DOCS & TALKS 2019 / PROGRAMME

THE DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (DIIS) AND CINEMATEKET PRESENT DOCS & TALKS – FILM AND RESEARCH DAYS, JANUARY 31st – FEBRUARY 6th, 2019

Daughters of foreign fighters from Georgia, flood-affected islanders in Kiribati and Australia’s hermetically sealed asylum centres. This year, we will once again travel far and wide at the third annual Docs & Talks film and research festival from January 31st to February 6th. The festival is organized by the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS) and Cinemateket.

With its combination of both proximity and a larger social perspective, documentary film is an ideal point of departure for research dissemination and debate. Docs & Talks offers a total of eight film events, in which researchers from DIIS and scholars from other leading international research institutes, filmmakers and practitioners discuss and put into perspective the different themes of the films – and we invite the audience to participate in the debate.

This year, three of the films will focus on the fate of children in war: in eastern Ukraine, we experience the war through the eyes of ten-year-old Oleg; in the Idlib province of Syria, al-Nusra fighters raise their sons to join the armed struggle in a society where violence is breeding violence; and in Georgia, two young teenage girls are deeply marked by the absence of their fathers, who have left to fight for the Islamic State.

Two films in the program touch upon the issues of poverty, health, inequality and climate change, and we host a special event where we scrutinize the visual narratives that dominate the development world and the communication of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Where nothing else is mentioned, the debates are in Danish.

Sara Thelle og Mira Bach Hansen / Forum for Film og Formidling

Anne Blaabjerg, Troels Jensen og Sine Plambech / DIIS

Rasmus Brendstrup, programredaktør / Cinemateket

https://www.diis.dk/en/trending-topic/docs-talks-film-and-research-days-2019

 

PROGRAMME

THURS 31/01 16:30

ASYLUM POLITICS / ISLAND OF THE HUNGRY GHOSTS

Gabrielle Brady, 2018 / Eng. subtitles / 94 min. / 145 min. incl. debate

We open the festival with Gabrielle Brady’s poetic and visually striking work on the nature of migration with the Australian asylum system as backdrop. The scenic and mysterious Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean is not just home of the red crab, which migrates by thousands from the jungle to the sea every year, and to a local population marked by Asian migrant culture. The island also houses one of three Australian detention centres where asylum seekers are detained and isolated indefinitely. Trauma therapist Poh Lin Lee tries to work with the detainees on their war traumas and the psychological consequences of their hopeless confinement – but her work is gradually becoming more difficult as the asylum seekers suddenly disappear without explanation from the authorities.

EVENT After the film, DIIS Senior Researcher Ninna Nyberg Sørensen and PhD Nikolas Feith Tan, researcher at the Danish Institute for Human Rights and Aarhus University, discuss asylum policies in Australia and Europe. The debate is in English.

 

 

FRI 01/02 16:45

CLIMATE CHANGE / ANOTE’S ARK

Matthieu Rytz, 2018 / Eng. subtitles / 77 min. / 140 min. incl. debate

Imagine if your home country was swallowed by the sea? The impacts of climate change threaten the small island nation of Kiribati with total obliteration, and the inhabitants must prepare for a future in climate exile. ‘Anote’s Ark’ follows both the relentless struggle of President Anote Tong to raise international awareness and to ensure the survival and cultural heritage of his countrymen, as well as the young mother Sermary, who literally fights against the rising water level while trying to reconcile herself to the idea of a new life in New Zealand. With ethnographic sensibility, Rytz has created a relevant and unsentimental story about the harsh consequences of the rising sea level for ordinary people.

EVENT How do we mitigate the consequences of the climate changes that we will have to live with and adapt to? This will be discussed by PhD Lily Lindegaard, who has researched climate adaptation and climate mobility in Vietnam, and former Emergency Managing Director of the UN in the Pacific, Sune Gudnitz. The debate is in English. Tickets: 95/65 kr.

 

SAT 02/02 17:00

RADICALIZATION / BEFORE FATHER GETS BACK

Sanam mama dabrundeba / Mari Gulbiani, 2018 / Eng. subtitles / 80 min. / 140 min. incl. debate

The Pankisi Valley in Georgia is notorious for being the breeding ground of a large number of radicalized Islamic State foreign fighters. In ‘Before Father Gets Back’, the camera is turned towards the society they departed from, giving us a rare insight into the life of the families left behind. The film is a touching coming-of-age story about the two young friends Iman and Eve whose lives are filled with so much more than the absence of their fathers.

EVENT Meet the director of the film, Mari Gulbiani, who has worked with adolescents of the region through various projects, and Maja Greenwood, who recently finished her PhD on foreign fighters. Together they will shed light on why men and women choose to go to war on behalf of Islamic groups in the Middle East and the consequences for the families they leave behind. The debate is in English. Tickets: 95/65 kr.

 

SUN 03/02 14:00

CHILDREN IN WAR / THE DISTANT BARKING OF DOGS

Olegs krig, Simon Lereng Wilmont, 2017 / English ssubt. / 90 min. / 145 min. incl. debate

[EVENT IN DANISH] Den prisbelønnede danske dokumentarfilm ‘The Distant Barking of Dogs’ tager os med til Ukraines frontlinje, hvor vi gennem 10-årige Olegs øjne bliver vidne til det uskyldstab, krigen gradvist påtvinger barnesindet. Instruktør Simon Lereng Wilmonts mesterligt fotograferede film portrætterer indlevende, hvor centrale de nære relationer er, når verden, som man kender den, udvikler sig til en krigszone, når naboerne flygter og alt, hvad der er velkendt og trygt, opløses omkring en.

EVENT Efter filmen perspektiverer seniorforsker på DIIS Johannes Lang i samtale med Mozhdeh Ghasemiyani, psykolog hos Læger uden Grænser, konsekvenserne af at vokse op og leve i en krigszone, og ikke mindst betydningen af de nære relationer, når krig bliver hverdag. Billetpris 95/65 kr.

 

MON 04/02 16:30

SYRIA / OF FATHERS AND SONS

Talal Derki, 2017 / Engl. subt. / 98 min. / 150 min. incl. debate

[EVENT IN DANISH] Den gribende og dybt foruroligende dokumentar ‘Of Fathers and Sons’ har vundet et utal af priser på filmfestivaler verden over det sidste år. Syriske Talal Derki (‘Return to Homs’) har på imponerende vis fået adgang til det intime familieliv blandt en gruppe al-Nusra-krigere i det nordlige Syrien. Instruktøren vender kameraet mod børnene, og filmen bliver til en hjerteskærende skildring af, hvordan den voldelige ideologi overleveres til den næste generation. Sønnerne vokser op i en verden, hvor brutaliteten siver ned i barnelivet og former dem til en fremtid som børnesoldater.

I den efterfølgende debat ser DIIS-forsker Tore Refslund Hamming m.fl. nærmere på de jihadistiske grupperinger i Syriens ideologiske grundlag, deres brug af vold og hvordan det påvirker individet, særligt den yngre generation. Billetpris 95/65 kr.

 

MON 04/02 17:00

DOCS & TALKS SPECIAL / UN GLOBAL GOALS: THE POWER OF IMAGES

Talk & debate / English / 90 min

With this special event, we look at the power of images in relation to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and development issues in general. How has poverty, inequality and other development topics been portrayed through images and films up until today – and what are the consequences of this visual representation?

DIIS researcher Adam Moe Fejerskov moderates the discussion spiced with case examples from the past up until today. Meet researcher Tobias Denskus from Malmö University, Danish development journalist Pernille Bærendtsen and BBC journalist Sammy Awami. The talk is in English. Admission is free, but reservations are required.

 

MON 04/02 19:30

POVERTY / MOTHERLAND

Bayang Ina Mo / Ramona S. Diaz, 2017 / Eng. subtitles / 94 min. / 150 min. incl. debate

With Ramona Diaz’s award-winning observational documentary, we find ourselves in the middle of the hustle and bustle of the world’s largest maternity clinic at the public Fabella Hospital in Manila, where poor women have to share the beds with each other. Personal stories are being told in between laughter and tears, screaming children, noisy loudspeakers and babies lost and found. The medical staff counselling on contraception and sterilization is met with scepticism in a society with strong catholic roots, and where young women often give birth to one child a year.

EVENT The film is followed by a discussion about reproductive health, inequality, poverty and sustainable development with DIIS Senior Researcher Helle Munk Ravnborg and Arthur Larok from ActionAid International. The debate is in English. Tickets: 95/65 kr.

 

TUES 05/02 16:45

TRAFFICKING / BLOWIN’ UP

Stephanie Wang-Breal, 2018 / Eng. subtitles / 98 min. / 150 min. incl. debate.

In Queens, New York, Judge Toko Serita is leading the first US Human Trafficking Intervention Court, a ground- breaking initiative to change the way women arrested for prostitution are prosecuted. The critically acclaimed documentary ‘Blowin’ Up’ brings us right into the turmoil of interpreters, lawyers and advisors inside and outside the courtroom and gives us a very close look at how the court works.

There is much at stake for the young women who have been arrested by the police on the street or in the many massage parlors of the city: in addition to a sentence, they often face problems with immigration authorities and risk deportation. With great insight and nuances, the film depicts how this profound change of the legal system affects the individuals involved, and what happens when prosecution and punishment are replaced with support and advice.

EVENT After the film, director Stephanie Wang-Breal, Maja Løvbjerg Hansen of the NGO The Danish Street Lawyers (Gadejuristen) and the leader of the NGO The Nest International (Reden), Kira West, will discuss the legal and social connections between migration, trafficking and sex work. DIIS senior researcher Sine Plambech moderates the debate in English. Tickets: 95/65 kr. 

 

WED 06/02 17:30

RESEARCH & FILM / HEARTBOUND

Hjertelandet / Janus Metz, Sine Plambech, 2018 / 90 min. / 145 min. inkl. debat

[EVENT IN DANISH] Få et indblik i, hvordan antropologisk feltarbejde og migrationsforskning forvandles til en prisvindende dokumentarfilm. Gennem ti år har filmskaberne Janus Metz og DIIS-seniorforsker Sine Plambech fulgt en håndfuld familier, som gennem arrangerede ægteskaber binder to perifere områder i Danmark og Thailand tæt sammen. Det er blevet til filmen ‘Hjertelandet’, en alternativ kærligheds- og migrationshistorie. Filmen havde danmarkspremiere i efteråret 2018 og har siden rejst verden rundt på festivaler.

EVENT Se eller gense Hjertelandet og mød filmens hovedrolleindehaver Sommai Molbæk og antropolog Sine Plambech til en samtale om at lade sit liv og sine valg være omdrejningspunktet i en film og et forskningsprojekt – og om værdien af at lade sin historie fortælle til den brede befolkning. Billetpris 95/65 kr.

TICKETS

https://www.dfi.dk/cinemateket/biograf/filmserier/serie/docs-talks-2019

 

DIIS OG CINEMATEKET I PARADIS PRÆSENTERER

DOCS & TALKS AARHUS

FILM- OG FORSKNINGSDAG D. 26. FEBRUAR 2019

 Dansk Institut for Internationale Studier (DIIS) og Cinemateket byder endnu en gang velkommen til DOCS & TALKS AARHUS – Film- og Forskningsdag tirsdag d. 26. februar i Øst for Paradis, hvor vi i år byder på to tankevækkende arrangementer, der kombinerer dokumentarfilm med forskningsformidling og debat.

Forskere fra DIIS vil sammen med kolleger fra bl.a. Aarhus Universitet diskutere og perspektivere filmenes temaer – og invitere publikum til at tage del i debatten.

Med DOCS & TALKS går vi endnu tættere på aktuelle begivenheder end i den daglige nyhedsstrøm, samtidig med at vi skildrer de grundlæggende politikker, ideologier og udviklingstendenser, der ligger bag. Festivalen løber af stablen i Cinemateket i København d. 31. januar. til 6. februar og i Aarhus d. 26. februar. Tanken med Docs & Talks er at formidle viden på en anderledes og spændende måde til et bredt publikum – og at gøre båndet mellem film og forskning stærkere. Vi glæder os til at byde et spørge- og diskussionslystent publikum velkommen!

 

TIR 26/02 14:00

ASYLPOLITIK / ISLAND OF THE HUNGRY GHOSTS

INSTRUKTØR: GABRIELLE BRADY / 150 min. inkl. debat

Gabrielle Bradys poetiske og visuelt slående værk om migrationens væsen har den australske asyllovgivning som baggrund. Den på én gang naturskønne og sælsomme ø Christmas Island i det Indiske Ocean er ikke bare hjemsted for den røde krabbe, der hvert år migrerer i tusindtal fra junglen til havet, og for en lokalbefolkning præget af asiatisk migrantkultur. Øen huser også en af de tre australske lejre, hvor asylansøgere tilbageholdes og isoleres på ubestemt tid. Traumeterapeuten Poh Lin Lee forsøger at få migranterne til at bearbejde deres krigstraumer og konsekvenserne af den udsigtsløse indespærring – men hendes arbejde bliver gradvist sværere at udføre, fordi asylansøgerne pludselig forsvinder uden forklaring fra myndighederne.

 Efter filmen vil DIIS-seniorforsker Ninna Nyberg Sørensen og Ph.d. Nikolas Feith Tan, der forsker i Australiens asylsystem ved Institut for Menneskerettigheder og Aarhus Universitet, diskutere asylforhold i Australien og Europa. Debatten foregår på engelsk.

AUSTRALIEN, TYSKLAND, UK, 2018. DCP FARVE. 94 MIN. ENGELSKE UNDERTEKSTER. TILLADT OVER 15 ÅR. ENTRE 80 KR.

 

TIRS 26/02 17:00

SYRIEN / OF FATHERS AND SONS

INSTRUKTØR: TALAL DERKI / 160 min. inkl. debat

Den gribende og dybt foruroligende dokumentar ‘Of Fathers and Sons’ har vundet et utal af priser på filmfestivaler verden over det sidste år. Syriske Talal Derki (‘Return to Homs’) har på imponerende vis fået adgang til det intime familieliv blandt en gruppe syriske al-Nusra-krigere i det nordlige Syrien. Instruktøren vender kameraet mod børnene, og filmen bliver til en hjerteskærende skildring af, hvordan den voldelige ideologi overleveres til den næste generation. Sønnerne vokser op i en verden, hvor brutaliteten siver ned i barnelivet og former dem til en fremtid som børnesoldater.

I den efterfølgende debat ser DIIS-forsker Tore Refslund Hamming m.fl. nærmere på de jihadistiske grupperinger i Syriens ideologiske grundlag, deres brug af vold og hvordan det påvirker individet, særligt den yngre generation.

TYSKLAND, SYRIEN, 2017. DCP FARVE. 98 MIN. ENGELSKE UNDERTEKSTER. TILLADT OVER 15 ÅR. ENTRE 80 KR.

BILLETTER

https://www.paradisbio.dk/MovieDetails.aspx?movieId=10524

(Island of the Hungry Ghosts)

https://www.paradisbio.dk/MovieDetails.aspx?movieId=10525 

(Of Fathers and Sons)

Viviane Candas: A Possible Algeria

TODAY, NOW…

Viviane Candas: A Possible Algeria 

by Allan Berg Nielsen / Filmkommentaren, le 4.2.2018 / Docs & Talks 2018 / translation into English: Sara Thelle

1.

The film is built upon the voice, the director of the film’s own voice. It tells the story. I always like that, it is honest, it is literary, closer to writing. And Viviane Candas’ voice makes me feel safe and makes me listen, even though what it tells me is horrifying. Next, her film builds on the archive material, a rare collection of historical footage edited together with a private archive. I almost always like that too, at least when it is done in a poetic construction like it is here, and not as a pedantic communication of a curriculum. In Candas’ work, this material is the very connection between the history of the world, the history of Algeria, the history of France and the biography of Yves Mathieu. He was Viviane Candas’ father, French as she, but deeply connected with Algeria in the country’s fateful hour. The narrative of the film is embedded in the two lines of the title, A Possible Algeria: The Revolution of Yves Mathieu, and in the contrast between society/nation/people and the individual lies the existential drama and the reflection on the nature of identity. Finally, the film is built on Candas’ uniquely sensitive and honest interviews with a few of the story’s key figures, which in the literary spirit of the film are more searching conversations than factual question/answer scenes. The heterogeneity of this material testifies to a long-standing collection of footage for the film, and it is linked by vignettes from the research travels in a reconstruction that has a fixed visual uniformity which works as a refuge for reflection. But curiously, these vignettes do not function as the “now” of the story. The present of the film is the voice of Candas narrating, and the protagonists leading the conversation in the interview scenes, where the director’s voice is usually cut out, and yet in a strange way she is still very present. The conclusion of all this results in me really meeting these people, and the encounter with an old Ahmed Ben Bella is an emotional shock. This is the present of the film, here is world history itself present in this fragile body that speaks of itself as a socialist. Today, now …

2.

The war in Algeria was a French matter, as I remember it, and the war was the brutality of the French military. I read about Djamila Boupacha in the Danish periodical Perspektiv, a specific quote from her during the trial, her important testimony, is still locked in my memory, still shaking me, because I remember how it was with me and the knowledge of violent brutality back then. She was always Picasso’s drawing, but it was not about Picasso, it was her. She, the model imprinted on the small portrait drawn after a photograph, was stronger than the artist, in a way opposite Guernica, who was always the famous painter more than the wretched city. I read Simone de Beauvoir’s novel The Mandarins about the French Intellectual Left in the 1940s, on the circle of Camus and Sartre. And I read about the war and about General Jacques Massu and his paratroopers’ victory in 1957 over the FLN Resistance in the capital, which he tore up with arbitrary arrests and brutal interrogations and systematic torture. It was The Battle of Algiers, which in 1966 also became a film by Gillo Pontecorvo with Jean Martin in the role of Colonel Mathieu, who is probably a portrait of General Massu, a feature film in black and white documentary style with amateurs straight in from the street in most of the other roles. The mimic documentary quality of Pontecorvo’s film is so astonishing that Candas has been able to use scenes from it as part of her archive material, for example the execution scenes.

3.

The opening sequence, the first images: the bridge with the cars in the mountain landscape, the roads seen from the car, the railway station with the train on a regular day, the style of the images as a whole and their particular technical quality define the time of the film as present, right now when these images where filmed, and right now where I am experiencing it, recalling the story of Algeria’s war of independence as scattered fragments bound in the films, photographs and documents from the archives, which are consistent layers in the architecture of the film: its past.

4.

The participants in the conversations are in this now, the director’s voice is in this now, the scenes of the vignettes are this now, thereby framing everything with the present, also the layers of the archive footage, which through the superb editing work is writing the film’s past. It is the fragile images of the memory, the fragments of the past, to which the voices add details. To all the terrifying events. But also adding clarifications, about what really happened: the guillotine in the prison yard; the execution of an Algerian resistance fighter; how an exit at a main road holds the information about the way in which Yves Mathieu in all probability was murdered, a circumstantial evidence indicating that this was possible, such as the car wreck was found. It is a film about memory based on archive material more related to Chris Marker’s Level 5 (1997) written in the present of the editing room, with its minimal and indistinct but utterly decisive archive scenes and photos; and it is related to Emile de Antonio’s Millhouse (1971), made solely on archive clips and, as I remember it, written in the past tense as a form of serious entertainment, while Chris Marker’s film is a moral philosophical task in the present tense, precisely like the core of Viviane Candas’ oeuvre, which is a similar obligation for me, a challenge to my thoughts, precisely what the festival Docs & Talks where the film is screened is intending.

5.

Candas’s film does not document this brief but violent chapter of Algeria’s history, rather her film is documenting a qualified thought about this period in history, a thought qualified by the memory of a state leader, the memory of a minister, and a daughter’s remembrance of her absent father. She now needs to share their memories, in order to understand her well-ordered fragments as historical knowledge, to come to love her revolutionary father, who was far away and buried in work, understand him and love him unreservedly now, despite him having been dead for many years. She stands in the present with the plate with the grave inscriptions in her hand, considering the right lapidary summary of this person’s life.

6.

The subtitle of the film is La révolution d’Yves Mathieu as I read on the screen after the title sequence. This is a couple of days ago, and I only now begin to understand the importance of the title as a whole. I am ready to watch this remarkable film again, ready to listen to Rasmus Alenius Boserup’s introduction and to his conversation with Viviane Candas in Cinemateket at the Docs & Talks Film and Research Festival.

Photos: Yves Mathieu and Ahmet Ben Bella

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4151/  (Filmkommentaren, le 4.2.2018)

 

DOCS & TALKS 2019

DIIS OG CINEMATEKET / FILM- OG FORSKNINGSDAGE /

31. JANUAR- 6. FEBRUAR 2019

Dostojevskijs Idioten i Cinemateket med mere…

… i et arrangement, som med rette blev kaldt for et maraton, visning af en russisk tv-serie bygget over romanen fra 2003 – 10 afsnit af en længde på 50 minutter. Publikum – vi – sad lørdag i Cinemateket fra 13.30 til lidt over midnat, over ti timer, afbrudt af pauser, én af dem med servering af bortsch, rødbedesuppen som jeg har nydt mange gange hjemme, og i Skt. Petersburg og hos Sonja Vesterholt, som også var at finde i biografen og som selvfølgelig havde set flere filmiske udgaver af den vidunderlige bog, som denne gamle bibliotekar har læst – og nu har lyst til at genlæse.

Det var stor skuespilkunst, som serien frembragte – mere det end stor filmkunst, fokus var på teksten, dialogerne, dramaerne og de mange morsomme situationer, som udspinder sig omkring det gode menneske fyrst Mysjkin, der blev spillet af Yevgeny Vitalevich Mironov. Det gjorde han fabelagtigt, intet mindre.

Er han kendt, spurgte jeg i en pause Rikke Helms, som om nogen kender til russisk kultur efter mange år i Moskva, Riga og Skt. Petersburg, hvor hun var leder af Det danske Kulturinstitut og bl.a. i 2010 generøst lagde lokaler til et dokumentarfilm-seminar for russiske filmfolk, som jeg var ansvarlig for. Meget vigtigt for deltagerne. Tak!

Ja, mon ikke, besvarede Helms mit spørgsmål, serien var hans gennembrud som skuespiller – og jeg kom til at tænke på, hvor lidt vi ved om russiske skuespillere af verdensklasse. Eller jeg ved. Ved et kig på wikipeak har jeg set Mironovs imponerende filmografi og lange række af hædersbevisninger. Selvfølgelig har han også spillet Hamlet. Det gad jeg godt nok se!

Ros til Cinemateket for et sådant arrangement og for det fremragende program for januar og februar. Der er kvalitet over hele linien og et bredt repertoire, mildest talt. Lad mig nævne et par instruktører som der er et retrospektivt fokus på: Andrzej Wajda (inklusiv et par dokumentarfilm der lyder spændende), Jacques Becker (”Smukke Marie” med Simone Signoret!), og Lanzmanns ”Shoah” igen igen – og tak for det, det er vel den vigtigste dokumentarfilm ever made. Og så er der film fra ”Iran 1979”, Kim Larsen in memoriam, selvfølgelig, Tery Gilliam, Murakami, Gøg og Gokke Osv. Osv. Programmet stråler af veloplagthed. Og så står der – med rødt – ”Event” ved hver andet arrangement, hvilket betyder, at der er tilsvarende, dog ikke så lange, arrangementer som ”Idioten”, med mad og drikke eller med introduktioner til filmene. Spørgsmålet er om ikke Cinemateket overdriver det sidste, introduktionerne, hvor jeg i mange sammenhænge har siddet og sagt til mig selv ”kom så i gang”, med filmen!

www.cinemateket.dk

True Stories Market Research Funding

Quote from filmkommentaren post in August: … thinking of the many documentary adventures I take with me from the Sarajevo Film Festival: To be part of the training team of representatives from ngo’s and human rights organizations was the experience for me. Engaged, committed people who every day deal with human beings who suffer from the consequences of the wars in the 1990’es – and try to help them. Respect!

The festival now makes a call – deadline January 31 – for proposals from filmmakers, who want to collaborate with the organisations and people mentioned to make the stories presented at the festival into films. A €3000 grant is given for further research followed by project development and presentation at the upcoming Cinelink Industry Days at the festival.

The call is open for “Production company or filmmaker coming from the following countries: Albania, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Georgia, Hungary, Kosovo, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Turkey.

All details are available through the link below. The same goes for the visual presentation/pitch of the projects. Check it out:

https://www.sff.ba/en/news/10995/sarajevo-film-festival-invites-filmmakers-to-apply-for-a-first-true-stories-market-research-funding

Danske Dokumentarfilm 2018

Etnografen Henning Haslund-Christensen står på fotografiet midt på højslettens vældige tomme flade med bjergene i dis langt, langt borte. Fotografiet er fra en af hans mange rejser i Mongoliet…

Jeg har som til tidligere nytårs opsummeringer udvalgt de danske dokumentarfilm fra 2018 som jeg i årets løb har været mest glad for og fundet vigtigst. Som Tue Steen Müller 1. januar på samme måde har gjort med udenlandske og valgt 16 film har jeg valgt 6 film blandt dem jeg har set og husker. De listes her op kronologisk med et citat fra anmeldelsen og med et link til anmeldelsens fulde tekst.

Jeg spurgte herefter også som tidligere mig selv, hvilken film af de 6 der fyldte mest i min erindring. Og jeg svarede mig selv: Andreas Dalsgaards Fædre & Sønner.

Men læs nedenfor om min glæde ved alle seks film, for hvis jeg skal stole på mine tekster, har det atter været et fantastisk år for dansk dokumentarfilm.

Torben Skjødt Jensen: Carl Th. Dreyer – min metier

”… Og det er jo så stil, ligesom den filmmåde jeg har mødt i Skjødt Jensens film al tid, men som først fæstnede sig som stil i min forståelse med Flâneur, 1993 ved en visning i en meget stor biograf i Clairmont-Ferrand. Hans film hører hjemme i biografen. Det er jo fotograferingens drømmende skarphed, musikkens arkitektur i en fremmedheds velkendthed, sætningernes helt nye gammeldags alvor, alt samlet i collagens tillid til associationens relevans af klippenes blide konsekvens.”

”… Torben Skjødt Jensen lagde med Dreyerfilmen fra 1995 denne stil ned over Dreyers indsats i dansk kunst, i verdenskunsten. Nu har han understreget sin stil og forbedret sin film, især ved, at en lang række forfærdende smukke og nyrestaurerede citater fra Dreyers film er lagt ind og på plads i hans nye essays fortællende forløb, så de ligesom bæres frem i procession gennem 1995-værket som fortjener det, bæres i triumf.”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4391/

 

Katrine Philp: False Confessions

”Jeg er naivt chokeret efter jeg har set den film. Indset jeg er et uvidende fjols. Jeg vidste jo ikke politiet måtte lyve, lægge fælder, udøve psykisk tortur, udmattelse og søvnberøvelse for som deres afhørings eneste formål at fremtvinge en tilståelse, også gerne en falsk, så politifolkene, som forhører og deres politistation kan få en imponerende succesrate. Nej, ikke af opklaringer, af tilståelser. Jeg vidste det ikke, nu ved jeg det er tilladt og endog almindelig praksis. Jo, i visse lande. Men i USA, i New York??…”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4279/

 

Andreas Dalsgaard: Fædre & Sønner

”Jeg reagerede spontant efter filmoplevelsen ved at skrive en mail til kollegerne: ´Så, Tue og Sara, har netop set filmen om Henning Haslund-Christensen og hans to sønner og om Torgut folket og om ekspeditioner og indsamlinger og kulturdrab og tabet af hukommelse. Den er vidunderlig og Michael i den er så ægte charmerende som ude i virkeligheden. Nu vil jeg gøre hvad jeg kan for at skrive om Dalsgaards store filmiske fortælling.’ Sådan, nu havde jeg lovet det, røbet min samlede vurdering, som kun kan blive alle vore 6 penne, røbet en disposition for min tøvende, langsomme kommentar, som skal begrunde vurderingen…”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4247/ og http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4257/

 

Boris Benjamin Bertram: The Human Shelter

“Kantokainen, Norge. Jeg bestemmer for mig selv med det samme at følge den unge kvindes forklaring på tid, et diktum som både er hendes opvækst og hendes beslutning. Tiden går ikke, den kommer. Det vante ur er her dyrenes selvfølgelige liv og landskabets skiftende lys. Jeg tror, det er hvad hendes smukke sang handler om. Denne alvorlige skønhed i rensdyr-nomadens fire hjem til de fire årstider…”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4223/

 

Max Kestner: Slette omstændigheder

” Et centralt nærbillede er fra en scene hos en grafolog. Er det et ”a” der på kortopmålingen? Hvad særligt er der i givet fald ved det ”a”? Jeg kan ikke svare, jeg kan ikke skrive om Max Kestners forunderligt vidunderlige film uden en spoiler sniger sig ind. Eller kan jeg? For hvilken undersøgelse foretages? Eller er det sådan, at flere undersøgelser overlapper hinanden? Er filmen en spændingsfilm, som jeg lægger væk, når jeg har fået vejret, eller er den et essay, som jeg stiller på reolen, så den gemmes nær mig, fordi de spørgsmål, det essay rejser, kaster flere af sig, flere spørgsmål, flere undersøgelser, yderligere læsninger? … ”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4206/

 

Mikala Krogh: A Year of Hope

“…Mikala Kroghs kyndige kritik, hendes vurderende blik er her og overalt i hendes værk den venlige, loyale holdning. Hun er ikke neutral, men hun vil, tror jeg, kun iagttage og se og forstå. Der er her ikke forklarende interviews eller samtaler med centerledelse eller medarbejdere, hendes blik bliver konstant i drengenes (og i politikadetternes) niveau, øjenhøjde og vinkel. Hun fastholder med sin film uden kameraets rysten, uden egen tvivl, men iboende vedholdende håbet: det kan lykkes, men det gør det ikke med det samme og hver gang, heller ikke i filmen for alle drengenes vedkommende. Men så er det forfra endnu en gang, for det kan lykkes ved at opføre sig ordentligt, ved at træne, ved at lære, ved at blive ved. A Year of Hope er en omhyggelig, klog og aldeles usentimental og filmkunstnerisk meget vellykket film. Ja, en dejlig film. Tankevækkende og så er den simpelthen så ordentlig”

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4173/

Faces and Places 2018

Taking the title of Agnès Varda and JR’s wonderful film as headline, I look back at festivals, pitching sessions, film schools… that I had the privilege to attend in 2018. Privilege is the right word to use, when you board a plane (this year I want to go much more by train…), arrive to a place where you are welcomed and spoilt by the warm hospitality that characterises the documentary community with all its organisers, programmers and volunteers.

Plus the generosity you feel as the one that brought me for the first time to the festival in Karlovy Vary, where ”Bridges of Time” by Kristine Briede and Audrius Stonys had its world premiere. Invited by one of the producers, Uldis Cekulis, I was there with old filmmaker friends Estonian Mark Soosaar, Latvian Ivars Seleckis and a new friend Andres Sööt from Estonia. Plus directors of course and producers and people from the Film institutes. Intense days of celebration of Baltic poetic cinema. On the photo, taken by Cekulis, you see Latvian Uldis Brauns, who is one of the masters in the film – the photo is from September 2014. Brauns passed away in January 2017.

For the 14th time I was at the Magnificent7 festival in Belgrade met by the warmth of

the couple Svetlana and Zoran Popovic and the team around them – this time the festival took place in June at the new venue for the festival, Kombank Dvorana, in the centre of the city, a very good change from the previous location, the Sava Centre. The audience thought the same, they came in big numbers – as usual, and we cross our fingers for one of the films shown, ”The Distant Barking of Dogs” by Simon Lereng Wilmont, shortlisted for the Oscar.

DocuDays in Kiev, lovely to come back, late March, films, CivilPitch, Vareniki, vodka and a theme, equality, ” related to many social problems and challenges. Human dignity, freedom, justice and equality are the values which underpin the concept of human rights. Meanwhile, the value of equality is accepted by only a half of the population of Ukraine. So equality requires action by human rights advocates. This year, we would like to talk about what equality is and how we can profess it in our everyday lives. » I admire so much the social and political commitment of the team in Kiev.

As I admire the professionalism of IDF (Institute of Documentary Film) in Prague that stands behind the East Doc Forum with debates and a pitching forum. I was there to help the presentation of new Czech films. There were 6 of them – I am especially curious to see the final result of the film „Solo“ by Artemio Benki, a film taking place at a psychiatric clinic in Buenos Aires with charismatic characters, to say the least. Everyone comes to the Forum, it seems, also Iikka Vehkalahti and Mikael Opstrup, with whom I watch football at a Chinese London Pub (!) as CL-matches always take place, when we are in Prague.

Football, sorry to bore you with this, is of course always on the agenda in Barcelona, where Joan Gonzalez takes me to the Camp Nou, this year to say goodbye to Andres Iniesta, who played his last match one of the evenings where I escaped the cinemas. 90.000 spectators to say goodbye! If any city and event, DocsBarcelona is the one, where I have been part of the furniture for more than 20 years. There were many cinematic highlights also this year, for me a great pleasure to be with Talal Derki for a masterclass. Cross fingers for his « Of Fathers and Sons », shortlisted for the Oscar.

Part of the furniture… the same goes for the Baltic Sea Docs in Riga, pitching forum for Eastern European documentaries, a place for talent development – Russian Tatyana Soboleva was there, Syrian Guevara Namer with director Antonia Kilian and at the table I was again happy to see the commitment from the Current Time TV people, Natalia Arshavskaya and Kenan Aliuyev. Baltic Sea Docs is a super-professional and warm event thanks to the team led by Zanda Dudina-Spoge.

In Georgia, at Cinedoc Tbilisi, Artchil Khetagouri and Ileana Stanculescu are the masters of ceremony in a city, that I have learned to adore thanks to them and filmmakers Anna Dziapshipa and Salomé Jashi. Do I offend anyone if I say that nothing compares to the food in Georgia – accompanied by chacha!. In 2018 I was appointed football referee for a match played according to the rules of Laurentiuu Ginghină, who is the main character in the film ”Infinite football” by Corneliu Porumbolu. Laurentiuu was there, wonderful man, who since then has travelled to other events to prove that football can be a better game that it is today.

At the Sarajevo Film Festival I was the lucky man to take part again, thanks to Masha Markovic, in the Dealing With the Past program, as part of the pitch training team for representatives from ngo’s and human rights organizations. It was the experience for me. I met engaged, committed people, who every day deal with human beings, who suffer from the consequences of the wars in the 1990’es – and try to help them. Respect!

Two more festivals – the bigger ones – to be mentioned, with artistic directors who I have known for years, Leena Pasanen from DOKLeipzig and Orwa Nyrabia from IDFA, the latter at his first year. Thanks for the invitations, lovely to be there to watch films, where films should be seen: in the Cinema. And to meet all those documentary people I have known for decades or less. Content-wise, the two festivals stand out.

Memories… not to forget the teaching at the film schools in Babelsberg and Bolzano, at Zelig talking to upcoming filmmakers, who have great ideas and projects and are hungry for learning, and watching to be inspired. I am grateful to the Germans Peter Badel and Daniel Abma, and to Italian Emanuele Vernillo for your trust in me.

… as I am to Marion Gompper from Sources for having me for one of their sessions talking about being a mentor, and to Viktor Skubey for the invitation to the St. Petersburg film school conference.

You are travelling a lot, I hear from many. Well, not as much as when I was at EDN. And in a different way. Nice hobby to have and this blog keeps my brain working! Here comes links to much less egocentric texts from the events mentioned:

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4288/ (Karlovy Vary)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4275/ (Magnificent7)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4200/ (Docudays Kiev)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4182/ (East Doc Forum)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4211/ (DocsBarcelona)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4329/ (Baltic Sea Docs)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4226/ (Cinédoc Tbilisi)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4322/ (Sarajevo Film Festival)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4304/ (DOKLeipzig)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4399/ (IDFA)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3553/ (Film school Konrad Wolf)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/3744/ (Zelig)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4351/ (Sources)

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4351/ (St. Petersburg) 

 

The Best Documentaries 2018 – Intro

Per tradition – in the post below you find 16 documentaries listed that I found to be Best of 2018. With links attached to what has been written about them. A choice made after many festival visits, links sent to me, vod´s… You will miss films that have been given a lot of attention in 2018 – like those of Talal Derki, Simon Lereng Wilmont (both shortlisted for the Oscars), Mila Turajlic, Marta Prus and Arunas Matelis (these three could have been shortlisted!) and others, that you can find on the ”Best of 2017”, where they premiered: http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4121/

I am sure I have forgotten some, sorry if so, and there are many still to be watched. And talents to be mentioned, which I will do in a coming post.

Crisis in documentary making? Not at all, look at the list!

Happy New Year!

Photo from a film that celebrates the documentary as an art form, historically – a film that in itself is a piece of art.

The Best Documentaries 2018

Viktor Kossakovsky: Aquarela

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4408/

Kristine Briede & Audrius Stonys. Bridges of Time

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4287/

Vitalyi Mansky: Putin’s Witnesses

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4390/

Ivars Seleckis: To be Continued

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4075/

Nebojša Slijepčević: Srbenka

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4308/

Anja Kofmel: Chris the Swiss

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4313/

Sergey Loznitsa: The Trial

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4393/

Bernadett Tuza-Ritter: A Woman Captured

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4093/

Janus Metz & Sine Plambech: Heartbound

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4348/

Göran Olsson: That Summer

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4335/

Marie Clémence Andriamonta Paes: Fahavalo

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4187/

Didem Pekün : Araf

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4316/

Scott Barley : Sleep has no House

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4276/

Thomas Riedelsheimer: Leaning into the Wind

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4266/

Claudia Tosi: I Had a Dream

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4389/

Andrijana Stojkovic: Wongar

http://www.filmkommentaren.dk/blog/blogpost/4137/ 

Viktor Kossakovsky – Collected Posts on his Works

The courage to address the world with ambiguity never stooping to easy answers, can also be attributed to the Russian filmmaker, Victor Kossakovsky, who never tires of reminding us that film is an emotionally charged medium, and even when it comes to reality based filmmaking, expressing and arousing emotion should always be at the heart of the work… (Karolina Lidin, from an article 1999)

 

VIKTOR KOSSAKOVSKY – COLLECTED POSTS ON HIS WORKS

by Tue Steen Mûller

 

BELOVY (1993)

Vivan Las Antipodas! … a new tone for a director whose filmography includes films that you want to see again and again, from ”The Belovs” (Belovy) to ”Svyato” and ”Tishe”. (From a post 08-05-2012))

… “The Belovs”, this film from the countryside of Russia brilliantly depicts the Russian soul as we have experienced it in works of Dostoyevsky and Thechov. (From a post 02-08-2014)

… Fassaert wanted to show his appreciation of Kossakovsky by showing a long clip from ”Belovs”. He did and it made Kossakovsky burst into tears, kneel in front of the screen, ”I am sorry I shot this”, ”this is a typical Russian person”, he was inconsolable, had to leave the room, came back, left again, came back and stayed. (From a post 20-11-2015)

 

SREDA (1997)

Back to the progression of the Balticum Festival years in Gudhjem, Bornholm and 1997, when one film in particular, “Sreda” (Wednesday) by Viktor Kossakovsky, overshadowed all others. He was the festival’s central figure in a year when not only his film, but many of the other’s are also a return to present-day portrayels and a rediscovery of dayly life with all its problems, but also its poetry. (Tue Steen Müller, from an article 1999)

The courage to address the world with ambiguity never stooping to easy answers, can also be attributed to the Russian filmmaker, Victor Kossakovsky, who never tires of reminding us that film is an emotionally charged medium, and even when it comes to reality based filmmaking, expressing and arousing emotion should always be at the heart of the work. “Wednesday”, his feature-length documentary about the fates of some 70 of the 101 children born in St. Petersburg the same day as himself, July 19th 1961, can be interpreted as a acid portrait of contemporary Russia, but more importantly it is a symphony of lives, brilliantly composed with major and minor characters together expressing the Scales of Life. Kossakovsky has no intention of solving the enigma of life on our behalf, rather he ventures to preserve the core of mystery intact, daring us to recognize the fortuity of our own lives. (Karolina Lidin from an article 1999)

“Wednesday”, an extraordinary documentry by the thirty-five year old Kossakovsky. Born on July, 19, 1961 in Leningrad he desided to make a film about all the other children born in the same place and on the same day. 101 people including himself. He spent a year just tracking them down. Who are they and what has become of them? Indeed an unusual picture of contemporary Russian destinies. (Hanne Nimskov og Andreas Steinmann, Balticum Festival, katalog 1997)

The film “Wednesday”, has been a long time in the making but is now finished . Right after it’s screening on a symbolic Wednesday at the Baltic Festival, it was clear that a strong favourite to win first prize was receiving thunderous applaus.

The concept is ripe for journalistic treatment, but Kossakovsky, who made his international breakthrough with “The Belovs”, has instead made an artistically powerful and humorous film about the fate of ordinary people. The film doesn’t unravel a biographical sequence of events , but instead lives up to the lofty assertion which Politiken succeded  in wheedling out of otherwise down-to-earth filmmaker Kossakovsky, “Life is lived as a secret”. (Kim Skotte from an article and interview 1999) 

JAN VRIJMAN FUND 2009

Another (as Sundance Institute) very important supporter of the non-mainstream, non-anglosaxon documentary production and distribution is the idfa-associated Jan Vrijman Fund. Bravo for a new initiative from JVF: ”Starting the end of July, ten JVF films will tour through Latin America. Besides the screening of beautiful documentaries from the continent itself, the fund subtitled films from Iran, South Africa, India, Bulgaria and Russia into Spanish for the Latin American audience. Moving stories varying from the unfulfilled election promises to Indian women in Six Yards to Democracy, a strikingly visualized portrait of three blind singing sisters from Brazil in Born to be Blind and not to forget Victor Kossakovsky’s Tishe! in which he filmed the repairs on a St. Petersburg street for one year from his apartment window. So far the tour is going to the Festidoc in Paraguay, the International Documentary Encounters in Colombia, Ícaro in Guatemala and to DocuPeru. (Post 22-07-2009)

STORYDOC CORFU 2011

Two key tutors were given the floor on the first day of the workshop. Danish Mikael Opstrup from EDN (European Documentary Network) introduced some presentation tricks to the participants before they were to communicate the content and form to their colleagues and to the tutors. And Scottish filmmaker and teacher Emma Davie brought clips from documentaries that one way or the other had a creative element that she wanted to highlight.

First one was ”Gallivant” (1996) by English Andrew Koting, a ”dada filmmaker”, that is how he has introduced himself, she said. The clip reminded the participants about the importance of keeping the playfulness in what they are doing. Emma Davie continued with two Danish films, ”Swenkas” (2004) by Jeppe Rønde and ”Burma vj” by Anders Østergaard (2008), both quoted because of their use of techniques that stem from fiction. For the latter, from the Burmese dictatorship, ”it let the limitation to be part of the storytelling”. Emma Davie concluded with a clip from ”The Eye of the Day” (2001) by Leonard Helmrich (idfa winner 2010 with the third part of this trilogy from Indonesia), and ”Wednesday” (1997) by Viktor Kossakovsky, the film where the Russian director went to find people who were born on the same day and in the same year as himself. In St. Petersburg. Great clip with a train station controller followed on his way in the opposite direction of the arriving travellers, AND a scene with a man who eats his ice cream. (Post 17-07-2011)

DOKLEIPZIG 2011

In the train for Copenhagen after 5 days at the 54th International Leipzig Festival for Documentary and Animated Film. I had my currywurst mit scharfe sauce a while ago and am ready for the train ride home via Hamburg. Gives me time to evaluate and write som texts about the films that I have seen at the very well organised digital Market in the basement of the Art Museum, a beautiful building close to the Market Square with a lot of light coming into the big hall that hosts the festival centre and the café catered by Michaelis, the hotel where I was staying, strongly to be recommended for its good rooms, calm and superb gourmet restaurant.

Yes, the Leipzig atmosphere is nice as is the festival. Easy to find out what happens where, and a good venue is the festival centre hall to sit and chat about the films. Enjoyable, simple.

Programme-wise the festival offered a lot – coproduction meetings, masterclasses, rough cut screenings, debates etc. in the so-called industry section, and films in competition and outside competition, retrospectives, focus on the Arab countries and Chile and so on so forth.

I was there to find films for Magnificent 7 festival in Belgrade and DOCSBarcelona – and I think I found good material for each of the festivals. Below you will find my impressions of several films, I will not call it reviews – of course it influences your watching sitting in a basement, in a booth with headphones – with a sound that was too low.

How do you measure and characterize the profile of a festival? What is it that makes the DOKLeipzig festival programming different from other festivals? To be honest, I have no answer. Well, here there is a special category for films by new talents with a good award, there is a German competition, there are the above mentioned focus and retrospectives, but the maincategories, the long and short international documentaries in competition – do not explicitly have a line, a red thread content-wise or aesthetically. Should they? Or is diversity a quality in itself. Also geographically and issue-wise. There is a huge step from socially committed Special Flight by Swiss Fernand Melgar to the visual extravagance of “Vivan Las Antipodas!” by Russian Viktor Kossakovsky. Not to talk about German Carmen Losmann and her issue-born ”Work Hard-Play Hard” to Marc Weymuller’s visual ”nothing-happens-here” film from the North of Portugal.

A little bit of everything from everywhere for every taste? Fair enough! Or charming or result of many voices in the selection process? What remains is an unclear programming policy. Most beautiful experience for me: the film of Kossakovsky (Post 22-10-2011)

DOCS BARCELONA 2012

The 15th edition of DocsBarcelona closed last night with quite a spectacular performance. After the screening of ”The Human Tower”, directed by Ram Devineni and Cano Rojas, a group went on stage to make the human tower happen in the beautiful Palau de la Musica Catalana. The small boy on the top unfolded a piece of cloth saying ”At Night, They Dance” (photo), the film that was awarded the price as the Best Film of DocsBarcelona 2012. Directed by Isabelle Lavigne and Stéphane Thibault, Canadians, the film gives a strong and warm portrait of a family of belly dancers in Cairo, shot before the revolution.

A special mention was given to Victor Kossakovsky for his ”Vivan las Antipodas”. Kossakovsky was definitely the star of the festival with a masterclass for 300 and three sold-out screenings of his films in the Renoir Cinemas, followed by 45 minutes of Q&A. Kossakovsky is a magnificent filmmaker but also a great entertainer. (Post 06-02-2012)

VIVAN LAS ANTIPODAS! (2011)

DOK Leipzig 2011 – Vivan Las Antipodas! Please surprise me, give me time for reflections, to smile, laugh, cry, tell me something I did not know in beforehand – or show me something that I have not seen before, or make some unpredictable montage of location connections with places, with sound and image. Surprises, please.

Viktor Kossakovsky delivers. Against all mainstream format tendencies he has made a film that has sequences that are magic, simply. Sans comparaison, this is the most impressive FILM of the international competition programme. The music score is constantly being brought to you upside-down as the tilted images are, according to the film’s concept, the antipodes of our round planet. From Argentina (or was it Bolivia?) to Shanghai, from Russia to Botswana or… I do not remember and it is not important because it all goes together without any preaching of ”halleluja, we are all the same boat”. On the contrary this is an extravagant invitation to watch our planet with all its beauty, man or nature, does not matter, the flow is there, suddenly the director allows himself, and us, to follow an eagle flying in the air for a long time, or a lion staring at you, it is a symphony of image and sound, with small human situations, scarce dialogue, mainly between the Pérez brothers talking about animal sounds and women! The camera moves against all rules, sometimes you wonder what is up and what is down.

Like we do in our life. What an adventurous and playful hymn to man and nature. And to what Film can be if you take your time and watch! Want to see it again on a big screen! And I will as it will be shown all over. Of course it will! (Post 22-10-2011) 

Finally! It has been and is being shown all over the world, the unique work of Viktor Kossakovsky, a generous and overwhelmingly beautiful film that also witnesses a new direction thematically, a new tone for a director whose filmography includes films that you want to see again and again, from ”Belovs” to ”Svyato” and ”Tishe”.

Finally, the film gets the first prize at an international festival. Not in Leipzig, where it was in competition, not in Barcelona where it was in competition – both places I had the impression that the juries thought that ”Kossakovsky has already been awarded so many times” – but in Trento, at the 60th edition of a festival that deals with films about nature, especially mountains. The jury phrased their motivation precisely:

The international jury had no doubts in assigning the Golden Gentian – City of Trento Grand Prize to this film, which is an unforgettable homage to the diversity, magnificence and antiquity of Mother Nature. The jury appreciated above all the ingenuity of the idea, the artistic quality and the technical brilliance of the film. (Post 08-05-2012)

VIKTOR KOSSAKOVSKY: MY TOP 10

Every year the film festival in Amsterdam, idfa, asks well known filmmakers to pick their favourites. This year Viktor Kossakovsky has made his choice. This is a text taken from the website of idfa:

According to Kossakovsky, the films in his Top 10 are films that challenged him when he first saw them, and again on revisiting them recently. They are films which, instead of trying to tell you something, try to show you something. According to Kossakovsky, if you were to add up all the new elements these films have added to the language of cinema, you would have the perfect documentary alphabet.

Look at the Face by Pavel Kogan (Russia, 1968)

Man of Aran by Robert Flaherty (United Kingdom, 1931)

Man with a Movie Camera by Dziga Vertov (Ukraine, 1929)

Our Mother is a Hero by Nikolai Obukhovich (Russia, 1979)

Position Among the Stars by Leonard Retel Helmrich (the Netherlands, 2010)

Seasons of the Year by Artavazd Pelechian (Armenia, 1975)

Spiritual Voices by Alexander Sokurov (Russia, 1995)

Ten Minutes Older by Herz Frank (Latvia, 1987) (Photo)

A Tram Runs Through the City by Ludmila Stanukinas (Russia, 1973)

Workingman’s Death by Michael Glawogger (Germany/Austria, 2005)

… how many of them did you see? (Post 13-09-2012)

KOSSAKOVSKY ON WHY POVERTY

Viktor Kossakovsky was on his way home from Vilnius Documentary Festival, where he presented a retrospective of his films from “Belovs” to “Vivan las Antipodas”. I was on my way to the 22nd edition of St. Petersburg festival “Message to Man”. While waiting for boarding permission, the director invited me to watch his newest work, “Lullaby”, a short film (around 3 mins.), he had made for the big documentary series initiative “Why Poverty”. Shot in Berlin with a focus on a Deutsche Bank door leading to cash withdrawal machines, the director has made an original contribution to the short film section of the series. It should be watchable very soon according to the site of “Why Poverty”, read this text clip:

”Why Poverty? uses film to get people talking about poverty.

We’ve commissioned award-winning film makers to make eight documentaries about poverty, and new and emerging talents to make around 30 short films. The films tackle big issues and pose difficult questions, but they’re also moving, subtle and thought-provoking stories.

They transmit around the world in November 2012, on 62 national broadcasters reaching 500 million people. They’ll be accompanied by events designed to spark global and national debates and an online campaign to get people asking “Why Poverty?”

You can watch clips and shorts online now, and find out more about what’s happening in your country.

After November, the documentaries will be available to everyone online and we’ll begin an outreach programme, building on the momentum from broadcast…” (Post 26-09-2012) 

MY GREATEST DOCS EVER

o this is my choice for the Sight & Sound “The Greatest Docs Ever”. I have chosen films that I have used in my work as a teacher and consultant, films that I have come back to because they have meant something to me. I have been influenced by meetings with the directors – Herz Frank, Lozinski, Kossakovsky, Apted, Glawogger, Matelis – and by reading about and listening to clever words by Leacock and Pelichian, not to forget Lanzmann. What the films all have in common, I think, are a belief in the values of Life how hard and unfair it may be to you. A humanistic fundament, can you say so? 6 of the films are from the Eastern part of Europe where I have been working quite a lot and from where most of the original, artistic documentaries come.

Those which are multi-layered, philosophical, essayistic in a Chris Marker-way, sketchy and close to the term “camera comme stylo”. To be stressed: This is a personal choice, if I had gone through film history decade after decade it would have been different.

1.Ten Minutes Older

Herz Frank (photo)

1978

It’s all there. The story of our lives. To be read in the face of a boy. An intellectual, concepedy documentary with Juris Podnieks as cameraman, “the story of good and evil” as the subtitle goes. I have shown it wherever I go to introduce that documentaries must be reflective and philosophical.

2. Shoah

Claude Lanzmann

1985

No words necessary, an obvious choice and Lanzmann’s follow-up “The Last of the Unjust” is an appendix that shows that the director/journalist is still able to add quality to documentary film history.

3. Anything Can Happen

Marcel Lozinski

1995

Playful and clever interpretation of what Life and Death, Joy and Sorrow is – the director’s charming son runs around in a park, where he meets old people

and ask them all kind of questions in a direct way that we grown-ups would never dare. The result is touching and great fun at the same time.

4. The Belovs

Viktor Kossakovsky

1994

I could have taken the director’s last masterpiece, Vivan las Antipodas, as well but this film from the countryside of Russia brilliantly depicts the Russian soul as we have experienced it in works of Dostoyevsky and Thechov.

5. Man With a Movie Camera

Dziga Vertov

1929

When you get bored of formatted documentaries, this is the one to make you trust the power of the documentary language, the joy of Life, the enthusiasm of what the new medium is able to achieve, innovative and playful, pure pleasure, to watch without music, please!

6. 7UP

Michael Apted

1964 –

It’s like watching yourself… wonderful hymn to human lives… you follow the characters with so much interest and empathy, you cry and laugh with them, it’s a magnificent series, and it also – in its style – is a look at how film and television language has changed through 50 years.

7. Megacities

Michael Glawogger

1998

Few directors have as Glawogger been travelling the world to tell stories about how people live and think and work. This is one of the works from his trilogy (the others are “Workingman’s Death” and “Whore’s Glory”), with a superb cinematography of Wolfgang Thaler, “la condition humaine” is the theme so far away from reportage as one can be.

8. Before Flying Back to the Earth

Arunas Matelis

2005

He comes from the Lithuanian school of poetic documentary, he made several beautiful b/w enigmatic short documentaries but when his daughter got leukemia and was at hospital for months, the director decided to make a film about children in a similar situation and he came up with his magnificent visual poetic homage to how children fight against their serious illness with all they got of courage and humour!

9. Seasons

Artavadz Pelichian

1975

I have never understood Pelichian’s montage theory but this his masterpiece will always attract an audience to see the power of the single image, at the same time as the film is anthropological, have totally abstract, non-figurative sequences, no words, Vivaldi “only”. You are speechless when you have been with peasants and sheep up and down the hills. If you look carefully there are small human stories, happiness and grief.

10. Jazz Dance

Richard Leacock

1954

I had to have Leacock on board… his filmography is extraordinary, his work with Flaherty is unique, his work with the other direct cinema people (Pennebaker, Maysles, Drew) likewise, but I have chosen this one that he himself has talked so well about, where he went bananas in a night club, filmed from the table, a jamming with the camera, a true FREE film. (Post 02-08-2014)

ONLINE RETROSPECTIVE

es, of course it is the unique Doc Alliance that brings to us – FOR FREE – seven of Kossakovsky’s film online – UNTIL FEBRUARY 1ST. It is “the first time that they enter the virtual online world and thus also your computer screens”.

It is indeed fantastic, thanks for that. Some of us will have the pleasure to revisit his work, others will have the chance to follow a great director’s development from “Losev” (1989) to “Vivan las Antipodas” (2011), passing by wonderful “Belovs” (1992), the conceptual “Wednesday” (1997), the declaration of love with “Pavel and Lalya” (1998), “Tishe!” (2002), a from-the-window-look from his appartment in St.Petersburg and “Svyato” (2005), the director’s two year old son discovering himself in the mirror. On top of that the film by Carlos Klein, “Where the Condors Fly” (2012), follows Kossakovsky during the shooting of “Vivan las Antipodas”. The latter it has to be said is available for viewing in” the following countries: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark, Portugal, Great Britain, Greece, Sweden, Lithuania, Latvia, Botswana and all Latin American countries.”

More roses to Doc Alliance – if you enter the website you will also be given competent information about each of the films. My advice for the Kossakovsky film festival you can make for yourself is to go chronologically. (Post 22-01-2015)

VARICELLA (2015)

I hope the audience will become infected, Kossakovsky said to me with a smile before the world premiere of his children documentary, ”Varicella” (Chickenpox). He was there on stage with one of his stars, Polina and with a twelve year old boy, who had made the music for the film! Sorry, did not catch his name…

The film is wonderful and beautiful, joyful and playful, you laugh and enjoy and you suffer a bit with big sister Nastya, when she cries and cries because she does not get the high mark, she had hoped for. But she qualifies for the next class at the ballet academy that is the main location of the film, where the sisters go to train with trainers, who demand quite a lot. But we also see them at home having their games – see photo.

Every image in this film is carefully composed, Kossakovsky lets them stand or have longer sequences like the pillow fights, girls against boys with Nastya in action, whereas the smaller Polina stands a bit in the background watching a world that will also be hers in some years. The girls are adorable because the camera makes them adorable, because the film has the right rythm of editing, because the director dares to stylize with some animation sequences, because Viktor Kossakovsky is a master in conveying emotions. The film is shot in St. Petersburg, like a painting a camera total shot of Neva marks that. Documentary poetry this is. Infected? Totally!

The film is in the international short documentary competition here is St. Petersburg at the Message2Man festival.

Sweden, Norway, Denmark, 2015, 22 mins. (Post 30-09-2015)

ROBERT FRANK, UKRAINIAN SHERIFFS AND KOSSAKOVSKY

If you read the post ”Viktor Kossakovsky at IDFA”, you will discover his insisting on the form, on the composing of the image, on the aesthetics. If you want to see how this can be done, please go and see Laura Israel’s film ”Don’t Blink: Robert Frank” here at IDFA. It was screened at the Stedelijk Museum thursday night and is an excellent introduction to the now 91 year old legendary photographer and filmmaker made by his editor and collaborator in many films, a warm and generous portrait and a look into the creative process of a lovely man, a great artist, who has suffered personal tragedies in his life, that is very much present in his work, but who has also demonstrated how to catch moments in the lives of ”The Americans”, the title of his masterpiece. There was a retrospective of his work – and there is right now at IDFA, including his Rolling Stones film, ”Cocksucker Blues” – in Copenhagen, Sara Thelle wrote about it on this site.

And then last night at the Munt 11 cinema with around 400 seats, full house to the world premiere of ”Ukrainian Sheriffs” by Roman Bondarchuk and Darya Averchenko, which I have had the pleasure to follow from the sideline and with a biased look: it is an excellent film that demonstrates fully the talent of Bondarchuk, also present in his ”Dixieland” that will premiere next year. A breakthrough on the international scene. The film has wisely been taken fo the main international competition by the IDFA, where it still has 6-7 screenings.

Finally, there has been quite some discussions here at IDFA about the Viktor Kossakovsky session the other day. I wrote about it and this morning I got an email from VK, who wrote to me something important, I have to correct from my previous text: … one thing: I was saying Sorry, because Russians or prorussians shot the airplane MH17. And when I was watching The Belovs I just realized that you can see in the film the main element of russian mentality: unpredictable aggression – when we talk about Patriotism and meaning of life… (Post 21-11-2015)

VIKTOR KOSSAKOVSKY AT IDFA 2015

The IDFAAcademy for young filmmakers from all over the world started yesterday. Joyful Meike Statema is the head of this important section of the Documentary Paradise that IDFA was called in the KLM flight magazine I had in my hands during the turbulent journey down from Copenhagen thursday morning.

The turbulence continued… After video introductions of the participants – full of fun – Viktor Kossakovsky and Tom Fassaert were introduced under the headline ”Master and Talent”. It became one of the most memorable sessions I have experienced. It was emotional and informational at the same time – to bring forward two words that Kossakovsky used on a stage that he conquered totally.

The original idea, I think, was that the two of them should have a conversation about filmmaking, the experienced Kossakovsky and the young Tom Fassaert, whose ”A Family Affair” was the opening film of the festival’s 28th edition.

It did not work out like that. Fassaert wanted to show his appreciation of Kossakovsky by showing a long clip from ”Belovs”. He did and it made Kossakovsky burst into tears, kneel in front of the screen, ”I am sorry I shot this”, ”this is a typical Russian person”, he was inconsolable, had to leave the room, came back, left again, came back and stayed.

Stayed, yes, I dare say, to tear apart completely the film of the talent. He asked for a screening of two times five minutes – without sound – from ”A Family Affair”… What do you think, he asked Fassaert, is that a good cut, is that a good shot, why did you not get up a bit earlier in the morning to catch the right light, so on so forth. ”There’s no form”, ”where is your talent”, the rhytm of your film is like ”a limping chicken”, ”you don’t know how to distinguish emotion and information”, ”composition of the image, it is not there”.

OMG – Tom Fassaert took it well, I think – but ”you could have warned me in beforehand” – and Kossakovsky gave him the following home work: 1.Go and watch Rembrandt. 2.Watch contemporary art. 3.Read big books.

”You can continue to be a filmmaker if you in the next film are able to surprise yourself and me”. And to the audience: ”If you watch two films by me, which are just good, then I will quit making films”.

”There must be an aesthetical reason, if you don’t have that, don’t make the film”.

Viktor Kossakovsky is a gift to the documentary community, always inspiring, not afraid to express his emotions. An entertainer as well. All right, he ”killed” the young director but he will survive and without having seen the whole ”A family affair”, but only clips, Kossakovsky was right in his objections. What a show, thank you IDFA! (Post 20-11-2015)

VIVAN LAS ANTIPODAS (2015)

Hun er en russisk skolepige. Hun står i stalden i den lille landejendom, hvor hendes mor ellers er alene med langt til naboer, men i et storslået landskab ved Baikalkasøen, et landskab hun elsker. Det fortæller hun datteren på turen op i højden med udsigten til den vældige vandflade. Den store pige er hjemme nogle dage, går i skole i byen langt væk. Nu laver hun ting sammen med moderen, i en smuk scene i det velordnede køkken med et lille så pænt hvidmalet bord og to lige så hvide taburetter sætter de sig over for hinanden, pigen har noget i hænderne og med en graciøs bevægelse trækker hun med en fod taburetten ind under sig, intet er tilfældigt i denne film, nu sidder de over for hinanden og ordner grøntsager. Det er scenens indhold, dette og så lyset.

Ude i stalden er det også lyset som er indholdet. Og så skolepigens gæs og en enkelt hane, som hun driver ind i deres aflukke. Men altså dette lys i skrå striber, som vel kun er til stede et kort øjeblik visse dage, at fange og skildre dette lys er scenens magi. I sin kritik af Tom Fassaerts ”A Family Affair” den dag i Amsterdam, som Tue Steen Müller refererede, faldt blandt andet denne hurtige, svidende bemærkning: ”… What do you think, he asked Fassaert, is that a good cut, is that a good shot, why did you not get up a bit earlier in the morning to catch the right light?” Alle som ser ”Vivan las Antipodas!” vil anerkende at den erfarne mester alle disse mange optagedage, som denne med den russiske skolepige i stalden, selv har været tidligt oppe. (Post 02-01-2016 abn)

M2M – MESSAGE TO MAN, AWARDS 2018

The festival in St. Petersburg is over and awards were announced yesterday after a grandiose (experienced through photos on Facebook) closing evening that had Viktor Kossakovsky’s “Aquarela” on the program, of course, this is his home town! (Posted 22-09-2018)

AT DOKLEIPZIG 2018

I have known him for years – since back to the days of the Bornholm festival in the 90’es. He came to Leipzig for one screening of the film and for a talk. We hugged and I told him that “Aquarela” is an ingenious film! No, no the next film is better, he said and went into the room, where the talk was to take place. Viktor Kossakovsky is not one, who answers the questions put to him, he takes his own roads of improvisation. Impossible job to be a moderator, when he is in the chair, does not matter, he is entertaining and has something important to say.

Let me quote Ukrainian Darya Bassel, who wrote on her FB: “Kossakovsky pours nectar in my ears. He sings an ode to a cinema, which doesn’t put story and character (person) in the middle of everything. A cinema which is art not storytelling.”

Yes, that’s what he keeps on saying and thanks for that in times of constant “what is your story, who are your characters”. We make movies for the cinema, the industry should know that, he said. In “Aquarela” you can´t have a shot of water that lasts 1 to 1,2 seconds. It has to be longer to give you a chance to think. When I’m editing, I’m always thinking about 10 people – one will think like this, another like that, and I try to put it together so many interpretations are possible. Why do we make films? If it is to prove our ideas, then it is not cinema! No brain first, I’m trying to use my eyes, my camera. Brain first, it is insulting!

And oh, Kossakovsky always refers to – this time – Leonardo da Vinci, Malevich – and to literature, it’s refreshing, include it in the curriculum of the film schools. (My comment!)

He talked about teaching, that he does not like, he talked about some of the sequences in “Aquarela”, about “how little we are” in this world (as is so obvious in the film), he praised his fellow cinematographer Ben Bernhard, he talked about “Tishe!” that he made while waiting for funding for his next film – a film that none of the tv commissioning editors would take when it was a project (I want to shoot a film from my window in Saint Petersburg), but all bought when it was made. Paper work is needed when you want funding for a film.

I have promised producer Aimara Reques also to watch the film in Amsterdam, at IDFA, I will, and will try to write a review of this masterpiece. (Post 02-11-2018)

PROPAGANDA

You have to be careful with “vonhörensagen” but in this case it had its influence on the talk with Vitaly Mansky, that took place friday afternoon at the Polish Institute in Leipzig, a couple of hours after his film had been screened at the Cinestar Cinema. At the Q&A after the cinema screening of “Putin’s Witnesses”, he was attacked for having made a propaganda film for Putin. One of the attacks came from Viktor Kossakovsky, who according to my sources was pretty rude towards Mansky. It was apparent that the two do not think high of each other… (DOK Leipzig, Vitaly Mansky and Putin, posted 04-11-2018 by Tue Steen Müller)

 

AQUARELA (2018)

Normally when I go to an art exhibition, I walk around alone, stop in front of the paintings, it’s silent, maybe I talk with the one who are with me, but I love this chance of stepping into a world that does not move. When watching Kossakovsky’s flow of aquarelas, WATERcolors in constant movement, there is no silence, on the contrary – it’s a bombardment of image and sound, an aesthetic composition, it’s expressionistic, surrealistic, abstract, figurative, a journey through art directions and genres. And a magnificent piece of Cinema. That also has a dramaturgy.

As the director put it before the screening at the Pathé Munt 3 cinema in

Amsterdam at IDFA, the only cinema in Amsterdam that can play atmos dolby sound: Be prepared for a cold shower in the beginning, it will be warmer later on in the film. I agree with the first, I am not sure about the second.

Any way the overall theme is there right up front: You see ice and you see people moving around. From a respectful distance there is a focus on a man kneeling. He is looking for something in the water under the ice. Kneeling. The reference to praying is obvious. The sound from the ice is like a thunder, it’s bumps and bangs, a bit scary.

They are moving around, the men in their orange work suits, we spectators don’t know why, but we are told after the introduction of a burning house (PHOTO) with a mind blowing beautiful surrealistic layered image with a burning house: it’s about pulling up a car from under the ice! Shocking to watch, not because of the car but because the men fall on the ass one after the other, we fear it at the same time as we hope for it – and because of the sound of the film – a shock effect is sought for. The power of nature. We humans don’t stand a chance! A man was in a car, he seems to have drowned. Drama; a friend is crying out “he has drowned”.

A cold shower, indeed. And thanks for some calm moments under water, abstractions, and then suddenly a cute small goldfish comes into the picture. Before that strong heavy metal music, “I look at the world and I notice it’s turning. While my guitar gently weeps…” I was thinking of George Harrison afterwards, and then again a shock with a clip from a boat surrounded by meter high waves. Gosh!

The first part of the film with the crazy moments of cars underwater to be taken up is shot in Kamtjatka Russia, a Russian friend told me, the boat is sailing in the Atlantic Ocean. In other words, the film is far from informational National Geographic, it moves from place to place, from continent to continent. From painting to painting.

I love the sequences, where you rest your eye and can enjoy aquarelas, where the paint is thinned by the water, where it’s surrealism giving associations to Yves Tanguy or expressionism in the direction of Kandinsky or more wild like Jackson Pollock. These sequences have no purpose, they are invitations to contemplate the colors that suddenly turn to a black canvas; it’s a film with constant surprises.

For a Dane it felt calming to come to Greenland, to hear but not see the howling dogs, to see a boat go out with men on their way for hunting, I know about this from lots of films by late Danish director Jørgen Roos – and then back to the boat and the heavy metal music and the amazing images of two sailors steering safely – after the screening there was a question to Kossakovsky on how filming was on the boat: “we were lying fixed on the deck and it took us hours to get the tripod from one side of the ship to the other”.

Underwater again, we see a horse walking, not the head, it is above water. You smile, shake your head, it’s amazing what this director and cameraman gives you, what an image. Dali is of course associated to in my head and up we go to see herons walking in a cemetery, it’s a place where there is flood, we leave the icebergs for a moment to see water, it’s calm but interrupted it is by scary hurricane images from Florida (?), to waterfalls and sides of mountains – and Faces full of emotions “hidden” behind the waterfalls, close-ups, the only ones in a film, that is to be concluded by a rainbow and cello music. There is death in this film but also life and hope. An essay about the human condition. Faces held for a long time on the screen like in a film by Sokurov, to whom Kossakovsky has dedicated the film.

Wow!

UK, Germany, Denmark, 2018, 90 mins. (Post 24-11-2018)

LITTERATUR

Karolina Lidin: “Unfolding the Universal” in Tue Steen Müller, ed.: “Balticum Film & TV Festival 1990-99”, Baltic Media Centre, 1999, pg. 29f.

Tue Steen Müller:  “The Bornholm festival Balticum Festival 1990-99”, ibid pg. 26.

Kim Skotte: “Life is lived as a secret”, ibid pg.49ff.

Wonderful Losers on Vimeo

My dear friend, film director and producer, who if anyone is the one, who follows his film to the audience all over the world, winning audiences and awards, Arunas Matelis has posted this, a xmas gift it is:

If you are not lucky and in your country there are no Losers screenings – Cycling Christmas came early for you ☺ 
NOW THE LOSERS ARE AVAILABLE for your private streaming on Vimeo . Almost in the whole world! Main languages subtitles are included. 

PLEASE SHARE THE NEWS. Make friends happy ! ☺ (including your FB friend- director of the film 🙂 
www.vimeo.com/ondemand/wonderfullosersfilm