Latvian National Film Awards

…were distributed the other day in Riga. I mention the documentary awards – many of them have been reviewed/noticed on this site. They are still strong in documentaries in the country of Herz Frank, Uldis Brauns, Ivars Seleckis, Juris Podnieks…!

Here they are, added with some” comments from Zane Balcus, critic (in the upcoming IDFA in the Fipresci jury) and manager of Baltic Sea Docs:

Best full-length documentary – ”Putin’s Witnesses” by Vitaly Manski

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4390/

Best documentary director – Kaspars Goba for “Inga Can Hear” (Inga dzird)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4609/

Best documentary cinematographer – Valdis Eglītis for “The Sixth Day” (Sestā diena) – Valdis is very experienced cinematographer, but for quite some time now is more engaged with teaching. ”The Sixth Day” is a very nice film – an observational documentary about one small farmers’ market, which is held on Saturdays, it has a very good atmosphere and interesting characters. 

Laila Pakalniņa for “Spoon” received a special jury mention on her strong creative vision, the film also received the best sound design award.

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4569/

From the documentaries jury a special mention also went to the film “2018”, it is like an homage to Brauns’ “235 000 000”. The film is pieced together from 15 short films made by different directors, and combined now into a unified film by Dainis Kļava (produced by VFS). The jury statement read that this is for the continuation of the poetical tradition of Latvian documentary cinema.

Gints Grūbe and Jaak Kilmi for “My Father the Spy” received the best editing prize.

Zelig Film School Film Festival

10 films were screened Friday and Saturday, November 8 and 9, at the Capitol cinema in Bolzano. The graduation films of the students, who had been studying at the Zelig School for Documentaries, Television and New Media. For three years, 2016-2019 with three lines: Direction, Camera and Editing.

The atmosphere was festive. Fellow students, friends, family and in some cases protagonists were there to celebrate – and there were Q&A sessions after each film. And diplomas and a rose were distributed to the now former students.

Contrary to (some) other film schools the films coming out of the Zelig are not made according to a pre-given format or theme; there is freedom for the students to find their own theme and style, of course under the supervision of filmmakers from the professional world, they are now to enter.

Themes – a quote from the Zelig invitation to the fest:

„From the snowy Scandinavian landscapes of the North of Europe to the heart of our Mother Earth in Central Africa; from the remote islands off the coast of Scotland to the Azores in the Atlantic, and – closer to us – in the Italian province and in the rest of Europe as well…“

Yes, the students have travelled and put all their energy into making creative documentaries. The overall quality is impressive and several of the films have already been to festivals, and even won awards. Like the one on the photo, „Theodor“, did at Festival dei Popoli.

Information about the 10 films can be found on, watch out for them, festival programmers:

https://film.zeligfilm.it/en/

Zelig: What is a Documentary

I was invited to give a pep talk to the new Zelig students by showing documentaries, talk about them and have them talk. They did, I enjoyed the four days a lot bombarding them with names of directors and film titles that they must be inspired by. AND this morning we made the small game: Which three words come to your mind, when I say DOCUMENTARY. Here is the result and a photo of the lucky students, who are to study at Zelig in Bolzano for the next three years:

Freedom Willing Choice Poetic Detail Glimmer Accidential Case Patience Strings Impact Storytelling Memorable Curiosity Connection Testimony Creative Chance Vessel Sensibility Instinct Relationship Perspective Feel Aesthetic Subjective Respectful Visual Empathy Recognition Heritage Job Mediation Responsibility Game Trade Cheating Time Place POV Unpretentious Free Personal Quest Passion Opinion Teamwork Observing Informing Meaning Intense Identity Summerbreeze Evidence Pursuit Intuition Honest Pure Humanity Thoughtprovoking Contact Problems Forgotten Improvisation Discovery Growth Research Portrait Listening Memory Cinema Art Microcosmos Serendipity Nuance Undermine Exposure Life Love Lagrein

Frelle Petersen: Onkel

Sydjysk landskab med stående kvinde og siddende mand

7. 11. 2019: Med ét i filmens lange dybt tilfredsstillende forløb af forunderlige scener, diskrete flytninger og tankesamlende vignetter står der uventet Onkel på lærredet! Og så kommer slutteksterne, de vigtigste først i skilte og derefter alle de andre rullende. Jeg bliver siddende i stolen. Forbløffet. Er det allerede forbi? Er hun gået? Denne vidunderlige fortælling, denne dejlige kvinde.

I instruktørens forrige film og fortælling Hundeliv (2016) havde både de to piger og den sårede soldat i filmen og jeg i biografen fæstnet os særligt ved kassedamen i supermarkedet. Hun var bare så sød, og både i sin rolle og i virkeligheden, så ægte livligt venligt snakkende med kunderne hun jo kendte. Her var det gode menneske.

Nu er hun så landmand, sød og ægte. Men nu fåmælt som onklen. Hun er forældreløs forstår jeg, han er alene og hendes nærmeste. Hun har  gennem skoletiden boet hos ham på hans gård med køer og græsmarker og kornmarker, og nu som ung kvinde passer hun hans hus og driver hans landbrug sammen med ham. Begge er de tavse i dagenes arbejde og i aftenernes sagte tv-lyd fra det lille apparat oppe på skabet og aviser i stak på stolen: han. Og bøjet i den tykke krydsordsbog: hun. Han let studs, hun let indadvendt begge i en ægte jysk tavshed. Tryg og smuk. Og skildret af Frelle Petersen med kompetent indsigt…

Onkel har premiere i biograferne torsdag, 14. november. Øst for Paradis lister dem alle op:

https://www.paradisbio.dk/ShowCrmNews.aspx?urlId=488 

 

… et drama af dage og nætter, af årstidernes gang (Flaherty / Grierson)

10.11.2019: Filmen vil ikke slippe mig, jeg noterer at den tegner døgnets tid, årets tid, kredsløbets tid med dagsrytmevignetter med solnedgange som i Hundeliv. Det er helt tydeligt. Mindre tydeligt tegnet, men ikke mindre vigtig, er den lineære tid, fortællelinjen, som manuskriptet håndfast, men personinstruktionen diskret, næsten umærkeligt tegner, udviklingen hos de medvirkende, især hos den unge kvinde som lader sig kalde Kris, som klipningen selvfølgeligt sikkert fuldfører i en dramatisk kurve af overvejelser og afprøvninger   filmen igennem tilbage til den ufravigelige oprindelige situation. Og Frelle Petersen lader med hende kredsløbets tid vinde over den lineære tid, alt kommer igen, intet forsvinder, det bliver ikke væk, det er stadigvvæk et vækkeur på natbordet i Kris’ værelse som sætter dagene i gang, Kris ejer endnu ikke en mobiltelefon. Til side med dynen, blå arbejdsbukser og hvid bh på, hun ruller gardinet op ser ud i den tidlige morgen. Så arbejdsdagens storternede skjorte.

 Efter lang tid kommer musikken og streger ind og streger under. Det er høst og det er sensommer. Og som i alle rutiner er jeg bundet i årets stadig gentagne tid. Og i årenes, Kris har blidt overtaget onklens plads i førerhuset, hun ser hans kræfter svigte, glad kører hun videre, det er høstarbejdets tid.

Blikket over det storladne landskab i lavt aftenlys afslutter dagene, Kris’ blik forstår jeg…

LINKS

https://www.dfi.dk/en/english/news/local-drama-uncle-meets-tokyo-audience (Synopsis and director’s comment in English)

https://www.dfi.dk/viden-om-film/filmdatabasen/person/frelle-petersen (Instruktørbiografi)

https://fjernleje.filmstriben.dk/film/9000004216/hundeliv (Frelle Petersen: Hundeliv, 2016, streaming)

http://www.radio-danmark.dk/podcasts/filmland (Flot anmeldelse. Fra 48:10 ud)

DOK Leipzig Makes a Summing Up

… which by all means is positive. 48.000 spectators, many full houses as I heard and saw for myself, good atmosphere. In the newsletter the press department asks ”How have the media experienced DOK Leipzig?” and below they highlight the presence of Cineuropa, fine enough. As the press department apparently does not know that www.filmkommentaren.dk was present, I list what has been written from my side:

Reviews of

Space Dogs – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4651/

The Royal Train – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4650/

Exemplary Behaviour – http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4648/

Reports about

Quay Brothers –

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4653/

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4632/

The festival program/and the retrospective http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4643/

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4636/

And here comes what the press department writes:

Vladan Petkovic was here this year, not only as a panellist, but also as the author of a number of reviews of our films for our media partner Cineuropa. Read more about THE FORUMNEVER WHISTLE ALONEand IT TAKES A FAMILY. Additionally, Cineuropa ran an interview with our festival director, Leena Pasanen.

Describing the film EXEMPLARY BEHAVIOUR, which received the Golden Dove in the International Competition Long Documentary, Petkovic wrote for Cineuropa: “It is a work of extraordinary poetics and aesthetics, and has numerous ambiguous layers that are impossible to penetrate with sheer common sense, requiring the viewer to let go and give in to the more oneiric side.”

Modern Times Review also saw and reviewed a lot of our films, including FAMILY RELATIONS and DEEP WATERS, and conducted an interview with the guest of our Homage, Tan Pin Pin.

Screen Daily picked up on the award-winning film EXEMPLARY BEHAVIOUR, and the International Documentary Association’s (IDA) Documentary Magazine ran an article about our programme DOK im Knast just in time for the festival.

https://www.dok-leipzig.de/

Quay Brothers at DOK Leipzig

It started at 7pm and ended at 10.30pm with half an hour break. 90 minutes talk with Stephen and Timothy Quay followed by the screening of their live action film (105 minutes) ”Institute Benjamenta”. (PHOTO)

It was an entertaining night with the two famous world artists – only 50 people came! You can do better than that Dok Leipzig! Was it because you

had placed the event, for me the scoop of the festival, at Schaubühne which is not in the centre, where the other screenings took place? Was it because you asked us accredited guests for 12€ as an entrance fee that many hesitated? Or is it simply because a younger audience in general does not know their magnificent pieces of art? Or had not read the great article written by the Brothers for the festival catalogue? Or did not appreciate the trailers, 3 of them, made specifically for the festival. Another grumpy remark: the sound is terrible at Schaubühne.

Anyway for those who missed it and would like to catch up, go to Youtube and find a lot of films made by the Brothers. And a 8 minutes long documentary look into their studio made by Christopher Nolan.

So there they were telling the story of how they entered the world of puppet animation as their contribution to visual art at the highest level. They had gone to the art college, they had made illustrations and book covers, they were in London and in Philadelphia, where they were dish washing hoping that someone would notice their talent. A man from Channel4 did and gave them a budget – it was the time when C4 took risks commissioning without having any guarantee that the final result would be good. Also documentaries by the way.

Why puppets, asked the fine moderator André Eckart… Answer: we had seen the Salzburg Marionette Theatre that came to Philadelphia in the late 70’es and 80’es.

So once we were funded, we went on making mini-biographies on the composers Janacek and Stravinsky, the latter for us being the one between Maijakovsky and Jean Cocteau.

We always start with music, music is our secret scenario, talking about this – the funders always ask us to deliver a scenario, why should we, the Brothers said, they did not ask Pina Bausch for a scenario! But we deliver a text and once we start building the puppets, we throw away the eventual script.

Later on they worked for BBC, who told them that “we choose the composers and you make the films with that as a starting point”. We loved that. Music is the most powerful for us.

We shot on 16mm in the beginning, then we went (with the better funding we got) for 35mm for 15 years before we went digital. And now we are back to 35mm thanks to support from Nolan.

Back then we did not know what a decent budget was… and answering the question about why they always move the camera, Timothy answered “if we move the camera, nobody will notice the poor animation…”.

Timothy was the one, who performed humour, often with irony, when answering questions, whereas Stephen gave the more reflective and factual considerations. And yet… they are this strange couple, identical twins, who for months, that’s what you feel, lock themselves into the studio, with helpers of course, for one purpose: Creation!

The creative process – we are longing for the unexpected, it is for us a process of discovery, it’s very organic; as identical twins you lose your Ego, you have to know how to take the spontaneity into something real. Every day is an improvisation, we have the privilege of being our own masters.

We do a lot of homework, research and we collect material until we have the first décor, the first puppet. One day Stephen is behind the camera and Timothy with the puppet, vice versa.

Stephen said that he did not like the word ”improvise“, he would prefer “explore” which is understandable when you think about the preparation research and the inspiration and interpretation of the literary works they take into the creative process.

Like the film of the night, ”Institute Benjamenta”, that is based on a novel and some other literary sources of the writer Robert Walser. With this film it was completely different for the Brothers: We had to work with 44 people and we had to explain to the actors, what we were aiming for. New for us, as puppets don’t talk back as you know!

The film was shown, ”Institute Benjamenta”, enigmatic, mysterious, magic, black comedy(?), existential drama and for a film freak like me, I was thinking of silent films from the 1920’es, of vampire films, of Carl Th. Dreyer, with his equally virtuose use of light and shadow, consequently of Lars von Trier’s early films, of surrealist works like “Le Chien Andalou” by Buñuel and Dali, the inner and not the outer… and in literature I was thinking of Perec and his “things”.

The film has a subtitle: This Dream People Call Human Life.

To quote an article on this site written more than 10 years ago :

”Influenced by a tradition of Eastern European animation, the Quays display a passion for detail, a breathtaking command of color and texture, and an uncanny use of focus and camera movement that make their films unique and instantly recognizable…”

www.dokleipzig-de.de

DOK Leipzig – History

With History two meanings, both of them personal related to film and film people. The first one came to me just after arriving to the Festival Centre Thursday late afternoon. I was waiting at the bar to be served and so was a man next to me. ”I think we have met before”, I said to him, ”mehrmals” he said, ”on Bornholm”, I asked, ”yes, I was there” said Jochen Wisotzki, with the film ”Komm in den Garten” that I made with Heinz Brinkmann… It must have been in 1991 that it was shown at the Balticum Film & TV Festival, and I still remember the film about three friends, ”artists in life”, outsiders in GDR. The film received the Silverne Taube in 1990. Later it came to my mind that Wisotzki was the one who invited Andreas Steinmann and me to a film gathering in Rügen. Or was it Eduard Schreiber?

I did not meet Wisotzki again during the few days in Leipzig. But I had a good talk with Heribert Schneiders, former MDR commissioner and always good in panels at pitch sessions. He was not – of course – happy with the political situation in the three Länder, where the Afd (Alternative für Deutschland) is having 25% support from the voters. ”Are they fascists”, I asked him, ”Yes, the party leaders say things that you can’t believe is true…”. His ”old” party, SPD, is doing bad, so now he goes for ”die Grüne” as many others, I guess.

Good friend, who by the way was at the above mentioned festival on Bornholm in the 90’es, when he was making films, Claas Danielsen, had the same opinion as Schneiders, yes the Afd includes people with fascist points of view.

Opposite the hotel where we were staying is the mural of optimism with slogans like ”Freiheit”, ”Wir sind das Volk”. No optimism these days… nach der Wende.

http://member.agdok.de/de_DE/members_detail/8314/vita

Elsa Kremser & Levin Peter: Space Dogs

„Das ist Laika. Am 3. November 1957 wurde die sowjetische Straßenhündin in einem Sputnik in die Erdumlaufbahn geschossen und war damit das erste Lebewesen im Weltall. Überlebt hat sie diese Mission nicht. Doch es gibt die Legende, dass sie als Geist auf die Erde zurückgekehrt ist und seitdem durch die Straßen Moskaus streift.“

Yes, that is what the two filmmakers do: follow stray dogs, Laika is maybe one of them, in Moscow, their drifting around, their barking, their showing teeth and aggression towards each other, their acting with brutality but also with care and love… Lebewesen in a metropole behaving like us human beings?

The film is constructed masterly in sound and image and editing; I read that the filmmakers are born in 1985. They demonstrate an amazing maturity, mixing the following of the stray dogs with Soviet science archive material of the preparation of dogs for space trips as well as (touching) footage of the dogs (those who survive) coming back. Colour and black&white images in a film, which is not really fun to look at: what we do with the animals in the name of science, and what they do to each other, the dogs in the constant „survival of the fittest“ game. But as a tense film essay, remarkable! Indeed also because of the narration, a fine factual(!) fairytale-like text in Russian, matching images and sound perfectly.

Watch out for that Dogumentary!

Photo of Laika.

https://www.raumzeitfilm.com/film/en-spacedogs

Austria, Germany, 2019, 91 mins.

Johannes Holzhausen: The Royal Train

The daughter of King Michael 1 of Romania (who died in 2017), Princess Margareta, and her husband Radu, travel in the train of her father to meet the people and have them remember him and the good old monarchy that came to an end in 1947, when the communists took over. The train stops at small stations, where the local authorities are nervously preparing the royal welcome. Red carpet and all that. And the royal staff prepares equally how to arrive, a scenario is needed.

That’s the red thread of a film, that with humour and warmth takes the viewer to the venues of the couple in Bucharest introducing the staff that helps them to keep the memories of the monarchy and the King alive. The most important person in that respect is for me the young man, Adrian, who searches for documents and artefacts of interest for the Princess. He is a passionate monarchist searching/ hoping for the return to old times – you are a Don Quichote, an old lady says to him, if you need a Sancho Panza, I am there for you – he is the one, who visits the old ladies, who remember the King and the royalty with big love.

In scenes like that the director manages – with his flair for creative storytelling – to balance all the wonderful absurd scenes of royal protocol, like how to approach the Princess in a correct way. Three steps backwards, when you have got your diploma and then you can turn around… like if it had been the Danish queen. It’s still very much alive and popular. What is most interesting in this film is, when the old royalists remember the time, where they were not allowed to celebrate the monarchy during the time of Ceaușescu.

Austria, Germany, 2019, 90 mins.

Max Kestner og Roos Prisen

Max Kestner modtog den 31. oktober på dokumentarfilmdagen, branchetræffet i Filmhuset årets Roos Pris. Roos Prisen påskønner en særlig bemærkelsesværdig indsats for dokumentarfilmen i Danmark, og priskomiteen bestod af sidste års prismodtagere, Mira Jargil og Christian Sønderby Jepsen af Claus Ladegaard og Ane Mandrup fra Filminstituttet.og priskomitéen motiverer så smukt valget af Max Kestner på den her måde:
” ’Kunst er, at man gennem et værk lader andre se på verden med kunstnerens blik’. Sådan har årets prismodtager defineret sin metier som filminstruktør. Og hvilket blik på verden, vi beriges af med Max Kestners øjne! Et altid åbent, nysgerrigt, generøst blik med glimt i øjet og en stor overbærenhed over for menneskets fejlbarlighed og dårskab.
Uanset om Kestners hovedpersoner er fabriksarbejdere, raketbyggere, polarforskere, fiktive fremtidsmennesker, børn eller kunstnere som han selv, kredser filmene om grundlæggende filosofiske spørgsmål: Hvordan skal du leve dit liv? Hvad er meningen med det hele? Er alting tilfældigt? Er alting forudbestemt? Hvad er sandhed?
Max Kestner iscenesætter sine film med omhu og sætter en ære i, at også dokumentarfilm er instruerede. Historier er ikke noget, der ligger ude i virkeligheden og venter på at blive hentet ind og fortalt. En god film er et resultat af bevidste valg. Det er et ansvar, man må påtage sig, mener han…”

Vi her på FILMKOMMENTAREN vil gerne deltage i påskønnelsen af Max Kestners til nu samlede filmværk. Vi har skrevet om nogle få af hans film og når jeg kigger efter i mine anmeldelser ser jeg dem faktisk i tråd med priskommiteens samlede oplevelse. Men vi er filmkritikere, og min kollega ser anderledes på det et enkelt sted.

Jeg selv har imidlertid altid været interesseret optaget af Max Kestners insisteren på sin filmiske stils renhed for eksempel i værker som Identitetstyveriet, 2012 (hvor begynder og slutter romanen, hvor begynder og slutter selve dokumentaren?), i Drømme i København, 2009 (lutter ømhed i Henrik Bohn Ipsens kamerarbejde og Anne Østeruds klip), i Rejsen på ophavet, 2004, (flimrende præcist distanceret kærlig ironi i en forbilledlig fortællestemme) og i Nede på jorden, 2004 (en filmhistorisk vigtig, en ærlig filmisk udforskning af den folkelige humors liv herude i virkeligheden). Her følger så citater fra og links til vores alt for få anmeldelser:

SLETTE OMSTÆNDIGHEDER (2018)

Ved siden af detektivromanens story line, som er Kestners observerende kamera i hælene på historikeren, er der en løbende essayistisk fremstilling, som ligger i Kestners venligt distancerede, så smukt docerende fortællerstemme, som huskes fra tidligere film. Og tab nu ikke tråden fra begyndelsen og hør godt efter, for essayet indledes i titelsekvensen til et stort betagende natlandskab under stjernehimlen, hvor Kestners fortællerstemme indleder et foredrag om fraktaler og om gengivelse af virkeligheden fra landskabet over korttegning og landskabstegning til notatet og påpeger, at i alle disse optegnelser er der mulighed for falskneri, fejl og fejltolkning og efter denne roligt alvorlige besindighed og tæt på at spoile (men fortumlet af Nanna Frank Møllers underfundige klip opdager jeg det ikke) vælter Kestner og hans bårne kamera og hans film ind hos detektiv-historikeren Steffen Holberg, som så i den grad tager over som fortæller…

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4206/

AMATEURS IN SPACE (2016)

Hele filmen igennem venter jeg på dette. At løfteraketten stiger præcist lodret ud af Jordens tyngde og ind i et ydre rum som regnestykkerne med kridt på laboratoriets sorte tavle har beregnet den skulle, så logistikken i raketten kan vide, at nu skal kapslen, det lille rumskib skydes af for at klare sig selv og senere lande forsigtigt båret af en faldskærm på havets overflade…

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3731/

DRØMME I KØBENHAVN (2009)

Filmkommentarens to skrivere var til forpremiere sammen. De så Max Kestners nye film, der får biografpremiere straks i det nye år. De var ret uenige om filmens kvalitet. Se nedenfor:

1) Henrik Ipsen hedder fotografen og det er ham, der skal have ros for sin indsats i en film, som ellers set ud fra sin ambitiøse præmis er mislykket. Ipsen har blik for København og har komponeret billeder, som er frapperende flotte, hvadenten de har de nye glashuse ved vandet som motiv eller er fra baggårdene eller skildrer gader med vidunderlige facader, der vidner om byens mangfoldige skønhed. Max Kestner har på dette område fået, hvad han som instruktør har bedt om. Det går så galt, når han selv skal træde i karakter som instruktør…

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/980/

2) Filmen fastholder – og lever næsten – af et kulturtræk, som om lidt er forsvundet. I nogle årtier har gardiner og persienner været borte fra vinduerne om aftenen. Vinduesåbningerne har været oplyste scener for hjemmelivets dramatik og udstillinger af boligernes scenografi. Det er nu ved at være forbi, man ruller ned og trækker for. Byen hyller sig ind igen i utilnærmelighed. Men i sidste øjeblik har Henrik Bohn Ipsen lagt sin skarphed på facaderne og vinduernes oplyste åbninger, hvori Max Kestner har iagttaget og iscenesat billeder af indbyggernes liv. En ung kvinde læser, et par skændes, en kvinde stiger nøgen og våd ud af badekarret, griber ud efter sin mand og indleder forførelsen…

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/979/