David Sington: The Fear of 13

Filmen har den danske titel Manden der ville henrettes, den var med på CPH:DOX, det er godt, at DR2 Dokumania tager den op igen. Det sker i morgen aften tirsdag 7. juni 20:45. Det er en god disposition, fordi David Sington er en vigtig instruktør, han har lavet mere end 30 dokumentarer for BBC, og det er en god disposition, fordi det er en vigtig film, en konsekvent egensindig konstruktion, som fik et stort publikum på den københavnske festival til at give den prisen, men som fik The Guardian’s meget erfarne Peter Bradshaw til at afvise dens radikale fortællegreb:

“… Director David Sington effectively turns the film over to Yarris (hovedpersonen), who is allowed to narrate the documentary on-camera and control its pace, tone and content. For me, he feels like a ham actor auditioning for the role of himself in a movie version: he delivers what sounds like an overwritten, over-rehearsed monologue in a breathy-mellifluous voice. His story is important, yet the style is mannered. I wondered if it might have been better as an interview, with Sington interrupting him, questioning him, getting more perspective on his (important) story.”

Independent’s Geoffrey Macnab blev lige modsat begejstret over grebet: “…What is fascinating about Sington’s invigorating documentary is that the inmate Nick Yarris recounts his story in his own words. He is formidably articulate, an autodidact who knows how to emphasise all the urgency, suspense, drama and macabre humour in the events that led him to be condemned to die. His account is complemented by reconstructions similar to those found in Errol Morris’ The Thin Blue Line. This is virtuoso film-making only partially let down by its artifice.”

Jeg må bestemt se det filmværk i morgen aften, se modet til at konstruere uden om enhver konvention om filmfortælling. Se filmen som er gestand for en diskussion på højt niveau af en kunstnerisk problemstilling.

SYNOPSIS

After more than 20 years on death row, a convicted murderer petitions the court asking to be executed. But as he tells his story, it gradually becomes clear that nothing is quite what it seems. This film is a stylistically daring experiment in storytelling, in effect a one-man play constructed from a four-day interview. In a monologue that is part confessional and part performance, Nick, the sole protagonist, tells a tale with all the twists and turns of classic crime drama. But as the story unfolds it reveals itself as something much deeper, an emotionally powerful meditation on the redemptive power of love and literature. A final shocking twist casts everything in a new light. (BBC Storyville)

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/12/the-fear-of-13-review-nick-yarris-death-row-inmate

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/the-fear-of-13-film-review-suspense-drama-and-macabre-humour-from-death-row-inmate-nick-yarris-a6732641.html

Krakow Film Festival: Quality and Diversity

The Krakow Film Festival is over for me. I have – with this one – delivered the agreed texts for the festival newspaper and I have watched the films in the Documentary Competition to give marks together with other critics. I have enjoyed the festival and yet… I was not there in persona! I had to stay home with my wife, who had a knee injury. We had both been looking forward to be in Krakow again after more than 10 years. A film festival is a place to celebrate Film, meet all the people involved, talk about films, have fun, I did not have that pleasure, alas. I was not for the masterclass of Marcel Lozinski, I did not take part in the 20 year celebration of Kieslowski, I did not meet brothers and sisters from Sweden, who make great documentaries for the moment. I would have loved to shake hands with and hug… No, I stop now!

But thanks to the professionalism and generosity of press spokeswoman Anna E. Dziedzic, with whom I have been in daily contact, and who have directed me to photos, texts, etc. on FB, Youtube, instagram and the website, I have felt the festival and am able to make this concluding text, a kind of conclusion, my impression of the competitive programme and the selection for that category, that included 19 films.

Like most documentary festivals it is obvious that the selection committee has been searching to cover themes of today: The war in Ukraine (“Alisa in Warland”, stupid title but fine film by a film student), “The Burden of Proof”, one more film about the big immigration issue in current Europe, “Employment Office”, I could repeat the sentence from before, unhappy people who are looking for a job and meet bureaucracy, “Life on the Border”, children in refugee camps depicting their situation in often very moving short clips, they are victims of ISIS, a film about Boris Nemtsov…

“I am looking forward to real life”, says the bearded, old man in the fine Canadian film “Manor” (PHOTO). “Here we don’t live, we just exist”, he says, as the psychiatric hospital, where he has stayed is closing down. I was very impressed by this well made, warm documentary as I was to see Wojciech Kasperski’s stunning “Icon” from a psychiatric hospital in Siberia. I remember his “Seeds” from 10 years ago, he is able to bring a philosophical element into his observation of human beings, who are outside our so-called normality.

The documentary competition programme is definitely characterized by seriousness. I could have wished for a bit more stylistical playfulness like there is in Piotr Stasik’s excellent New York film, in “Homo Sacer”, in the amazing Brazilian “Curumim” and in “The Nine” that has a social focus and a surprising way of telling a story about outsiders.

On the other hand, I don´t want to forget Swedish Sara Broos and her “Reflections” that is both very personal, joyful and painful at the same time, and on a constant search for a style, a way of telling a story, to make an aesthetic choice. Which are what so many Polish documentarians do and which is what a festival like the Krakow Film Festival wants us to appreciate. We do!

Krakow Film Festival Awards

Last night the award ceremony was held at the 56th Krakow Film Festival. Projects in development, participating in the impressive Industry section, were honored and supported, and there were decisions made by juries in the many festival sections. I saw the films in the International Documentary Competition so I will limit myself to comment on that – a full list of prize winners can be found on the website of the festival.

The jury for the Documentary Competition chose to give the Golden Horn to the director of the best film, Zosya Rodkevich for the film “My Friend Boris Nemtsov”, a popular and – allow me to say that – political correct decision. The Silver Horn for best medium length went to Massimo Coppola for the charming “Romeo and Juliet” and the one for the best feature-length documentary film to Canadian Pier-Luc Latulippe and Martin Fournier for the film “Manor”. 

I was part of a 6 person critic’s panel that gave marks to the 19 films in this competition – published in the festival newspaper. I had “Manor” as one of the 4 I gave top points, whereas the two films that were number 1 and 2 on the critics list, both original and innovative in their cinematic language, Polish Piotr Stasik’s “21 x New York” and Brazilian “Curumim” by Marcos Prado were surprisingly not on the list of the jury. Stasik’s film with top points from all 6 critics! A great film, if he is disappointed, it is understandable.

The fourth one of my favourtites, Wojciech Kasperski’s “Icon” received the Fipresci prize, and was awarded as the best film in the National Polish Documentary Competition, plus it was recognized for its editing, for raising social awareness and for its cinematography.

The Award for the best cinematography funded by the HBO Polska went to Lithuanian Kristina Sereikaitė for the film “Dead Ears”, directed by Linas Mikuta.

And another partly Lithuanian film “I’m Not from Here” by Chilean Maite Alberti and Lithuanian Giedre Zickyte got the Prix EFA Krakow 2016 as best short film and qualifies therefore to the European Film Award.

One small consolation for the best film – according to me – Best producer in the National Polish Competition was Agnieszka Wasiak, Lava Film for her work on “21 x New York”.

www.krakowfilmfestival.pl

 

Sunday in Cph: Forough Farrokhzad’s film/poetry

About three years ago I spent a magical moment at Cinemateket in Copenhagen. Gyldendal had just published the first Danish anthology of the works of the Iranian poet Forough Farrokhzad and the writer and translator Shadi Angelina Bazeghis, together with poet Mette Moestrup with whom she edited the book, was there to recite and talk about Farrokhzad’s poetry and programmer Rasmus Brendstrup showed us her film The House is Black.

Forough only made one film, it is a twenty minute long documentary about a leper home, a work that was commissioned by an Iranian charity organisation. The film blows you away.

The cinema was bursting with energy, spellbound and drunk on poetry we all ran out at the end of the event to by the book on sale at the ticket stand. I don’t think poetry has ever been handed over the counter at a speed like that – everybody had to own that book right now!

Fourough Farrokhzad was tragically killed in a car accident in Teheran in 1967.

Here are the words that Chris Marker wrote after she died:

Black, abrupt, ardent. These vague words make of her a portrait so precise that you will recognize her amongst thousands. February 13, at 4:30 PM, Forough Farrokhzad died in a car accident in Tehran. She was one of the greatest contemporary Persian poets, and she was also a filmmaker. She had directed The House Is Black, a short feature on the lepers, Grand Prix at Oberhausen, and beyond that practically unknown in Europe, and which is a masterpiece. She was thirty-three years old. She was equally made of magic and energy, she was the Queen of Sheba described by Stendhal. It was particularly the courage. She sought no alibis for herself, no pledges, she knew the horror of the world as well as the despair professionals, she felt the need to fight as well as the justice professionals, but she had not betrayed her deep chant.

For her first film, she went straight to the most unwatchable: leprosy, lepers. And if was needed the gaze of a woman, if is always needed the look of a woman to establish the right distance with suffering and hideousness, without complacency and self-pity, her gaze still transformed her subject, and by by-passing the abominable trap of the symbol, succeed in binding, besides the truth, this leprosy to all the leprosies of the world. So that The House Is Black is also the Land Without Bread of Iran, and the day that French distributors will admit that one can be Persian, we shall notice that Forough Farrokhzad had given more in one movie than lots of people with easier name to remember. She wrote:

“The soil tightly grips my cold body. Without you, far from the emotions of your heart, my heart decomposes under the soil. Rainwater, the gusts, later, quietly, will wash my body under the ground. My grave will be the one of the unknown freed from praises, delivered from the misunderstandings.”

Forgive me for the praises, Forough. Freed from misunderstandings, it is to be seen. But to remaining unknown, I do not believe that you will arrive there.

(Chris Marker, Cinéma 67, n°117, June 1967, the translation is borrowed from the blog:

http://notesoncinematograph.blogspot.dk/2016/05/chris-marker-on-forough-farrokhzad.html )

Sunday June 5 Shadi Angelina Bazeghis is back at Cinemateket, this time in company of the musician Mehrdad Zamani. See if you can still get tickets, you won’t regret it!

Forough Farrokhzad: The House is Black (Iran 1962, 21 min.)

Screened at the event Lut & Ord, Cinemateket Sunday June 5 at 18h. It is part of a larger program on Iranian film 1960-90 running through the month of June.

http://www.dfi.dk/Filmhuset/Cinemateket/Billetter-og-program/Film.aspx?filmID=v1024585

Litt.:

Kun stemmen bliver tilbage: Poesi og biografi, Forugh Farrokhzad, red. Shadi Angelina Bazeghi & Mette Moestrup, Gyldendal (2013)

DocsBarcelona Awards and Numbers

Apart from the already mentioned, see below, main award for Martin Solá’s “The Chechen Family”, the director Marcela Zamora received The Amnesty International Catalunya Award and the Jury’s Special Mention for her touching “The Room of Bones”. It is a film that has this story according to the site of the festival:

“A bold look at the social violence in El Salvador. The mothers who have lost their kids to youth gang wars look for their bodies in the Legal Medicine Institute, where corpses with no names or identifiable relatives pile up daily. During the last decade murdered people have amounted to tens of thousands. Forensic anthropologists in El Salvador face the titanic job of recovering human remains hidden in clandestine graves throughout the country. The majority are young, victims of various types of violence: attacks between youth gangs, people who vanish during their attempt to emigrate to the USA, and inside the deepest graves are victims of the bloody civil war which took place between 1980 and 1992.”

Photo: Marcela Zamora (left) with award and friend Maria Cille, one of many great DocsBarcelona staff members.

Also awarded, again one should say, was Polish Karolina Bielawska for her “Call me Marianna” in the New Talent Category

and Jorge Caballero for “Patient” in the Latitud category. Also this Latin American film deserves to be introduced to a European audience:

“Patient is the word that defines us when we need to follow medical prescriptions or we have to stay calm while we wait. In Colombia, a patient is not only someone who suffers an illness and hopes to overcome it, but also those who take care of that person and fight daily against an absurd bureaucratic system to make sure their loved ones receive what they need. Nubia is patient, and despite living anguished by the loss of her daughter to an aggressive cancer, she manages to navigate with admirable firmness the rambling processes of the Colombian health system.”

DocsBarcelona has screened 46 documentaries and most of the directors and protagonists have been in Barcelona to present their films. The nineteenth edition has increased its viewers by a 30%, overcoming for the first time the barrier of 10,000 spectators (the total assistance will be closed in a few days with DocsBarcelona online final numbers). In addition, the professional activities have gathered 980 professionals and more than 1,300 people have visited the exhibition “Seguir con vida”. (Doctors Without Borders, ed.)

www.docsbarcelona.com

Magnus og Fredrik Gertten: Den unge Zlatan /3

Becoming Zlatan / Den unge Zlatan har DOXBIO premiere I MORGEN onsdag den 1. juni 2016 i 50 biografer i hele landet. Se link nedenfor. Tue Steen Müller anmeldte jo filmen her på Filmkommentaren med sin ganske særlige indsigtsfulde entusiasme og nu vil han gerne, at jeg sætter dette statement af Morten Olsen på, en tekst, som Line Bilenberg har med i sit fint varierede pressemateriale:

MORTEN OLSEN om ZLATAN IBRAHIMOVIC

Det, der for alvor kendetegner Zlatan er, at han bliver ved. Uanset hvor meget han har vundet, så bliver han ved med at ville vinde. Noget af det, der gør ham speciel er, at han dels er en fysisk stor spiller. Jeg kan huske ham, da han spillede nede på Brøndbys grusbane, som var allerførste gang jeg så ham, der tænkte jeg over det her med, hvor fysisk stor en spiller han er. Zlatan er 1,95 m høj og samtidig har han en fremragende teknik. Og så scorer han altid mål, ligegyldig hvor han er, så er han garant for at score mål. Det er effektivt og i virkeligheden det, der i mange tilfælde gør hele forskellen. I moderne fodbold er der ikke så stor forskel på de hold, der ligger i toppen, så man har brug for spillere, som kan gå ind og afgøre en kamp. Det kan Zlatan.

Zlatan scorer ikke bare mål, han laver også mange assists. Han er udstyret med en stor fodboldintelligens, som ofte kommer til udtryk, når han sætter sine medspillere i scene. Han er unik i klubfodbold, men også i landsholdssammenhænge. Uden ham var Danmark kommet til EM. Han gør forskellen for begge hold både på klubniveau og på det svenske landshold.

Hvis man kigger på hans baggrund, så er der ingen tvivl om, at han har måttet kæmpe for tingene. Han har troet på sig selv hele vejen. Men han har måttet kæmpe for det, lige fra da han kom til Holland og ja, også i Malmø.

Det ærgrer mig personligt, at han ikke fik større succes i Barcelona. Jeg kan huske en kamp vi spiller oppe i Sverige, hvor vi vandt 0-1 og de svenske spillere er på vej ind i bussen. Jeg vidste godt, at der var gang i noget med både Real Madrid og Barcelona. Zlatan vender sig om og spørger mig om min mening i forhold til de to klubber. Jeg svarede ham, ”Du mangler kun én ting – du skal have succes i Barcelona.” Det fik han aldrig. Men ellers har han haft succes alle steder. Han er en god fyr også udenfor banen. Han er tro imod det, han kommer fra, men altså ja, der er ingen tvivl om som filmen Den Unge Zlatan også siger, at hollænderne havde det svært med ham, da han først kom til Ajax. Der gik jo ikke mere end to dage, før han havde købt en Ferrari. Hollænderne har det sådan, at køber du en Ferrari, så skal du også score mål.

På den måde tror jeg godt at folk stødte sig på ham. Han har en fantastisk tro på sig selv og det er jo det vi gerne vil have; den sunde arrogance, men alligevel så vil du altid støde nogen, når du har den her her-kommer-jeg attitude, men det er også dem, der kan gøre hele forskellen. Når man får spillere i en trup, som har det samme som Zlatan, så bliver de accepteret af holdet og af trænerstaben, hvis de laver mål det er der mange tvivl om. Så må de andre arbejde rundt om den person. Det er straks værre, hvis ikke de har noget at have det i, de spillere jeg kalder pseudostjerner, men i Zlatans tilfælde er det bare med at tage ham som han er.

Hvis jeg skal sammenligne ham med nogen i Skandinavien er det oplagt at sige Michael Laudrup, selvom de er meget forskellige, eller Peter Scmeichel. Det er gode spillere, det er gode spillere, der kan gøre en forskel.

http://www.doxbio.dk/movie-archive/becoming-zlatan/ 

http://www.doxbio.dk/kob-billet/ 

Brian Hill: The Confessions of Thomas Quick

I morgen aften 20:45 skal jeg se dokumentarisk kriminalfilm på DR2 DOKUMANIA. Jeg ved ikke noget om den autentiske sag, ikke noget om instruktøren. Så jeg læser omtaler og anmeldelser fra filmens fremkomst og glæder mig:

TRUE CRIME-THRILLER

The Confessions of Thomas Quick er en skandinavisk noir og en true crime-thriller, der udspiller sig i et net af mord og løgne. Men den er ikke en af den slags, hvor man ånder lettet op til sidst. Historien om den tragiske outsider Thomas Quick/Sture Bergvall er nemlig også en historie om, hvor let det er at lade sig rive med af folkestemninger og gruppepres – også internt i politiet og psykiatrien. Alle har deres egne motiver, men hvornår kan vi være sikre på, at det vi tror vi ved faktisk er rigtigt? (CPH:DOX)

RATHER SENTIONALIST FASHION

… British director Brian Hill (Climate of Change) relates the events of Bergwall’s life in rather sensationalist fashion, cutting between one-on-one interviews – including an extended talk with the “killer” himself – and stagy recreations that bring to mind TV shows like Unsolved Mysteries and America’s Most Wanted. It’s not always the most subtle way to explain such a complex case, though the various interviewees help enlighten us on how a “perfect patient” like Quick/Bergwall made all his psychiatrists’ dreams come true, especially during reenactment therapy sessions where he fabricated gruesome childhood memories in order to justify his serial killer instincts. (The Hollywood Reporter / Jordan Mintzer)

RÅSTAM & KÜTTIM

… It was at this point that the story took an extraordinary turn. In 2008, journalist Hannes Råstam decided to re-examine the 50,000 pages of therapy notes, court documents and police interrogations relating to Bergwall’s convictions. In tandem with Jenny Küttim, then his assistant, Råstam came to the conclusion that there was no evidence for any of them aside from Bergwall’s own confessions, many of which had been made when he was taking high doses of the mind-altering tranquilliser benzodiazepine.

Råstam visited Bergwall at Säter, the psychiatric prison where he had been incarcerated since 1991 for an armed robbery, and confronted him. To his surprise, Bergwall broke down, admitting all his confessions were false.

Råstam published a bestselling book about the case in 2012 and within a year, to the huge embarrassment of the Swedish police, psychiatric establishment and judiciary, Bergwall was cleared of all the murders. The following year he was released after 23 years’ confinement. (The Telegraph / Julia Llewellyn Smith)

HELSTØBT HÅNDVÆRK

… Filmens skurke er disse kvinder med deres sektlignende dyrkelse af psykoanalysen, som meget problematisk bliver blandet sammen med politiefterforskningen, men man kan godt anklage filmen for at lade Sture Bergwall slippe for billigt.

I filmen bliver han i nutidig kontekst portrætteret som en hyggeonkel. Men ikke nok med, at onklen har begået voldelige og seksuelle overgreb mod unge drenge, han har også holdt ofrenes pårørende for nar. Og selv om han indrømmer dårlig samvittighed, kunne Brian Hill som erfaren dokumentarist godt være gået ham mere på klingen.

Men The Confessions of Thomas Quick er en fængslende antikrimi. Anti, fordi den ikke handler om at opklare mord, men dekonstruere de domme, som allerede er fældet. Og det bliver gjort med et helstøbt håndværk. (Ekko / Anders Højberg Kamp)

Brian Hill: The Confessions of Thomas Quick, UK, Sverige, 2015. 94 min.

STILL: Hannes Råstam og Jenny Küttim, journalisterne, som måske opklarede bekendelsernes bedrag.

http://cphdox.dk/program/film/?id=3148

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/confessions-thomas-quick-rome-review-835975

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/the-confessions-of-thomas-quick/sture-bergwall-serial-killer/

http://www.ekkofilm.dk/anmeldelser/confessions-thomas-quick/

DocsBarcelona: Chechen Family

On the last day of DocsBarcelona – in the afternoon – I attended the screening of ”Chechen Family” (”La Familia Chechena”) by Argentinian director Martin Solá, who brought to me not only a strong film but also the best Q&A discussion after the film, led by my colleague programmer Daniel Jariod, who provoked by me translated the words of the director into English – at a festival that still hesitates when it comes to use the English language at opening and closing ceremonies and at Question and Answer sessions.

Anyway, Solá told the audience how he worked with camera and sound to get into the sufist spiritual sessions, which are the core of this both beautiful and at the same time frightening tough interpretation of a phenomenon in an oppressing country. Solá sees the religion as a resistance to the official Chechnya that he visually catches in a long travelling scene from Grozny, the shining city or could one say the shined-up city. The film lives up to a sentence so often used on this site, a quote from Richard Leacock, it conveys ”the feeling of being there”.

No surprise that Solá got the first prize later that night at the closing ceremony of the festival. The English version of the jury motivation is not available yet – here comes the local:  

“una manera poètica de fer sentir l’interior d’una comunitat i de mostrar la identitat d’un poble en un context de violència històrica, a través d’un fort compromís amb la forma.”

and why not bring the English one used at the Visions du Réel in Nyon, where ”Chechen Family” won as well:

The Chechen Family is an intense, unique, uncompromising film. This award is for the radical cinematographic gesture of making a film with and not about a community: a trance-like movie that disrupts the conventional flux of time and that offers both an individual and collective, ethic and aesthetic experience.”

I will get back with a mention of the other awards. Photo: the team behind the film and the main character. Taken from FB page og Solá.

www.docsbarcelona.com

DocsBarcelona Vermut & Shadow Girl

Wonderful. The smell of books that meet you, when you enter the Altaïr Bookshop on Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes. You go downstairs to smell and have the best coffee in Barcelona together with film directors, whose films are in the programme of DocsBarcelona 2016. They are here for this noon intimate arrangement made by the charismatic owner of the place.

The filmmakers were Léa Rinaldi (”Esto es lo que hay” from Cuba), Marcela Zamora (”El cuarto de los huesos” from El Salvador), Pieter van Eecker (”Samuel in the Clouds” from Bolivia) and German Kral (”The Last Tango” from Argentina). I attended the introduction by the directors with clips from their films and enjoy to know that – apart from the tough documentary from El Salvador – they all have and have had theatrical release with quite a success. German Kral told me that 44.000 tickets had been sold in Germany for his film. Wow!

And then to the cinema to sit next to Maria Teresa Larrain in a cinema, where her ”Shadow Girl” had its second screening at the festival, where she pitched the film a couple of years ago. The film is strong and emotional in its description of how Maria Teresa grows blind, a film that is without sentimentality but full of reflections on what it means to become blind. She meets blind street vendors, she shows the film to them and it is said that the worst thing about getting blind is to lose your dignity. Maria Teresa does not, she is a role model of great courage in a film that has a clever personal text from her and a visual flow of colours. It must have a long festival life and come on broadcasters, this is also for you, or for us television viewers!

www.docsbarcelona.com 

DocsBarcelona: When Directors Intervene

Look at the photo. Gaudi. La Pedrera, built between 1906 and 1910, 92 Paseo de Gracia. A must-see for visitors to Barcelona. But also the yearly venue for master classes at DocsBarcelona like yesterday, where (from left to right with badge in hand) after the session Brian Hill (City of Dreams – a Musical), Sean McAllister (A Syrian Love Story), me as moderator, Rokhsareh Ghaem Maghami (Sonita), with Greek director Apostolos Karakasis as participant, were talking about intervention in documentaries with their films as examples:

Rokhsareh Ghaem Maghami changed the life of Sonita by helping her to make the music video that became a hit on the internet, went with her from Iran to Afghanistan to settle visa and passport so she could go to the US, where she is now. McAllister was arrested in Syria, his material was confiscated, the couple in the film, Amer and Raghda, had to flee the country for that reason, with their children as they were on the director’s tape. McAllister followed the couple when they ended up in exile in France and participated actively in the problems they had in their marriage. Brian Hill went to the Bombay school and made the kids and their teachers sing their social stories in the genre that he has created, the musical documentary.

From Gaudi’s architectural pearl after a good 90 minutes session to Aribau Club cinema where 120 people watched ”A Syrian Love Story” with a very, very pleasant surprise: Amer and Raghda, the son of Amer, and the 9 year old Bob, the child of Amer and Raghda came on stage to receive a more than a warm applause and to answer questions from the audience.

They will be there again tonight at the screening at Aribau Club 1 at 18.15.

Photo by Maria Cilleros

www.docsbarcelona.com