrainian filmmaker Sergei Loznitsa for his film “The Event“.