Three Russian Documentaries at IDFA

… which all deserve to be mentioned and noticed by other festivals.

“How Big is the Galaxy” (Photo) by Ksenia Elyan (Russia, Estonia, 72 mins.), with Max Tuula and Maria Gavrilova as producers as well as late Alexander Rastorguev for Black and White Cinema, is a gem, with two charming kids Zakhar, 7 years old and the older brother Prokopy. They live far up in North of Siberia with their parents, as – taken from the IDFA website – “belonging to the Dolgan community, one of the last indigenous peoples pursuing their traditional nomadic life in the extreme north of Siberia.” It’s an observational documentary, you follow everyday life with a special focus on the kids, who go to school next door, allowed to have homeschooling. Out of the warmth in the wagon-like house, where the family lives, out in the freezing cold to the next door house that serves as a school with a school teacher and books etc. Zakhar has an eye for the director/cameraman asking her “you take photos”, “is that a job”. Lovely.

“The Potato Eaters” by Dina Barinova (Russia, 51 mins.) from Marina Razbezhkina Studio, a tough social documentation of a village life in awful poor conditions, also featuring two children, who live and play as kids do, jumping in water puddles. They live with their grandparents Svetlana and Victor, the latter deeply alcoholised, Svetlana being the one, who has to take care of everything – without any money. It’s as bad as it could be. Depressing and shocking to watch if not for the kids and Sergei, who is the son of Svetlana and Victor, and the one who moves a bit around and plays vinyl records.

“Dorotchka” by Olga Delane (Russia, 20 mins), who made the fine “Siberian Love”, where she met the 80 year old woman and decided to dedicate a film to her. The IDFA website text is excellent so I quote: “The beautiful, static images of Dorotchka in and around her wooden house, against the backdrop of a relentless landscape in which there’s constant hard work to be done, are reminiscent of 19th-century paintings of romanticized agricultural life. Wringing her hands at the kitchen table, Dorotchka speaks in short sentences peppered with expletives, making it clear that even women like her have their hearts broken. Stylized shots of rural life are combined with comical black-and-white footage of Russian country weddings, folk dancing and singing: a promise of opportunities in a bygone era.” “Siberian Love” is reviewed here: http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3930/

www.idfa.nl

Andrei Kutsila: Summa

I was very happy to know that the new film by Belorussian director Andreu Kutsila received – in the midlength category – the main award at IDFA for “Summa”, a Belorussian/Polish coproduction with Miroslaw Dembinski as the Polish partner.

In 2015 Kutsila won the main national award with “Guests” at the Listapad festival in Minsk (http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3370/)

3 years before he was the Belorussian director, who took part in “15 Young by Young”, the documentary short film series initiated and produced by Latvian producer Ilona Bicevska. Some words from the brief review of “Guests” I wrote 3 years ago: “He has found the right, slow rhythm, he lets the scenes develop, he gets close but does never lose a respectful distance…”. Which are words that fit perfectly on “Summa”.

Andrzej Strumillo is an elderly Polish painter, around 90 years old,  Maryia is a young artist from Belarus. She leaves Belarus to come to visit lonely Strumillo, who is happy to have her around. He lives in a spacious house, he breeds horses, the house is close to a lake where he goes, they sit and talk at the table, eat, mostly it is the old man who talks, and she listens if she is not interrupted by calls from her boyfriend/husband, who seems to be jealous – she wants and decides to stay longer, you can understand that – the director who is also the cinematographer understands you see clearly – Kutsila caresses the characters, he has taken his time to compose images of the beauty of the quiet place, he creates a meditative atmosphere. Graceful it is. “It’s sad life is so short”, Strumillo says, at the same time as he remembers the life he had with his wife, who died in 2011, their travels, their being together.

His paintings are shown, they are dark, impressive, religious maybe, at least mysterious; and yet the film is not a portrait of an artist and his work, it is a meeting between youth and wisdom, beautifully interpreted by a director with a vision.

Poland/Belarus, 2018, 51 mins.

Ada Bligaard Søby: The best is yet to come /2

The best is yet to come er Ada Bligaard Søbys første bog forstår jeg, men den hænger sammen med hendes filmværk og er for mig at se en selvfølgelig konsekvens af først og fremmest American Losers, 2006 men også af Meet me in Berlin, 2007, Black Heart, 2008 og Petey & Ginger, 2009. Den nye bog, en fotobog og et bogobjekt er en essens af opdagelserne, erfaringerne og fremstillingen af antropologien i disse tidligere filmværker. Den er en inddampning, præcisering og i sig selv en film i romanens form som for eksempel Chris Markers filmroman La Jetée som både er en bog og en film, men altså i to adskilte objekter. Ada Bligaards ny værk er foreløbigt samlet i ét objekt, et bogobjekt, fysisk tungtvejende, æstetisk fjerlet stigende. Det melder sig ind i den trykte litteratur, ved siden af sin generation, både Josefine Klougarts og Lea Marie Løppenthins bøger melder sig i min tanke med familieligheder i baggrund, erhvervede erfaringer og æstetisk praksis og så med det store gennemgående tema om kvinden og manden: mødet, udforskningen, erkendelsen og bruddet. Og med tilsvarende sidetemaer: forældre, barndom, rejser…

Ada Bligaards bog kom jo med posten forleden dag. Tusind tak, jeg blev så glad. Jeg skrev med det samme om den, men det blev blot til en præsentation af indpakningen. Nu kigger jeg forsigtigt i den, langsomt, opslag for opslag. Bevæget og tøvende ved den særlige finhed og en ligesom henkastet beslutsomhed som er sikker viljestyrke og kloge valg, mærker jeg. Tydeligste følelse i mig er en bevægelse ved dens billedsiders, ved dens valgs og ved omhuens ømhed, måske som Dawn Shadforth’s gråd i Shoreditch House. Ombundet af spændet mellem satyr og nonne, mellem vellyst og afkald, mellem snavs og renhed, mellem mørke og lys. Jeg snyder mig ind og læser Louis’ replik: ”When Ada told me about this project I know it meant putting very cute photos of her with very fucked-up pictures of me in various states of degradation, dehydration and madness…” Ja, bogen er konstrueret til at vende blade i. Ganske forsigtigt som med de nænsomme fingre her i forlagets video:

https://www.kehrerverlag.com/en/ada-bligaard-soby-the-best-is-yet-to-come

Og sådan, så godt jeg kan, går jeg i gang og begejstres opslag for opslag…

Læsningen forlanger som konsekvens af mig at jeg med det samme imaginært åbner min egen æske med fotografier. Ser på dem ét for ét omhyggeligt og længe, lægger dem i opslag i tofløjede overvejelser af de udløste associationsfragmenter og erindringsglimt. Binder dem i stift bind i en dikotomi og konkluderer at dette var stort og noget bedre vil komme til mig. Leve hver dag som den sidste? Nej, skrev kirkefaderen fra oldtiden, leve hver dag som den første…

Men jeg er jo kun kommet til dette tankevækkende hardcover og straks er jeg ude i en tangent af min egen historie i en banal ”ja, det kender jeg godt”, selvhenførende. Jeg trækker vejret dybt og ryster udflugten af mig. Jeg åbner Ada Bligaard Søbys bog: ”… og ser hendes blik for enhver detaljes fortællende, fastholdende, erindrende kræfter når den er fundet, udpeget, valgt og monteret.” Sætningen sidder mumlende i mit hoved hele dagen…

Jeg vælger i en sammenfatning ordet ”ømhed” – jeg ser på disse forrevne shorts, revet fri af deres cowboybukseben, jeg ser på håret, hvordan det er og sidder og tænker intenst på hvor den medvirkende også er i billederne. Kan jeg identificere hovedpersonen, som måske også er nonne på bagsiden af bogen? Kan jeg forstå en storyline, udvikling fra tilstand til tilstand? Er det jeg forstår der i dette fotografi ikke især Ada Bligaards ømhed for sin kvindelige hovedperson? Det vælger jeg…

At se tilbage på konkrete levn fra sin historie kræver mod, tilgivelse og ømhed. Se sig som udsat i en verden som siden konstant har ændret sig, i forståelse, ømt. Som Louis gør i fortsættelsen af sin replik ovenfor: ”… Now that the war against the Universe is over I can look at these pictures with compassionate amusement, something which I could not do before.”

REVIEW

Jeg har til nu ikke kunnet skrive en egentlig analyse, heller ikke en ordentlig indholdsbeskrivelse. Vel fordi jeg mangler forusætningerne. Det gør til gengæld Elin Amundsen Grinaker, BlazerFanzine ikke. Har du læst hertil skal du i hvert fald læse hendes vidunderlige anbefaling af Ada Bligaard Søbys bog:

https://blazerfanzine.no/2018/11/02/anbefaling-ada-bligaard-soby

Viktor Kossakovsky: Aquarela

Normally when I go to an art exhibition, I walk around alone, stop in front of the paintings, it’s silent, maybe I talk with the one who are with me, but I love this chance of stepping into a world that does not move. When watching Kossakovsky’s flow of aquarelas, WATERcolors in constant movement, there is no silence, on the contrary – it’s a bombardment of image and sound, an aesthetic composition, it’s expressionistic, surrealistic, abstract, figurative, a journey through art directions and genres. And a magnificent piece of Cinema. That also has a dramaturgy.

As the director put it before the screening at the Pathé Munt 3 cinema in

Amsterdam at IDFA, the only cinema in Amsterdam that can play atmos dolby sound: Be prepared for a cold shower in the beginning, it will be warmer later on in the film. I agree with the first, I am not sure about the second.

Any way the overall theme is there right up front: You see ice and you see people moving around. From a respectful distance there is a focus on a man kneeling. He is looking for something in the water under the ice. Kneeling. The reference to praying is obvious. The sound from the ice is like a thunder, it’s bumps and bangs, a bit scary.

They are moving around, the men in their orange work suits, we spectators don’t know why, but we are told after the introduction of a burning house (PHOTO) with a mind blowing beautiful surrealistic layered image with a burning house: it’s about pulling up a car from under the ice! Shocking to watch, not because of the car but because the men fall on the ass one after the other, we fear it at the same time as we hope for it – and because of the sound of the film – a shock effect is sought for. The power of nature. We humans don’t stand a chance! A man was in a car, he seems to have drowned. Drama; a friend is crying out “he has drowned”.

A cold shower, indeed. And thanks for some calm moments under water, abstractions, and then suddenly a cute small goldfish comes into the picture. Before that strong heavy metal music, “I look at the world and I notice it’s turning. While my guitar gently weeps…” I was thinking of George Harrison afterwards, and then again a shock with a clip from a boat surrounded by meter high waves. Gosh!

The first part of the film with the crazy moments of cars underwater to be taken up is shot in Kamtjatka Russia, a Russian friend told me, the boat is sailing in the Atlantic Ocean. In other words, the film is far from informational National Geographic, it moves from place to place, from continent to continent. From painting to painting.

I love the sequences, where you rest your eye and can enjoy aquarelas, where the paint is thinned by the water, where it’s surrealism giving associations to Yves Tanguy or expressionism in the direction of Kandinsky or more wild like Jackson Pollock. These sequences have no purpose, they are invitations to contemplate the colors that suddenly turn to a black canvas; it’s a film with constant surprises.

For a Dane it felt calming to come to Greenland, to hear but not see the howling dogs, to see a boat go out with men on their way for hunting, I know about this from lots of films by late Danish director Jørgen Roos – and then back to the boat and the heavy metal music and the amazing images of two sailors steering safely – after the screening there was a question to Kossakovsky on how filming was on the boat: “we were lying fixed on the deck and it took us hours to get the tripod from one side of the ship to the other”.

Underwater again, we see a horse walking, not the head, it is above water. You smile, shake your head, it’s amazing what this director and cameraman gives you, what an image. Dali is of course associated to in my head and up we go to see herons walking in a cemetery, it’s a place where there is flood, we leave the icebergs for a moment to see water, it’s calm but interrupted it is by scary hurricane images from Florida (?), to waterfalls and sides of mountains – and Faces full of emotions “hidden” behind the waterfalls, close-ups, the only ones in a film, that is to be concluded by a rainbow and cello music. There is death in this film but also life and hope. An essay about the human condition. Faces held for a long time on the screen like in a film by Sokurov, to whom Kossakovsky has dedicated the film.

Wow!

UK, Germany, Denmark, 2018, 90 mins.

IDFA at the Eye Filmmuseum Amsterdam

I went to the Eye that everyone has praised during its few years of existence. And it is really something. I crossed the water with the ferry next to the Central Station, 2 mins. it took to get to the other side together with a lot of people, bikes and scooters, and then another couple of minutes of walk to the Eye that I saw in daylight and later – in the evening – with a view to an illuminated Amsterdam. The big open hall has a restaurant that I visited between the two films I saw – I had half an hour, they managed to serve a fine soup and a glass of wine in no time – and an exhibition area. I got a free ticket to see an exhibition of Japanese Ryoji Ikeda, Datamatics it is called and is accompanied by electronic music. I had to leave quickly, no appeal to me, actually I was afraid of having an epileptic seizure…

Instead I rushed to the cinema to watch “Los Reyes” by Chilean Bettina Perut and Iván Osnovikoff. I had forgotten my badge but with the help of Argentinian director Andrés Di Tella and Bettina Perut, who I knew from visits to the two countries I got in to sit at the best place in the very fine cinema hall Eye 1.

And I saw one more film, “Hungary 2018”, by Eszter Hajdú with Sandor Mester as producer, and with superb Menno Boerema as one of the editors. Both films were followed by talks. More about films and talks below.

Bettina Perut & Iván Osnovikoff: Los Reyes

The film was screened and there was a half hour talk afterwards. These IDFA talks, I understood, are formatted to have no questions from the audience. I sensed a disappointment in the hall, probably many would have loved to get more from the sympathetic two directors. But they were surrounded outside for further talks in the corridor after the screening. It was my impression that the audience loved the film about “the kings”, why this title – here is a quote from the IDFA website: “Los Reyes is the oldest skatepark in the Chilean

capital of Santiago. But in its literal sense, “the kings” in the title of this film can equally refer to Chola and Football, the two stray dogs that have made their home in this open space full of hurtling skateboards and rowdy teenagers. The energetic female Chola loves to play with the balls she finds lying around. She positions them at the edge of the bowls, where the skaters show off their tricks, and tries to catch them just before they fall down. The older dog, Football, looks on impatiently and barks at Chola until she finally drops the ball…”

A simplification of course in a film that is rich in observations and small stories and that delivers sound bite dialogues between youngsters, who come here to escape problems at home, to smoke all kind of stuff, to talk about the life they lead, in other words. You never see the young people, you see the dogs listening to them, most of the time with something in the mouth, an empty bottle or a ball. It’s hard for Chola and Football to survive in the heat but they find their shady places and profits from the showering of the lawns at the park. And they are barking at horses and donkeys – get out of here, this is our place. Playing, sleeping or resting but attentive to sounds, and if one of them gets up to move to another place, the other follows.

OK, you might think, a film about two dogs, so what? Yes, a lot of the answer to the “what” is connected to the way the film is built and to the extraordinary camerawork by Pablo Valdés, who also worked with the couple on “Surire”, reviewed on http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3397/ and who has been filming with Maite Alberti (“I’m not from Here” and “The Grown-Ups”). His close-ups are second to none, on the insects that are taking rest in the dog’s fur, on the paws of the dogs, on the tennis balls; it looks like paintings, nature morte and it is followed by amazing images of the skatepark, when the sun goes down.

The hairy Football is the oldest one of the two and you see from the start that he is not at his best, when he is limping around in the park. And you understand that he is no longer there, when Chola is howling, alone with her grief.

At the fine talk after the screening Bettina Perut told – in tears – that she was there when Football died. And that she and Iván Osnovikoff have adopted Chola. Football was alive when the editing progressed. Actually finishing the editing helped them to get over the grieving. We went to the dogs three times per week for the 8 months the shooting took, they said, and informed the audience that the film project originally was to deal with the kids hanging out at the skatepark, where Iván went to skate. But we did not get the feel of the film until the dogs became the protagonists.

The film got the Special Jury Award at IDFA 2018 for “for the creative and beautiful way it displaces the viewer gaze by associating a sensible look at non-human wonderful characters and the soundtrack that connects daily lives of animal and human stray dogs”. No objections from a Danish dog lover.

www.idfa.nl

Eszter Hajdú: Hungary 2018

I got a mail from the producer of this film, Sandor Mester: “Hungary 2018 is not at the IDFA Forum because it is already in the Feature Length Competition this year and it was not there last year because it was not possible going to public pitching because it could risk, potentially stop this kind of production. We made this new film with a very hard and painful work, it is very complicated to do a project like this in Hungary and finally it was produced by our Portuguese company. Some of the members of our Hungarian crew did not want that their names appear in the credits because they are afraid of the revenge of the government. “Hungary 2018” is about right-wing populism, far-right extremism from the perspective of the last elections in Hungary in 2018 showing how Hungary is in 2018 and how the extreme-right propaganda works on the government level. We have to stand-up against far-right politics and right-wing populism because it generates fear and hate based on lies, semi lies, lies and manipulation.”

The film was screened at IDFA and the main character of the film, former prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsány, who fought against Orbán and the Fidesz party at the election for president in April 2018, was invited for the talk after the film. I knew Hajdu and Mester from their previous brave work, “Judgement in Hungary” reviewed here http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/2966/

and on my list of best documentaries in 2014.

“Hungary 2018” does not bring anything new, the political situation in the country is pretty well covered in the media I follow. And yet here we get on film a documentation of how disgusting the propaganda is from the Fidesz leaders and those, who campaign for Orbán. It is simply amazing, how xenophobia flourishes and how fear is playing a role, when speeches are held: Hungary will be overflooded with muslims, who will rape women in miniskirts – and Soros, the Jewish billionaire, is enemy number One, who supports Gyurcsány and his gang of traitors and is running the EU. Gyurcsány is followed in his campaign, you can only have sympathy for him, as far too few Hungarians had when the election results were clear. Huge victory for Orbán and his non-European attitude.

The film is partly financed by the EU, which is of course used against it: See, the EU is paying for propaganda against Hungary.

Are you going to screen it, I asked a festival director from a country close to Hungary. Of course he said, we are having the same political tendencies in our country… and in Denmark it looks like a new party will enter the parliament at the next election in 2019. It has the same policy as Fidesz.

www.idfa.nl

IDFA Winners 2018

IDFA Competition for Feature-Length Documentary 

Anand Patwardhan won the IDFA Award for Best Feature-Length Documentary (€ 15.000) with Reason (India). The film is a broad-ranging examination of Indian society, where secular rationalists are hunted down as they attempt to stem the rising tide of religious and nationalist fundamentalism. 

“The IDFA Award for Best Feature-Length Documentary is unanimously given to Reason by Anand Patwardhan for the epic storytelling of the rise of the far right in one of the most populated countries of this planet, the violence of religious and ultranationalist militias with the support of authorities and dominant medias, the dignity of resistance in multiple forms, often at life-cost, in a way that acknowledges the complexity of the situation but put it in a very understandable shape,” the jury reported. 

In addition, the jury presented the IDFA Special Jury Award for Feature-Length Documentary (€ 2.500) to Los Reyes (Chile, Germany) by Bettina Perut and Iván Osnovikoff. In this almost fairy-tale-like film, the phenomenal, dreamlike camerawork centers almost entirely on the subtle interaction between two dogs, as they play with a ball, a stick, a stone, and each other.

“The IDFA Special Jury Award for Feature-Length Documentary goes to Los Reyes by Bettina Perut and Iván Osnivikoff (Chile, Germany) for the creative

and beautiful way it displaces the viewer gaze by associating a sensible look at non-human wonderful characters and the soundtrack that connects daily lives of animal and human stray dogs,” the jury said. 

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Feature-Length Documentary this year were Daniela Elstner, Jean-Michel Frodon, Tala Hadid, Mahamat-Saleh Haroun, and Alina Marazzi. 

IDFA Competition for First Appearance

Sebastiano d’Ayala Valva won the IDFA Award for Best First Appearance (€ 10.000) for Giacinto Scelsi. The First Motion of the Immovable (France, Italy). 

Aboozar Amini won the IDFA Special Jury Award for First Appearance, in memory of Peter Wintonick (€ 2.500) for Kabul, City in the Wind (Netherlands, Afghanistan, Japan, Germany). (PHOTO).

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for First Appearance this year were Catherine Dussart, Ross McElwee, Avi Mograbi, Jean Perret, and Adina Pintilie. 

Made possible by the Friends of IDFA.

IDFA Competition for Mid-Length Documentary 

The IDFA Award for Best Mid-Length Documentary (€ 10.000) was awarded to Andrei Kutsila for Summa (Poland, Belarus). 

The IDFA Special Jury Award for Mid-Length Documentary (€ 2.500) went to In Touch(Poland, Iceland) by Pawel Ziemilski. 

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Mid-Length Documentary this year were Leah Giblin, Everardo Gonzalez, and Marc Isaacs.

IDFA DocLab Competition for Digital Storytelling

Ross Goodwin won the IDFA DocLab Award for Digital Storytelling (€ 5.000) for 1 the Road(United States). 

The jury members for the IDFA DocLab Competition for Digital Storytelling this year were Dries Depoorter, Joël Ronez, and Mandy Rose.

IDFA DocLab Competition for Immersive Non-Fiction

The IDFA DocLab Award for Immersive Non-Fiction (€ 5,000) went to Eat | Tech | Kitchen(Netherlands, United States) by Klasien van de Zandschulp and Emilie Baltz. 

The jury members for the IDFA DocLab Competition for Immersive Non-Fiction this year were Mads Damsbo, Ali Eslami, and Luna Maurer.

IDFA Competition for Dutch Documentary 

The Beeld en Geluid IDFA Award for Dutch Documentary (€ 7.500) went to ‘Now something is slowly changing’ by mint film office. 

Carin Goeijers received the IDFA Special Jury Award for Dutch Documentary (€ 2.500) forBut Now Is Perfect

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Dutch Documentary this year were Catherine Bizern, Eduardo Escorel, and Alisa Lebow. 

Made possible by the Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid.

IDFA Competition for Short Documentary 

I Signed the Petition (United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland) by Mahdi Fleifel won the IDFA Award for Best Short Documentary (€ 5.000). 

The IDFA Special Jury Award for Short Documentary (€ 2.500) went to And What Is the Summer Saying (India) by Payal Kapadia. 
The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Short Documentary this year were Catherine van Campen, Inadelso Cossa, and Haruka Hama.

IDFA Competition for Student Documentary

Beryl Magoko won the IDFA Award for Best Student Documentary (€ 5.000) for In Search…(Germany, Kenya). 

The IDFA Special Jury Award for Student Documentary (€ 2.500) was presented to Dana Gelman for Backwards (Israel). 

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Student Documentary this year were Klaudiusz Chrostowski, Serra Ciliv, and Pauline Terreehorst.

IDFA Competition for Kids & Docs

The IDFA Award for Best Children’s Documentary (€ 5.000) went to Dancing for You(Poland) by Katarzyna Lesisz. 

Martijn Blekendaal received the IDFA Special Jury Award for Children’s Documentary (€ 2.500) for The Man Who Looked Beyond the Horizon (the Netherlands). 

The jury members for the IDFA Competition for Kids & Docs this year were Ingvil Giske, Pawel Lozinski, and Shamira Raphaëla.

Ada Bligaard Søby: The best is yet to come

Så kom postbudet med Ada Bligaard Søbys bog, ”min første bog” havde hun skrevet. En fotobog, vidste jeg det var.

Der var tre citater trykt uden på cellofanindpakningen fra bogbinderen som havde gjort den fornemt udstyrede bog færdig som bog, som en håndfast ting, en genstand. Jeg læste med det samme for eksempel dette af Erik Kessels: ”… Raw, honest and intimate, I cant’t look away.” Mit oprindelige møde med Bligaard Søbys foto- og filmkunst dækkes fuldstændig ind af dette citat, af sådanne anmeldelser på Filmkommentaren. Jeg skrev jo om American Losers i 2006, ”this is a subtle text about two biographies in balance and about a storyteller and portrait photographer and her deliberations: this is not about winners. The montage presented before the title contains all the elements and the whole story in a way. The title gives away the conclusion. I can hardly wait. I must watch this film”.

Og jeg udsatte nu udpakningen og læste i det næste citat, af Brigid Dawson, den tidligere dobbelttambourinist og sanger for Thee Oh Sees: ”It’s something a John Lennon could never do.” Nu tænkte jeg selvfølgelig på Petey & Ginger fra 2009 og at jeg dengang skrev ”at en del af Ada Bligaards kunstneriske særpræg er alvoren bag det hele og den ganske originale og naturlige evne, hun har til nå dybde i den filmiske tænkning. Petey & Ginger bliver og er således først og fremmest et personligt essay om moderne fattigdom på grundlag af en antropologisk undersøgelse, en poetisk og filmisk etnografi, som kommer tydeligt igennem. Efter at have set filmen sidder jeg helt stille, for det her er egentligt tankevækkende. Det er ikke en bekymring, dog, det ligner, men det er noget mere, det er en stille fortvivlelse.” Et citat fra filminstruktøren Dawn Shad, der uden på bogens indpakning kort bekræfter den følelse, fortæller ”you just made me cry in Shoreditch house.”

Og indpakningen af fotobogen har endelig dette påtrykte citat af en anmelder, Norman Reedus, som kalder sig “zombie killer” på “The Walking Dead”: ”Everything Ada does is personel. Like hyper-personel. Scarily so. She only tells the truth, it seems. Or she’s a really, really good liar. I love her. ” Bevæget og tøvende vover jeg at tilføje ” Og det er altså sådan at ”jeg bliver sært grebet og konstant optaget og sidder og nikker og mumler: ja, ja… Og det er ikke kun fordi, jeg kender instruktøren, nej, det er den offentlige film, som i den grad optager mig på meget private områder”, som jeg som jeg  oplevede “Meet me in Berlin”, 2007.

Så meget om en række forbavsende og præcise bagflap citater uden på indpakningen af en bog, som jeg skal til at åbne, så meget om forventningerne til en forfatter, filminstruktør og fotograf, som havde været ude af mit synsfelt nogle år, hvis arbejder jeg nu måtte repetere og her er så samlet det jeg tidligere har skrevet om disse film:

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/2116/

Nu til den nye bog, nu pakker jeg ud og åbner forsigtigt…

Ada Bligaard Søby: The best is yet to come, 2018. Kehrer Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin. Tekster af Ada Bligaard Søbyog Louis My

https://www.kehrerverlag.com/en/ada-bligaard-soby-the-best-is-yet-to-come

Fotografierne er fra bogbindets forside og bagside

Dziga Vertov: Anniversary of the Revolution

Tuesday night I was back in Saint Petersburg after two days at the IDFA festival in Amsterdam. In the cinema. On screen. No, wrong – I was back in Petrograd 1918 through the outstanding film historical event organized so brilliantly by the festival. A full house in the Tuschinski for a film from 1918! By the father of documentary cinema Dziga Vertov. I felt an atmosphere of concentration, a history lesson it was with the images and the inserted texts that conveyed where we are and what happened almost day by day in 1917, in Petrograd and Moscow primarily; and it was a concert with images or a film with musical accompagnement. Everything. Joyful to watch:

The people in the mass demonstrations. The ones who discover that a camera is pointing at them. A dog that runs through the picture. The politicians at the time of the revolution. Trotsky giving speeches wherever he was, what a body language, and he seems to know that he was filmed. One after the other they are posing for the camera these bearded men, who communicate Power. Ready to be interviewed, they are moving their lips but there was no sound, we can’t hear what they are saying; otherwise they are like the politicians of today, they want to be heard and seen. The story about the revolution, the progressing overtake by the proletarians. The battles in Kazan. Street scenes, direct cinema before it was named like that. And at the end the start of the communes. Peace and collaboration. Faces to remember. Vertov was the one who put it all together, a young man he was at that time, in the beginning of his twenties.

Back to the screening where IDFA had invited Russian musicians to be there on stage. Playing live. It was fine in the true meaning of this word. Artistically superb! A piano, singers, violin, electronic music.. Who never “followed” the action on screen but commented gently and with respect. I am sure I have forgotten something – but the scoop at the end: a choir performing from one of the balconies of the theatre. Mise-en-scène, stressing the creativeness of the author.

What a brave choice from IDFA, “unforgettable” it will be, the new artistic director of IDFA, Orwa Nyrabia said welcoming the audience – without knowing if it would work – it became an unforgettable evening. A tribute to the history of Cinema.

Below you will find a link to a very interesting IDFA interview Pamela Cohn made with Nikolai Izvolov, who talks about being a “preservationist and a historian”. I bring the intro here: “Distinguished Russian film scholar Nikolai Izvolov describes himself as a sort of archaeologist. The Moscow-based historian and researcher spent a great deal of time carefully restoring and piecing together fragments from other historical films found in the archives that were originally used for Dziga Vertov’s first film, The Anniversary of the Revolution, made in 1918. This November is the film’s 100th anniversary, and Amsterdam audiences will be able to view the premiere of this 120-minute film in its entirety, a full century after it was first screened in Soviet Russia. The special screening will be accompanied by a live soundscape as part of this year’s IDFA on Stage.”

And here is the introduction to the film from IDFA’s website: Up until recently, only 12 minutes of the first full-length film by the godfather of creative documentary Dziga Vertov had survived. After years of searching, however, the Russian researcher Nikolai Izvolov finally found the whole film in the Russian State Documentary Film & Photo Archive. This two-hour account of the Russian Revolution, partly compiled from the newsreels Vertov made for Kino-Nedelya, opens with footage of the February Revolution in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg) and ends two years later with the idealistic image of a collective farm, with the entire community peacefully working together.

The unique footage of the intervening period includes beautiful pioneering shots of a roaring crowd running behind a camera mounted on a car, Lenin briefly addressing the man behind the camera, and fiery speeches by Leon Trotsky during the Russian Civil War.

In the historic Tuschinski 1 cinema, these images will be accompanied by a live score that continually links the year of the revolution with present day. Excerpts from contemporary masterpieces performed by classical musicians blend with Moscow artist Kate NV’s poppy electronics, creating an eclectic soundscape that effortlessly bridges the century in between.

Photo by Roger Cremers for International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam (IDFA)

https://www.idfa.nl/en/article/107760/idfa-celebrates-the-centenary-of-dziga-vertovs-long-lost-first-film-the-anniversary-of-the-revolution

Russia, 1918, 119 mins.