The Syrian Revolution/ 7

Facebook is a very important tool for us to achieve information about what happens in Syria. Filmmaking friends are bloggers, who constantly convey the hard facts about the daily atrocities – while other media give space for analyses connected to realpolitik. Unfortunately for us most of the texts and links posted on facebook appear in Arab language. But there are exceptions. I picked 3 for you

1.

Syria: Security Forces Remove Wounded From Hospital | Human Rights Watch

www.hrw.org

‎(New York) – Syrian security forces forcibly removed 18 wounded people from al-Barr hospital in the central city of Homs on September 7, 2011, including five from the operating room, Human Rights Watch said today, based on reports from witnesses, including doctors.

2.

Dr. Rafah Nashed, 66y, Syria’s leading Psycho-analyst and a prominent psychoanalysis promoter and teacher, a Sorbonne-educated analyst, she’s been abducted today at the Damascus Int’l Airport. Her husband’s inquiry about her was answered with denying she was there. Nashed founded the ‘Damascus School of Psychoanalysis’, teaching, publishing & defending psychoanalysis & its necessity in Syria, she’s been dedicated to helping many reach a better sense of themselves & of the atrocities around them

3.

In this video, dated June 2011, you can see Abdullatif Alwa, from Inkhel, Syria, and his great non-violent attitude, minutes before Security Forces murdered him. Almost four months after that, Syrians are still defending pacifism… and are still being killed. If some violent reactions erupted at some point, in some place, the world has to understand… I will understand while I keep on defending pacifism.

كلنا شهداء حوران: الشهيد البطل محمد عبداللطيف العلوه

www.youtube.com

‫و الشخص الظاهر في الفيديو هو الشهيد محمد عبد اللطيف العلوه ( الزعبي )ا من مدينة إنخل و قد غناها بعد استشهاد الشهيد ضياء ماجد الشمري بتاريخ 1‬

-4-2011 حيث ظل مع…

http://www.lccsyria.org/1639

The End of Pitching Sessions?

So, no more pitching sessions, the young distributor said to me during the Baltic Sea Forum for Documentaries in Riga? She had followed the Doc Discussion on this blog, and had read the many skeptical texts from filmmakers, who saw the pitching sessions as a kind of show without any content (= money).

What to answer? It is true, and should not be hidden behind halleluja marketing language like ”come to our pitching session and get your film financed”, that the financial situation is pretty weak when it comes to contributions from public broadcasters, and that many leave frustrated with unfulfilled expectations.

On the other hand it was again, having just been to Riga, very encouraging to meet experienced producers bring new talents to the table. There was a focus on their projects for several days, they were discussed, criticised and developed, coalitions were made that can endure and make the films better. A Lithuanian producer, who had been to other pitch events before, is now working on two projects with a German and Belgian editor. An Estonian producer matched with a Georgian director, which made the representative from Estonian Film Foundation say that the door could be open for further funding. And several projects made such a strong promotion that the filmmakers can come back at a later stage. A Swedish director/producer felt that the positive reactions she got in Riga could help her chances at the national film fund. And so on, so forth.

The sessions should definitely continue. And in a realistic workshop-like frame – we meet to bring forward and develop new projects and new talented directors, we meet to create new contacts and strengthen the already existing ones, to sum up, we meet to keep the creative documentary alive!

Not only young talents pitched in Riga – 85 years old Herz Frank (photo from themovingarts.com) went on stage with his exciting story about Larissa, who has married the murderer of Rabin, and have a child with him.

Baltic Sea Forum for Documentaries

It was the 15th edition of the Baltic Sea Forum for Documentaries that ended in Riga yesterday with the presentation of a new project by Herz Frank, ”Without Fear”, to be co-directed by the master himself and Maria Kravchenko, with Guntis Trekteris, Ego Media, as the producer. The catalogue annotation goes like this: ”In 2004 Larissa Trembovler, philosophy professor and mother of four, leaves her husband and marries Yigal Amir – the assasin of Yitzhak Rabin. Three years later she gives birth to their son.” The film is in its early production stage and will definitely receive international support when more material is watchable.

Apart from this presentation from the man, who has inspired generations of filmmakers with his impressive work, the Forum also this time formed the first step for new young talents, in many cases accompanied by experienced producers like Estonian Peeter Urbla, Latvian Antra Cilinska and Lithuanian Rasa Miskinyte.

But there were also filmmakers who came on their own. Gunilla Bresky from Sweden presented ”I Stop Time”, a film that is ”a unique testimony” from the war photographer during the Second World War, Vladislav Mikosha, based on his photos and footage. As well as Georgian Alex Kvatashidze who showed amazing material shot by war reporters, and interviews with some of them reflecting the personal consequences of the profession.

Lithuanian producer Dagne Vildziunaite took part with two very promising projects. One is ”Toys” about people in a small Belorussian city. The young director Lina Luzyte showed me a rough cut  (around 70 minutes) of the film – very promising it was, a new talent from a strong documentary country. The other film project brought by Vildziunaite was ”Father” that is being edited right now, a former criminal, 20 years in jail, 13 children, ”an insatiable lust for life”. Director Marat Sargyan.

Russian producer Vlad Ketkovich also brought two projects to the table, ”Heralds from the Big World” by Tatyana Soboleva, a story about a floating hospital, the people working there and the patients boarding the ship, and ”Men’s Choice” by Elena Demidova, about men going to the North to do shift work. The energetic producer deserves credit for bringing Russian talented directors to the international documentary community.

Photo from the production of Ego Media, “Chronicles from the Last Temple” about the Latvian National Library, the coming city monument of Riga, director: Davis Simanis.

http://www.mediadesklatvia.eu/baltic-sea-forum-for-documentaries-2011/

Doc Discussion/ 11

Mikael Opstrup writes: Dear Louise, Thanks a lot for your thoughts on the future for documentary. I think you are pointing out the right issues, I will try to address a few of them.

For me this debate started with the question about independent feature film docs and the decreasing TV financing that the filmmakers meet when pitching at the many sessions around Europe and abroad.

It’s been easy to see that over the last 5 years it has become much more difficult and this of course causes frustration. Frustration can be very negative but it can also be the starting point of new ideas and necessary changes. I think this is key issue. Think back, the technical changes have always changed art and the production conditions. And that’s where we are, digitalization and the web is changing almost everything: TV, production, distribution etc.

What is hasn’t changed is storytelling, the need for strong stories is eternal. So – still focusing on documentary and TV – I think we need to see it like this:

Storytelling, no problem. The technical development offers a variety of newshooting and distribution formats, in fact it’s much richer than the existing slot-length tyranny. TV programming, where the film is available online, needs no length limitations. The web, mobiles, VOD etc. opens to all kinds of formats. Where it will take us is extremely difficult to predict and I think we will have to live with the financing-limbo for some years but at a longer perspective I think the development offers more opportunities than restrictions.

Feature length ‘creative documentary’, the format we know today, will have a smaller place in the television of tomorrow. So in terms of financing I think we need to think differently. Of course the national or regional funding will have to

be strengthened. Whether it’s realistic (I’m not thinking of the current financial crisis but beyond this) I’m not sure but it’s for sure necessary. But also other ‘non-media’ funding is important and I could imagine that the sales agent will play a bigger role here – the professionals who know the increasingly fragmented market. We see more and more players who are mediators in finding funding that relates to the subject or the format and I think that today’s sales agents need to go down this road as well.

And again I would like to raise the question of future cinema, which will be totally digital. The cinema is THE place for many creative documentaries but audience wise it’s always been for fiction. Of course the cost reduction from 35mm to bits is one thing but it will probably also open the cinema to sports events, concerts etc, and this could break down the fiction-tradition of this temple and pave the way for documentary.

Enough for now, it’s getting dark in Riga, Latvia where the Baltic Sea Forum in its 15th year one again holds a variety of wonderful projects that will be pitched in 2 days – and for quite a few of they face some financial difficulties! Yesterday I saw the strong film “Give up Tomorrow” (photo) by Michael Collins and Marty Syjuco – stresses the importance of the documentary genre go and see it!

Let’s keep up discussion …

Mikael Opstrup was a producer of international documentaries since the 90’s. He worked as production Adviser at The Danish Film Institute 1998-2002 and was from 2002 – 2008 co-owner of Final Cut Productions in Copenhagen. He is currently Head of Studies at EDN (European Documentary Network).

Doc Discussion/ 10

Louise Rosen, who started this Doc Discussion writes: Dear Mikael (Opstrup), Reading the posts is uncomfortable – the humiliation and frustration of the filmmakers, the sense from the CEs/funders of being overwhelmed and likewise frustrated. I feel both sets of experiences – as a consequence of representing filmmakers and being approached by filmmakers to represent them. Everyone’s trying to find their way in a profoundly changed and changing world. Right now it’s futile to speculate on the financial potential, or lack thereof, in digital distribution. In any event, there’s nothing to suggest thus far that the digital world will be a robust source of widespread production funding.

What can be done to improve matters – in the near and long term? We share a framework for considering the issues as the documentary form encompasses a broad range of formats and styles. Doc series, and single docs that fit into existing formatted series on TV are doing quite well these days. But for the sake of discussion here, let’s assume we are focused on single, longform films of an hour or feature length and filmmakers whose goal is to reach as wide an audience as possible.

So, what can filmmakers do? What can funders and CEs do? How can we collectively make a more effective case for the value of documentaries?

Demonstrating the power of docs

Are there data and metrics that can be compiled to make a more compelling case for feature docs – to networks, funders and investors? How can making an anthology strand/home for single docs on a network prove or improve their ratings potential? What can be learned about marketing, promotion and branding by all parties?  

Making docs more cost effective/designing new business structures

Are there ways of making production and post-production more cost efficient,

approaches that will help reduce the cost of items such as clearances and insurance? What are new models of sustainability for indie prodcos?

Training

What can filmmakers, network execs and funders learn to do better, particularly in relationship to one another? Leadership skills, communication, talent and project development are among the areas we all need to be better at.

Transparency

The power of shared knowledge – participants can help create “terms of trade” even without official adoption of guidelines.

I want to believe it’s never too late for labor organizing 101 for culture workers (1). But, are we “whistling past the graveyard”? There are now so many aspiring filmmakers, the documentary ecology has been transformed. I’m a Luddite (2) in many respects yet I know there’s little point (and no comfort) in mourning the passing of the old ways. Let’s keep talking about the future.

(1) Means basic lessons (101 is the first year curriculum in any subject) in union-type political organizing. “Culture workers” is a term I first heard from Rudy Buttignol. That’s what we all are, right?

(2) A social movement of textile artisans in England in the early 19th century who tried to destroy the mechanical looms tthey saw were taking away their jobs. Has also come to mean someone who clings to old ways.

Photo: A film from the catalogue of Louise Rosen.

Louise Rosen is a media executive with over 25 years experience in all areas of the international television and film business. She runs an agency specializing in the financing and distribution of documentaries with particular focus on pre-sales and co-productions, and she has been invited to tutor and lecture all over the world.

Doc Discussion/ 9

Charlie Phillips writes: Tue has kindly given us an opportunity to respond to some critical comments about Sheffield Doc/Fest in the last few months on his blog.

We think this blog is brilliant, especially with the recent discussions over the direction of documentary, so we’re certainly not using this opportunity to complain about anyone’s right to express their opinions here. We love documentary for its democracy and its diversity of views – if anyone doesn’t feel we’re serving their needs as doc professionals, then that’s their welcome right. We’re just using our right to reply.

First, we want to respond to Tue’s comments on 7th June that we were looking a bit provincial at the 2011 festival. There were 21 different countries represented in the film programme, of which the UK and US were just two, and the diversity of delegates attending numbers about 50 different countries.

We think we’re truly international, but regardless, festivals aren’t a numbers game. It’s about showing the best work, and though the process of reducing 2000 submissions to under 200 screened films probably does miss some treats and involves hard decisions, the greater evil would be a tokenistic geographical spread. Public funding for festivals especially involves a need for diversity and spread that doesn’t implicitly reflect quality. We’d be criticised for implementing a quota system – isn’t that the greater evil than a system that puts quality first ? Albeit of course subject to the idiosyncrasies of human programmers.

The other blog we’d like to respond to is Doug Aubrey’s of last week. Many of his criticisms of commissioning and the current risk-averse culture of some

doc funders are accurate and are opinions we sympathise with. But surely it’s not fair to blame us for that? Especially when events like MeetMarket and our year-round training and mentoring opportunities are attempts to support and showcase as many people and projects as possible that need personal attention and matchmade meetings rather than a remote closed one-size-fits-all attitude.

We think that what we do is the polar opposite of the ‘pole-dancing’ pitch scenario in that it’s focused around private meetings and consensual encounters. We try and give you what you want in a way that funders or resource-holders have a chance to understand and respond to consensually. If they show interest, it’s real interest, it’s not constructed by us for show. If they’re not interested, that’s a wider problem of taste that yes, perhaps all of us together need to discuss and combat. But we’re not the enemy in that scenario.

It’s worth stating for the record that all of us at Doc/Fest have a massive passion for documentary and documentary filmmakers, and that you  – the documentary-makers are our top priority. We’re not brand managers, we’re not profit makers, we’re running a festival we love for the benefit of all in the industry making brilliant work, or with the potential to make something beautiful. It’s that naïve and that uncynical.

We’re not perfect, but we are led by you – if you help us to be what you want us to be, then we can build something constructive together.

Charlie Phillips is Marketplace Director at Sheffield Doc/Fest

Baltic Sea Forum and Screenings 2011

Documentary filmmakers from the Baltic countries, Russia, Poland, Norway and Sweden gather this week in Riga, Latvia. For the 15th time the Forum, that started on the Danish island of Bornholm, organises a meeting between those who have ideas for documentaries and those, who come from tv channels and film funds to look for new documentaries for their audiences. This so-called industry meeting, organised by National Film Centre of Latvia with the support of the EUMEDIA programme, has a very important public addition, a film programme of very high quality, entitled ”Daring Minds”:

A couple of the films have been reviewed on filmkommentaren.dk – ”Steam of Life” from Finland and ”Regretters” from Sweden. Others that have been seen by this blogger are the shocking investigative ”Give us Tomorrow” by Michael Colling and Marty Syjuco, a Shakespearean drama about an innocent man trialed and condemned for murder in a totally corrupt Philippene society – and Estonian Marianna Kaat’s human story ”Pit no.8” from an Ukrainian mining environment, where children work illegally. Also to watch is the Irish ”The Pipe”, a classic David-Goliath story (director Risteard O Domhnaill) about Irish farmers and fisherman, who rise up in protest when Shell tries to build a pipeline for natural gas through their county. Russian Alina Rudnitskaya proves again her big talent with “I will forget this Day”, a cinematically beautiful short film about young women waiting to have an abortion performed. Equally talented is local Kaspars Goba, whose “homo@lv” premiered at the Berlinale this year. This is a clip of the presentation text of the film:

“In the summer of 2005 two guys came up with the idea to organize an unprecedented event – a festive lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people’s parade through the streets of Riga, the capital of Latvia. Little did they know that their good intent would spiral into a chain of inconceivable events lasting several years: the great emotion stirred up would dramatically divide Latvian society; the persons involved would be showered, in turn, with human excrement and holy water, families would be torn apart, jobs lost, and a pastor expelled from the church for free thinking.”

Two more films will be shown – and reported on by filmkommentaren.dk: Cyril Tuschi’s “Khodorkovsky” (photo) and Banksy’s “Exit through the Gift Shop”.

http://www.mediadesklatvia.eu/baltic-sea-forum-for-documentaries-2011/

Sergey Kachin: On the Way Home

A film about an ordinary couple, Aleksay and Valya, it could be a story from everywhere… she sits at home in the house far away from big cities, she knits and sews and waits for the husband to call and come home, next to her is her beloved protector, a dog. He is a long distance truck driver, always, literally, on the road, at home once in a while, tough working conditions, phone calls between them, you sense a good ambience, the filmmaker takes his time in accordance with the life that is presented, nothing really happens apart from the dog getting more and more ill, it dies, is buried, big grief from the side of the woman.

… and sometimes the children and grandchildren pay a visit, it is warmly described, an ordinary family, for once not a film about a Russian famliy with vodka drinking all the time, no this is a non-sensational film about a family divided because of the man’s job. At the end of the film the information is given that Aleksey is seriuosly ill.

The film has a tone, it is well composed, one could maybe have wished for more context as it comes in a fine way towards the end through truck drivers communicating their opinion about Russian politics and social conditions, at the same time as you are with Aleksey in his truck in a long and hopeless queue on the road.

Russia, 56 mins., 2011

http://onthewayhome.eu/

Anne Wivel: Svend

This is a review in Danish language of a new documentary made by Anne Wivel, acclaimed veteran in Danish documentary. For years she followed her husband, politician Svend Auken in his work in- and outside Denmark. Auken, a strongly committed humanist, suffered from a cancer illness but was active until his death in August 2009. The film, that premieres this month, is brilliant.  

Udgangspunktet er jo klart fra start. Dette er en film om en mand, som er død. En dansk politikers sidste år, ”filmet og erindret af Anne Wivel”, som skrevet står på lærredet i filmens begyndelse. Anne Wivel som levede med Svend Auken i syv år, fra 2002 til hans død i august 2009. En hustru som filmer sin mand, som er syg af kræft, det kunne gå hen og blive flæbende, det er det ikke, slet slet ikke, det er tværtimod en bevægende og smuk erindring som instruktøren giver sit publikum, og på mange måder også en almenmenneskelig henvendelse, som efterlader én smilende glad over at have mødt et fint, kærligt menneske. Og forpustet for det var dog helt utroligt, hvad Svend Auken nåede af møder, taler og tv-medvirken. Og trist, naturligvis, over at det gik den vej, som det gik. Som han siger, jeg ville jo gerne leve lidt længere.

Svend Aukens engagement i klimapolitik, hans internationale betydning som medlem af diverse bestyrelser, hans retoriske begavelse og talent for at tale til store forsamlinger og gribe dem om hjertet, hvad enten han talte på dansk eller engelsk – er stærkt dokumenteret af Anne Wivel, som fulgte ham på mange rejser verden rundt. Men det er ikke derfor, at denne film om en mand, som var politiker, hæver sig højt over de mange andre politiker-film vi er blevet præsenteret for i de sidste år (Fogh, Khader, Lykketoft f.eks.). Grunden er den enkle, at her bringes vi i selskab med en politiker i sit hjem, i sit sommerhus, i en sommerlejlighed i det sydlige Frankrig, på et hotelværelse med himmelseng i Brønderslev! Med Anne Wivel bag kameraet, i årtier en af dansk dokumentarfilms stærkeste profiler som instruktør og producent.

Og det er jo derfor, at filmen hæver sig. Det er en film, det her, der er foretaget nogle valg ud fra et stort materiale, der er i klipningen fundet en rytme, hvor pauserne i det politiske ”udeliv” spiller en rolle, ind imellem de mange møder, hvor de mange små vidunderligt sigende og smukke dagligdagsøjeblikke træder frem og skaber tonen. Når Svend kommer hjem, står Anne for enden af trappen og filmer ham igen og igen. Man sidder faktisk undervejs og venter på at den scene skal gentage sig. Når Svend småsnakkende til kvinden bag kameraet spejler æg i det lille køkken og varmer mælk i mikroovnen. Det gør han mange gange i filmen. Når han starter en sætning, men ikke kan afslutte den, fordi han læser avis og ikke kan ”multi-taske”. Når han sidder i en stol med sit boardingkort i jakken, strandet i Ålborg lufthavn, maskinen går ikke pga. maskinfejl, så falder man med ham helt ned, stresser af og tager på hotel i Brønderslev. Eller når han bliver hamrende irriteret, fordi taxaen ikke kommer og han skal være i et tv-studie om et øjeblik, tingene skal klappe. Genkendelig hverdagsbeskrivelse.

Anne Wivel er bag kameraet, hun stiller spørgsmål til Svend, svarer når han spørger og beder om reaktioner til sine taler, hun er der hele tiden, men trænger sig ikke på, viser ikke hvor forfærdeligt, det må have været at filme sin mand blive mere og mere syg – for så i én sekvens, Villefranche i Sydfrankrig i januar 2009, at lade kameraets bevægelser skrive et digt om et dejligt rum med udsigt til vand, et rum med smukke ting, musik og stearinlys. Det emmer af kærlighed.      

Danmark, 110 mins., Instruktør & fotograf: Anne Wivel, Klippere: Camilla Skousen og Peter Winther, Komponist: Povl Kristian. Med støtte fra DFI og DR.

Filmen får premiere i 68 DoxBio biografer den 11. september og den 14. September, derefter vises filmen dagligt i 10-15 af biograferne. Hvor og hvornår se

www.doxbio.dk

DOC Discussion/ 8

Comments on the Doc Discussion have been posted on facebook as well. They take different directions. Producers Marie Olesen, Scotland and Sinisa Juricic, Croatia characterise the pitching  as “a fool’s game” and “a showcase of big ego’s from the other side of the table… not a useful tool for film financing”, wheras several acknowledge the contribution of Philippe van Meerbeeck. Mark Daems, producer from Belgium writes: “I’d like to click the ‘like’-button, but in fact I don’t like that Philippe is so close to the truth”.

The debate can, and should, go on but in this round the idea is now to ask Louise Rosen and Mikael Opstrup to make some closing remarks that could very well deal with: What can be done, what’s next? Their texts will be brought asap, before that you may want to read what others have to say:

Simon Kilmurry, very active commissioning editor for POV in the US writes: Hi Tue, This is a fascinating discussion, and Louise (Rosen) and Mikael (Opstrup) make some interesting and troubling observations. Another part of the problem, I think, is the sheer volume of work being produced. We are seeing twice as many films as we did 10 years ago. But resources and slots have not increased commensurately. While we have a few more slots at POV, overall broadcast space has diminished. Thanks for sharing this.

Kilmurry kindly refers to two articles about “The Fate of Documentary”, the first one, with that title, to be found in New York, August 16, written by Leslie Stonebraker – to be responded by guest blogger at POV, Heather McIntosh. I quote the end words of her article, but read both articles in full length, through sites below:

“… Documentary is an amazingly flexible, versatile and innovative form, and its makers and believers have been remarkably creative in applying it and bringing it to audiences. The mainstream presence is new, and it will become part of the documentary history as we move through the changes over time. The mainstream presence certainly expands the documentary conversation, but it is such a small part of the rich form with an even deeper and more nuanced history. Not to mention, an even deeper and more nuanced present.”

Photo: Armadillo, Janus Metz, recently broadcast on POV.

http://www.nypress.com/article-22735-the-fate-of-documentary-film.html

http://www.pbs.org/pov/blog/2011/08/the_fate_of_documentary.php